Letsoalo's suspension sparks uproar: Reformist CEO taken down amid legal backlash
Sources close to the matter claim the suspension of RAF CEO Collins Letsoalo was a calculated move to pacify a deeply aggrieved group of attorneys
In a move that has ignited controversy and speculation, Collins Letsoalo, the CEO of the Road Accident Fund (RAF), has been placed on suspension — a decision that legal experts and insiders say is less about accountability and more about political appeasement.
Letsoalo's suspension comes just weeks after a Supreme Court of Appeal ruling cleared him and the RAF board of personal liability in two long-delayed claims.
While the court's decision offered legal vindication, the political pressure around his leadership has been mounting, largely from within a legal fraternity that has openly waged war on him since his tenure began.
Sources close to the matter claim the suspension was a calculated move to pacify a deeply aggrieved group of attorneys, many of whom also serve as magistrates and judges and wield substantial influence and public funds.
These lawyers have seen their lucrative RAF-related revenues dry up under Letsoalo's aggressive anti-corruption and reform agenda. Letsoalo is no stranger to conflict. He publicly branded elements of the legal industry as 'thuggish,' accusing some attorneys of manipulating the claims system for personal enrichment at the expense of road accident victims.
One of the most high-profile battles was with Gert Nel Incorporated and the Association for the Protection of Road Accident Victims (APRAV), whom Letsoalo accused of fighting transformation and resisting the Road Accident Benefit Scheme (RABS) Bill — a policy shift that threatens the profit models of many legal firms.
'They never cared about victims,' Letsoalo declared during a media briefing in March. 'They cared about the billions they've made off the pain of others.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
11 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
SCA sends home affairs minister packing in ZEP appeal
The Supreme Court of Appeal has rejected an appeal by the minister of home affairs against the Johannesburg high court order on Zimbabwe Exemption Permits (ZEPs), which give about 180,000 Zimbabweans a special dispensation to lawfully remain in South Africa. The judgment also clears the path for the Zimbabwean Immigration Federation to return to court and argue that it is only parliament, and not the home affairs minister, which can decide whether to extend the ZEP regime. In 2023, the Johannesburg high court set aside a decision by former minister Aaron Motsoaledi to terminate the ZEP regime and to reconsider his decision, following a fair process. The SCA's judgment on Friday said that counsel for the minister told the court that 'the order is being implemented, and ... the minister is following a fair process'. But the federation wants to go back to court to argue that ZEP-holders and their children enjoy constitutional rights in South Africa. If these are to be limited, only parliament may do so — 'by enacting a law of general application,' says the SCA's judgment. The SCA did not give a view on whether that argument was correct, but it rejected an appeal by the minister that would have prevented the federation from ever making it. When the high court gave its order, the federation was one of the parties in the litigation, along with the Helen Suzman Foundation (HSF). Theirs were two separate cases, which were heard together. While the federation and the HSF both wanted similar orders, at that time, from the high court, their grounds were different. And while the HSF asked the court for a final order, the federation only sought an interim interdict — it wanted to argue its main case at a later date. The court gave a final order, as sought by the HSF, and also the interim interdict sought by the federation. The minister had already tried, and failed, to appeal against the HSF order. In this case, the minister approached the SCA on appeal, saying the interim interdict was 'redundant' since the court had already granted a final order to the HSF. In Friday's judgment, the SCA disagreed. Judge of Appeal David Unterhalter said the federation's case 'raised distinctive grounds of review', which laid the basis for an argument that was not raised or argued earlier — about the powers of the minister when there were constitutional rights at stake. If the federation's argument was to be accepted, it 'would not permit the minister to terminate the ZEP regime'. 'That is a remedial outcome of a considerably more far-reaching kind because it reaches into the future and is not based on a reconsideration,' said Unterhalter. The redundancy argument could therefore not hold, he said.
