German exports rise by 1.1% m/m in March
A container ship is seen at the loading terminal "Altenwerder" in the port of Hamburg, Germany, February 17, 2025. REUTERS/Fabian Bimmer/File Photo Purchase Licensing Rights , opens new tab
May 8 (Reuters) - German exports rose by 1.1% in March compared with the previous month, data from the federal statistics office showed on Thursday.
The result compared with a forecast 1.0% increase in a Reuters poll.
The Reuters Tariff Watch newsletter is your daily guide to the latest global trade and tariff news. Sign up here.
The statistics office publishes more detailed economic data on its website
, opens new tab
Reporting by Tristan Veyet in Gdansk, editing by Thomas Seythal
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. , opens new tab
Share X
Facebook
Linkedin
Email
Link
Purchase Licensing Rights
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
Investors eye US protests, Iran tensions as S&P 500 stalls
NEW YORK, June 13 (Reuters) - Investors will keep close watch on planned protests across U.S. cities on Saturday, amid heightened concerns following immigration raids in Los Angeles and developments in the Middle East. The protests, organized by the "No Kings" coalition to oppose President Donald Trump's policies, are set to coincide on Saturday with a military parade in Washington marking the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary and Trump's 79th birthday. Trump on Tuesday warned against protests at the parade. The protests also come on the heels of heightened geopolitical concerns after Israel's military strikes on Iran and have sparked a rush into safe havens such as gold and the dollar. "The protests and the ongoing developments in Iran bear further watching," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Cresset Capital. The protests could negatively impact the markets from a psychological standpoint, said Tim Ghriskey, senior portfolio strategist at Ingalls & Snyder in New York. "These protests have been relatively peaceful but have the potential to spiral out of control and result in injuries, etc," he said. Any damage to sentiment and the willingness to take risks could add to the challenge the S&P 500 faces in the near term as the index appears to have stalled after making big advances from its early April trade war-induced market swoon. The S&P 500 is about 20% above its April low, but is little changed over the last four weeks. The benchmark stock index is about 2% shy of its record closing high reached in mid-February. The index was down about 1% on Friday afternoon. Trump's decision last weekend to dispatch troops to Los Angeles over the objections of California Governor Gavin Newsom has sparked a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and further polarized the country. Americans are divided over Trump's decision to activate the military to respond to protests against his crackdown on migrants, with about half supportive of the move, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll on Thursday. For now, much of the market's attention remains fixated on events unfolding in the Middle East. "I don't think there's a direct impact to the markets. It may come more on the confidence side, adversely impacting sentiment," Jack Janasiewicz, portfolio manager at Natixis Investment Managers Solutions, in Boston, said.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The ‘experts' you've never heard of inspiring Rachel Reeves's disastrous economic policy
A little like the Chagos Islands giveaway and, more recently, the apparent Gibraltar sell out, it's almost impossible to work out the motivations behind each and every idiotic decision this Labour Government takes. There's a palpable sense of incredulity spreading across Britain as the Prime Minister and Chancellor continue to insist that everything is going swimmingly despite most key markers showing precisely the opposite is true. Take the economy. In Wednesday's Spending Review, Rachel Reeves boasted that she had 'wasted no time' removing the barriers to growth. Less than 24 hours later, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) revealed that UK GDP had shrunk by 0.3 per cent in April. Labour continues to splurge taxpayers' hard-earned cash despite the national debt sitting at around 96 per cent of GDP, the budget deficit more doubling in the past seven years, and public spending being on a par with the profligate Labour government of the 1970s, which almost bankrupted the country. Back then, taxes as a share of GDP were around 33 per cent. Forecasts suggest that, by 2027, they could reach 37.7 per cent. Unemployment is at its highest level in four years, UK payrolls have lost 276,000 employees since the autumn Budget, and a millionaire is reportedly leaving the UK every 45 minutes under Labour. Still, no one in the Cabinet appears able to rule out further tax rises, with Paul Johnson, the outgoing chief of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) concluding that 'council tax bills look set to rise at their fastest rate over any parliament since 2001-05.' Who is advising Reeves on tax policy, and her relentless assault on our wallets? Readers may not have heard of Arun Advani and Andy Summers, but these little known academics may have been the inspiration for Labour's seemingly never-ending tax grab. They run the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation (CenTax), which some credit for Labour's farm tax. Advani, who is associate professor in the economics department at the University of Warwick, called for inheritance tax 