5 Best waterproof phone pouches for swimming that let you snap pics, scroll, and float!
The best waterproof phone pouch does more than keep things dry. With proper sealing, clear plastic, and easy-to-use locking systems, these pouches are changing how we treat our tech around water. From pool days to beach trips, a reliable waterproof phone cover is one bit of gear that's surprisingly handy and worth having.
CASEOLOGY by Spigen brings a waterproof phone pouch with a clever vacuum seal that hugs your camera lens for sharp underwater shots. It fits smartphones up to 8.3 inches, even with bulky cases. The pouch allows smooth touch and button access, has anti-fog tech, and includes a long adjustable strap for versatile wear. Perfect for active outdoor use.
What are buyers saying on Amazon?Reliable seal, solid underwater performance and surprisingly clear photos. Users praise the vacuum feature, though a few find it slightly pricey.
CASEOLOGY by Spigen Waterproof Mobile Pouch up to 8.3 for iPhone 16 15 14 13 12 Series, iPhone Pro Max, Samsung S25 S24 S23 Ultra, Pixel Series, Vacuum Pump Mobile Waterproof Pouch - Charcoal Grey
The Spigen Waterproof Mobile Pouch (A601) is a clear, lightweight pouch that fits phones up to 8.2 inches. With IPX8 certification, it protects your device up to 30 metres underwater. The soft PVC lets you scroll with ease, even while submerged. It also holds essentials like cash and cards, making it a solid pick for swimming and travel.
What are buyers saying on Amazon?Buyers love the secure seal, crystal clarity, and easy touchscreen use. It's compact enough yet roomy for the essentials.
Spigen Waterproof Mobile Pouch (A601) for iPhone, Samsung Galaxy, Google Pixel and All Other Smartphones up to 8.2 Inches, Mobile Waterproof Pouch (IPX8 Certified, Pack of 1) - Crystal Clear
The ESR waterproof phone pouch is built for the iPhone 14 Pro Max and 15 Pro Max, combining full underwater touch sensitivity with a float-ready design. Certified IPX8, it keeps your device dry up to 30 metres deep. Its snug fit, responsive buttons, and buoyant sponge layer make it a reliable pick for beach trips and underwater activities.
What are buyers saying on Amazon?Praised for its snug fit, solid waterproofing and floating design, though some note the case must be removed before use.
ESR 1 Pack Waterproof Phone Pouch for iPhone 15 Pro Max/14 Pro Max, Underwater Touch Sensitivity, IPX8 Floating Waterproof Cellphone Case with Lanyard, Dry Bag for Snorkeling, Black
The BOBO Universal Waterproof Pouch is a practical dry bag-style case that fits a wide range of smartphones. With IPX8 certification, it offers reliable water, snow and dirt protection. Its transparent build keeps your phone visible on both sides, making it handy for snapping photos or checking notifications. Great for the beach or pool, with a basic snap lock and neck strap.
What are buyers saying on Amazon?Appreciated for keeping phones dry and looking neat, though the screen response and fit vary across different phone sizes.
BOBO Universal Waterproof Pouch (Big Size) Cellphone Dry Bag Case for Smartphone – Transparent (Pack of 1)
The JOTO waterproof phone pouch is made for smartphones up to 6 inches, offering protection for beach days and poolside lounging. It features clear windows on both sides for easy photo-taking and screen visibility. The IPX8 rating promises water resistance up to 30 metres, while the simple snap lock and included neck strap keep things practical and hands-free.
What are buyers saying on Amazon?Buyers like the fit and affordability. Opinions are mixed on water resistance and touchscreen performance during underwater use.
JOTO Pouch Case For Apple iPhone 6S 6,6S Plus, SE 5S 7, Samsung Galaxy S7, S6 Note 5 4, HTC LG Sony Nokia Motorola up to 6.0 ( Polyvinyl Chloride|Black )
For anyone after a waterproof phone pouch for swimming that's reliable, touch-friendly and travel-ready, these options offer solid protection without fuss. Keep your phone dry and your snaps coming.
Zouk: Meet modern vegan designs, rooted in Indian artistry
Vegan handbags for the modern professional: Work smarter, carry kinder
Vegan leather handbag brands that will transform the way you style!
Bag the one you want: Get handbags that speak your language.
Yes, many waterproof phone pouches are designed specifically for swimming and offer protection up to 30 metres underwater.
Most pouches have a clear, touch-sensitive window allowing smooth screen use underwater or on land.
Check the pouch's maximum device size; many fit phones up to around 8.3 inches diagonally.
Yes, they are made to be durable and reusable for multiple water activities with proper care.
