Toxic algae bloom kills hundreds of marine species in Australia
A toxic algal bloom in South Australia has killed over 200 marine species, including deepwater sharks, octopuses and leafy sea dragons, in what conservationists have called one of the worst marine die-offs the region has ever seen.
The algae, Karenia mikimotoi, has spread across more than 150km of coastline since it was first detected in March, nearly the size of the Kangaroo Island.
Since the algae appeared, local people and scientists have observed mass deaths of fish, shellfish, sharks, sea dragons, rays, cuttlefish, and deepwater species along the southern coastline.
South Australia 's environment minister said the outbreak had grown to an unprecedented scale. "It is a larger bloom than we have ever seen before," Susan Close said.
Scientists say that it is being fuelled by an ongoing marine heatwave, with sea temperatures 2.5C above average, and calm conditions that allow it to thrive.
Described as a 'toxic blanket', the bloom suffocates fish by damaging their gills and attacking red blood cells and the nervous system. It can lead to haemorrhaging and erratic behaviour in affected animals. 'It is like a horror movie for fish,' Brad Martin of OzFish told The Guardian.
Ms Close said there was not much the government could do. "The only thing that is going to break this bloom up is a change in the weather and starting to get strong westerly winds," she said.
An analysis of over 1,400 citizen science reports found around half of the dead species were ray-finned fish and more than a quarter were sharks and rays. Cephalopods like squid and cuttlefish and crustaceans such as crabs and lobsters were among the affected species as well.
Though not toxic to humans, the algae has caused skin irritation and respiratory symptoms in some beachgoers.
Authorities have temporarily closed several oyster farms and banned pipi harvesting in parts of South Australia.
An alarm about the bloom was first sounded by beachgoers back in March after thick foam and dead marine animals washed up on Waitpinga and Parsons beach on the Fleurieu Peninsula.
Professor Shauna Murray, a marine biologist at the University of Technology Sydney, identified the algae under a microscope and through DNA analysis.
She told The Guardian that K mikimotoi was known to produce reactive oxygen that could suffocate marine life.
South Australia's government said winds needed to disperse the algal bloom were being delayed by persistent high-pressure systems – another symptom of shifting climate patterns.
Authorities say the full ecological and economic impact of the bloom is yet to be understood but environmental groups urge improved monitoring and stronger action on marine heatwaves, which are growing much more frequent as oceans continue to warm.
Alongside the marine heatwave, southern Australia is suffering through one of the worst droughts on record.
Ms Close sounded the alarm on how climate change was making the crisis worse.
The minister said ocean monitoring showed 'a full-scale climate emergency in our coastal waters', with the bloom extending across an area roughly the size of Kangaroo Island and up to 20m deep.
'These extreme marine heat waves are not just anomalies, they are the new reality. And our marine ecosystems are the first casualties.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
18 hours ago
- The Guardian
Distorted moles to lesser bilbies: a new way to marvel at Australia's supremely weird and unique mammals
The skeleton of Australia's supremely weird southern marsupial mole has a distorted skull 'that looks like a god rammed it into a mountain side on its day of creation', says Vera Weisbecker. It is one of 189 Australian mammals in a new public database of 3D scans of bones and skeletons where users can spin the mole's skeleton around, zooming in and out, to marvel at its oddness. 'It's my favourite because that skeleton is a one-stop shop that dispels the myth that our animals are primitive – it's like the essence of mammal design in so many ways, with these claws like shovels so they can almost swim through the sand,' Weisbecker says. Weisbecker, an associate professor at Flinders University in South Australia, is a self-confessed 'militant' out to dispel what she says is a common scientific myth that Australia's marsupial mammals are less evolved. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton's Clear Air column as a free newsletter To help in her mission, she has led the creation of Ozboneviz – a virtual collection of 1,600 bones and skeletons for researchers, teachers, students, artists and anyone else who wants to gaze at mandibles, femurs or the skeletons of ringtail possums or brush-tailed phascogales. 'Australia leads the world in mammal extinctions, but we are losing far more than a few fluffy rat-like critters,' she says. 