Rewiring HR: How technology and AI are redefining the HR function
In 2025, HR has moved from peripheral to pivotal. From onboarding to offboarding – and every regulatory, engagement and talent challenge in between – the function now touches nearly every strategic lever in a business. At the centre of this evolution is technology and now, AI.
HR professionals are being called upon to not only navigate complexity, but to lead through it – often with limited resources and rising expectations. This has made the HR tech stack not just a nice-to-have, but a necessity, particularly as artificial intelligence enters the picture in a meaningful, practical way.
Here are three of the shifts reshaping how HR leaders operate – and why these tools are no longer just about efficiency, but impact.
1. HR systems are converging – and that's a good thing
For many years, HR systems have been fragmented: payroll often lives in one platform, onboarding in another and engagement tools are tacked on as an afterthought. The result, however, is often time lost to double-handling, poor data visibility and missed insights.
But this is changing. Businesses are increasingly moving toward centralised, cloud-based Employment Operating Systems (eOS) – platforms designed to bring everything from compliance tracking to recruitment, performance reviews and employee engagement under one digital roof.
This kind of integration doesn't just make admin easier, iIt offers something much more powerful: a single source of truth. When systems talk to each other, HR teams can see emerging issues and trends in real time, respond proactively and make more confident decisions.
As expectations grow around employee experience, governance and ROI, this centralisation gives HR professionals the ability to turn insights into actions faster – from addressing turnover patterns to improving onboarding timelines.
2. Compliance is getting more complex – and more manageable
New Zealand employers in particular are dealing with an unprecedented wave of compliance change. From upcoming Holidays Act reforms to a more prescriptive personal grievance process, shifting health and safety obligations and evolving visa and minimum wage requirements – staying compliant is no longer a passive process.
Even the most well-resourced HR teams can struggle to keep pace and for smaller businesses, the risk of missing a critical update or misinterpreting a new obligation is high – and the consequences can be costly.
That's why technology is increasingly becoming a compliance partner, not just a tool. Smart HR systems now provide real-time updates, pre-built policy templates and automated entitlements calculations. In practice, this means less time spent deciphering legislation and more time spent applying it meaningfully – all while significantly reducing the margin for error.
With AI-supported workflows, even complex processes like visa status management, leave accruals or disciplinary documentation can now be streamlined with greater accuracy and auditability – creating peace of mind for employers and better protection for employees.
3. AI is reshaping how we hire and who we reach
Hiring has always been a high-stakes game, but in today's climate it's also a technology 'race'. Candidate expectations have shifted, recruitment channels are more competitive and the window to act on securing top talent is narrower than ever.
AI-powered hiring tools are becoming critical infrastructure in this new environment because these tools help HR teams screen CVs more efficiently, match candidates to job requirements with higher precision and support bias-aware decision-making through structured, data-informed shortlisting. Think of it as 'always-on' recruitment – where systems are continuously scanning the market for role matches, surfacing qualified candidates automatically and reducing the time it takes to move from vacancy to offer.
Early adopters are already reporting measurable impacts. For example, AI-assisted matching has been shown to shave up to two weeks off standard recruitment cycles. Beyond speed, this shift also supports better hiring decisions by amplifying reach and reducing human bottlenecks, enabling smaller HR teams to operate with the scale and intelligence of much larger ones.
The future of HR is already here – but are we ready?
What these three shifts point to is a broader truth: HR is no longer about processing work – it's about enabling performance. And in a world where people strategy is business strategy, the systems we use to support that function matter more than ever.
The rise of AI and integrated platforms isn't about replacing the human side of HR – it's about giving it the space and data it needs to thrive and add even more value. HR teams will always be the cultural glue of an organisation but the tools they use can now be the difference between surviving complexity and driving impact.
