Trinamool MLA says Operation Sindoor was ‘politicised drama', BJP seeks probe
A political row has erupted in West Bengal after Trinamoool Congress MLA Narendranath Chakraborty described 'Operation Sindoor' as a 'pre-planned drama' and 'a game in the name of war.' The MLA from Pandaveswar Assembly constituency in Paschim Bardhaman district said that those politicising 'Operation Sindoor' will face resistance and will end up in the dustbin.
' It (Operation Sindoor) is a well-planned drama. A game in the name of war was going on. The entire thing is 'fitting' (setting/arrangement) with Pakistan,' the MLA is heard saying in a viral video.
Mr. Chakraborty also sought to know 'why the terrorists responsible for the Pahalgam massacre on April 22 have not been arrested yet.'
The MLA was speaking in Paschim Bardhaman district at an event where Trinamool Congress leaders, including MP Kirti Azad, and party supporters were present. In the video, Mr. Chakraborty says that tourist spots in Kashmir are heavily guarded, so how was the terror attack possible?
The remarks evoked sharp reactions. Leader of the Opposition Suvendu Adhikari said that the Trinamool MLA's statement demands scrutiny and he should be grilled.
'If an elected representative like Chakraborty has prior knowledge or insights into such a heinous act, it is imperative that the NIA take him into custody for questioning to uncover the source and credibility of his information,' the BJP leader pointed out.
TMC distances itself
The Trinamool Congress leadership distanced itself from the remarks. Senior leader Kunal Ghosh said that Mr. Chakraborty's views do not reflect the party line on the issue.
BJP State president Sukanta Majumdar also criticised the Trinamool MLAs' remark. He shared a video of the MLA making the remark on social media.
'This statement is not just objectionable — it is blatantly anti-national. Sadly, he is not the first. Several other TMC leaders, including the failed Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee herself, have made indecent and disgraceful remarks about Operation Sindoor,' Mr. Majumdar said.
Last week Union Home Minister Amit Shah, during a public meeting in Kolkata, accused Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee of opposing Operation Sindoor to 'appease the Muslim vote bank.'
The Trinamool Congress responded, saying that the Union Home Minister's remarks were 'factually incorrect and politically motivated.' Ms. Banerjee had expressed full support for India's response to the Pahalgam terror attack, stating that she stood 'shoulder-to-shoulder' in the fight against terrorism.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
24 minutes ago
- Hans India
AP CM Chandrababu Extends Bakrid Greetings
Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Nara Chandrababu Naidu has conveyed his heartfelt greetings to the Muslim community in the state in celebration of Bakrid. In a message shared on social media, CM Naidu emphasised the essence of Bakrid, highlighting its significance in promoting the spirit of sacrifice and urging individuals to rise above selfishness, jealousy, and hatred. His message stated, "Eid Mubarak to Muslim brothers and sisters on the occasion of Bakrid, which stands as a symbol of Hazrat Ibrahim's sacrifice. Bakrid reminds us that only those who embody the spirit of sacrifice and genuine devotion are deserving of God's grace. In today's modern era, true devotees of God are those who love their fellow beings." CM Naidu expressed his wish that, inspired by the example set by Hazrat Ibrahim, everyone would advance with compassion and support for one another during this festive occasion.
News18
29 minutes ago
- News18
'No Equivalence With Terrorists': Shashi Tharoor Says Mediation Between India, Pakistan Not Possible
Tharoor said there was no scope for mediation between two unequals, stressing that there was no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has strongly asserted that there was no scope for external mediation between India and Pakistan, saying the two neighbouring countries are not equals, amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he 'helped settle" the recent conflict. While speaking at the Council on Foreign Relations in Washington on Thursday, Tharoor, who is leading an all-party delegation on Operation Sindoor, said there was no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. 'Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," he said at the event. 'There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business." 'There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible," Tharoor went on to say. Tharoor has repeatedly denied Trump's claims of brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, after tensions flared when India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22. Both countries agreed to a ceasefire on May 10. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a 'full and immediate" ceasefire after a 'long night" of talks mediated by the United States, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he 'helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. During a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump against raked up the issue, saying he was 'very proud" to help stop the India-Pakistan conflict. 'I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides," he said, adding that he warned of cancelling trade deals with both countries if the conflict persisted. 'You know what, I got that war stopped…Now, am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that," he added. Speaking on the American role in the conflict, Tharoor said he is 'guessing to some degree" that their priority would have been to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and 'certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government". At the same time, the US must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and 'our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process," he said. India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. (with PTI inputs) First Published: June 07, 2025, 09:04 IST
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who will be next BJP national president? All eyes on these three heavyweights
The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is likely to shift focus to organisational matters, particularly the appointment of its next national president. While the party has made no official announcement yet, sources suggest that internal deliberations are underway and a formal process could begin as early as mid-June. According to sources cited by Live Hindustan, the BJP has completed organisational elections in most states, which are a necessary precondition under the party constitution before electing the next national president. The recent announcement of 70 district presidents in Uttar Pradesh has further fuelled speculation that the central leadership may soon decide on the BJP chief post. However, the process is said to have been briefly delayed in the wake of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu, and Kashmir on April 22. Party sources reportedly indicate that before the national-level appointment, the BJP may first finalise new state unit presidents in key states, including Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Uttarakhand. In Uttar Pradesh, where caste equations are pivotal, a Brahmin face was reportedly being considered earlier. However, a growing demand for an OBC leader has emerged within sections of the party, reported Live Hindustan. This shift could reflect the BJP's broader attempt to consolidate its OBC support base, particularly after recent electoral trends. In Madhya Pradesh, the current leadership structure has an OBC Chief Minister and a Brahmin state president – a balance that has so far worked for the party. However, sources suggest the party is now considering appointing a tribal leader as the state chief, given the relatively low tribal representation in the current state and national leadership. In Uttarakhand, a Brahmin leader is said to be the frontrunner for the state president's post, although no official confirmation has been made. Even as the state-level equations are being finalised, names of potential contenders for the national president's post have started doing the rounds in party circles. Union minister Dharmendra Pradhan, a key OBC leader from Odisha, known for his organisational acumen and proximity to the central leadership is one of the key bigwigs in the race for the party's president post. Shivraj Singh Chouhan has emerged as another top contender. A former Madhya Pradesh chief minister and now a union minister, is seen as a mass leader with grassroots experience. Manohar Lal Khattar, who recently transitioned from his role as Haryana chief minister to the union cabinet, could represent continuity and administrative experience; hence, he is said to be one of the big three names the BJP may choose from. According to sources, the party's final choice is likely to factor in organisational experience, regional representation, and caste balance. The current national president, JP Nadda, has held the post since January 2020. His term was extended to steer the party through the 2024 general elections. With that mandate now fulfilled, leadership transition discussions have gained momentum. A central election committee is expected to be constituted to oversee the election process, which will include nomination filing, scrutiny, and, if necessary, voting. As of now, it is unclear whether Nadda will seek a second full term or the party will opt for a fresh face. Opposition parties , including the Congress and AAP, are said to be following the developments closely. The new chief will be instrumental in framing electoral narratives ahead of crucial state elections in 2026 and the next Lok Sabha polls in 2029.