IOL News
15 hours ago
- IOL News
The urgent need for whistle-blower protection in South Africa
Chief director for financial accounting at Gauteng Department of Health, Babita Deokaran, was brutally murdered after she raised alarm on large-scale corruption at Tembisa Hospital. Image: File Parliamentarians stated that Babita Deokaran, who exposed corruption at the Gauteng Department of Health, and other whistle-blowers would still be alive if they were protected by the government. These were the sentiments echoed on Friday during a discussion over the strengthening of whistle-blower protection by enacting robust laws that guarantee anonymity, job security, and legal support for individuals who report corruption. Deokaran was the acting chief financial officer at the department and reported on financial fraud and corruption at Tembisa Hospital when she was killed outside her home in August 2021. The Whistle-blower Protection Bill is due to be introduced to Parliament later this year. The Bill follows a recommendation by the State Capture Commission, contained in its report released in 2022, that whistle-blower legislation be amended to provide increased protection. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ Visvin Reddy, an MP in the uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP), stated that the MKP does not run away from corruption, but face it head on. "We don't silence whistle-blowers, we protect them because in a country drowning in lies, the person who tells the truth is the bravest one of all. If Babita Deokaran had spoken out under an MKP government, she would still be alive, protected and not hunted, celebrated and not assassinated. "There are officials in departments who are watching bribes being paid daily, and municipal officials who see tenders being given to cronies while people go without water. They stay silent because they know the risk," Reddy stated. Philip van Staden, Freedom Front Plus MP, said other examples include: Pamela Mabini (murdered), Athol Williams (fled the country), Jimmy Mohlala (murdered), Martha Ngoye (dismissed by the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa), and Cynthia Stimpel (dismissed). "These examples clearly demonstrate a significant lack of legal, financial, and psychological support for those who expose corruption in government and elsewhere. The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development's draft document outlining proposed reforms for whistle-blower protection, published in June 2023, has still not been finalised, despite President Cyril Ramaphosa's undertaking to do so in his State of the Nation Address at the beginning of the year," he said. Van Staden believed that South Africa does not have the experience, expertise, intelligence capabilities, and manpower needed to enforce laws. "The significant shortcomings in, among other things, crime intelligence are evident in ordinary criminal cases, which often end in unsuccessful prosecutions," he added. Advocate Glynnis Breytenbach, an MP and member of the DA, said the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) has failed to secure a single successful prosecution of a politically connected figure implicated in state capture. Breytenbach said that cases like the Vrede Dairy scandal, the Zizi Kodwa debacle, and the Transnet corruption trial have all collapsed due to incompetence, poor preparation, or basic procedural errors. Corruption has reached epidemic proportions, said EFF MP Thapelo Mogale, adding that President Cyril Ramaphosa himself was involved in the Phala Phala saga where the theft of $4m from his game farm became international news. The stigma of being labelled an impimpi, which refers to a police informer or spy in South Africa, should also be addressed and dismantled in communities, said Thokozani Langa, an IFP MP. Langa added that whistle-blowers should be heroes and not seen as traitors. Marlon Daniels, a Patriotic Alliance MP, said that robust laws should guarantee legal defence for whistle-blowers who face frivolous lawsuits after reporting corruption. Daniels also warned about false allegations and those who want to settle personal scores.
The South African
15 hours ago
- The South African
Trump vs Musk vs Gates: Battle of the billionaires has just begun
By now you've probably heard the cyber supersonic boom of the internet exploding after Elon Musk dropped a bombshell tweet about President Donald Trump. Musk alleged that the reason why the Epstein files have not been fully disclosed to the public yet is because POTUS Donald J. Trump is in them. Musk ended the tweet with, 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He then attached a second tweet which read: 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' In response, Trump dropped a post on his Truth Social announcing that his administration is revoking funding and subsidies for Musk's companies, including Tesla and Space X. To which Musk responded by announcing on X that he would be decommissioning the latest SpaceX Dragon rocket programme – which is much needed by NASA to service and supply the International Space Station. Given these latest developments, one has to wonder whether the rumours and reports are indeed true – is Musk on hard chemical drugs? Part of the backlash in the media and on social media right now is around who started the spat, and who's going to 'win'. One Musk-supporting X user pointed out: 'Musk criticized Trump's Bill. Trump, however, criticised Musk. Elon Musk played the ball, some are arguing, while Donald Trump played the man.' Musk's first salvo against Trump's budget came when, on 3 June, he could no longer contain his disgust at Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and spilt his guts about it on X, when he tweeted: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' During a live press briefing in the Oval Office on 5 June, while hosting neo-Nazi, pro-Zionist, ex-Blackrock executive, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump addressed Musk's comments about the bill. 