U.S. judge orders temporary halt to construction at Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz' detention centre
MIAMI — A U.S. federal judge on Thursday ordered a temporary halt to construction at an immigration detention centre — built in the middle of the Florida Everglades and dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz' — as attorneys argue whether it violates environmental laws.
The facility can continue to operate and hold detainees for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but workers will be barred from adding any new filling, paving or infrastructure for the next 14 days. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams issued the ruling during a hearing and said she will issue a written order later Thursday.
Environmental groups and the Miccosukee Tribe have asked Williams to issue a preliminary injunction to halt operations and further construction. The suit claims the project threatens environmentally sensitive wetlands that are home to protected plants and animals and would reverse billions of dollars' worth of environmental restoration.
Plaintiffs presented witnesses Wednesday and Thursday in support of the injunction, while attorneys for the state and federal government were scheduled to present next week.
Following Thursday's testimony, Paul Schwiep, an attorney for the environmental groups, asked Williams to issue a temporary restraining order that would at least prevent any new construction at the site while the preliminary injunction was argued.
Williams asked Florida attorney Jesse Panuccio if the state would agree to halt construction so that she wouldn't need to issue the restraining order. She pointed out that anything built at the site would likely remain there permanently, regardless of how the case was ultimately decided.
Panuccio said he couldn't guarantee that the state would stop all work.
This sparked an hour-long hearing about the temporary restraining order, which will be in place for the next two weeks while the still ongoing preliminary injunction hearing continues.
The crux of the plaintiffs' argument is that the detention facility violates the National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to assess the environmental effects of major construction projects.
Panuccio said during the hearing that although the detention centre would be holding federal detainees, the construction and operation of the facility is entirely under the state of Florida, meaning the NEPA review wouldn't apply.
Schwiep said the purpose of the facility is for immigration enforcement, which is exclusively a federal function. He said the facility wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the federal government's desire for a facility to hold detainees.
Williams said Thursday that the detention facility was at a minimum a joint partnership between the state and federal government.
The lawsuit in Miami against federal and state authorities is one of two legal challenges to the South Florida detention centre which was built more than a month ago by the state of Florida on an isolated airstrip owned by Miami-Dade County.
A second lawsuit brought by civil rights groups says detainees' constitutional rights are being violated since they are barred from meeting lawyers, are being held without any charges, and a federal immigration court has canceled bond hearings. A hearing in that case is scheduled for Aug. 18.
Under the 55-year-old federal environmental law, federal agencies should have examined how the detention centre's construction would impact the environment, identified ways to minimize the impact and followed other procedural rules such as allowing public comment, according to the environmental groups and the tribe.
It makes no difference that the detention centre holding hundreds of detainees was built by the state of Florida since federal agencies have authority over immigration, the suit said.
Attorneys for federal and state agencies last week asked Williams to dismiss or transfer the injunction request, saying the lawsuit was filed in the wrong jurisdiction. Even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's southern district is the wrong venue for the lawsuit since the detention centre is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's middle district, they said.
Williams had yet to rule on that argument.
The lawsuits were being heard as Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis ′ administration apparently was preparing to build a second immigration detention centre at a Florida National Guard training centre in north Florida. At least one contract has been awarded for what's labeled in state records as the 'North Detention Facility.'
David Fischer, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
24 minutes ago
- CTV News
RCMP union pushes for change to help force attract talent from U.S., other countries
Members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police march towards the front lawn of Parliament Hill during the 47th Annual Canadian Police and Peace Officers' Memorial Service in downtown Ottawa on Sunday, Sept. 29, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Spencer Colby OTTAWA — The union representing front-line RCMP members wants the force to ease requirements for foreign applicants to help attract experienced police officers from agencies like the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation and counterparts in the United Kingdom and Australia. The RCMP currently requires that applicants be Canadian citizens or have permanent resident status in Canada. Applicants with permanent resident status must have lived in Canada as a permanent resident for three of the last five years. The National Police Federation says the RCMP should follow the lead of the Canadian Armed Forces, which in 2022 opened applications to permanent residents without any requirement on time spent in Canada. Federation president Brian Sauvé said he's 'pretty sure we can attract some good talent' through a similar move by the RCMP. Sauvé compares the idea to federal immigration programs that seek to entice skilled workers to come to Canada. 'If this government has identified public safety, border security and all that stuff as an imperative, we can do the same thing, right?' Sauvé said in a recent interview. 