logo
Mississippi's education miracle: A model for global literacy reform

Mississippi's education miracle: A model for global literacy reform

Yahoo26-03-2025
In a surprising turnaround, Mississippi, once ranked near the bottom of U.S. education standings, has dramatically improved its student literacy rates.
As of 2023, the state ranks among the top 20 for fourth grade reading, a significant leap from its 49th-place ranking in 2013. This transformation was driven by evidence-based policy reforms focused on early literacy and teacher development.
The rest of the country might want to take note.
That's because Mississippi's success offers a proven solution to the reading literacy crisis facing many states – a clear road map for closing early literacy gaps and improving reading outcomes nationwide.
As an expert on the economics of education, I believe the learning crisis is not just an educational issue. It's also economic.
When students struggle, their academic performance declines. And that leads to lower test scores. Research shows that these declining scores are closely linked to reduced economic growth, as a less educated workforce hampers productivity and innovation.
In 2013, Mississippi implemented a multifaceted strategy for enhancing kindergarten to third grade literacy. The Literacy-Based Promotion Act focuses on early literacy and teacher development. It includes teacher training in proven reading instruction methods and teacher coaching.
Relying on federally supported research from the Institute of Education Science, the state invested in phonics, fluency, vocabulary and reading comprehension. The law provided K-3 teachers with training and support to help students master reading by the end of third grade.
It includes provisions for reading coaches, parent communication, individual reading plans and other supportive measures. It also includes targeted support for struggling readers. Students repeat the third grade if they fail to meet reading standards.
The state also aligned its test to the NAEP, or National Assessment of Educational Progress, something which not all states do. Often referred to as 'The Nation's Report Card,' the NAEP is a nationwide assessment that measures student performance in various subjects.
Mississippi's reforms have led to significant gains in reading and math, with fourth graders improving on national assessments.
I believe this is extremely important. That's because early reading is a foundational skill that helps develop the ability to read at grade level by the end of third grade. It also leads to general academic success, graduating from high school prepared for college, and becoming productive adults less likely to fall into poverty.
Research by Noah Spencer, an economics doctoral student at the University of Toronto, shows that the Mississippi law boosted scores.
Students exposed to it from kindergarten to the third grade gained a 0.25 standard deviation improvement in reading scores. That is roughly equivalent to one year of academic progress in reading, according to educational benchmarks. This gain reflects significant strides in students' literacy development over the course of a school year.
Another study has found an even greater impact attributed to grade retention in the third grade – it led to a huge increase in learning in English Language Arts by the sixth grade.
But the Mississippi law is not just about retention. Spencer found that grade retention explains only about 22% of the treatment effect. The rest is presumably due to the other components of the measure – namely, teacher training and coaching.
Other previous research supports these results across the country.
Adopting an early literacy policy improves elementary students' reading achievement on important student assessments, with third grade retention and instructional support substantially enhancing English learners' skills. The policy also increases test scores for students' younger siblings, although it is not clear why.
Moreover, third grade retention programs immediately boost English Language Arts and math achievements into middle school without disciplinary incidents or negatively impacting student attendance.
These changes were achieved despite Mississippi being one of the lowest spenders per pupil in the U.S., proving that strategic investments in teacher development and early literacy can yield impressive results even with limited resources.
Mississippi's success is timely. Millions of children globally struggle to read by age 10. It's a crisis that has worsened after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mississippi's early literacy interventions show lasting impact and offer a potential solution for other regions facing similar challenges.
In 2024, only 31% of U.S. fourth grade students were proficient or above in reading, according to the NAEP, while 40% were below basic. Reading scores for fourth and eighth graders also dropped by five points compared with 2019, with averages lower than any year since 2005.
Mississippi's literacy program provides a learning gain equal to a year of schooling. The program costs US$15 million annually – 0.2% of the state budget in 2023 – and $32 per student.
The learning gain associated with the Mississippi program is equal to about an extra quarter of a year. Since each year of schooling raises earnings by about 9%, then a quarter-year gain means that Mississippi students benefiting from the program will increase future earnings by 2.25% a year.
Based on typical high school graduate earnings, the average student can expect to earn an extra $1,000 per year for the rest of their life.
That is, for every dollar Mississippi spends, the state gains about $32 in additional lifetime earnings, offering substantial long-term economic benefits compared with the initial cost.
The Mississippi literacy project focuses on teaching at the right level, which focuses on assessing children's actual learning levels and then tailoring instruction to meet them, rather than strictly following age- or grade-level curriculum.
Teaching at the right level and a scripted lessons plan are among the most effective strategies to address the global learning crisis. After the World Bank reviewed over 150 education programs in 2020, nearly half showed no learning benefit.
I believe Mississippi's progress, despite being the second-poorest state, can serve as a wake-up call.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Harry Anthony Patrinos, University of Arkansas
Read more:
AI transformation in the legal sector begins in law schools
Do 'sputnik moments' spur educational reform? A rhetoric scholar weighs in
Students lose out as cities and states give billions in property tax breaks to businesses − draining school budgets and especially hurting the poorest students
Harry Anthony Patrinos does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why Mamdani Might Be Willing to Have Less Power Over Schools
Why Mamdani Might Be Willing to Have Less Power Over Schools