'loopholes' on farms to be scrapped in two reports for the Institute for Fiscal Studies, as well as writing a further report for CenTax making the same arguments for changes to both Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR) last October. After Advani boasted at the Labour Party Conference that he was 'optimistic' because the Labour government is 'genuinely listening' to his ideas, Reeves announced in the Budget that the availability of 100 per cent relief for agricultural and business property would be capped at £1 million. So far, so predictable, you may argue. What's the harm in tapping up Left-wing think tanks for radical tax ideas? Do Conservative governments not rely on the research of free market institutes? Well, some have alleged the Treasury relied solely on CenTax's projection that the changes would raise £520 million, without doing its own calculations. As it conceded in response to a Freedom of Information request: 'H M Treasury does not hold a disaggregated cost projection for the revenue raised from the measure announced at Autumn Budget 2024 to restrict these reliefs. This is a combined policy across the reliefs, rather than separate policies for each relief.' Even more problematically, the £520 million figure has been challenged. The OBR itself said it was uncertain how much would be raised as a result of behavioural responses, whilst CBI Economics calculates that the new tax on both family firms and farms will actually cost the Treasury £1.9 billion over the next five years. Advani claimed that only around 500 farms would be affected by the tax. As the Adam Smith Institute points out, however, 'the government's much-quoted '500' a year is really 15,000 a generation.' The true number of farms could be more than 40,000. Separate research, commissioned by Ashbridge Partners, found that one in 10 farmers surveyed said they will face an IHT bill of more than £1 million due to the inheritance tax hike, with 31 per cent expecting to pay more than £500,000. Why didn't Labour listen? Treasury minister James Murray, who referenced back in 2022 how many Zoom meetings he'd held with Dr Summers, even hosted CenTax's official launch in Parliament last November when he declared his desire 'to make sure that collaboration between CenTax, Treasury and HMRC continues for many years into the future.' Advani and Summers also influenced Labour's pledge to scrap non dom status with Treasury ministers again seeming to unquestioningly swallow their claim that it would raise £3.2 billion, a figure repeatedly cited by the Government. The trouble is, that number was also based on some misguided premises, perhaps including Advani and Summers' quite ludicrous prediction that out of 70,000 non-doms, only 77 would leave. As other economists later pointed out, the projection did not take into account the impact of abolishing non-dom inheritance tax protections. Even the OBR assumed that the changes would likely lead to a loss of 25 per cent of non-doms with trusts, which could cost the UK more than £12 billion during the course of the parliament. Still the Government swallowed the £3.2 billion figure hook line and sinker despite some now estimating that 10 per cent of non-doms may have already left the UK. A report by the CEBR predicts the ongoing exodus could reach 40 per cent – costing the Treasury a self-defeating £7.1 billion over this parliament. This combined with the £1.9 billion revenue lost as a result of the farm and family firm tax could mean the Government is down £9 billion thanks to listening to these nitwits. CenTax also wrongly predicted that increasing the tax rate on carried interest to 45 per cent would raise additional revenue of £0.8 billion per year. Labour settled on 32 per cent – but a January 2025 estimate by the OBR suggests that only £100 million will be raised and since then Reeves has watered it down. Labour claim to be a 'party of business'. So why are they seemingly listening to two economists who are laying the intellectual groundwork for an expansion in taxation that could come to look like Corbynism on steroids.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
May imports drop 9% at busiest US seaport on 145% China tariffs
LOS ANGELES, June 13 (Reuters) - Imports to the busiest U.S. seaport at Los Angeles dropped 9% year-on-year in May, offering insight into how many shipments were canceled or put on hold after President Donald Trump slapped tariffs of 145% on goods from China. China is the top U.S. supplier of sea-borne goods, and Los Angeles is the No. 1 port for those imports. Domestic businesses ranging from retailer Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab to automaker Ford (F.N), opens new tab rely on the toys, furniture and auto parts that land on its docks. The Port of Los Angeles handled the equivalent of 355,950 20-foot shipping containers of imports in May, when the 145% tariffs began to show up in data. "May marked our lowest monthly volume in over two years," said Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles. The world's two biggest economies last month agreed to a 90-day pause on tit-for-tat tariffs, and the U.S. lowered the duty on many China goods to 30% from 145%. The U.S. and China this week agreed to maintain that lower rate, potentially defusing their high-stakes trade dispute. Port executives and shipping consultants expect volumes from China to rebound, albeit at a more moderate level as 30% duties represent a significant cost increase for importers. "I expect overall cargo flow to remain modest for the balance of 2025," Seroka said.