'Our mammals have evolved in isolation for nearly 40m years – there is simply nothing like them anywhere else. They're all so weird and diverse.' As a German native, she says many scientists in the northern hemisphere with a western scientific background see even the common kangaroo as exotic. Australia's marsupials, to them, are 'an alternative universe'. To create Ozboneviz, researchers spent three years travelling around Australian museums and universities digitising specimens using a 3D light scanner. Some complete specimens were put into CT scanners so the whole skeleton could be digitised – such as the ringtail possum, the rakali (a native water rat), the golden bandicoot and the northern quoll. But there are also more individual mandibles, skulls, femurs and ankle bones in the collection than you can shake a tibia-shaped stick at. The technical detail in the collection means the online specimens can be used to help researchers identify bones found in the field. Sign up to Clear Air Australia Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis after newsletter promotion 'Hopefully this will lead the way to an even wider use of digitisation to make Australia's unique local biodiversity accessible to the global public,' Weisbecker says. Ten extinct species have also been digitised, including the full skeleton of the lesser bilby and the skull of the thylacine, also known as the Tasmanian tiger that some scientists are trying to revive. The 3D files are housed in a repository called MorphoSource, but some of the more important and intriguing specimens have been uploaded to a site allowing users to spin and zoom the 3D images. 'This means the public can compare the cranium of a fox to a thylacine and dingo, for example, and compare the size and shape of limb bones of common marsupials,' says the Flinders University archaeologist Dr Erin Mein, of the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage. The project is described in an article in the scientific journal Bioscience.
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
'World's first coral-friendly sunscreen' unveiled in Derby
Scientists at the University of Derby say they have developed a sunscreen which could help corals team was working on the creation of a science-backed standard for reef-friendly sun protection when their lab experiments showed including certain nutrients in eco-friendly sunscreens helped some coral species grow - with one species increasing by almost a academic study revealed eight in 10 creams which say they are reef or ocean-friendly have not been rigorously tested, and some include chemicals proven to cause coral Derby scientists hope their new reef protection factors of gold, silver and bronze will eventually set the global industry standard. When hundreds of swimmers hit the water at the same time around a quarter of their sunscreen immediately washes off and creates an oily layer in the water. The impact on coral reefs and the marine life they support can be reefs around the world face a multitude of threats from climate change and ocean acidification, and the Derby research team set out to target one of the most preventable "stressors" for these the University of Derby's Aquatic Research Facility, team leader Prof Michael Sweet demonstrated how a small dab of "bad" sunscreen can start to kill tiny coral samples within hours of being added to laboratory tanks."We only started this experiment this morning," he said, fishing out a plug where a small coral fragment seems to be disintegrating. "Compared to the control tank, you can already see the tissue sloughing off the coral skeleton." The research started because the team and its commercial partners wanted to create a robust sunscreen accreditation system shoppers could trust. That meant designing a scientifically-validated test which brands would have to pass before they could claim to be "coral friendly" and earn their "reef protection factor" (RPF) of gold, silver or when research began, the concept of a coral-friendly sunscreen seemed unlikely."Originally I didn't think this was going to be possible," Prof Sweet said. "When [the nutrient-dense sunscreen] started showing a positive impact we knew we were on to something big." As part of the research, PhD student Triona Barker was asked to measure how corals responded when exposed to sunscreen without toxic chemicals but with added minerals and nutrients. The cocktail of ingredients was based on components known to be beneficial for cream was first tested to ensure it was safe for humans."We then dosed nine tanks over the course of 16 weeks," Ms Barker explained."At first we saw a growth of 8%, so we left it a bit longer. After 16 weeks [one coral species] had grown by 29%." Prof Sweet added: "We're not only avoiding any harm, we're actually feeding the corals as well." Wary of being accused of cosying up to commercial companies, Prof Sweet was determined the research would be conducted as non-profit. That meant the university had to pay the cost of the testing. "That was important to me," said Prof Sweet. "I had to stand up in front of my peers and the public and say this is truly reef-safe, as we have shown it to be... reaching a scientific consensus was a massive milestone for us."The research paper showing the university's test design and results is open-access and is now being scientifically first product to be certified under the new gold accreditation has been supported by the Tourism Authority of Thailand which recently arranged to hand it out on beaches in Thailand in exchange for non-accredited sunscreen. Now the university has been offered a profit share in Stream2Sea's "Coral Care", with the money ring-fenced for an educational fellowship programme to be launched globally in project is designed to raise public awareness of how sunscreen can damage marine life, with booklets being sent out to 600 schools. They also want to encourage manufacturers of other potentially damaging products such as shampoos and cosmetics to seek accreditation.
