
Vaping Causes Incurable Lung Disease, Groundbreaking Study Shows
Vaping has, for the first time, been linked to a life-limiting and irreversible lung disease.
The groundbreaking study, published in the Nicotine and Tobacco Research Journal, shows that e-cigarette use is strongly associated with increased new diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). COPD is the fourth leading cause of death in New Zealand.
Asthma and Respiratory Foundation NZ Chief Executive Ms Letitia Harding says this study confirms what we've long suspected - vaping isn't just risky, it's dangerous to your health.
"For years, we've been gaslighted into believing vaping is harmless - or at least 'less harmful' than cigarettes - meanwhile, we've watched teen vaping rates skyrocket.
"Now the science is catching up, and it's not good news," she says.
"Vaping is not harmless - it never has been - and this study shows it causes long-term irreversible lung damage."
This study, which tracked 250,000 people over about three-and-a-half years, should be a significant wake-up call to the Government to tighten regulations even further, Ms Harding says.
"Let's stop pretending we're balancing harm reduction with consumer freedom - vaping isn't harm reduction, it's harm transfer.
"The vaping industry is using the same tactics Big Tobacco used decades ago - and it's resulting in a new generation of teens addicted to nicotine who we now know are at risk of developing a life-long respiratory illness."
Dr Stuart Jones, a respiratory physician and member of the Foundation's Scientific Advisory Board, says that while there is now a clear link between vaping and COPD, the bigger issue is dual use (vaping and smoking).
"For the first time, we've got hard data showing that vaping alone can cause COPD - and if you're vaping and smoking, you're not reducing risk, you're doubling down on it.
"Dual use is not a stepping stone to quitting - it's a shortcut to the respiratory ward."
E-cigarettes must be kept out of the hands of non-smokers, particularly young people, Dr Jones says.
"Vapes are not harmless devices - they are engineered nicotine delivery systems that inflame lung tissue and can leave lasting damage.
"If you smoke and vape, then the goal is to stop both. If you don't smoke, then don't vape. It's that simple."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsroom
2 days ago
- Newsroom
The science sector sounds the alarm
New Zealand's science sector, once hailed for its agility and ingenuity during the pandemic and natural disasters, is now grappling with what researchers say is a crisis of confidence, fuelled by shrinking budgets, unstable funding pathways, and policy decisions that increasingly favour commercial returns over long-term public good. Last month, a total of $212 million was cut from the science sector in this Budget, which reprioritises existing research funding towards commercially focused science and innovation. A sizeable portion goes to Invest NZ and a new gene tech regulator. The Government says it backs the sector and is prioritising industry partnerships, private-sector investment, and 'innovation outcomes with measurable economic impact.' While officials insist the move reflects 'fiscal discipline and real-world alignment,' many in the sector say it amounts to a dismantling of the research base. Newsroom political journalist Fox Meyer tells The Detail 'the scale of the cuts is not great for the sector, but it's also more about the lack of investment'. 'It's one thing to have cuts and reprioritisation, but people have been calling for more of just anything for some time now. Now, there is a lot of frustration. 'Science funding has been stagnant or declining for years now, and a decision to reprioritise stuff is not necessarily going to put money in the Government's pocket like they think.' With a focus on the bottom line, is this the Government pulling off a Sir John Key 'show me the money' moment, with a scientific bent? 'That actually goes both ways,' says Meyer. 'Scientists are looking at the Government saying, 'Show me the money if you want me to produce more money', and the Government is looking back at the scientists and saying, 'Well, you show me the money, what are you bringing in, how are you lifting your weight?'. 'That is going to be a hard one to reconcile unless the Government is willing to pony up and make the investment.' He worries the fall-out will include a 'brain drain' with our country's brightest and best scientists and researchers opting to take up positions overseas. 'My connections in the science world – plenty of them – have moved. 'The chief science adviser for the Department of Conservation has moved to Australia … that's an expert in a cutting-edge field that we have lost to a company in Australia. 'And it's not the only example of this sort of thing. We invest so much in training up these scientists, and they are very skilled scientists, and then to not give them what they are asking for and what they need, I feel it falls short of our own investment.' In fairness, it is not all doom and gloom. 'So, the positives, there is a new funding pool for Māori-related science, that's a good thing. There's the sector-wide report that has come out, which has given us a good look at the sector. We know more now, that's a good thing. And the chief science adviser has been appointed, and the panel around him has been appointed, that's a good thing there.' Meyer says the sector is crucial to all parts of New Zealand. 'The science sector is about answering questions. If you have questions, science is a method, and it is used to answer a lot of those questions … the more money that we put into this sector, the more questions we can answer. And the more questions we can answer, the more answers we can sell. 'If the Government is worried about economic growth, and they want to champion this sector, then you've got to put your money where your mouth is. 'I am going to be curious to see how they can steer the ship of science, when maybe what they are most suited for is selling the fruits of science.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.


NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
East Coast MP Dana Kirkpatrick says funding will bring in-person urgent care closer to rural communities
'Health New Zealand would move quickly to begin discussions with the providers already in those areas to ensure services are in place, that they are supported to provide the services and that there is a clearer fee structure for everyone,' Kirkpatrick said. Iwi health provider Ngāti Porou Oranga has been approached for comment. Kirkpatrick said a more sustainable approach to providing rural urgent and after-hours care was needed. 'The current model, which often depends on rural GPs being on call 24/7, was unsustainable and placed significant strain on an already overstretched workforce. 'The investment will provide more sustainable funding and targeted support to help these clinicians continue delivering timely, quality healthcare in their communities.' Kirkpatrick said the Government's Health Infrastructure Plan, released in April, included 'some relief in sight for Tairāwhiti'. A new rural hub for better diagnostics, ambulatory treatment, birthing, acute and sub-acute care and a new urban ambulatory hub operated by Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora were planned between 2025 and 2029 in Tairāwhiti. The Gisborne Hospital redevelopment was planned between 2030 and 2034, Kirkpatrick said. 'We know that this, on its own, won't fix the challenges in the health system in their entirety – but it is one of the building blocks we have put in place.'


Scoop
3 days ago
- Scoop
Government Continues To Respond To Royal Commission Into Abuse In Care
Lead Coordination Minister for the Government's Response to the Royal Commission's Report into Historical Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith-based Institutions The Government has outlined its ongoing response to the Royal Commission into Historical Abuse in State Care and in the Care of Faith-based Institutions. 'We are committed to continuing to respond to the Royal Commission of Inquiry with respect and dignity. To maintain transparency with our response, the Government's released its Response Plan which lays out what work has already been completed and what work is still underway,' Lead Coordination Minister Erica Stanford says. The Royal Commission made 95 recommendations in its 2021 redress report, and 138 in its final report in 2024. Of these 233 recommendations overall, 207 are addressed to the Crown, of these, 85 have been either accepted, partially accepted or we have accepted the intent. Since the release of the Royal Commission's Final report in July 2024: The Government acknowledged that torture occurred at Lake Alice Psychiatric Hospital Child and Adolescent Unit (Lake Alice) and introduced two pathways for redress which are now underway; An end-of-life payment of $20,000 was made available for Lake Alice survivors along with work to address inequities in the reimbursement of legal fees; Public Apologies were made by the Prime Minister and Government agency Chief Executives on 12 November 2024; A $32 million investment as part of the apology to increase capacity in current redress and claims systems from approximately 1350 to 1550 claims per year Progression of the Responding to Abuse in Care Legislation Amendment Bill which supports the Crown response to a range of recommendations a $2 million dual purpose survivor-focused fund for local authorities, non-governmental organisations and community groups; Commitment to a national day of reflection on the one-year anniversary of the public apology, 12 November 2025; Budget 2025 investment of $533 million over four years, for redress improvements including increasing average payments and increasing the number of claims paid each year; Budget 2025 investment of $188 million over four years to improve the safety of children, young people and vulnerable people. 'We know the Crown's response will be ongoing given the number and complexity of recommendations. The Royal Commission estimated it could take up to 15 years. 'While we can never fully make redress for or right the harm survivors experienced, the Government remains committed to engaging with the Royal Commission's report and recommendations in good faith and with careful consideration,' Ms Stanford says.