Finland again summons Russian diplomat over a suspected airspace violation
HELSINKI (Reuters) -Finland's foreign ministry said on Wednesday it had summoned Russia's top diplomat to Helsinki over a suspected June 10 violation of Finnish airspace, the second such event in under three weeks.
NATO member Finland on Tuesday said it believed a Russian military aircraft entered its airspace off the coast of Porvoo in the southern part of the Nordic country, and that the Finnish Border Guard was investigating the incident.
"The foreign ministry has invited Russia's acting head of mission to speak on the issue today," the Finnish ministry said in a statement to Reuters.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Australia to boost aerial surveillance of Pacific for illegal fishing fleets
By Kirsty Needham SYDNEY (Reuters) -Australia plans to significantly boost surveillance of Pacific Islands territorial waters, spending A$477 million ($310.72 million) on aerial patrols for illegal fishing fleets, tender documents viewed by Reuters show, as China takes steps towards sending its coast guard to the region. Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will visit Fiji on Friday, the Fiji Times newspaper reported, after the government of Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka last week approved a maritime security agreement that will see Australia fund a patrol boat for Fiji. Australia will operate commercial aerial patrols to support Pacific Island countries monitoring exclusive economic zones which span millions of kilometres of ocean. Efforts to tackle illegal fishing also led to a new monitoring centre being opened in Fiji in April. Australia's defence department declined to comment on the aerial tender, and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy did not respond to a request for comment. Reuters reported last week that China's coast guard is taking further steps towards high seas boarding of fishing boats in the Pacific for the first time, risking tensions with Taiwanese fleets that also ply the region. The Chinese Coast Guard demonstrated the capabilities of one of its largest ships, used to enforce maritime law in the Taiwan Strait, to 10 Pacific Island ministers, including Fiji's, in China a fortnight ago. China has registered 26 coast guard vessels for Pacific Ocean patrols with the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, although it is yet to conduct an inspection, WCPFC officials said. China declined to comment. Australia has gifted two dozen patrol boats to Pacific Island nations, and operates navy and air force patrols for illegal fishing in the region several times a year. Sangaa Clark, chief executive of the Parties to the Nauru Agreement, representing nine Pacific Island countries controlling the world's largest tuna fishery, said the group has not invited China to conduct coast guard patrols, and instead relied on Australian-funded surveillance and patrols by Australia, New Zealand, France and the United States. Pacific security expert Peter Connolly, a fellow at the University of New South Wales, said Chinese Coast Guard patrols in the region would "introduce geostrategic tensions to the policing of the Pacific's fisheries". "This is particularly likely because the two most common nationalities of illegal fishermen in the Pacific have been from the PRC and from Taiwan," he said, referring to the People's Republic of China. ($1 = 1.5352 Australian dollars)
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pope names Chinese bishop as he keeps historic Vatican-Beijing accord
Pope Leo XIV has appointed the first Chinese bishop of his papacy, signalling that he will continue a historic agreement that sought to improve relations between the Vatican and China. Both sides have hailed the appointment of Fuzhou Auxiliary Bishop Joseph Lin Yuntuan as an affirmation of their commitment to the 2018 accord, which was reached under the late Pope Francis. The agreement gave Chinese officials some input on the appointment of bishops. However, its contents were never fully disclosed to the public. Beijing insists that the state must approve the appointment of bishops in China, running contrary to the Catholic Church's insistence that it is a papal decision. China has some 10 million Catholics. Currently, they face the choice of attending state-sanctioned churches approved by Beijing or worshipping in underground congregations that have sworn allegiance to the Vatican. On Wednesday, the Vatican said Yuntuan's ministry had been "recognised" by Chinese law. "This event constitutes a further fruit of the dialogue between the Holy See and the Chinese Authorities and is an important step in the journey of communion of the Diocese," the Vatican said. When asked about Yuntuan's appointment, foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian told reporters on Thursday that this showed how the 2018 agreement had been "smoothly implemented", state media reported. China is willing to work with the Vatican to continue improving relations, he said. The Pope's move shows a "willingness to support reconciliation instead of antagonism", Michel Chambon, a research fellow at the Asia Research Institute in Singapore who has written extensively about the Catholic Church, told Reuters news agency. In September 2018, Pope Francis recognised seven bishops appointed by China. The Vatican also posthumously recognised an eighth bishop who died the year before. China first broke off diplomatic ties with the Holy See in 1951, and many Catholics were forced to go underground during former communist leader Mao Zedong's rule, emerging only in the 1980s when religious practices were tolerated again. China, the Vatican and a controversial deal Pope and China in historic deal on bishops