Reuters
2 days ago
- Reuters
Explainer: What is the High Seas Treaty to protect world oceans?
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - While many countries have agreed to take steps to protect the vast, ungoverned swathes of the world's oceans, they have yet to see their High Seas Treaty go into effect. This week's U.N. Oceans Conference in the French city of Nice hopes to change that. The treaty, signed in 2023, provides a legal framework for creating marine protected areas on the "high seas", or the ocean areas that lie beyond any national jurisdiction. Currently, less than 3% of the oceans are under some form of protection, although altogether the world's oceans cover two-thirds of the planet. The treaty contains 75 points covering areas such as protecting, caring for and ensuring responsible use of marine resources, and includes a provision for requiring environmental impact assessments of any economic activities in international waters. The treaty also aims to ensure that all countries have fair and equitable access to the ocean's resources. While it is widely referred to as the High Seas Treaty, officially it is called the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty. As of Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron said 50 countries had ratified the treaty, with 60 needed for it to go into effect. Separate to the High Seas Treaty, countries agreed under a 2022 U.N. biodiversity pact to put 30% of their territorial waters under conservation. Oceans support coastal economies and livelihoods through tourism, fishing, shipping, mining, offshore energy and more. Oceans also absorb about a third of the world's carbon dioxide, or CO2 - the primary gas driving climate change - while ocean-swimming phytoplankton provide about half of the world's oxygen. But marine life is now struggling, and human industry and development are almost entirely to blame. More than 1,500 ocean plants and animals are now at risk of extinction, and that number is expected to rise amid ongoing pollution, overfishing, ocean warming, opens new tab and acidification, according to scientists at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Additionally, new threats to ocean organisms and ecosystems could emerge in coming years in the form of deep-sea mining for rare-earth minerals. In Nice, Macron is expected to urge countries to support postponing sea-bed exploration while researchers work to understand deep sea ecosystems. Scientists are also concerned about the possibility that governments could look to modify ocean chemistry to boost its capacity for absorbing CO2 - a scenario that researchers say could help to limit global warming but could also have unintended consequences. Macron's news on Monday of 50 governments having ratified the treaty means it is still short by 10 signatures. The treaty will enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified it. Work then begins on setting up institutions and committees to implement the treaty, while its signatories expect to hold a first conference within a year. Despite its involvement in the original treaty negotiations, the United States under current President Donald Trump is not expected to ratify the treaty. Macron is co-hosting this third U.N. Oceans conference with Costa Rica, and with at least 55 heads of state, business leaders and civil society groups expected to attend the five-day event. Aside from discussions to advance the treaty, delegates are also expected this week to discuss overfishing, water pollution and other threats to marine life. They'll also be looking for fresh ideas on how to pay for it all - with ocean-linked financing lagging far behind other sustainable investment areas. For the five years spanning 2015-2019, ocean-related spending totalled $10 billion. By comparison, the U.N. estimates that every year at least $175 billion is needed for marine protection. The last U.N. oceans summit was held in Lisbon and co-hosted by Kenya in 2022. The next, co-hosted by Chile and Korea, is set for 2028.
