Walmart broadens 10% staff discount to include most grocery products
The discount, previously limited to fresh produce and general merchandise such as apparel, now extends to almost all food categories — including milk, meat, dry grocery, and seafood — in stores and online, effective immediately.
Walmart, the largest private employer in the United States, had previously extended its grocery discount during the holidays, but the perk will now be available year-round, the company said.
"We've heard your feedback that these savings make a real difference for you and your families," Donna Morris, Walmart's chief people officer, wrote in the letter.
Morris said the extension of the discount card program, first introduced more than 50 years ago, was among the company's most requested benefits.
The company has also raised wages for U.S. hourly workers and launched a bonus program for about 700,000 front-line staff over the last couple of years to help retain workers.
The Wall Street Journal first reported on the extension of the discount program.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
4 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump weighs taking stake in Intel, Bloomberg News reports
Aug 14 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is in talks with Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab to have the U.S. government potentially take a stake in the struggling chipmaker, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the plan. Such a move would mark another intervention by U.S. President Donald Trump in industries seen as vital to national security. Trump has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths - for instance, a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and an arrangement with rare-earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals. Intel declined to comment on the report but said it was deeply committed to supporting Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. White House spokesman Kush Desai said: "Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration." Intel's shares surged over 7% in regular trading and then another 2.6% after the bell. The discussions follow a meeting this week between Trump and Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan. That meeting came days after Trump publicly demanded that Tan resign over his investments in Chinese tech companies, some linked to the Chinese military. Details of the stake and price are still being discussed, Bloomberg said. Ryuta Makino, an analyst at Intel investor Gabelli Funds, said it was likely that the U.S. government would take a stake in Intel because Trump wants the chipmaker to expand domestic manufacturing and to create more jobs. Intel warned last month that it may have to get out of the chip manufacturing business if it does not land external customers to make chips in its factories. It planned to slow construction work on new factories in Ohio. Tan, who took the top job just over six months back, has been tasked to undo years of missteps that left Intel struggling to make inroads in the booming AI chip industry dominated by Nvidia, while investment-heavy contract manufacturing ambitions led to heavy losses. "I think any deal that involves the U.S., as well as third-party investors (PE) likely has to come with tariffs that strongly encourage customers like Nvidia, AMD (AMD.O), opens new tab, Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab to use Intel Foundry," said Ben Bajarin, CEO of market analysis firm Creative Strategies. It is not unusual for the U.S. government to take a stake in a company, but those have usually needed financial help. Though Intel's stock market value has tumbled in recent years and it has lost its industry leadership, its revenue remains stable at over $50 billion a year, and it was not clear to some investors that the chipmaker needs such direct government assistance.
The Independent
33 minutes ago
- The Independent
Economic uncertainty blamed for ‘lacklustre' retail performance last month
Analysists have blamed rising economic uncertainty for a 'lacklustre' July that saw Scottish retail sales fall in real terms compared with the same month last year. According to figures from the Scottish Retail Consortium (SRC) and KPMG, total sales in Scotland rose 0.1% last month compared with July 2024, when they had decreased by 0.9%. However when adjusted for inflation this represents a year-on-year fall of 0.5%. Food sales in Scotland were down 1.4% compared with July 2024, when they had decreased by just 0.3%. This was despite a strong opening to the month when hot weather led to a 'boost' in spending on barbecues and summer meals. Non-food sales on the other hand rose by 1.4% compared with the same period last year, with analysists saying phones and some furniture and toy ranges performed well. Adjusted for the effects of online sales, non-food sales increased 1.6% on July 2024, when they had decreased by 1.5%. Ewan MacDonald-Russell, deputy head of the SRC, said: 'July was a lacklustre month for Scottish retailers as sales again disappointed. 'When adjusted for inflation retail sales in Scotland fell by 0.5%. That's a slight improvement on June's figures, but demonstrates shoppers continue to cut back on shopping as economic uncertainty continues to rise. 'Within the general disappointment there were some bright spots. Food sales shone in the opening half of the month as Scots took advantage of the warm weather to cook barbeque and summer meals. 'Phone sales did well, as did some toys and furniture ranges. Against that televisions continue to disappoint, with few households investing in high-end entertainment despite the summer plethora of sporting events. 'Fashion ranges performed poorly, albeit the likelihood is shoppers did their summer wardrobe shopping earlier in the year when the sunshine emerged. 'The harsh truth is Scots are holding back spending as worries about the economy grow. 'That is leaving shops in the lurch – facing higher costs as a consequence of last year's UK Government budget without the growth needed to pay those bills. 'With little sight the economic weather will brighten, many retailers, especially those on the high street, face increasingly unpalatable choices in the coming months.' Linda Ellett, UK head of consumer, retail and leisure at KPMG, described the current trading environment as 'challenging' for retailers. 'The UK's fifth warmest July on Met Office record brought a boost to home appliance and food and drink sales,' she said. 'But rising inflation was also a driver of the latter and monthly non-food sales are only growing at around 1% on average at present. 'With employment costs having risen and inflation both a business and consumer side pressure, it remains a challenging trading environment for many retailers. 'While the majority of consumers that KPMG surveys are confident in their ability to balance their monthly household budgets, big ticket purchases are more considered in the context of rising essential costs and ongoing caution about the economy and labour market. 'Holidays are the priority for many this summer but those heading away have had to account for a higher cost of travel. 'Consequently, spending in some areas of the retail sector remains subdued and competition for consumer spend will remain fierce.' The figures were published in the SRC-KPMG Retail Sales Monitor for July.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Social Security monthly payments expected to rise in 2026
The Senior Citizens' League predicts a 2.7 percent cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for Social Security beneficiaries in 2026. This annual COLA aims to help seniors' benefits keep pace with inflation, though many beneficiaries believe it does not fully capture their actual cost increases. The predicted 2026 increase is slightly higher than the 2025 COLA, with the League noting that rising predictions point to risks of resurgent inflation. Experts anticipate inflation will rise later in the year, partly due to tariffs imposed by Donald Trump, which are expected to increase consumer prices on various goods. Despite White House claims that Trump's tariffs have not harmed Americans, a Yale Budget Lab study indicates consumers face the highest average tariff rate since the Great Depression.