'We have equivalency training. You can come from Manchester, you can come from New South Wales, you can come from, I don't know, the FBI. And we'll train you to be equivalent, to give you a job and put you in a role.' The proposal is one of several ideas the police federation presented in a June report aimed at improving the RCMP's recruitment practices, funding model, training programs and procurement. The federation says independent reports over the past two decades have offered the federal government clear guidance on how to improve RCMP operations in these areas. 'Yet time and again, these recommendations have been met with inaction or insufficient follow-through,' the June report says. 'As a result, long-standing issues persisted and were allowed to worsen.' Public Safety Canada spokesperson Max Watson said the department is committed to working with the RCMP and others to ensure the force 'is equipped to meet evolving public safety needs.' The federation is calling for a streamlined and modernized RCMP application processing system, more training capacity and an increase in the cadet training allowance to about $1,200 a week from the current $525. The federation says it wants more flexibility for some new recruits, such as people from other law enforcement agencies, to make it easier for them to fit into the RCMP. For instance, the federation notes only serving or recently inactive police officers can apply through the RCMP's three-week experienced police officer program, provided they meet strict criteria. That excludes a large pool of well-trained public safety personnel, including members of the Canada Border Services Agency, provincial sheriffs, conservation officers and other law enforcement agents who may not meet the threshold, the report says. Forcing these candidates to repeat a full 26-week training program at the RCMP training depot 'creates a barrier to recruitment and results in missed opportunities to bring skilled, experienced candidates into the RCMP,' the report adds. It also says the federal procurement process is too slow and unresponsive to the urgent needs of modern policing, and drains valuable government resources. 'Delays in rolling out life-saving equipment, including service pistols, body armour and body-worn cameras, threaten both officer safety and public trust,' the report says. During the spring election campaign, the Liberals promised to recruit 1,000 more RCMP personnel to tackle drug and human trafficking, foreign interference, cybercrime and car thefts by organized crime. The Liberals also pledged to create a new RCMP academy in Regina and increase pay for cadet recruits. Watson acknowledged the promise to hire more Mounties and said Public Safety recognizes the importance of cadet pay in broader efforts to support recruitment and retention. The RCMP did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication. The police force has been told to trim two per cent of its budget as part of a governmentwide cost-cutting exercise. Sauvé said he is 'cautiously optimistic' the Liberal government will follow through on its commitment to strengthen law enforcement, set out in a May mandate letter. The RCMP provides policing services through contracts with all provinces and territories, except Ontario and Quebec. RCMP policing agreements cover much of rural Canada, all of the North and many towns and municipalities in contract provinces. The police federation acknowledges that some continue to ask whether the RCMP should shed its contract policing role across Canada and become more like the FBI by focusing on federal criminal matters. In March, before Mark Carney became prime minister, the Liberals published a paper outlining a new vision for the RCMP. It suggested the force concentrate on federal policing, reflecting its 'essential mandate and where it is best placed to lead investigations.' The federation flatly rejects the idea. 'The RCMP's integrated pan-Canadian policing model remains one of its greatest strengths, due to its ability to leverage co-ordination, consistency and efficiency across all jurisdictions,' the June report says. It argues that moving away from the current model 'would create deep service gaps, duplication and costly public safety and economic inefficiencies with no evidence of better results.' The federation calls for dedicated funding for federal policing, saying RCMP officers carrying out those duties must no longer be used to backstop vacancies in contract jurisdictions. 'Federal assets should be used solely for federal mandates,' the report says. 'If federal members are redeployed for non-federal purposes, those services must be cost-recovered from contract partners.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 9, 2025. Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press
Globe and Mail
24 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Brace yourself for the rest of Trump 2
The night that Donald Trump won the election for the first time I was in New York. I had parked myself in a bar where young Republicans were gathering to watch the results come in. My assignment was to talk to them after Mr. Trump had lost and write something about the future of the Republican Party after his failure. A look at the post-Trump GOP, in other words. As the evening wore on and state after state went Trump, it became clear that I was never going to do that story. Instead I ended up writing about the reaction of a jittery world to the fact that a real estate mogul and former reality-TV star was poised to become the 45th president of the world's most powerful nation. It seemed incredible that such a person could obtain such power. It seemed doubly incredible when, eight years later, Americans handed him the keys to the White House again. They could be forgiven for electing him once. The American political system had become stagnant and money-driven. Many Americans wanted someone to go in and break some furniture. Mr. Trump seemed just the man. Trump administration could use military action against some drug cartels, Rubio says All the rage: How the UFC became America's most important (and misunderstood) political powerhouse But twice? After everything they had seen in Trump 1? Yes, incredible. Yet it happened, and the world is only beginning to count the cost. We have seen half a year of Trump 2 now (though it seems much longer) and it has been uglier than even his bitterest rivals