Oxford could become first city in 20 years to launch congestion charge
Oxford, which has many narrow medieval streets, has been named as one of the most congested cities in the UK.
The county council, run by the Liberal Democrats, has previously taken controversial steps to tackle the issue, including launching low-traffic neighbourhoods in parts of the city.
Its cabinet will vote on the congestion charge proposal on June 17. If approved, a public consultation will begin on June 23, with the measures potentially being introduced by the autumn.
The scheme would be enforced using automatic number plate recognition cameras at six key locations in the city but would only apply to cars. Other motor vehicles, including vans, HGVs and coaches, and cars with a permit, would be exempt.
The council said it would help improve bus services in the area and make it easier for those with permits, including carers, traders and blue badge holders, to travel by car around the city.
It insisted the charge would be temporary and would eventually be replaced by traffic filters, which limit through-traffic along a section of a road to certain modes of transport such as cars. A fine of £70 would apply to those who break the rules.
The filters are intended to be introduced when Botley Road, a major street in the city that has been closed for more than two years, reopens in August 2026.
Councils clash
Oxford city council, a separate local authority, criticised the scheme. Susan Brown, the council's leader, said on Monday: 'There has been no engagement with businesses, residents or the city council until today – yet again the city is being done to rather than engaged with in preparing transport proposals.
'We are concerned that this scheme allows people who can afford to do so to buy access to our streets. Those who can't will struggle.'
Andrew Gant, the county council's transport chief, described the city council's comments as 'disappointing'.
He added: 'They may be reassured as they learn more about proposals to manage traffic in and around the city. The city council has asked us to take action and that is exactly what this is.
'The recommendation is to engage with businesses, residents and organisations on this idea for a congestion charge to improve bus services and travel around the city for everyone.
'Any revenue from this scheme would by law be spent on improving travel. This is a bespoke idea for Oxford, it is not the same as a London congestion charge.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
9 minutes ago
- BBC News
Cardiff University defends job cuts process amid crisis claims
Cardiff University bosses have defended the way a process to cut hundreds of jobs and axe some departments has been evidence to a Senedd Committee, Vice Chancellor Prof Wendy Larner said it had been "difficult" but they had taken "the right approach".Prof Larner was asked whether announcing plans to close some departments, including nursing and then "backtracking" had been wise in view of the impact on staff morale and the institution's comes after a union claimed the process had led to a "severe and urgent mental health crisis" among staff. Proposals initially included cutting 400 jobs and closing some subject areas including music, modern languages and nursing, which will now be during the consultation period and more than 150 staff leaving voluntarily also led to a reduction in the number of posts to be cut - currently down to 69 by 2029-30 Prof Larner told MSs. She said she was "delighted by the quality of the alternative proposals" which enabled them to change the initial plans "quite significantly".But she confirmed the business case going to the university council for sign off on 17 June would still mean stopping ancient history and religion and asked whether she had any regrets about the process, she said she regretted that some members of staff had learnt their jobs were at risk through media coverage after a "leak" of also expressed regret that the university had received an "undue share of attention" for the cuts despite many other universities facing similar challenges."Our intention all the way through has been to ensure that Cardiff University is successful for the future," she said. Prof Larner and chairman of the University Council Patrick Younge's appearance in front of MSs follows the University and College Union's (UCU) claim there was a "total health and safety crisis" at the said there had been a "comprehensive breakdown of trust and morale" between university bosses and staff."I think we've worked really hard to do what we can to ensure that staff have been adequately supported", said Prof Younge said the university had been "blindsided" by the UCU referring it to the Health and Safety Executive when it was due to agree a strategy to address the union's to the union's move, he said he was "deeply disappointed in some of the behaviours." Mr Younge outlined the financial challenges facing the university and said its reserves had to be spent on securing the university's future - including improving halls of residence which, he said, required a spend of £300m to £ about the university's new campus in Kazakhstan's capital, Astana, Prof Larner said the university had spent money on "due diligence" but the campus, which opens in September, was paid for by partners in said so far there had been 186 application for the two foundation courses initially offered on the site which was part of a "slow rollout".In response, Cardiff UCU said it remained "deeply concerned" about the proposed added the changes risked affecting the university's "ability to contribute" to teaching, research and training in Wales.