'We've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He campaigned for me.' Then Trump said, 'I think I would've won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump told reporters. Elon must've been watching that press briefing live because minutes later, he responded to Trump's statement by tweeting: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' 'Such ingratitude,' he then added. Trump went on to tell the press: 'I'm very disappointed, because, Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. He only developed a problem when he found we're going to cut the EV [electric vehicle] mandate…because that's billions and billions of dollars. We wanna have cars of all types.' Trump also said, 'When he left, he said the most beautiful things about me. He hasn't said anything bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next. But, I'm very disappointed in Elon, I've helped Elon a lot.' Trump also later posted on his Truth Social: 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' That's when the break-up started to turn nastier than the War of the Roses. The jibes went back and forth until it culminated in that earth-shattering tweet of the century from Musk. But Trump is not the only one Musk has just thrown under the Epstein bus. He recently, and in the past, did the same to Bill Gates. On 7 October 2024, during an interview with Tucker Carlson, Musk said: 'You know, I think part of why Kamala's getting so much support is that if Trump wins, that Epstein client list is going to become public. And some of those billionaires behind Kamala are terrified of that outcome.' Carlson asked Musk: 'Do you think Reid Hoffman (billionaire founder of LinkedIn) is uncomfortable?' Musk answered: 'Yes.' After a brief pause, he added, 'And Gates.' Last month, on 20 May 2025, at the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha, Musk was interviewed before a live and online audience by Bloomberg's Mishal Husain. Husain started to ask Musk about comments made by Bill Gates regarding Elon's decision to cut funding to the USAID programme – when Musk interjected. 'He's a huge liar', Musk said. 'I know, you've said that already,' Husain replied. The comments they're referring to emerged when Bill Gates, in an interview with the Financial Times on 8 May, accused Elon Musk of 'killing children in the world's poorest countries' by cutting foreign aid under the Trump administration. Gates assailed Musk for the actions he took as head of President Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'He could go on to be a great philanthropist,' Gates told the magazine. 'Meantime, he's involved in the deaths of the world's poorest children.' Sticking the blade in a little deeper, he added, 'The picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one.' Responding to Gates' comments in Qatar, Musk sprung an unexpected gobsmacker on Husain and the audience; 'Who does Bill Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children, given that he has frequented Jeffrey Epstein?', he said. 'Ok, Well…', Husain started to respond, but she was drowned out by applause and cheers from the audience.' When the ovation died down, Musk added, 'I wouldn't trust that guy to babysit my kids.' It's worth noting that, curiously, Jeffrey Epstein 'committed suicide' (by breaking his own neck twice with paper sheets, while the prison cameras were switched off and the guards were fast asleep) during Trump's first term. It's also worth noting that the last remaining, vocal survivor in the Epstein case, Virginia Giuffre – who accused Prince Andrew of raping her when she was 17, a woman who was close to seeing justice served for being sex-trafficked by Epstein to Andrew and other predatory paedophiles – allegedly committed suicide on 6 April this year…during Trump's second term. What's all the more mysterious about her death is the fact that…just a few years earlier, on 11 Dec 2019, she tweeted: 'I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. If something happens to me – for the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.' Here's where it gets dubiously curious. The person who recruited Virginia Giuffre to be Jeffrey Epstein's personal 'masseuse' was Epstein's partner in life and crime, Ghislaine Maxwell (currently serving time for child sex trafficking). Ghislaine is the daughter of (media mogul and alleged ex-Mossad agent) Robert Maxwell. Do you know where Ghislaine Maxwell met and recruited Virginia Giuffre? At a place called Mar-a-Lago. Ring any bells? That's right, Donald Trump's Florida mansion. Where 16-year-old Giuffre was working as a spa attendant at the time. It's been rumoured and reported that Epstein himself was also a Mossad agent, running a 'honey trap' operation for Israeli intelligence. So far, the rumours and accusations by the Democrats of Trump playing golden showers and glass-topped coffee tables with Russian hookers in a swanky Moscow Hotel have proven to be unfounded. But if there is compromising footage of POTUS Donald Trump on Epstein island molesting minors, and that footage is being held by Mossad, it would certainly explain a lot about why Trump has allowed barbaric Bedlam Bibi Netanyahu to steamroll over him…like that bulldozer did to Rachel Corrie. Of course, the whole world and their brother – including me – have dropped everything to weigh in on this Musk-Trump (and Gates) feud. On X and other platforms, people are digging up and dropping videos from the '90s of Donald Trump with Jeffrey Epstein (and Ghislaine Maxwell) surrounded by a bevy of beautiful nubile babes, partying their a**es off at Mar-a-Lago. Others have posted photos of Elon posing alongside Maxwell. Someone posted: 'Elon Musk didn't kill himself.' Another, recommended Musk multiply his security detail immediately. Piers Morgan posted: 'Holy sh*t!' And a string of 'shocked' emojis. Alex Jones posted: 'God Help Us ALL…' Russell Dobular from Due Dissidence said in the duo's commentary video: 'This actually reinforces the idea that Elon is whacked out on drugs, because…this is such a self-destructive move.' 'Going out on a limb here – the Tesla board is going to replace Elon as the CEO by the end of the year,' he added. Tesla shares have slumped by 14% on Wall Street since Thursday's clash of the titan tycoons. Let us know by leaving a comment below or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
