
Democratic strategist David Plouffe to become Coinbase's newest adviser
SAN FRANCISCO — David Plouffe, the veteran Democratic strategist who in recent years has worked extensively in tech, is joining the global advisory council of Coinbase.
Plouffe, who recently helped guide Kamala Harris' presidential campaign and was a top aide to Barack Obama, is the latest political heavy-hitter to join the advisory body, telling POLITICO he'll bring his skills as a storyteller to an industry whose regulatory struggles have turned into a fight for credibility and stability.
Among Plouffe's charges will be outreach to tech-savvy voters who flocked to Democrats during the Obama era, but have shifted to the right in recent years. It's another move meant to reinforce the bipartisan credentials of the largest U.S.-based cryptocurrency exchange as it pushes for broader buy-in after Republicans and President Donald Trump opened their arms to the industry and many of its policy goals.
'A lot of the debate is 'are you pro-crypto or anti-crypto, pro-ride sharing or not, pro-home-sharing or not,'' Plouffe said in an interview, referencing the emerging industries that have grown around companies like Uber and Airbnb. 'And I think this next stage is really deepening the benefits, whether that's the unbanked, whether that's security, whether that's opening up new forms of commerce.'
Plouffe arrives a few months after the advisory council added former Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona — a Democrat turned independent — and Chris LaCivita, who served as Trump's co-campaign manager in 2024. Others on the board include the Democratic pollster John Anzalone; former Democratic Reps. Tim Ryan of Ohio and Stephanie Murphy of Florida; former Republican Sen. Pat Toomey; as well as longtime Republican strategist and lobbyist David Urban, among others.
Plouffe and LaCivita are appearing on a panel this morning with Faryar Shirzad, Coinbase's chief policy officer at the exchange's third annual State of Crypto Summit in Manhattan.
Plouffe has worked in a number of prominent tech roles before, including at Uber, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative and rival crypto exchange Binance in a similar advisory post. He was a top adviser to Obama's first campaign and then served in the White House. He joined Harris' unsuccessful bid last fall, blending with a team of Harris loyalists and leftover aides and advisers to former President Joe Biden.
Plouffe joins the exchange's council during a crucial week for the crypto industry in Washington, where both the Senate and the House advanced key pieces of legislation.
The Senate could vote as soon as Monday on a bill that would create a new regulatory structure for stablecoins, which are tied to real-world assets, and is seen as an important step toward legitimizing crypto.
Two committees in the House approved another bill that would lay down the first U.S. regulatory framework for crypto assets — but not without exposing deep Democratic divisions over how to police a sector that Trump has so blatantly embraced and profited off of through his family ventures.
Plouffe conceded that 'there were elements of the Biden administration clearly not very friendly to the industry' and he has since seen remarkable progress in Democrats' attitude toward crypto.
The digital asset industry found itself in the crosshairs of Biden's regulators after a series of high-profile scandals. Former SEC Chair Gary Gensler wielded the agency's enforcement powers to file lawsuits and actions against companies like Coinbase, which it dropped after Trump came into power.
'In some of the votes in the Senate, in the House, and some of the comments made from people who might end up being presidential candidates in '28, I think there's an understanding,' Plouffe told POLITICO.
They may have learned from last campaign cycle, when Coinbase's influence operation quietly thrust the once-niche digital asset world into the heart of the 2024 elections. It outspent every other business in the sector on lobbying, poured millions into the industry's leading super PAC and helped launch a grassroots arm.
Crypto has made a concerted push to keep a bipartisan reputation, though. The super PAC, Fairshake, also heavily backed the races of friendly Democrats like Sens. Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Elissa Slotkin of Michigan.
Industry lobbyists have worried that the Trump family's fast-growing interests in crypto could distract from getting the legislation it wants from Capitol Hill and undermine the president's own desire to make the U.S. 'the crypto capital of the world.'