BreakingNews.ie
10 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Public Services Card database of millions of Irish people's faces declared illegal
The Data Protection Commission (DPC) has found that the collection of facial (biometric) data for the Public Services Card (PSC) is unlawful. The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL) said it partially welcomes the findings, but said the decision is "more than a decade late and inadequate". Advertisement The Government had previously claimed that the facial records were not biometric data. On Thursday, the DPC found that the Department of Social Protection (DSP) unlawfully collected facial records (biometric data) from 70 per cent of the population of Ireland over 15 years. In addition, the ICCL said the department failed to tell people why it was collecting their facial records and whether it was legal. In light of the infringements discovered by the DPC, it reprimanded the Department of Social Protection by issuing administrative fines totalling €550,000. It also issued an order to the department requiring it to cease processing of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration within nine months of this decision if the department cannot identify a valid lawful basis. Advertisement Deputy commissioner, Graham Doyle, said: 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the rollout of SAFE 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. "The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with SAFE 2 registration in the context of this inquiry. "This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for SAFE 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates SAFE 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.' 'Illegal facial database' The ICCL said the Data Protection Commission failed to take decisive action on Thursday and said that, after 15 years, its actions are not enough. Advertisement The ICCL is insisting on the immediate deletion of the illegal facial data database. It has also called for the department and the DPC to explain to the Oireachtas and the public how this system was permitted to operate unlawfully for so long. Executive Director of ICCL, Joe O'Brien, said: 'For many years, ICCL and our colleagues at Digital Rights Ireland, have argued that the PSC's mandatory use of facial recognition technology is unlawful. 'This is a partial win for the privacy and data protection rights of people living in Ireland. It confirms what we have advocated for, for many years - that the Public Services Card, which was estimated to have cost the State €100 million, trespassed upon human rights and infringed EU and Irish law. 'The DPC decision is over a decade late and does not go far enough. The Department effectively created a de facto national biometric ID system by stealth over 15-plus years without a proper legal foundation. This illegal database of millions of Irish people's biometric data must be deleted.'
The Sun
10 minutes ago
- The Sun
Grandfather left £45k out of pocket after purchasing a caravan from Haven Holidays – ‘the worst decision I've ever made'
A GRANDFATHER has been left £45,000 out of pocket after purchasing a caravan from Haven Holidays. Despite the vehicle being worth less than £15,000, spiralling costs have left him saying "it's the worst decision I've ever made". 3 3 Christopher Jeff, 60, bought the caravan in 2023 in Doniford Bay holiday park, Somerset in 2023. He and his wife Ida, 56, had first visited 13 years ago before deciding to put some of his pension money towards the vehicle when they visited with their grandson Theo two years ago. He told BPM Media: "We knew we couldn't afford a brand new caravan but we found what we thought was a nice one that was a bit older for £14,859. "I had to cash in a good chunk of my pension to pay for the caravan. "I thought it would be worth it for some family holidays away from the rat race." The old caravan quickly began racking up additional costs, as Christopher spent more than £10,000 refitting the caravan he purchased as a leaseholder from Haven Holidays. This included kitting the vehicle out with a microwave, fridge freezer and bedding - costing around £5,000. On top of these costs, the couple were "encouraged" to buy side decking, a storage box and a bench, all of which came to just under £5,000. Even the ground rent - a fee paid by leaseholders to freeholders - was more than Christopher and Ida expected. This added another £6,000 in annual fees - a cost that has since gone up to £8,161. Haven Holidays say that the purchase and license agreement clearly states the total site fees, the basis for fee increases, and the period the park is open. Christopher says that Haven Holidays advised the couple to rent out the caravan to help cover their growing expenses. However, in order to cover the thousands of pounds in ground rent, the caravan would need to be rented out every single week of the season for £450. This was made even more difficult by the fact that Haven Holidays were reportedly offering cheaper rents on their own caravans. Christopher said: "Haven were undercutting us by renting their own caravans cheaper all season long - sometimes £150 for a week in the off season." As a result, the couple only managed to rent the caravan out for five weeks in 2024. With much of the annual cost unaccounted for, Ida's income from working in sales was used to cover the shortfall. Christopher estimates that the caravan costs £1,500 a day of use in real terms, as 30 days onsite has cost the couple £45,000. He said: "It's just too expensive to own one of these units. We have only holidayed in it for ten long weekends." The couple faced further financial insecurity after a national grid failure damaged a lot of electrical appliances at the park, leading them to be told their boiler would need replacing. However, after three months and three visits from contractors, they were eventually told they didn't need any repairs as they had a water heater, not a boiler. A spokesperson for Haven Holidays say that they worked "as quickly as possible" to fix issues and that this was at no cost to Mr Jeff. The costs have become so unbearable that the couple has tried to sell the caravan - but this too would lose them money. While they paid nearly £15,000 for the vehicle, they are yet to receive an offer for more than £3,000, with Haven Holidays taking a 15% commission of any sales. Mr Jeff said: "Nobody wants to buy a caravan and take on the commitment of paying over £8,000 for nine months of caravan access. "Especially when you can't rent it out and break even because its cheaper for guests to go directly through Haven." In a desperate bid to resolve their financial problems, they reached out to European Consumer Claims who have taken on the case with the hopes of getting the couple their money back. CEO of ECC Greg Wilson said: "When we first started looking into holiday park consumer abuse we were aware that there were issues. However the sheer scale of wrongdoing was shocking even to us." The company is working with leading consumer lawyers to seek financial compensation for people who have been swindled by unexpected fees. Haven owns a number of holiday parks around the UK, primarily found along the coastline, including in Yorkshire, the Lake District, Scotland and Cornwall. A Haven Holidays spokesperson said: "Haven is committed to ensuring full transparency at every stage of the buying and selling process and clearly communicates with owners the different options available to them - including the total site fees for that year, the basis for subsequent increases and period the park is open during the year – as well as any associated terms and conditions. "The decking was installed at Mr. Jeffs' request; however, the other items mentioned (including the storage box, microwave, fridge freezer, bedding, and bench) were not purchased from Haven, and we are therefore unable to comment on them.'
