logo
‘We're just asking for a vote:' Vineyard residents launch referendum against new $35M city hall

‘We're just asking for a vote:' Vineyard residents launch referendum against new $35M city hall

Yahoo09-04-2025

VINEYARD, Utah () — A group of concerned residents in has launched a referendum against a resolution to finance up to $35 million for a new city hall.
On April 3, the held a special session, during which they voted on Resolution 2025-15. David Robertson, a financial advisor with Lewis, Robertson and Burningham (LRB), presented it to the council.
'Vineyard City intends to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping, and improvement ofthe Vineyard Center — a multi-use building that will house Vineyard City Offices, theMountainland Association of Governments ('MAG'),' the background of the resolution reads.
It continues: 'To that end, the City proposes to issue Sales and Franchise Tax Revenue Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000 (the 'Series 2025 Bonds'), pursuant to the Utah Local Government Bonding Act and the Revenue Bond Act.'
IN VINEYARD: Huntsman Cancer Institute breaks ground on new $400M Utah County cancer center
After more than an hour of discussion on the resolution, a motion to adopt the resolution was passed, with all but one council member's vote.
'My understanding is that we'll come back to the city council on May 14 and present numbers and — all the various numbers we talked about — and if the city council likes it, we'll continue chugging forward. And if not, we'll stop,' Robertson said shortly before the vote.
The council will meet again on May 14, where the resolution will be reviewed, and the council can finalize a decision on whether to move forward with the resolution.
In a release from the concerned residents launching the referendum, they share their concerns about the city council meeting. Jacob Holdaway, the one council member who did not support the resolution, is quoted in the release.
Distracted driving? Law enforcement statewide is increasing `covert` enforcement
'We were told this vote wouldn`t happen over spring break, and we were promised public comment before any decision,' Holdaway is quoted in the release. 'None of those commitments were honored. This kind of process erodes public trust.'
The release from concerned residents further states that this Sales Tax Revenue bond could cost between $920,000 to $1.7 million annually. They are concerned that the city will not be able to keep up with payments without increasing taxes or removing public services.
'This isn't about politics, it's about principle. This decision was made without the basic financial transparency Vineyard residents deserve. Now we're just asking for a vote,' said Zack Stratton in the press release. He is named as a Vineyard resident and business owner.
ABC4.com reached out to Vineyard City for more information. In a joint statement from Mayor Julie Fullmer, Councilmember Mardi Sifuentes, Councilmember Sara Cameron and Councilmember Brett Clawson, they clarified their stance on the resolution.
Salt Lake Bees celebrate first home game at new Daybreak ballpark
'The project has strong community support, does not increase property or sales taxes, and passed with the support of all but one council member. It is designed to provide essential civic services to our growing community with maximum efficiency,' it reads. 'We've worked carefully to ensure we minimize the financial impact to avoid escalating interest, construction and land costs in the future.'
The full statement can be read below:
On April 3, 2025, the Vineyard City Council voted to initiate a bonding process to fund the long planned and critically needed Vineyard Center. The Vineyard Center project is the culmination of years of public process and extensive planning. It will establish a civic and community center to support Vineyard's unprecedented growth. The project has strong community support, does not increase property or sales taxes, and passed with the support of all but one council member. It is designed to provide essential civic services to our growing community with maximum efficiency by sharing the building cost and space with numerous community partners. We've worked carefully to ensure we minimize the financial impact to avoid escalating interest, construction and land costs in the future. Additional financial analysis is in progress to confirm the city's safe financial position. We are concerned that the efforts of a small, vocal minority to mislead the public and push for a referendum on this will be a waste of city resources and taxpayer dollars and will ultimately cost the city much more in the future and sacrifice the City's ability to deliver day-to-day services to our growing community.
Joint Statement on Vineyard Center Bond from Mayor Julie Fullmer, Councilmember Mardi Sifuentes, Councilmember Sara Cameron and Councilmember Brett Clawson
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illinois among states suing government over deal ending trigger ban
Illinois among states suing government over deal ending trigger ban

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Illinois among states suing government over deal ending trigger ban

Sixteen states have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers with Rare Breed Triggers, which was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Bipartisan bill in Congress would name Zablocki VA women's clinic after Anna Mae Robertson
Bipartisan bill in Congress would name Zablocki VA women's clinic after Anna Mae Robertson

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Bipartisan bill in Congress would name Zablocki VA women's clinic after Anna Mae Robertson

