China's top diplomat visits Europe pitching closer ties in 'volatile' world
Wang Yi's tour will take him to the European Union's headquarters in Brussels as well as France and Germany as China seeks to improve relations with the bloc as a counterweight to superpower rival the United States.
But deep frictions remain over the economy -- including a yawning trade deficit of $357.1 billion between China and the EU -- and Beijing's close ties with Russia despite Moscow's war in Ukraine.
"The world is undergoing an accelerated evolution of a century-old change, with unilateralism, protectionism and bullying behaviour becoming rampant," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said on Friday -- a thinly veiled swipe against the United States under President Donald Trump.
In that context, Guo said, Beijing and the European bloc must "keep the world peaceful and stable, safeguard multilateralism, free trade, international rules, fairness and justice, and act firmly as anchors of stability and constructive forces in a volatile world".
Wang will meet with his EU counterpart, Kaja Kallas, at the bloc's headquarters in Brussels for "high-level strategic dialogue".
In Germany, he will hold talks with Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on diplomacy and security -- his first visit since Berlin's new conservative-led government took power in May.
And in France, Wang will meet minister for Europe and foreign affairs Jean-Noel Barrot, who visited China in March.
The war in Ukraine will likely be high on the agenda, with European leaders having been forthright in condemning what they say is Beijing's backing for Moscow.
China has portrayed itself as a neutral party in Russia's more than three-year war with Ukraine.
But Western governments say Beijing's close ties have given Moscow crucial economic and diplomatic support, and they have urged China to do more to press Russia to end the war.
Trade tensions
Ties between Europe and China have also strained in recent years as the EU seeks to get tougher on what it says are unfair economic practices by Beijing.
After the European bloc placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle imports, China retaliated with its own duties, including on French cognac.
An agreement on cognac has been reached with Beijing but not formally approved by the Chinese commerce ministry, a source in the French economy ministry told AFP.
The source said finalization was partially linked with the EU's ongoing negotiations over EVs.
Tensions flared this month after the EU banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros ($5.8 million), in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market.
The latest salvo in trade tensions between the 27-nation bloc and China covered a wide range of healthcare supplies, from surgical masks to X-ray machines, that represent a market worth 150 billion euros in the EU.
In response, China accused the European Union of "double standards".
Another sticking point has been rare earths.
Beijing has since April required licences to export these strategic materials from China, which accounts for almost two-thirds of rare earth mining production and 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency.
The metals are used in a wide variety of products, including electric car batteries, and there has been criticism from industries about the way China's licences have been issued.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
39 minutes ago
- Euronews
France sets framework for EU's 2040 climate targets
The battle to reach Europe's 2040 climate targets has begun. On 2 July, the European Commission is due to present its proposals for reducing CO2 emissions. It is expected to announce a 90% reduction to take the EU towards carbon neutrality by 2050. This proposal comes at a time when the European Green Deal is being called into question and the EU's competitiveness is being strengthened in the face of international competition. Member states are preparing their political arguments for the debate. France has already taken the first offensive at last week's European summit, setting out its framework. "I'm in favour of having these targets in 2040, but basically I said some very simple things. Firstly, if we want these targets by 2040, we have to give ourselves the means to do so and make them compatible with our competitiveness. What does that mean? Technological neutrality, flexibility, investment," French President Emmanuel Macron said at the end of the meeting of the 27 EU leaders. Flexibility: the word has been thrown around and is used repeatedly in Europe's corridors of power. The Commission has also adopted the same term. The Vice-President of the institution responsible for the Clean, Fair and Competitive Transition seems ready to grant flexibility to convince capitals. "Reducing our emissions by 90% by 2040 is a clear objective. We then need to discuss how we can combine the different elements, the possible flexibilities," Teresa Ribera told Euronews. The grey area of flexibility For environmental NGOs, the figure of 90% reduction in emissions is an important marker, but they do not wish to limit the debate to this numerical assessment. Several organisations are warning of the flexibility and possible flaws in the Commission's proposal. Flexibility could take the form of international credits. "Essentially, the EU and its member states could pay other countries outside the EU to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. This amount would then be included in the 90% of greenhouse gas emissions within the EU's borders," explains Michael Sicaud-Clyet, Climate Governance Officer at WWF EU. For him, this political sleight of hand is "a major problem, because it will divert investment to industry, or to people and municipalities outside the EU and it will cost more and have less positive impact on people and industry in the EU." Other forms of flexibility could involve absorbing carbon through carbon sinks, which are natural carbon absorbers, and permanent absorbers, which are technologies whose large-scale development has not yet been proven", warns Michael Sicaud-Clyet. Time for negotiations France says it does not want to rush the negotiations. The 2040 targets "cannot be a technical debate that takes place in a few weeks. It must be a democratic debate," Macron warned. "It's not a target for Belém (the Brazilian city will host COP30, the UN climate conference, this year). If we have it for Belém, great. If it's going to take longer, let's take longer to do it right." The President repeated his mantra of "flexibility, investment, technological neutrality and trade coherence, meaning that if we set targets for 2040, we want a trade policy that protects us." In this debate, Paris should be able to count on the support of Budapest and Warsaw. However, other member states such as Germany, Spain, Finland and Denmark (which holds the six-month EU presidency from 1 July) fully support the 90% emissions reduction target . The WWF EU also mentions a number of "swing states," countries that are keeping their final position vague. For the European Commission, it is vital that the EU does not miss the turning point represented by the 2040 target. "I think this could be a mistake. I think that this year (2025) marks the 10th anniversary of the Paris Agreement (on climate), and we want to determine how we can continue to make progress in an area that we consider essential for the economic and social well-being of Europeans," says Teresa Ribera. The Spanish official also opened the door to debate. "We will have to identify the challenges that lie ahead, while trying to reach an agreement between all the European countries."
