Mooresville school shooting plot shows long-term toll of Indiana's opioid crisis
Shockley was a senior in Mooresville Schools until Feb. 20 when her plans for a Valentine's Day mass shooting in the cafeteria were discovered. This is the same school my daughter attends, the same cafeteria my daughter would have been sitting in with her friends during the planned attack.
Hicks: How to create equal opportunities in post-DEI Indiana
More than 320,000 children lost a parent to drug overdoses during the opioid crisis, according to the most recent data. Shockley's case is a stark reminder that efforts to combat the opioid crisis have entered a new phase. While the first two years of support have focused on supporting addicts directly, a better understanding of and support for the children of addicts deserves attention.
More than 57,500 Hoosier children were affected by the opioid crisis, with the highest concentration in rural areas. This is more than the number of children affected by autism and childhood diabetes combined.
The effects of having a parent that is an addict or has substance usage disorder is widely studied and very clear:
Higher rates of child abuse and neglect
Lower academic achievement
Higher rates of family breakdown
Higher rates of mental health issues
Lower rates of family involvement and support
Increased rates of incarceration as an adult
Increased rates of addiction and substance usage disorder as adults
The emotional and long-term toll of navigating life with a parent that is an addict is not just overwhelming Hoosier children and families, but also costing our state systems billions.
According to the most recent estimates, children with a parent that's an addict cost our state $37,000 in health care, $44,000 in child welfare and social programs, and $186,000 in special education costs. Pediatricians, schools, therapists, and social services are increasingly seeing more high-need cases at greater frequencies than ever before.
This means state agencies are overwhelmed by providing services and supporting kids displaying high acuity behaviors. These trends are not set to slow anytime soon. By 2030, the innocent victims of the opioid crisis are set to have cost the state $10.5 billion.
Indiana received $980 million in opioid settlement dollars to be doled out over 18 years. If there is one thing we have learned from this crisis, it's that only treating the addict is ineffective because it leaves family members like Shockley untreated.
We've also learned that rural areas were hit far harder than urban areas. The challenges to providing support in rural areas have proven to be far more difficult and have shown less efficacy to date. To curb the systemic impact and give these innocent victims a shot at a healthy future, we need to work smarter not harder.
We need to be investing opioid settlement dollars into evidence-based, data-driven approaches that support inner agency collaborations of all the systems that support the children of addicts. We need infrastructure that ensures data from each of these agencies are talking to each other in tangible ways. We need to focus on efforts that coordinate data and responses across health care, law enforcement, child welfare agencies and education to reduce redundancies and ensure kids are getting the best we have to offer. We need to support innovative approaches that address academic achievement, health outcomes and workforce development needs in the professional areas meeting the needs of children who have a parent battling addiction.
Most importantly, rural Indiana needs more support.
As a Mooresville mom, it's difficult to express my gratitude to Mooresville Schools and the police department for their handling of last week's incident. Their quick and decisive action ensured that all the children in our community were safe.
As an educational professional who has been working with kids with mental health needs for more than 20 years, I can't help but be impressed by the teachers, counselors, administrators, school nurses, coaches, staff members and officers who served bravely last week.
If you follow Mooresville Schools on social media, you know their hashtag is #BeMoore. After last week, I would argue that their hashtag should be #DoingMoore because they are clearly doing more with less to support our kids.