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' as US evacuates bases and embassies
Israel is considering launching a military strike against Iran in the coming days without American support, according to Western officials. The officials said fears of either no deal or a weak deal between Donald Trump, the president of the United States, and the Islamic Republic to curtail its nuclear programme had forced Israeli strategists to consider a unilateral attack against Tehran. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors found that Iran had broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. The governors demanded Iran provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. Iran is believed to have enriched uranium to at least 60 per cent, putting it within 'sprint' distance of a potential nuclear device. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location' and 'significantly' increasing its production of enriched uranium. Behrouz Kamalvandi, spokesman for Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation, said: 'We are replacing all of these first-generation machines with sixth-generation advanced machines' at the Fordow uranium enrichment plant south of Tehran. He added this means 'our production of enriched material will increase significantly'. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, adding that a 'friendly' country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel. The official said the tensions were aimed at influencing Tehran to 'change its position about its nuclear rights' during talks with the US on Sunday in Oman. US-Iran negotiations to curb Tehran's programme have been continuing for several weeks now. There had been indications in recent days that the two sides might be close to closing on a framework that includes provisions about uranium enrichment that Israel views as unacceptable. However, Mr Trump told a New York Post podcast on Wednesday he was 'less confident' about the prospects of a deal, having accused Tehran of adopting a hardline position. Israel, which is not a party to the discussions, has demanded a complete dismantling of Iran's nuclear programme. The US is now 'on alert' for the possibility of an Israeli strike, Western officials told US media outlets, with officials preparing to send home non-essential staff and families in its embassies in the Middle East, ahead of a potential Iranian retaliation. The embassy in Baghdad is currently planning an 'ordered evacuation', according to sources. The White House has also ordered its other missions within range of Iranian missiles to provide risk assessments. The United Kingdom Maritime and Trade Organisation has issued a warning urging vessels using the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz to exercise heightened caution. Military and intelligence chiefs have been concerned for several months that Mr Trump might strike a 'soft' deal with Iran that does not guarantee the Jewish state's long-term security – in order to establish his legacy as a peacemaker. The broad consensus in Israel has been that a unilateral strike on Iran would be unthinkable. Despite a slight cooling of relations with Mr Trump in recent weeks, it is thought unlikely Benjamin Netanyahu, the prime minister of Israel, would be willing to embarrass his greatest ally in the middle of negotiations. Additionally, while Israel reportedly has the military capability to set Tehran back, it is thought that only with US support could they be sure of profoundly damaging the programme. The US alone has the capability to sustain an air campaign over several days; it has crucial refuelling aircraft, plus strategic bombers that can drop clusters of specialist munitions that have the best chance of punching through the thick rock that protects some of Iran's nuclear development sites. Iran also has large stockpiles of non-nuclear ballistic missiles which it would likely launch at Israel in retaliation. While Israel has a sophisticated missile defence system, this can be overwhelmed by a large barrage, and it would require active US support in protecting its cities. Despite the desirability of US support, Israeli military chiefs are understood to be frustrated that their ideal window for an attack is closing, while Mr Trump's talks force them to sit on their hands. Israel destroyed a key Iranian S-300 aerial defence system last year, while Hezbollah in Lebanon is all but defeated, reducing the chance of a meaningful retaliation against Israel's northern border communities. However, it is thought that neither advantage will last indefinitely. In April, The New York Times revealed that Mr Trump had, some weeks earlier, warned Mr Netanyahu off a unilateral strike as early as this spring. In his first term, he pulled the US out of a multinational agreement that relaxed economic sanctions on Iran in return for curbs on its enrichment process, brokered by Barack Obama. The aim of that deal was to keep Iran at least 12 months away from being able to build a nuclear warhead. Since Mr Trump upended the deal, Tehran has enriched uranium to about 60 per cent. Although it claims that this is for civilian purposes, numerous experts and watchdogs say there is no justifiable military purpose for such highly enriched uranium. US officials are reportedly concerned that, if pushed, Iran could engineer a 'crude' nuclear bomb in a matter of weeks. However, it would likely have to be delivered on a truck or a ship, as miniaturising it on to a ballistic missile would take longer and be more likely to be detected by the US and Israel. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