France 24
2 hours ago
- France 24
China says aircraft carriers conduct combat training in Pacific
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) said its Liaoning and Shandong carrier formations "recently... completed combat training on the high seas and returned to their home ports safely". The mission was "routine training organised in accordance with annual plans", the military said on an official social media account without disclosing the dates or precise locations of the manoeuvres. The carriers conducted joint combat and systems training as well as reconnaissance, early warning, anti-strike, sea assault, air defence and night flight training, the PLA said. State broadcaster CCTV published a video of sleek grey warplanes soaring into the air from the runway on the deck of one of the carriers. Other clips showed two planes flying in close formation, as well as a helicopter, with navy personnel watching through binoculars. Recent Chinese manoeuvres in the Pacific have caused particular concern in Japan, which said this month it detected the two aircraft carriers operating simultaneously in the Pacific for the first time, indicating China's intention to improve operational capacity in remote areas. Tokyo also said Chinese fighters took off from the Shandong and flew within 45 metres (150 feet) of a Japanese military patrol plane. Chinese officials disputed the account at the time, blaming the incident on the Japanese aircraft. The PLA acknowledged on Monday that "during the drills, foreign warships and aircraft approached (the carriers) several times to conduct reconnaissance, tracking and surveillance". "The formations maintained a high alert level and a responsive combat status throughout the process, organised combat takeoffs of carrier-based aircraft many times, and handled affairs professionally and steadily," it said. China has ploughed billions of dollars into modernising its military in recent years, a trend that has unnerved some governments in East Asia even though Beijing claims its aims are peaceful. The Liaoning and Shandong are China's only two carriers currently in operation, but a third -- the Fujian -- is undergoing sea trials. A Taiwanese security official also said this month that Beijing had deployed its two aircraft carrier groups around the island in May. The Communist Party has refused to rule out using force to seize control of Taiwan, a democratic, self-ruled island that Beijing insists is part of its territory.
Local France
2 hours ago
- Local France
What is France's Loi Duplomb and why are farmers protesting about it?
Back in January 2024, French farmers began a series of protests that included roadblocks on motorways and a 'siege' of the city of Paris. Their demands were varied, but among them was a request for a simplification and scaling back of the rules and paperwork that French farmers operate under. Eighteen months on, a piece of legislation that attempts to address those demands is coming before the French parliament - the Loi Duplomb, named after the right-wing Senator Laurent Duplomb who introduced it. The bill aims to "lift the constraints on the profession of agriculture". It has some measures to simplify the paperwork that farmers must deal with, which are relatively uncontroversial, but the other aspect of "lifting constraints" goes much further - relaxing or scrapping altogether rules relating to the use of pesticides, insecticides and other chemicals as well as rules on water storage and extraction. Advertisement Do farmers support it? This bill illustrates neatly why it's impossible to talk about 'the farmers' - agriculture is a huge and very varied industry that does not speak with one voice. Different types of farmers have different needs and problems, and sometimes those interests are in direct competition. The Loi Duplomb is supported by France's largest farming union the FNSEA - this union is dominated by the large cereal farmers and agri-businesses. They say that they face unfair competition because they cannot use certain types of pesticides and weedkillers which are legal in other EU countries. However other farmers and agricultural producers - especially beekeepers - are staunchly opposed to the Loi Duplomb, with many holding protests over the weekend. The country's third largest farming union, Confédération paysanne which advocates an agro-ecological transition, is opposed to the bill, but the Jeunes Agriculteurs (young farmers) union supports it. What's in the bill? The bill is wide-ranging and contains provisions on a number of topics. Among the most controversial are the relaxing of the rules on pesticide use and changes to rules on water storage. Also proposed are a relaxation around the rules on constructing new agricultural buildings and a weakening of the powers of the French biodiversity office. Advertisement Particularly controversial is the proposal to allow farmers to use a currently banned type of insecticide - acétamipride - which can be fatal to bees. Christian Pons, president of the beekeepers' union Union nationale de l'apiculture française (Unaf) denounced the law , which he says "claims to defend food sovereignty, but since when has it been acceptable to destroy one sector, that of beekeepers, in order to save another, that of hazelnut trees, for example?" Water storage and in particular the building of new water storage sites would be made easier under the Loi Duplomb, with exemptions granted to general rules that require any new project to protect local biodiversity. With increasing temperatures and drought, water supplies are likely to become more and more of a flashpoint in the years to come - in France the issue already led to violent clashes in the south-west town of Sainte-Soline where giant underground water storage basins were being built. Advertisement Farmers insisted the water storage basins were necessary to deal with drought, environmental campaigners accused them of diverting water supplies from local people and effectively trying to 'privatise' water. "The proposed Loi Duplomb will be detrimental to the proper functioning of natural environments, at a time when more than a third of France is already suffering from structural water shortages," said the group France nature environnement , adding that the water clauses of the bill are "yet another gift to a few industrial farmers, and detrimental to future production capacities". Environmental groups including Greenpeace have also raised concerns over the bill. So what next? Debates begin in the French parliament this week and are expected to be finely balanced, making it unclear whether the text will pass. Even within the government there are divisions - the agriculture minister Annie Genevard has asked MPs not to oppose it, saying that "farmers need it", while the environment minister Agnès Pannier-Runacher has said she is against the section on relaxing pesticide rules. The debates are expected to last at least a week, while if the law is passed it would likely need to be referred to the Conseil constitutionnel , which will judge whether the bill strikes a balance with France's environmental obligations. Further protests are also possible - the FNSEA began preemptive protests in May in an attempt to pressure MPs into supporting the bill, while environmental groups and other farming unions may continue protests against the bill.
