Tennessee guard Chaz Lanier wins Jerry West Award
Tennessee guard Chaz Lanier wins Jerry West Award
Tennessee basketball player Chaz Lanier won the 2024-25 Jerry West Award. His selection for the honor was announced on ESPN's "College GameDay."
The Jerry West Award, named in honor of the late class of 1980 Hall of Famer and 1959 NCAA Final Four Most Valuable Player, is given to the best shooting guard in the country and distributed by the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame.
"I want to start by thanking the West family and the selection committee for naming me the recipient of this incredible distinction," Lanier said. "It is a true privilege to win the Jerry West Award and I am deeply honored. I would not bein this position without God and the support of my family, my coaches, my teammates and the fans.
"Representing the University of Tennessee this year has been special and this accolade is not just about me, but about all of us who contributed to such an awesome season."
Lanier averaged 18.0 points, 3.9 rebounds and 1.1 assists per game for Tennessee, helping the Vols' reach the Elite Eight for the third time in school history. He was a Second-Team All-SEC selection and was named the SEC Newcomer and the Year. Lanier was also a finalist for the John R. Wooden Award.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Cleveland Browns' brass believes Shedeur Sanders could '100%' start per NFL insider
Cleveland Browns' brass believes Shedeur Sanders could '100%' start per NFL insider Shedeur Sanders is already making waves in Cleveland. The former Colorado star and fifth-round pick is drawing praise inside the Browns organization for his attitude, preparation and seemingly rapid development during offseason workouts. According to ESPN's Kimberley A. Martin, there are people within the building who believe Sanders has what it takes to start for the Browns in Week 1. "Listen, in that building, there are people who believe that Shedeur can 100 percent be the starter of this football team," Martin said on ESPN's "Get Up." "It's incumbent upon Shedeur to do the work, which, talking to people in that building, they've said he is soaking up everything like a sponge." Sanders' work ethic since being drafted has stood out. During rookie minicamp, he was one of the last players off the field each day, and he's been taking full advantage of a veteran-rich quarterback room. Sanders has reportedly been active in film sessions and meetings, learning from veteran Joe Flacco. "The quarterback room is fun," Sanders said on a recent episode of his "2Legendary" podcast. "Every day is fun going in there. Everything is real good. I'm happy. You've got a bunch of different personalities in the quarterback room, and that's what it is. Just getting to talk to the quarterbacks that took NFL snaps, that played in the league, you're living the experience through them also and asking them whatever question comes to mind." While Joe Flacco, Kenny Pickett and fellow rookie Dillon Gabriel may offer solid competition, Sanders' desire to prove doubters wrong might give him the upper hand at becoming a starter. The Browns' quarterback room may be crowded, but Shedeur Sanders is quickly proving he belongs. Follow Charlie Strella on X, Threads, and Instagram. Contact/Follow us @BuffaloesWire on X (formerly Twitter), and like our page on Facebook for ongoing coverage of Colorado news, notes and opinions.
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Initial FPI rankings place Florida in College Football Playoff picture
Initial FPI rankings place Florida in College Football Playoff picture Florida's return to national prominence in 2025 appears likely, with DJ Lagway leading the offense. ESPN's recent relaunch of the College Football Power Index has the Gators among the top 20 teams in contention for an NCAA Championship. Florida sits at No. 18 on the 2025 College FPI with a 14.3 power index. ESPN projects the Gators to finish the 2025 season with a 6.4-5.6 record and gives UF a 68.2% chance to reach six wins (bowl eligibility). But Florida also plays the toughest schedule in the country, according to ESPN, which means a seven-win season could be enough to sneak into the playoffs. Florida's CFP odds sit at a surprisingly high 14.5%, and 0.7% odds to win the national championship are the 19th best. "FPI is a predictive rating system that estimates each FBS team's strength (in points per game relative to the national average) on offense, defense and special teams, making adjustments for starters lost, recruiting talent and other personnel changes," Paine reminds us. "Those numbers are then plugged into the schedule, and everything is simulated 20,000 times to track each team's odds of winning its conference, making the playoff and advancing through to the national title." FPI projects the SEC to send 4.6 teams to the College Football Playoff this year, with Alabama, Georgia and Texas being the strongest candidates. Auburn, LSU, Ole Miss, Tennessee and Texas A&M make up the next tier of SEC teams, with South Carolina and Oklahoma on the outer edge. Florida is behind all of them, but a few key wins could change things. ESPN highlights an Oct. 4 matchup with Texas and the Georgia game on Nov. 1 as the most anticipated games on Florida's schedule, ranking Nos. 6 and 15 on the national schedule. The biggest reason for optimism is Florida being ranked inside the top 20 on both offense and defense. The Gators' 7.0 offensive FPI ranks No. 14 and is the result of a 27-spot jump over the offseason. On defense, a 6.4 rating is good for No. 16 in the country, one spot up from the last update. Follow us @GatorsWire on X, formerly known as Twitter, as well as Bluesky, and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Florida Gators news, notes and opinions.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Will Steph Curry move to TV? Will ESPN's booth sputter? Will fans watch? NBA Finals Media Preview
