Oil price falls back on Israel-Iran ceasefire
The cost of Brent oil fell by 4% in morning trading on Tuesday, settling at around 69 US dollars a barrel, having jumped to a five-month high on Monday.
London's FTSE 100 Index also rebounded higher, up 40.5 points or 0.5% to 8798.5 in early trade following overnight gains in Asia, with Japan's Nikkei 225 up 1.1% and the Hang Seng in China ahead 0.7%.
Investors were breathing a sigh of relief after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire had been brokered between Israel and Iran.
The pound also rose, up 0.4% at 1.36 US dollars and 0.3% higher at 1.17 euros after both Iran and Israel confirmed they had agreed to stop fighting.
Brent crude had shot up in price in recent days on the escalating conflict, with worries that Iran might seek to block oil being shipped through the all-important Strait of Hormuz.
Panmure Liberum experts estimated that Brent crude could peak at 100 dollars (£74.43) a barrel thanks to severe disruption of the crucial waterway route, which they warned would send inflation soaring and hit stock markets hard.
Matt Britzman, senior equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: 'Despite the turmoil over the weekend, oil prices were quick to shift into reverse – an early signal that markets were betting on de-escalation sooner rather than later.
'Iran's response notably refrained from targeting any oil facilities or the important Strait of Hormuz, and the jump in prices over the past few days has mostly been erased now, positive news for the US administration and investors alike.
'Lower oil prices are a key component to keep inflation down and something the US Fed will have one eye on when thinking about whether to cut interest rates at the next meeting in July.'
Among stocks in London, blue chip oil giants BP and Shell saw recent gains reversed on the crude price fall, down 5% and 4% respectively, which held back gains on the wider FTSE 100.
Defence stocks were also lower, with aerospace group BAE Systems off 2%.
But Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB cautioned it was 'still a very fluid situation'.
She said: 'Brent crude had rallied nearly 20% in the past month as a war premium was attached to the price of oil, which is now being unwound.
'However, if there are more signs that the ceasefire is not holding, we could see the oil price resume its uptrend.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Europe's holstered defence billions are a problem
BERLIN, June 24 (Reuters Breakingviews) - The 32 members of NATO will congratulate themselves this week on agreeing to increase their defence budgets from the current 2% to 3.5% of their GDP by 2032. They will add some 1.5% of related spending – such as infrastructure, civil defence or cybersecurity – to come up with the headline 5% demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump as a condition to keep his country engaged in Europe. They may even find a fudge to accommodate Spain's reluctance to spend so much on its defence. The real problem, however, is the wait-and-see attitude European governments have adopted with regard to actual military outlays. Even a solemn and common pledge at NATO's Brussels gathering will not change the reality of the situation of the last two years, which has seen governments either promise money they don't have or are loath to spend. Furthermore, as outlined by a report, opens new tab from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy last week, the abstract debate on spending numbers has obscured the lack of real procurement and large equipment orders. At the current pace it would take several decades for Europe to be fit for war, the authors note. The organisation's defence ministers in 2006 agreed on a commitment to hike their national defence budgets to 2% of GDP, and it took them 19 years, opens new tab to get there. It may not take as much time to meet the new target: Europeans are now facing a serious Russian threat on their Eastern flank and must prepare for the credible scenario of an American withdrawal from their continent. But for now, budgets have only increased incrementally, and big defence contractors are still waiting for orders before they can commit to long-term investments, as Europe looks impervious to the emergency created by a new Russian offensive in Ukraine. The European members of NATO (minus Turkey) spent, opens new tab more than 450 billion euros on their defence in 2024. That was a significant 21% jump over what they allocated in 2023, when their military spending had already increased by 18% over 2022, the year Russia invaded Ukraine. Yet even if all seem to agree that the target of 3.5% is the right one considering the new geopolitical context, governments across the region seem seized by a general fatigue. In the UK and France, the region's two biggest military powers, public debt at more than 100% of GDP is forcing a reality check: if defence is a priority, taxes will have to be raised or other public spending will have to be cut. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has so far refused to commit, opens new tab to the 3.5% target, and his Chancellor Rachel Reeves has warned that military spending would be capped at 2.6% of GDP until the end of the current parliament in 2029. French President Emmanuel Macron has accepted the target, opens new tab, but without a timeline. Raising spending to that level would force him to find more than 40 billion euros a year in France's stretched public finances – or to raise taxes in a country already shouldering the OECD's second-highest tax burden, opens new tab. