Why do you assume they came from Pak?: Chidambaram's 'homegrown terrorist' remark stirs row
'Have they (NIA) identified the terrorists or where they came from? For all we know, they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do… pic.twitter.com/c32I1KzqOg
— Amit Malviya (@amitmalviya) July 27, 2025
Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation
The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!
— P. Chidambaram (@PChidambaram_IN) July 28, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Justice delayed yet again
Last week, a special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court acquitted all the seven accused, including BJP MP Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur, in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case. Six people were killed and 95 injured in the bombing that had struck the Muslim-majority town in Maharashtra. The case, which was investigated by two different agencies, triggered accusations of 'saffron terror'. All the accused were charged by the Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad (ATS) in 2008 of being 'Hindutva extremists'. The trial was controversial as Rohini Salian, the former special public prosecutor, had alleged in 2015 that the government had put pressure on her, through the NIA, to 'go soft' on the accused. The case was initially probed by ATS chief Hemant Karkare, who was gunned down by terrorists during the November 26, 2008, terror attack on Mumbai. Eventually, it was handed over to the NIA. While acquitting the seven accused, the court pointed out several lapses in the investigation and criticised the NIA for presenting 'inconclusive', 'unreliable', and 'legally inadmissible' evidence. It said that there were procedural lapses in the invocation of stringent laws such as the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999, and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967. It added that the investigators had failed to link the motorcycle, allegedly used in the crime, to Ms. Thakur; that there were problems with witness statements; and that there was no proof that Lt Col Prasad Purohit (retired) or the right-wing outfit, Abhinav Bharat, was linked to the blast. In the order, Special Judge A.K. Lahoti observed, 'The testimony of prosecution witnesses is riddled with material inconsistencies and contradictions. Such discrepancies undermine the credibility of the prosecution's case and fall short of establishing the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.' While he said that terrorism has no religion, the Special Judge also added that a court cannot convict someone based on mere perception. Civil society members were critical of the verdict given the allegations that it was politically driven; and also since it came on the back of another verdict acquitting all the accused in another blast case. On July 21, the Bombay High Court acquitted all the 12 accused in the 2006 serial bomb blasts case. Seven explosions had ripped through Mumbai's local trains on the evening of July 11, 2006, killing 189 people and seriously injuring 824. The coordinated blasts had scarred the estimated 70 lakh people of Mumbai who use the local trains, often dubbed the city's lifeline, every day. Many victims feared taking the local train again. This case too was riddled with controversies. While the Maharashtra ATS, which had conducted the probe from the beginning, claimed that the attacks were the handiwork of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Students' Islamic Movement of India, several other investigating agencies, including the NIA, claimed that the Indian Mujahideen had carried out the terror attacks. While acquitting the 12 accused, the High Court laid bare the inconsistencies, loopholes, and lapses in the probe by the Maharashtra ATS. It asked how key witness statements were recorded after an unexplained delay of 100 days. It questioned the trustworthiness and credibility of witnesses, highlighted deep flaws in both the investigation as well as prosecution, and demanded to know why the circumstantial evidence, such as call detail records, which the investigators had relied on so much, was inconclusive. It pointed out that the witness statements were delayed and inconsistent; that there were procedural lapses and coercion allegations about the confessions retrieved; that there was no proof of actual explosives used; and that the chain of custody of the recoveries was broken. The High Court also rapped the trial court for the conviction order. The judgments on two terror cases in India have left the victims, who have had to wait for nearly two decades for verdicts, without a sense of justice. The investigations raise serious questions about India's criminal justice system and specifically about the accountability of investigating agencies. Who are the agencies answerable to, for their contradictory claims and shoddy procedures, which have allowed extremist organisations to get away with such terrible crimes in Maharashtra? And when — if at all they do — will the victims of these blasts get a sense of closure?