Addie Angelov is the co-founder and CEO of the Paramount Health Data Project.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: Mooresville school shooting plot points to opioid crisis | Opinion
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Medscape
3 days ago
- Medscape
FDA Okays Ketamine-Based Med for Post-Surgical Pain
The FDA has approved the racemic ketamine product known as KETARx (PharmaTher Holdings) for the treatment of post-surgical pain. 'This historic FDA approval…is a testament to years of dedicated development,' Fabio Chianelli, chairman and CEO of PharmaTher, said in a release. 'We remain steadfast in our mission to harness the pharmaceutical potential of ketamine for a range of mental health, neurological, and pain disorders,' he added. The company noted that it hopes to expand ketamine development into conditions such as Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, depression, and complex regional pain syndrome. Its product has already received an orphan drug designation for the treatment of Rett syndrome. It added that, among psychedelic and 'psychedelic-adjacent' drugs, ketamine is the only one to be included on a list of Essential Medicines by the World Health Organization. The company initially announced that the FDA had set an approval goal date of April 2024 for KETARx. However, after 'minor deficiencies identified by Quality' were identified, the FDA assigned a new target date of October 2024. As reported by Medscape Medical News at the time, the FDA issued a complete response letter requesting additional information on the application. The final date of August 2025 was set after the company submitted the requested additional information.
Epoch Times
3 days ago
- Epoch Times
‘A Testament to the Power of Prayer, Faith, and Hope'
Valentine's Day 2024 began like any other day, but it ended as one I will never forget—the day I was diagnosed with cancer. Initially, it was breast cancer. Within weeks, we learned it had spread to my liver. My official diagnosis was stage 4 invasive lobular carcinoma in the right breast with metastasis to the liver and stage 1A invasive ductal carcinoma in the left breast. The prognosis was devastating—a 30 percent chance of living five years.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
The anti-sunscreen movement and what to know about its claims
In one TikTok video, a woman declared that she stopped using sunscreen altogether. In an Instagram reel, a man insists that building sun exposure without sunscreen can help boost a person's immunity. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. And on YouTube, some are promoting do-it-yourself sunscreen alternatives using oil, butters or other natural remedies. For years dermatologists and health experts have extolled the value of sunscreen to prevent skin cancer and protect people from the ultraviolet radiation of the sun. But a growing anti-sunscreen movement has taken hold on social media, causing confusion about its benefits and alarming public health experts who say avoiding sunscreen increases long-term health risks. - - - How does sunscreen work, and what's in it? Sunscreen protects the skin by either absorbing or reflecting ultraviolet rays that can cause sunburn, premature aging and skin cancer. Most sunscreen formulas fall into two categories: chemical and mineral. Chemical sunscreens form a thin protective film to absorb UV radiation. They use ingredients such as avobenzone, oxybenzone and octocrylene to absorb UV radiation and convert it into heat before it reaches the skin. Mineral sunscreens rely on zinc oxide or titanium dioxide to physically block UV rays from reaching the skin. - - - Why is there skepticism of sunscreen? More Americans are questioning the safety of everyday products, driven by a growing distrust in conventional health advice, pharmaceutical companies and federal regulators. Among them are supporters of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Make America Healthy Again movement, who have helped revive skepticism of sunscreen ingredients such as oxybenzone and titanium dioxide. Some people are also looking for natural alternatives, and they say skin irritation they have experienced from certain products has caused them to shift from conventional products. As a result, alternatives like homemade creams and mineral-based sunscreens have become more popular. Some people are also choosing to stop using sunscreen entirely. 'I am definitely a MAHA mom and voted for Trump so that RFK Jr. could get into office,' said Summer Whiteside, 31, an ER nurse from Wildomar, California, in a text message. 'After listening to his podcast on Joe Rogan, I knew he was the man for the job.' On Instagram, Whiteside, who doesn't shy away from the label 'crunchy,' posts about things like beef tallow for sunburns and her preference for mineral sunscreen. Whiteside, who said she has concerns about the chemicals in sunscreen, uses long-sleeved rash guards on her kids and sunblock only on their faces. Some wellness figures have claimed that diet changes or building sun exposure gradually can protect against burns, which dermatologists and the scientific community strongly recommend against. Some in the anti-sunscreen movement point to studies suggesting that certain chemicals cause cancer or are absorbed too heavily into the body. But public health experts say there are no human studies that conclusively prove ingredients like oxybenzone act as carcinogens. 