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is at least preparing a 2026 budget where defence spending could jump from 80 billion euros to 110 billion euros, according to a Deutsche Bank forecast. But that would still only amount to around 2.4% of output – up from 2.1% in 2024. Merz at least looks determined to make the German Bundeswehr the strongest, opens new tab conventional army in Europe. So far no other European Union leader has emulated him in asking the European Commission for an exemption – using the so-called escape clause – from its deficit and debt rules. Yet that is an option open to all after Brussels' ReArm Europe Plan, opens new tab, which also created a 150 billion euro investment fund financed by joint borrowing. Meanwhile defence contractors are still waiting for the real orders that would show governments are serious about defence. Micael Johansson, the CEO of $27 billion Swedish defence group Saab ( opens new tab and head of Europe's defence industry lobby, has warned, opens new tab that companies are now waiting for long-term commitments from governments. Only then will they be able to proceed with the massive investments needed to keep factories ready to ramp up production in a hurry. Governments are the only customers of the defence industry, which does not rely on massive inventories. While public spending is lagging in spite of promises, private capital is warming to a defence industry that was long shunned by major investors, whether investment funds or venture capital players. The military sector was long deemed to fail basic environmental, social and governance criteria. This is changing fast. Public sector entities such as the European Investment Bank have now loosened their rules. Policymakers in Norway are also thinking about easing the investment criteria of the country's $1.8 trillion sovereign wealth fund. And active European defence startups no longer seem to struggle to find funding – as witnessed in recent weeks by Germany's Helsing, opens new tab and Quantum Systems, opens new tab, which raised a combined 760 million euros based on hefty valuations. Some European members of NATO like Hungary and Slovakia are now closer to Russia and may not join others in raising the organisation's spending target. But together these two countries only account for less than 2% of Europe's defence budgets. A larger problem comes from Italy and Spain, who respectively only allocated 1.5% and 1.3% of their GDP last year to their defence budgets, which together amount to 12% of Europe's spending. Rome and Madrid's perception of threat is affected by their distance from the Russian front line, and the two governments seem to find it convenient to free-ride on the others' military buildup. Some pressure may have to be applied and it would be more efficient if it came not only from Trump but from other European capitals. A real pledge by Europe's NATO members to hike defence budgets with a firmer deadline would be the ideal outcome. But no government is obliged to wait for an international deal to beef up its defence and security. For now European governments sound like a soldiers' choir bellowing 'let's march' on an opera stage, opens new tab without going anywhere. They should stop the singing and start the marching. Follow Pierre Briancon on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Rupee jumps most in a month as Iran-Israel ceasefire sparks relief rally
MUMBAI, June 24 (Reuters) - The Indian rupee had its best day in a month on Tuesday as oil prices slumped, the dollar weakened and Asian currencies rallied after a ceasefire between Israel and Iran went into effect, reviving risk sentiment. The rupee closed at 85.9750 against the U.S. dollar, up 0.9% on the day, its biggest single-day rise since May 23. Oil prices dropped after the ceasefire was announced by U.S. President Donald Trump overnight, bringing relief to currencies of oil-importing countries like India. Brent crude futures were at $69 per barrel, down more than 15% from a five-month high hit a day earlier. Broad-based interbank dollar sales and cutting of bearish bets on the rupee boosted the local currency, traders said. India's benchmark equity indexes, the BSE Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab and Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab, ended higher, but pared gains after Israel said that Iran had violated the ceasefire. Iran denied reports of violations but the developments raised doubts over whether the ceasefire, which came after 12 days of war, would last. "Markets are materially scaling back geopolitical risk," ING said in a Tuesday note. The dollar is under pressure as oil prices fall and the downside risks are elevated ahead of remarks from Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, it said. Powell is slated to speak in front of U.S. lawmakers on Tuesday and Wednesday. The dollar index was down 0.2% at 98. Fed vice-chair Michelle Bowman said on Monday that the first interest rate cut this year could come as soon as July, helping boost odds of a rate cut to 22.7% from 16.3% last week, as per CME's FedWatch tool. Asian currencies were up between 0.1% and 1.7% on the day and global stocks rallied with U.S. equity futures indicating that stocks would open in the green.