Bipartisan legislation in Congress could rename part of Milwaukee's Zablocki VA Medical Center after Anna Mae Robertson, a member of the famed Six Triple Eight battalion who died May 30 at 101. The Women's Well Clinic, which provides services like primary care, gynecology, maternity care and mental health care, would be named the Anna Mae Robertson VA Well Women Clinic. The VA as a whole, named after former Milwaukee congressman Clement J. Zablocki, would keep its name. The bill is authored by Democratic U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore and has the support of three Wisconsin Republicans — Reps. Bryan Steil, Scott Fitzgerald and Tony Wied. Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan also backs the legislation. 'As our community and her family mourn her passing, I am pleased that my Wisconsin colleagues from both sides of the aisle have come together to help honor her in this way," Moore said in a news release. Wied, a Republican who represents the northeastern part of the state, said Robertson "exemplifies the best of Wisconsin." And Stiel, from southeastern Wisconsin, said "it's fitting that she receives recognition for her service to our nation and her fellow veterans at the facility she dedicated her time and talents.' Robertson was among the 855 women in the 6888th Central Postal Directory Battalion, the only all-Black female unit stationed overseas during World War II. With the slogan 'No Mail, Low Morale,' they cleared a nearly three-year logjam of mail destined for homesick soldiers in just three months. After decades of little recognition of their service, the Six Triple Eight's story became a Netflix film directed by Tyler Perry and starring Kerry Washington. More: Milwaukee's Anna Mae Robertson, one of last surviving members of World War II's famed Six Triple Eight unit, dies at 101 In 2022, Robertson, then 98, and other members of the Six Triple Eight were awarded the Congressional Gold Medal, one of the highest civilian honors awarded in the United States. At the time, there were only six known living veterans of the unit. Robertson's celebration of life was held June 7. If the clinic is named after Robertson, her name will grace a place that was closely connected to her life. After moving to Milwaukee post-war, Robertson worked as a nurse's aide, caring for sick veterans at the veteran's hospital. Eventually, she too received care from the VA. 'The VA hospital was wonderful to my mother,' Sheree Robertson told the Journal Sentinel. 'They provided her with such loving care, and any time she needed any equipment, it was provided to her." She thanked Moore for recognizing her mother in a profound way and 'for doing the tough work to get this legislation passed.' 'I just wished that people would remember the life she lived and be inspired by it,' Robertson said. "I think it is only fitting that they name (the) women's clinic after my mother, so everyone who goes to that clinic would know about my mother's history, her life, the story of the Six Triple Eight … and that she proudly served her country.' The clinic could become even more important in the coming years. Women are the fastest-growing segment of the veteran population, projected to make up 18% of all veterans in 2040, compared to just 4% in 2000. Democratic lawmakers in the state Capitol — including Moore's son, state Rep. Supreme Moore Omokunde from Milwaukee — also introduced a joint resolution early this month to honor Robertson. Resolutions express lawmakers' opinion and don't carry the force of law. Two Republicans have signed onto the resolution, according to Moore Omokunde's office, and GOP legislative leaders could choose to schedule it for a vote during an upcoming floor session. Robertson "(leaves) behind a profound legacy of resilience, service, and inspiration," the resolution reads. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Milwaukee VA women's clinic could be named after Six Triple Eight hero

States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly
States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly

San Francisco Chronicle​

time5 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

States sue US government over deal ending ban on triggers that make some rifles fire more rapidly

Sixteen states have sued the Trump administration over its plan to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers that make semiautomatic rifles fire more rapidly and return devices already seized to their owners. The suit announced Monday argues that returning the triggers would violate federal law, pose a threat to residents and law enforcement and worsen gun violence. It was filed in federal court in Maryland. There had been several legal battles over the devices, which replace the typical trigger on an AR-15-style rifle. The Biden administration had previously argued the triggers qualify as machine guns under federal law because constant finger pressure on the triggers will keep a rifle firing, essentially creating an illegal machine gun. Rare Breed Triggers, the maker of the devices, had argued that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives was wrong in its classification and ignored demands to stop selling the triggers before being sued by the Biden administration. The Justice Department reached a deal announced last month to allow the sale of forced-reset triggers with Rare Breed Triggers, which was previously represented by David Warrington, Trump's current White House counsel. Under the settlement, Rare Breed Triggers agreed not to develop such devices to be used on handguns, according to the Justice Department. The settlement requires the ATF to return triggers that it had seized or that owners had voluntarily surrendered to the government. The states' lawsuit is being led by the attorneys general of Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Other states involved are Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, along with the District of Columbia.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store