'Oxybenzone has been used since the 1970s in sunscreen, so we would have found out by now if it caused harm,' said Henry W. Lim, senior vice president of academic affairs and former chair of dermatology at Henry Ford Health. Lim said that some groups will use testing methods and safety thresholds in studies that differ from those required for product approval in the United States. 'A lot of the concerns come from animal studies using high doses, but those results don't automatically translate to humans,' said Lim, who is also the president of the International League of Dermatological Societies and a past president of the American Academy of Dermatology. - - - What do health experts and science say? Health professionals warn that anti-sunscreen messaging can be harmful for the public because skin cancer remains one of the most common types of cancer, according to the American Cancer Society. Experts say sunscreen is one of the most effective tools for prevention. Adam Friedman, a professor and chair of dermatology at George Washington University, said skepticism of sunscreen is nothing new. Concerns about chemical ingredients and mistrust in federal oversight resurface every few years, often fueled by social media and wellness trends. But he said the science has remained consistent. 'Ultraviolet radiation is a known carcinogen; there is no debate about that,' Friedman said. 'We've had decades of data showing that sunscreen plays a critical role in reducing skin cancer risk.' Studies have shown that regular sunscreen use significantly reduces the risk of skin cancer. A randomized controlled trial in Australia known as the Nambour Skin Cancer Prevention Trial followed more than 1,600 participants for about 10 years. Those who used sunscreen daily had a lower incidence of melanoma compared with those who used it occasionally. Another prospective cohort study of more than 143,000 Norwegian women found that using an SPF 15 or higher sunscreen was associated with a 33 percent lower risk of melanoma compared with people using less than an SPF 15 or none at all. The American Academy of Dermatology recommends broad-spectrum sunscreen with an SPF of 30 or higher daily, even on cloudy days. Mineral sunscreens containing zinc oxide or titanium dioxide are considered safe by dermatologists. Veena Vanchinathan, a board-certified dermatologist in California and a member of the American Academy of Dermatology, said the hesitation regarding sunscreen use in wellness spaces is not supported by current scientific evidence. She explained that just because a sunscreen ingredient is absorbed into the body doesn't mean it is harmful. 'We see small amounts of absorption from many everyday products without any proven risk,' Vanchinathan said. 'Our skin is designed to function as a barrier, not a sponge.' Her bigger concern is that people are skipping sunscreen altogether or using ineffective unproven alternatives like coconut oil or beef tallow. This could lead to more preventable sun damage, especially among younger people who are influenced by wellness content online. - - - Why does the U.S. have fewer sunscreen options than Europe and Asia? The Food and Drug Administration regulates sunscreen, but U.S. standards have not kept up. The last major sunscreen monograph proposal came in 1999. This document serves as the FDA's official guideline for what ingredients can be used in over-the-counter sunscreens. Although the agency proposed updates in recent years, delays have left many newer active ingredients, which are already used in Europe and Asia, unavailable in the U.S. This regulatory delay has drawn criticism from dermatologists and public health experts who say the U.S. is falling behind global standards and giving consumers fewer safe options. Some people, frustrated by the lack of innovation, are turning to imported products or homemade solutions, which Friedman strongly discourages. 'Would you make Tylenol or Advil in your bathtub?' Friedman said. 'There's no way to replicate the safety, testing and effectiveness of a professionally formulated sunscreen.' Other countries often approve sunscreen filters faster by following a different regulatory model that emphasizes post-market surveillance and international data. The European Commission evaluates sunscreen ingredients under a cosmetics framework that allows newer filters to reach the market more quickly. Some advocacy groups are calling on Congress to require faster review timelines or align with international standards. Dermatologists say the science continues to support daily use of FDA-approved sunscreens to prevent skin cancer. They warn that avoiding sunscreen altogether poses a far greater risk than any concern about ingredient absorption. Related Content He builds sand sculptures for joy. A huge carving of Crocs put him on the map. Why we're still obsessed with Lindsay Lohan They once shared recipes. Now her family is going hungry in Gaza. Solve the daily Crossword