New York Times

time11-08-2025

  • New York Times

Why Mamdani Might Be Willing to Have Less Power Over Schools

Good morning. It's Monday. Today we'll look at Zohran Mamdani's vision for the city's sprawling school system. The next mayor will take office at a perilous moment for education. New York is facing dismal literacy rates, an alarming crisis of school absences and stark gaps in outcomes between students from well-off families and those from low-income households — as well as possible threats to school funding from the federal government. But most candidates devoted little attention to public education before the Democratic primary in June. I asked Troy Closson, who covers education in New York, to discuss how the winner of the primary, Zohran Mamdani, sees the school system. One of Mamdani's biggest ideas for the schools centers on weakening mayoral control and giving power to teachers and parents. Really? A mayor giving up power? That's unheard of. When you talk about mayoral control in New York, you're really talking about the mayor appointing whomever they want as chancellor and also appointing a majority of members on the Panel for Educational Policy, which votes on some major school contracts and policies. This is the model that has been in place for more than two decades. Mamdani has said he would still appoint the chancellor, but he has floated ideas like giving up majority control on the panel so that more teachers or families could have a say. He has said his goal is to create a school system that's more democratic, one where mayors aren't forcing ideas on schools without consulting the people who work and learn in them. That has excited some parents and educators across the city. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Trump changing the school year to 6 months? Not true
Trump changing the school year to 6 months? Not true

The Hill

time09-08-2025

  • The Hill

Trump changing the school year to 6 months? Not true

(NewsNation) — Videos circulating on social media claim President Trump is shortening the school year to six months. Is there any truth to the statement? The claim is completely inaccurate. The president cannot dictate the length of the school year; this is determined by individual states. Outlandish claims across the internet Videos are appearing on various social media platforms spreading the incorrect assertion. The origin of the rumor remains unclear. In one TikTok video titled 'Donald trump announces a new school system where kids attend school for only 6 months,' user @ starts off the video by saying, 'Breaking news, Trump decided kids don't have to go to school anymore, not as much as they used to.' The video has been viewed over 130,000 times. Trump committed to changing education in the US While not reducing the school year to six months, Trump has promised and made sweeping changes to education policy in the country. In March, Trump signed an executive order aimed at getting rid of the Education Department altogether. Although total elimination of the department would necessitate congressional action, the Supreme Court allowed the administration to lay off hundreds of workers in July. These changes come as recent studies indicate a stark decline in test scores since the pandemic. 'This year's National Assessment of Educational Progress showed that 70 percent of 8th graders were below proficient in reading, and 72 percent were below proficient in math,' the executive order said. The Trump administration has also made efforts to shift policy surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion, higher education and protections for transgender students.

Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?
Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?

Newsweek

time07-08-2025

  • Newsweek

Fact Check: Did Trump Say Kids to Only Attend School 6 Months Out of Year?

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Rumors are circulating social media that President Donald Trump has said children should only attend school six months of the year. The Trump administration has embarked upon major changes to American education. In March, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to begin "eliminating" the Department of Education (DOE), marking a major change in the federal oversight of schools. A litany of concerns about the state of American education was compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruption that followed. A 2024 report from the Center on Reinventing Public Education (CRPE), a research group at Arizona State University, found that the average American student is "less than halfway to full academic recovery" from the impact of the pandemic. In January, a report from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) found that the reading and math skills of fourth and eighth grade students have declined in multiple states to below the national average. However, in June of this year, Gen Z students reported their most positive evaluations of schools in years. The standard U.S. academic or school year can vary slightly depending on the state, but the majority of states require 180 days per school year. The state with the lowest mandated school days is Colorado, which requires 160, while Kansas requires 186, according to the Pew Research Center. The Claim On TikTok, claims that Trump is trying to change the school year, making it only six months, have swept across the app. The claims differ slightly in different videos. Some social media users claim that Trump has announced this change, while others claim that he is actively trying to pass a law. One video, shared to TikTok by the account @uiort05 features a talking head of a man over images of Trump. That video has the text overlay "Donald Trump just announced kids only attend school 6 months Out of the year," and goes on to count six months of the school year as being from August to January. That video has been viewed over 200,000 times as of reporting. The audio of that TikTok has been widely shared across the platform. Another video, from the account @solyapp, claims "Donald Trump is tryna pass a law where kids only have to go to school for six months." That video has been viewed over 400,000 times as of reporting. Both of those videos were made by adults, not school aged children. The Facts The claim is false. There has been no wider reporting about the post, which would be the case if it were real. There is no record of Trump saying anything about changing the school year. The minimum amount of time that school must be in session is set by individual states, not the president. As it stands, children attend school for roughly 180 days each year. Per day, that amounts to six months. In practice, factoring in weekends and breaks for holidays, the total number of days is spread across approximately nine months, with the school year generally beginning either in late August or early September and ending in late May or early June. The TikTok from @uiort05 states in the description, "disclaimer for entertainment purposes only," indicating that it is false. The Ruling False. Trump has not said anything about changing the school year to six months. There is no evidence of the claims. The initial claim came from a source that is not reputable. FACT CHECK BY Newsweek's Fact Check team

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store