'We don't try to solve for one particular political circumstance or another,' Shirzad told POLITICO. 'That's been our model for the last two and a half years that we did our political efforts. And so far it's, I think, paid off for us.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Focus groups: North Carolina swing voters mostly OK with Trump's LA response
A majority of North Carolina swing voters in our latest Engagious / Sago focus groups supported President Trump's deportations and activation of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles, despite some concerns about civil rights and government overreach. The big picture: These Biden-to-Trump voters' desire to eject undocumented migrants from the U.S. — and their critical views of California and Democrats — shape how they see this massive test of executive power playing out far from their own hometowns. Seven of 12 panelists said they support the president's activation of the National Guard and Marines in L.A. despite Gov. Gavin Newsom's and local officials' objections. Three disapproved; two didn't have an opinion. Eight of the 12 said they believe Democrats prioritize illegal immigrants over American citizens. Why it matters: "Democrats who doubt their party remains out of touch with swing voters will be stunned by what these North Carolinians told us about immigration," said Rich Thau, President of Engagious, who moderated the focus groups. How it works: Axios observed two Engagious / Sago online focus groups Tuesday night with North Carolinians who said they voted for Joe Biden in 2020 and Donald Trump in 2024. The panelists included nine independents and three Republicans. While a focus group is not a statistically significant sample like a poll, the responses show how some voters are thinking and talking about current events. What they're saying: "The stance California has on illegal immigration only enables all these people, and they're not going to stop it," said Gregory D., 43, of Greensboro. "So we need to bring it up another level. It needs to stop. California doesn't want to stop it." "It's in the best interest of the nation that we call this, I don't know, uprising, call it what you want, but yeah, that needs to get nipped in the bud, just like George Floyd and all that sh*t should have," said Alex H., 44, of Charlotte. Butch F., 58, of Mebane, said he believes illegal immigrants got government assistance that reduced North Carolinians' access to disaster funds. Gerius J., 33, of Charlotte, said he's for diversity but wants to "do it the right way. Get the right paperwork, the right documentation." He said Democrats "have always wanted illegals to come here," and if anyone objects, "you're the bad guy. And as a U.S. citizen, I'm not the bad guy. I just want things to be done the right way." The other side: Karen L., 61, of Wilmington, said of Trump's immigration actions, "When he first started out, it seemed like he was really going after the criminals — like, the ones committing murder and rape — and he was getting all of them. And we don't want them here if they're [here] illegally, especially. But now ... it's way too extreme, and he's violating civil rights, and he's causing more chaos than anything." Rachid O., 46, of Raleigh, said the administration should prioritize arresting and deporting criminals, above all undocumented immigrants. Many undocumented immigrants pay taxes "so they contribute to the country," he said. Between the lines: Shifting the focus to combating illegal immigration may help him with some voters who have cooled on his performance in other areas. Several panelists voiced concerns about the economy, tariffs and political corruption and objected to Trump's moves to cut university research, or possible Medicaid cuts in the spending and tax-cut bill before Congress. "It's getting harder and harder to afford things," said Kimberly S., 37, of Sanford. "We are just kind of told, 'Hey, you just got to bear with us just a little bit more,' and it doesn't feel like it's getting any easier." Shauna S., 54, of Harrisburg, said when it comes to tariffs, "There's no plan, and it's been erratic. It appears to be an opportunity to manipulate the markets, and I really want someone to investigate where and who's actually gaining financially every time these tariffs are being threatened and then removed. I'm just curious what's really happening."


Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Padilla episode triggers five-alarm fire for Democrats
Democrats spooked by President Trump's state-sanctioned shows of force have shifted into five-alarm fire mode, warning he's pushing American democracy to the brink. Why it matters: They're pointing to what happened yesterday to Alex Padilla, California's senior senator, as a crossing-the-Rubicon moment. Driving the news: The jarring scene of Padilla, a Democrat, being forcefully removed from Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's press conference after interrupting it — and then being dragged to the ground and handcuffed — felt like kerosene on the nation's political fire. To Trump's most loyal allies, Padilla's actions were merely an exercise in political theater. Back in D.C., House Speaker Mike Johnson was among the Republicans blaming Padilla, saying that "at a minimum," the senator should be censured. To Democrats, the episode crystallized fears about Trump's willingness to crush dissent, and shatter democratic norms and institutions. "This is the stuff of dictatorships. It is actually happening," said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). A few Republicans were just as alarmed. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who's repeatedly proved her independent streak, told reporters the incident was "shocking at every level. It's not the America I know." Padilla wasn't arrested, but the fallout from the incident promises to endure as Congress continues to wrestle with Trump's giant tax and spending bill. Zoom in: To fully understand the alarm that's gripping Democrats over the Padilla incident, consider two factors: 1. It took place in a mostly Democratic city where Trump's immigration agents are using military-style tactics to conduct raids and make arrests in mostly Hispanic communities and workplaces. Padilla is one of the nation's highest-ranking Hispanic public officials, and is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee's immigration panel. 2. Trump's over-the-top-enforcement seems to be about more than immigration. When Padilla interrupted Noem during her press conference to try to ask a question, the DHS secretary had just said that her agents were in Los Angeles "to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and this mayor have placed on this country."

Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump's $1,000 baby bonus idea takes a leaf out of Warren Buffett's wealth-building playbook
President Donald Trump wants the next generation of Americans to be stock investors from birth — an idea that could easily have come from Warren Buffett. The US leader's so-called Trump Accounts are part of his proposed " One Big Beautiful Bill," a huge package of tax and spending legislation that's been approved by the House of Representatives and is now under Senate scrutiny. If passed, the government would open a tax-deferred investment account for every newborn citizen born between January 1, 2025 and December 31, 2028, and seed it with $1,000. Each child's guardian would be in charge of their account, able to deposit up to $5,000 a year into it, and allowed to invest in broad US index funds that don't use leverage and minimize fees and expenses. Withdrawals wouldn't be allowed until the age of 18, and the account would automatically terminate when the holder is 31. "This will afford a generation of children the chance to experience the miracle of compounded growth and set them on a course for prosperity from the very beginning," the White House said on its website, highlighting endorsements from the CEOs of Dell, Goldman Sachs, Uber, and Altimeter Capital. The bosses of Arm, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Robinhood have also signaled they're willing to contribute to the Trump Accounts of their employees' children. 'Start young' Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, has long recommended investing from a young age in a low-fee, broad-market index fund and holding for the long run as the most reliable way to build wealth over a lifetime. "Start young," Buffett told a shareholder who asked how to become a multibillionaire during Berkshire's 1999 meeting. He explained that "the nature of compound interest is it behaves like a snowball of sticky snow. And the trick is to have a very long hill, which means either starting very young or living to be very old." Buffett, whose net worth now exceeds $150 billion, said at the 2001 meeting that saving $10,000 by the time he turned 21 gave him a "huge, huge headstart" in life. It meant he could afford to get married and have kids while still having spare money to invest. "While he hasn't commented directly on government-funded stock accounts for newborns, the investing logic behind such a proposal aligns with his core principles," Lawrence Cunningham, the author of "The Essays of Warren Buffett" and the director of the University of Delaware's Weinberg Center, told Business Insider. "Buffett would likely agree that giving more Americans a long-term stake in the market — especially through low-cost vehicles like the S&P 500 — is both financially sound and socially beneficial," Cunningham said. The Berkshire chief, who bought his first stock at age 11, turns 95 in August, meaning he's been compounding his wealth for more than eight decades. Buffett has repeatedly said more than 99% of his wealth is in Berkshire stock, which he's owned since the 1960s. 'Eighth wonder' David Kass, a finance professor who's been following Buffett closely for nearly 40 years, told BI that Trump's program could help to reduce wealth inequality by "encouraging additional savings, providing more of a safety net, promoting financial literacy, and exposing everyone to a stake in corporate America while experiencing the 'eighth wonder of the world' — compounding." Berkshire declined to comment. It's worth noting that even if the program launched as planned and every American child owns a piece of the stock market from birth, lower-income parents might struggle to invest the maximum $5,000 a year into the account, allowing kids with more affluent parents to quickly pull ahead. Children from wealthier families might also have additional savings accounts and assets, other advantages such as access to better healthcare and education, and significant inheritances in their future, limiting the potential for a single government payout and account to narrow the wealth gap. Yet Buffett might still see the plan as a step in the right direction. He has long heralded compounding over decades as the secret to wealth creation, as it can turn even a small amount into a fortune. For example, a $1,000 investment that compounds at 8% annually for 65 years would be worth nearly $160,000.