For New Zealand HR professionals, the opportunity is clear: by embracing these tools early and strategically, we position ourselves not just to meet change – but to lead it.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Pilots lose Employment Relations Authority battle with Jetstar
Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. Photo: 123RF Jetstar is entitled not to offer its pilots an alternative day off if they are on call on a public holiday but do not have to work, the Employment Relations Authority says. The New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association went to the authority alleging breaches of the Holidays Act and collective agreement for pilots. It argued that pilots were entitled to an alternative holiday when they were on standby during a public holiday, even if they were not called to work. The association - and two pilot members, Richard Greenslade and Greig Johnston - argued the restrictions on the pilots on standby were such that they could not enjoy a holiday as they normally would. They: The association said the limitations were made more onerous when pilots had to ensure they were contactable at all times while on standby. Pilots were restricted from observing occasions of national, religious or cultural significance and celebrating with friends and family. Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. It said that some of the restrictions were inherent for any employee on standby, and requirements such as abstaining from alcohol were not unique to standby pilots. Authority member Alex Leulu said there was no dispute that an employee on call would face some degree of restriction, including not being able to fully observe occasions of national, religious or cultural significance with some family and friends. "Given the nature of the pilot's role in this case, issues such as health and safety meant the Jetstar restrictions on the consumption of alcohol and medication were reasonable. The other restrictions such as limitation on activities and the requirement to attend work were not significantly onerous and were not outside the usual bounds of planning one might be expected to undertake knowing they are rostered to be on standby. "Johnston's evidence also focused on him residing in Bombay and the logistical difficulties and restrictions he faced trying to attend work within two hours after being called to duty while on standby. "It is difficult to understand how Jetstar could account for any restriction on a pilot based upon where they decide to reside. Where a pilot resides is ultimately a decision by the pilot knowing their employment obligations. Little weight can be given to Johnston's evidence in this regard." Leulu said the restrictions were not enough to conclude that pilots did not have a whole public holiday while on standby. "I accept the Jetstar pilots who are on standby during a public holiday are not entitled to an alternative holiday unless they are called to duty." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
5 days ago
- RNZ News
Pilots on standby on public holidays not entitled to alternative day off
Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. Photo: 123RF Jetstar is entitled not to offer its pilots an alternative day off if they are on call on a public holiday but do not have to work, the Employment Relations Authority says. The New Zealand Air Line Pilots' Association went to the authority alleging breaches of the Holidays Act and collective agreement for pilots. It argued that pilots were entitled to an alternative holiday when they were on standby during a public holiday, even if they were not called to work. The association - and two pilot members, Richard Greenslade and Greig Johnston - argued the restrictions on the pilots on standby were such that they could not enjoy a holiday as they normally would. They: The association said the limitations were made more onerous when pilots had to ensure they were contactable at all times while on standby. Pilots were restricted from observing occasions of national, religious or cultural significance and celebrating with friends and family. Jetstar argued there was no entitlement to an alternative holiday. It said that some of the restrictions were inherent for any employee on standby, and requirements such as abstaining from alcohol were not unique to standby pilots. Authority member Alex Leulu said there was no dispute that an employee on call would face some degree of restriction, including not being able to fully observe occasions of national, religious or cultural significance with some family and friends. "Given the nature of the pilot's role in this case, issues such as health and safety meant the Jetstar restrictions on the consumption of alcohol and medication were reasonable. The other restrictions such as limitation on activities and the requirement to attend work were not significantly onerous and were not outside the usual bounds of planning one might be expected to undertake knowing they are rostered to be on standby. "Johnston's evidence also focused on him residing in Bombay and the logistical difficulties and restrictions he faced trying to attend work within two hours after being called to duty while on standby. "It is difficult to understand how Jetstar could account for any restriction on a pilot based upon where they decide to reside. Where a pilot resides is ultimately a decision by the pilot knowing their employment obligations. Little weight can be given to Johnston's evidence in this regard." Leulu said the restrictions were not enough to conclude that pilots did not have a whole public holiday while on standby. "I accept the Jetstar pilots who are on standby during a public holiday are not entitled to an alternative holiday unless they are called to duty." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
17-06-2025
- Scoop
Current Sick Leave Entitlements ‘Manifestly Unfair'
An Auckland business owner says it is adding a significant burden in tough economic times. Checkpoint An Auckland business owner has described current sick leave entitlements 'manifestly unfair', adding it is a significant burden in tough economic times. In 2021 minimum paid sick leave for workers went from five to 10 days regardless of how often a person works. The government has confirmed it is changing the law to a pro-rata system, or proportional leave, where sick day allowances will be different for part and full-time workers depending on how many hours or days they work. The exact detail is yet to be decided. Kathy Aspden, who owns an entertainment business told Checkpoint her sick leave costs have increased 400 percent since the allowance doubled. 'In 2019 we had people taking 64 sick days off and that was basically about. 0.9 percent of our total wage bill. In 2025, we had 278.5 sick days and that was 2.4 percent of our total wage bill. Our costs went from $10,000 to $50,000,' she said. 'We have found that since the sick leave, entitlement has increased the number of people, the actual sick leave that's being used has increased as well.' Aspden said she supports the government push to switch to a proportional system. 'We have a lot of part time staff and having a person who works for us one day a week, being entitled to 10 days sick leave every year just doesn't feel proportionate. It basically means that they can have 20 percent of the year off sick, which doesn't happen very often to be honest. But every now and then it does get abused.' Aspden's company currently has around 50 part-time workers on its books, some working over 30 hours, others just one or two days a week. She said that due to the nature of the service industry, when one worker was off, another had to be brought in to cover, contributing to the company's costs. 'All businesses are doing it really tough at the moment and especially hospitality and entertainment businesses. We've been in the business for over 30 years now and I can't remember a time when it's been so difficult for businesses,' she said. 'All of these additional costs that we're having to fund really don't help us at all.' However, she said the reason sick leave taken by staff had increased so dramatically was hard to pinpoint. 'Since Covid people are more conscious of taking time off if they are sick and we fully encourage that the last thing we want is someone sick coming into work and making the rest of our team sick.' 'At the same time, we do have some people who are abusing it and just not really treating us fairly.' Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Checkpoint yesterday she had been looking at sick leave changes alongside ongoing work to replace the Holidays Act. She did not disclose whether the changes would be based on the days or hours people were working. But said she believed someone who worked 'what we expect to be a full week', would have the full entitlement, including someone who worked 40 hours in four days. Van Velden didn't give any evidence on how much sick leave part-timers were currently taking. 'That's not the reason behind doing this change,' she said. 'It's to do with whether it's right, and is it right that someone who is working one day a week is entitled to the same sick leave allocation as someone who works five days a week – that's what we are basing this policy on, whether it's right.'