Richard Deitsch and Andrew Marchand are sports media writers for The Athletic. They converse every couple of weeks on sports media topics. Today, they discuss the NBA Finals from a media perspective, with thoughts on the future of ESPN's NBA Finals booth; the expectation of the NBA Finals drawing low viewership (Indianapolis is the 25th-largest media market in the country and Oklahoma City is No. 47). Plus, they discuss 'Inside The NBA' moving to ABC/ESPN next season and whether viewers should expect changes from ESPN management to the show. Advertisement Richard Deitsch: Let's start with what you reported on Wednesday: ESPN is planning to reevaluate its entire NBA on-air game roster outside of Mike Breen, including Doris Burke's spot as a Finals announcer not guaranteed for next season, and Richard Jefferson's contract expiring and his broadcasting destination next year still up for grabs. What's been clear is that this booth lacks great on-air chemistry. Each broadcaster individually has shined elsewhere. They know the sport cold. But it's not a symphony. It's a three-piece band, each doing its own thing. It is also an issue of ESPN's own making. What I wrote in July 2023 remains true today: ESPN laying off Jeff Van Gundy was a brutally bad decision. Andrew Marchand: I think what gets lost is it takes time. Joe Buck left Fox for ESPN because the contract was for so much and he would work less, but another part of his calculus was staying with Troy Aikman. It is hard to build chemistry quickly with a new partner, and Buck did not want to start over. Breen is an all-time great, but the play-by-play broadcaster is most responsible for making a new team work. It's not easy, and it has shown these past two years. The NBA Finals is a hard place for on-the-job training. Deitsch: Management has a decision: Do we once again change our booth, or ride this one in the hopes of the booth naturally growing? The turnover over the past three years has been disjointed for ESPN viewers. Some of this is on ESPN management. Some was out of its control. Could they have anticipated Doc Rivers bailing out of that deal so early? I think the gamble on J.J. Reddick was logical. If Danny Hurley had taken the Lakers job, maybe this is Year 2 of that booth, and who knows? But can you turn this booth over yet again? We probably won't get into this, but I also guarantee that, internally, ESPN is worried that NBC and Amazon Prime Video are going to come out of the box strong, and people are going to make comparisons. Advertisement Marchand: I think you just hit on the most interesting subplot: Neither Prime nor NBC have hired a No. 1. Amazon has Stan Van Gundy as its top analyst so far, while NBC has Jamal Crawford or Reggie Miller. (Now, I'm putting up my Brian Windhorst two fingers). Why have they done that? There is an upcoming class of analysts these platforms are eying for their new 11-year deals: LeBron James, Steph Curry, Draymond Green and Steve Kerr will all potentially go into broadcasting in some fashion. James and Curry as game analysts would cost hundreds of millions, while Green seems more of a studio guy. If Kerr stepped away from coaching, all three NBA national partners would likely want him on games. Deitsch: Onto another topic. It has no impact on whether NBA fans will enjoy the finals or whether the finals will produce great basketball, but in our world, viewership metrics are always a significant story. Heading into the finals, the NBA has a good viewership story to tell. Sports Business Journal's Austin Karp reported that the 2025 NBA postseason is up 3 percent across NBA TV, ESPN, ABC, ESPN2, TNT and truTV. One individual highlight: The Eastern Conference finals averaged seven million viewers across the six games. That's up three percent from the corresponding Western Conference finals on TNT the year before. With Indianapolis and Oklahoma City being small media markets and lacking a fundamental star such as Steph Curry or LeBron James, there is an expectation: That this series is going to struggle to draw viewership unless it goes very deep. My bold prediction: If the series goes to Game 7, which most people do not expect, it will draw 22.5 million viewers, more than this year's college football title game. It's a prediction based on momentum, as well as Nielsen capturing better out-of-home measurement for sporting events (which means higher reported data for televised sporting events). Alas, I don't expect it to get to Game 7. How do you look at this? Advertisement Marchand: I think the world has largely changed with us all being more connected. The idea of the big market vs. small market is not the issue with these teams. They just are nameless to the casual fan. If OKC becomes a dynasty, I think that changes, and they may become more interesting. To me, it is less that the markets are small, but rather the stars are not as well-known. Deitsch: Let's hit on one more topic of great interest to sports viewers: 'Inside The NBA' moving to ESPN next season. I have witnessed your media tour on this topic, and we agree that ESPN isn't going to tinker with the show. They literally gave up game inventory for it. (Sure, the game inventory wasn't SEC football, but they outlayed money.) We already have proof of concept here. Jimmy Pitaro and Co. have let 'The Pat McAfee Show' run essentially untouched. Same with anything out of Omaha Productions. I don't worry about ESPN trying to censor Charles Barkley, Shaquille O'Neal, Ernie Johnson and Kenny Smith on any third-rail topic. But I am concerned about Inside the NBA getting the same kind of length in the postgame that it got on TNT. The ESPN programming grid is far more rigid. That's where I think the essence of the show could be hurt. Marchand: We'll see, but ESPN executives have eyes and ears. Pitaro made this deal to have 'Inside The NBA,' the most iconic studio show of all-time. Why would he or ESPN water down or ruin it? I can't promise that your fears won't be realized, but there is no way of knowing, except what they have said. I think the examples of what you said are accurate, and Pitaro has shown he's willing to outsource programming if he thinks it is additive. I think this column still holds true.