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
Assam BJP leader slams Malviya over ‘Bangladeshi language' row
A former Bharatiya Janata Party MP from Assam's Bengali-speaking Barak Valley hit out at party leader Amit Malviya for his take on Sylheti, a variant of Bengali. Defending a recent Delhi Police communique seeking the 'translation of documents containing text in Bangladeshi language', Mr. Malviya, who heads the BJP's information technology cell, said the Sylheti dialect of Bengali was 'nearly incomprehensible to Indian Bengalis'. Taking to social media, the BJP's former Silchar MP, Rajdeep Roy, wrote: 'Sylheti is far older than the modern state of Bangladesh, or even East Pakistan. It transcends the borders and histories of today's political entities.' Pointing out that Sylheti is the lingua franca of Barak Valley, Mr. Roy said that more than 70 lakh people in Assam, Meghalaya and Tripura speak it. He said dismissing Sylheti as alien to Bengalis in India was 'inaccurate, deeply unfortunate, and condemnable'. The former MP also reminded Mr. Malviya that some of the historical figures that the BJP reveres spoke Sylheti. They include Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, the founder of Gaudiya Vaishnavism, and Bipin Chandra Pal, one of the Lal-Bal-Pal trio of India's freedom movement. Other BJP leaders in Barak Valley spoke out against Mr Malviya. 'Silchar's incumbent MP, Parimal Suklabaidya, is a Sylheti speaker. So is Kabindra Purkayastha, who became our party's first-ever MP from the northeast in 1991,' a BJP leader in Barak Valley said. The Trinamool Congress's Rajya Sabha member and a resident of Silchar, Sushmita Dev, slammed Mr. Malviya too. 'It is disgraceful that the BJP's loudmouth does not know the history of those of us who speak in Sylheti. The Prime Minister's Office needs to sack this incompetent and ignorant bigot,' she said. Assam Congress president Gaurav Gogoi said it was not surprising for the 'arrogant BJP' to dehumanise Bengali people living in West Bengal and the northeastern States of the country. 'First, the BJP asks the Bengali people to declare themselves as Bangladeshis through the CAA, and now the party insults their language as being foreign. The BJP does not want a united India. They are only interested in reopening old scars,' he posted on X. Earlier, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee had said that the Delhi Police's letter to the Resident Commissioner of New Delhi's Banga Bhavan for assistance on 'Bangladeshi language' was 'scandalous, insulting, anti-national, unconstitutional'. She pointed out that Nobel laureate Rabindranath Tagore and Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay wrote the National Anthem and the National Song in Bengali. Pradyot Kishore Manikya Debbarma, the founder of Tripura's Tipra Motha Party, also expressed his indignation at the letter. 'This is deeply concerning. Today it is Bengali, tomorrow it can be any other language. There is no such thing as the Bangladeshi language! How can we forget that even our National Anthem 'Jana Gana Mana' was originally composed in Bengali by Tagore,' he asked.
Mint
14 hours ago
- Mint
26/11 Mumbai terror attack ‘mastermind' Tahawwur Rana seeks private lawyer, Court verdict on August 7
26/11 Mumbai Terror Attack case alleged mastermind Tahawwur Rana has said that he wants to engage a private counsel to represent him, news agency ANI reported. The news report stated that Rana has sought to talk to his family to seek the private lawyer. Patiala House court has reserved the order on this issue after receiving replies from the NIA and Jail authorities. The court will pronounce the order on August 7. Till now, Mumbai terror attack's alleged mastermind Tahawwur Rana has been represented by a legal aid counsel. On August 1, the Tihar jail authorities had opposed an application filed by 26/11 Mumbai attack accused Tahawwur Hussain Rana before a Delhi court seeking a phone conversation with family members. The jail authorities made the submissions before special judge Chander Jit Singh in an in-chamber proceeding. Tahawwur Rana is allegedly a close associate of 26/11 main conspirator David Coleman Headley alias Daood Gilani, a US citizen. Tahawwur Rana was extradited to India following the dismissal of his review petition by the United States Supreme Court on 4 April. The court's decision cleared the way for his transfer, after a prolonged legal battle challenging the extradition request. The Mumbai terror attacks of 26 November 2008 marked one of the darkest chapters in India's recent history. Ten heavily armed terrorists from Pakistan arrived by sea and unleashed coordinated assaults on multiple high-profile targets, including a bustling railway terminus, two luxury hotels, and a Jewish centre. The siege lasted nearly 60 hours and left 166 people dead.