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Urgent warning as bank customers risk losing more than £500 after ‘falling into Zombie account trap'
People are potentially missing out on hundreds of pounds in interest CASH BLOW Urgent warning as bank customers risk losing more than £500 after 'falling into Zombie account trap' BRITS are warned as £297B sits in dead-end bank accounts - and it's costing you hundreds a year. Brits are flushing away over £500 a year by leaving their cash rotting in low-interest 'zombie' bank accounts, experts have warned. 2 Millions of Brits are being stung by a silent savings crisis Credit: Getty 2 New research reveals more than half of UK savers are hoarding their hard-earned cash in zero-interest current accounts Credit: Getty A staggering £297billion is sat in current accounts that pay zero interest – meaning millions are missing out on easy money. The research, by Opinium for Hargreaves Lansdown, found 56% of savers are parking their hard-earned money in accounts that give them absolutely nothing back – a 20% rise from last year. And it's younger savers who are feeling the pinch the most, with 67% of 18–34-year-olds admitting to stashing savings in current accounts – rather than moving it to proper savings pots. Even higher-rate taxpayers (81%) and investors (83%) are falling into the trap. So why are we doing it? Almost half (46%) said they want quick access to their money for emergencies, while 15% said they couldn't be bothered to move it, 14% preferred having everything in one place and 13% admitted they just hadn't got around to switching. But Sarah Coles, personal finance boss at Hargreaves Lansdown, says savers are 'paying a big price for a misguided sense of comfort'. She warns of two big dangers with the current account habit – the first being overspending. 'You don't have to transfer cash from another account in order to spend it, you just spend as normal – and find yourself eating away at your savings,' she said. One in five admitted they've burned through savings without even realising. Easy Income Boosters Money Making Tips You Need to Know The second danger is inflation. Coles explains: 'With inflation around 3.5%, a household holding £3,365 in a zero-interest account would lose £114 in spending power in just one year.' Those sitting on £10,180 would lose £344 annually – and over five years, £3,365 could shrink by £532. Coles says Brits could be earning 4.5% or more interest by switching to an online savings platform. 'These sites let you track everything in one place – and snap up the best rates without drowning in paperwork,' she added. How do I find the best savings rates? WITH your current savings rates in mind, don't waste time looking at individual banking sites to compare rates - it'll take you an eternity. Research price comparison websites such as and MoneySupermarket. These will help you save you time and show you the best rates available. They also let you tailor your searches to an account type that suits you. As a benchmark, you'll want to consider any account that currently pays more interest than the current level of inflation - 2%. It's always wise to have some money stashed inside an easy-access savings account to ensure you have quick access to cash to deal with any emergencies like a boiler repair, for example. If you're saving for a long-term goal, then consider locking some of your savings inside a fixed bond, as these usually come with the highest savings rates. Moral of the story? Ditch the dead accounts – and make your money work for you. Time to ditch zombie savings accounts You might want to keep money in a current account paying no interest because you need to use it for daily expenses. But, if you've got cash stashed away in a savings account paying little to no interest, it pays to switch to a different one. The latest data from Moneyfactscompare shows some savings accounts are paying as little as 0.49% interest on minimum £1 deposits. However, there are a range of bank accounts offering rates over 5%, including across easy access savings accounts and Cash ISAs. According to Moneyfactscompare, Chip's Easy Access Saver is offering the highest rate across easy access savings accounts, then Atom Bank's Instant Saver Reward - with rates of 4.76% and 4.75%, respectively. Savers can also get rates of up to 5.71% on easy access Cash ISAs, according to the price comparison website. Make sure you're picking the best savings account for your needs though. ISAs are a great way to save money as any interest earned is tax-free, which is not the case for easy access savings accounts. A lot of savings accounts set a limit on the amount of withdrawals you can make per year before incurring a fee too. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories
