
Reform must shape up if it is to challenge Labour at the next election
SIR – Rupert Lowe, the suspended MP for Great Yarmouth, is correct in his criticisms ('Civil war as Reform chief clashes with Farage critic', report, March 8); Reform needs to get more structured and more radical to present a powerful alternative to the other parties.
At present Reform is a party of protest, such as Nigel Farage has led many times before. Mr Farage needs to empower his MPs and others around him to create a clear policy platform and a structured party apparatus before the next election.
Moreover, Reform must avoid becoming a replacement Conservative Party, tempting as that might be. Only a novel approach to politics can supersede the failures of past Conservative governments on immigration, economy, the Covid-19 pandemic and foreign policy. Reform must be bold to beat Labour at the next election. Labour will use a New Labour-style play-book to grow the party's popularity by 2029, embracing housing expansion, digital ID cards, spending cuts and moderate immigration reduction.
Reform is the only force that can step up to displace this Government.
Anders Seyersted
Richmond, Surrey
SIR – With (for now) only five MPs, it is easy to suggest a serious split in Reform UK when one steps out in public to criticise aspects of leadership and policy. Power plays like this never benefit the party.
Reform does have areas of policy that have attracted more than 200,000 members. Policies on immigration, energy, economics, defence and reducing the size of the state are well known and are the framework on which to build for future elections. Reform is in good health and Nigel Farage has time and time again shown leadership, guts and determination.
The current spat will pass.
James Kent
Northallerton, North Yorkshire
SIR – The current eruption of infighting in Reform UK at least proves it is a real political party.
Michael West
Poole, Dorset
SIR – Nigel Farage, Zia Yusuf and Lee Anderson's spat with Rupert Lowe follows a similar falling-out with Ben Habib. They are scuppering Reform's chances of a general election win.
Reform must properly democratise and Nigel Farage must allow it. He must form a genuine 'government in waiting' cadre of potential MPs and prospective ministers. He must learn to be bigger than a one-man band.
Tim Pope
Weybridge, Surrey
SIR – The 1963 hit It's My Party ('and I'll cry if I want to') by Lesley Gore sums up the problems with Reform UK.
The party is run for Nigel Farage by Nigel Farage, and it's stuck in the past.
Oliver Tyson
Ashby-de-la-Zouch, Leicestershire
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Letter: Newport not at forefront of industrial revolution
It was mainly private money that was the impetus, not like the nationalisation and never-ending government subsidies that have continued and are still continuing since the end of the Second World War. Although I concede that of necessity, at that time governments had to be involved with the restart of the economy. I note that the Welsh Government has an investment, or should that be another subsidy, of £7.5 million in their Flexible Skills Programme (Argus 22nd May) for training courses. Why aren't companies training more apprentices instead of relying on the taxpayers to fund those schemes? Perhaps Jessica Morden and her fellow Labour politicians should start asking, although they might not hear the answers they want, bearing in mind the present occupiers of Westminster. Newport


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Vital routes to be protected as part of buses overhaul
Councils in England will put strict requirements in place before 'socially necessary' routes can be changed or cancelled, the department said. This is aimed at services to locations such as hospitals and schools. The measure is part of the Government's Bus Services Bill, which reached its second reading in the House of Commons on Monday. This will lead to an overhaul of buses, such as by giving all local transport authorities new powers to run their own services. The Government will also reduce some of the red tape involved in bus franchising, including reducing the minimum period between local areas taking control of services and being allowed to start operations. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: 'We're committed to giving local leaders the power to shape the bus services their communities rely on. 'Our Bus Services Bill is a big step forward, protecting vital services that people depend on to get to work, school or essential appointments. 'We have taken a decisive step towards better buses, building on our £1 billion investment to improve and maintain bus services, keeping people connected, driving up living standards and growing the economy.' Ben Plowden, of lobby group the Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Buses are the most-used form of public transport. 'Preserving vital bus services has long been central to our campaigning, so the new protections in the Bus Services Bill are very welcome indeed. 'Protecting existing services, and identifying and filling gaps in the network, is the way to ensure everyone can access opportunities and stay connected.' Conservative shadow transport secretary Gareth Bacon attacked the Bus Services Bill as 'an ideological move that threatens essential services'. He said: 'They scrapped the £2 fare cap, slashed support for routes, and now want to strip away safeguards so councils can seize control of networks they aren't capable of operating. 'This is about Labour clinging to a fantasy of municipal socialism, whatever the cost to those who rely on local transport. Without the requirement to prove any benefit to passengers, Labour-run councils will be free to run yet another public service into the ground. 'We're not opposed to local decision-making. But this Bill offers no real investment, no credible delivery model, and no route to better services.'


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Trade Secretary to push for timeline on US tariff exemption
Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Trump announced the broad terms of an agreement last month that would exempt the UK from some of the US president's tariffs on steel and cars while increasing market access for other goods. The Prime Minister hailed the announcement as a major achievement, saying the UK was the first nation to reach such an agreement with Mr Trump. But the details are still being worked out ahead of a formal deal, and the Government hopes for an agreement within weeks. Mr Reynolds is expected to discuss implementing the deal during talks with US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday, where he is attending a meeting of the OECD. That meeting comes amid uncertainty about the future of Mr Trump's tariffs after a US court last week ruled many of them unlawful, before an appeals court reinstated the levies pending a further hearing. Last week also saw Mr Trump announce that he would double tariffs on steel to 50%, starting on Wednesday, and it remains unclear how the UK would be affected. Mr Reynolds's visit to Paris is part of a three-day trip, during which he is expected to meet other trade ministers and attend a G7 ministerial meeting before heading to Brussels for meetings with his EU counterparts. During the trip, the Trade Secretary will argue that the UK is a dependable partner in an era of increasing global volatility. He said: 'Our deals with the US, EU and India are proof that the UK is the most connected country in the world to do business. Along with our modern industrial strategy, our Plan for Change is making the UK a safe, stable bet in uncertain times. 'We recognise our relationship with G7 allies and EU counterparts must continue to evolve and deliver a better trading environment for our businesses and exporters. 'That's why we want to wipe away costly, business-blocking barriers and open up opportunities to grow our economy, create jobs and put more money in people's pockets.' Andrew Griffith, Conservative shadow business secretary, said: 'Labour told the British public we had a deal with the US – but one month on there is no deal in sight, meaning British businesses and workers continue to suffer because of Labour's failed negotiations. 'After snatching the winter fuel payment, lying about not increasing taxes, and misleading the public by saying the US trade deal was done, the public will rightly not trust a word Labour says. 'As all the other political parties wrangle over how to spend more taxpayers money, only the Conservatives are committed to being responsible with the public finances.'