warned. The U.S. foreign aid program slashed, putting the health and very survival of countless needy people in jeopardy. America's finest universities attacked because they refused to kiss the ring. Immigrants scooped up and dispatched to dank overseas jails. Efforts to fight climate change trashed. The head of the central bank slurred for the crime of trying to control inflation. We are only just into August and already this month the rogue President has fired the respected head of a respected statistics agency for issuing a jobs report he didn't like and imposed punishing new tariffs on some of his country's closest friends, raising the average U.S. tariff rate to the highest level since the Great Depression. Meanwhile, the rogue Health Secretary he appointed has cancelled half a billion dollars worth of contracts and grants for developing the kind of vaccines that helped beat back COVID-19. Far worse is to come. Some countries have managed to strike tariff deals with Mr. Trump. Others, like Canada, are trying. Whatever the result, he is overturning a system of trade and exchange that has fuelled the growth of economies around the world for decades, helping to lift hundreds of millions out of poverty. The United States built that system and profited immensely from it. Now he wants to destroy it, taking an axe to the goose that laid the golden egg. Meanwhile, just for the hell of it, he is undermining his country's fiscal standing to such an extent that it threatens the stability of the American dollar and puts the whole world's financial system at risk. His Big Beautiful Bill will add trillions to the U.S. debt. Then there is the little matter of the future of democracy. America's standing as the citadel of freedom is eroding every day that this man is in office. He refused to accept the outcome of the 2020 election and was found to have helped foment a violent rebellion. He is going after judges that question him and journalists that scrutinize him and civil servants that simply annoy him (like that job-stats official). He is wielding the already-immense executive power of the presidency with the abandon of a tinpot dictator. He is using the office of the presidency to enrich himself. I hate to paint such a dark picture. I am a lifelong admirer of the United States, which for its failings has done far more good than ill. Its sheer dynamism still astonishes, even in the Trump era. Despite all the damage he has done, much is going right in the world. As I wrote earlier this year, global prosperity, health and education have advanced by huge leaps in the past few decades – a fact we often forget amid all the turmoil. There is no reason they should not continue to advance. We know the formula: science, trade, democracy, sound finances. Unfortunately, Donald Trump is an enemy of all of them. I still think the U.S. will right itself somehow, but no one should underestimate the havoc he can cause in the meantime. I didn't see what was coming when I sat in that New York bar in 2016. Perhaps none of us did. Now we know. We should brace ourselves and, in every way possible, resist.
CTV News
2 hours ago
- CTV News
Apple shows us how appeasing Trump can help you avoid tariffs: expert
FILE - Semiconductor chips are assembled and organized on a workbench at the Nanotronics manufacturing centre at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, on April 28, 2021. (John Minchillo / AP) Donald Trump announced that his administration will be putting a 'very large tariff on chips and semiconductors' that is designed to encourage production stateside. The U.S. president said it would be 'approximately 100 per cent.' In his announcement, Trump highlighted 'companies like Apple, if you're building in the United States or have committed to building in the United States, there will be no charge.' Financial analyst John Ehrlichman told CTV Your Morning on Friday the move is not just about economic security, but is political in nature. Ehrlichman explained how Apple CEO Tim Cook got in the president's good books, bringing with him a 24-carat plaque that read 'Made in America.' 'There's arguably no bigger CEO, in America, or in the world, than Tim Cook. He's in the Oval Office and he's trying to appease the president,' Ehrlichman said. 'The president loves that and uses that as the backdrop to say, 'by the way, if you're not following the Apple way, you could be subject to these tariffs.'' The Associated Press reported that American tech giants have already made commitments to invest nearly US$1.5 trillion in the U.S. since Trump returned to office in January. Apple is part of those agreements, with a total of about $600 billion committed to these stateside investments. Apple relies on foreign labour and factories to create their iPhones and other consumer products. One expert told CNN in April that an iPhone made in the U.S. could jump three times in price to US$3,500, or more than C$4,800. Ehrlichman said working with Trump is Apple's best hope. 'Here is the president saying 'if you invest in America, you can avoid these additional import costs,' which would double the costs for companies and ultimately be passed on to consumers,' he said. 'Directed squarely at China' Chip manufacturing can be a fairly decentralized process, Ehrlichman said, with products often moving from China to South Korea, to Malaysia, to Vietnam, creating a wide ecosystem. But he's sure the president's announcement was designed to strike at one of the main American rivals across the pacific. 'Obviously a lot of this is directed squarely at China,' adding that Trump is trying to isolate them from the industry. 'Even this week, you saw Donald Trump accusing the CEO of Intel, probably the most storied chip manufacturer,' he added. 'The new CEO has ties to China, whether its through the business he used to run doing business with China, his personal investments, he wants him out of the job.' Ehrlichman says Trump is currently being courted by one of China's main rivals, Taiwan. 'You've got Taiwan Semiconductor, who have committed billions and billions of dollars to the U.S. to make sure the U.S. is on side with their strategies.' If countries like Taiwan want continued American support, they may have to bring their own gift for the president. 'Bring a 24-carat gold plaque to the White House or the tariff story could go on,' Ehrlichman said.