Disclaimer: At Hindustan Times, we help you stay up-to-date with the latest trends and products. Hindustan Times has an affiliate partnership, so we may get a part of the revenue when you make a purchase. We shall not be liable for any claim under applicable laws, including but not limited to the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, concerning the products. The products listed in this article are in no particular order of priority.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Apple sues YouTuber Jon Prosser: Who is he and how he 'used' an Apple employee's phone to extract company secrets
(Image via YouTube/fpt.) Apple has filed a federal lawsuit against popular YouTuber Jon Prosser and Michael Ramacciotti. In the lawsuit, the tech giant has accused them of orchestrating a scheme to steal iOS 26 trade secrets from a development iPhone. The company has accused Prosser of leaking confidential details about its upcoming iOS 26 software. Along with this, the video editor Michael Ramacciotti who is the accomplice of Prosser has reportedly accessed a development iPhone belonging to an Apple employee. The lawsuit claims Ramacciotti broke into his friend Ethan Lipnik's Apple-issued development phone while staying at his home, then showed the unreleased software to Prosser via FaceTime. Prosser allegedly recorded the call and used the footage to create "reconstructed" renderings for his YouTube channel. Who is Jon Prosser For those unaware, Jon Prosser is the creator of popular YouTube channel called Front Page Tech. He is known for leaking details about Apple products which are not yet released by the company. The lawsuit filed by Apple claims that in January 2025 Prosser gained access to early visuals of iOS 26's new Liquid Glass design, which resembles a lot to the final version showcased by Apple at WWDC 2025. Allegations made by Apple against Jon Prosser The Cupertino- based tech giant alleges that Ramacotti, a friend of Apple employee Ethan Lipnik, allegedly used Lipnik's passcode and then tracked his location to access a development iPhone while staying at his home. During that time Ramacotti made a FaceTime call to Prosser and showed him the unreleased iOS 26 features. Prosser then reportedly recorded that call and later used that to create monetised YouTube content. Apple also claims that Prosser promised payment or future job opportunities to Ramacotti for the leaked information. What information was leaked by Prosser The YouTuber leaked the details about the redesigned camera app with simplified controls. He also showcased the Liquid Glass design which featured pill-shaped tabs and rounded visuals. Along with this, he also talked about the early previews of the Messages app and other UI elevates which later appeared in iOS 26. What Apple is seeking Apple is requesting a jury trial and seeking multiple forms of relief: * Injunctive relief to prevent further disclosure of confidential information * Punitive and compensatory damages for trade secret misappropriation * An order requiring defendants to return or destroy any confidential Apple information * Recovery of legal fees and costs * Pre- and post-judgment interest The lawsuit includes claims under the Defend Trade Secrets Act and the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Need a promotion at Amazon? Show your AI skills first
An internal email stated that employees are also required to attach or cite specific AI projects they have worked on, along with measurable outcomes. Managers must also report how AI tools were leveraged at work to boost productivity at scale, which could potentially reduce the company's headcount. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Amazon has reportedly made it a requirement for employees in several units, including smart home security brands Ring and Blink, to demonstrate their use of artificial intelligence (AI) when applying for promotions.A Business Insider report on Thursday revealed that Jamie Siminoff , the founder of Ring, announced that promotion applications within the organisation must include data on employees' AI usage at internal email stated that employees are also required to attach or cite specific AI projects they have worked on, along with measurable must also report how AI tools were leveraged at work to boost productivity at scale, which could potentially reduce the company's headcount.A Ring spokesperson clarified in the report that these changes currently apply only to Amazon's RBKS employees (Ring, Blink, Key, and Services), not to the rest of the rejoined Amazon in April after a two-year hiatus, with a mission to promote 'innovative thinking' and enhance speed and efficiency in the his return, Siminoff hinted at plans to leverage AI and innovation. 'The AI transformation happening right now is a once-in-a-generation opportunity, and I think we're super well positioned with helpful and practical AI features like Smart Video Search. It's just the start here—we're just scratching the surface of what we can do with AI—and I look forward to digging into this with the team even more,' he also shared his vision after his return to the company. 'Invention is my true passion—I love looking at what we can invent for our neighbors, which is what I've always called our customers.''I tend not think in terms of, 'in X years, we're going to build this.' Instead, I try to think about finite truths,' he founded fourteen years ago by Siminoff, is best known for inventing the video doorbell—a device that lets homeowners see, hear, and speak to visitors remotely using live video and two-way audio via a also oversees other Amazon units such as Blink, the in-home and in-garage delivery service Amazon Key, and the Sidewalk team, which extends the range and connectivity of smart devices like AI becomes deeply integrated across industries, some tech leaders are pushing the boundaries. Last month, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy told employees that AI would gradually reduce the corporate workforce as more AI tools and agents are deployed throughout note did not outline which teams or roles would be affected. Amazon employs over 1.56 million people globally. Earlier this year, the ecommerce major said it plans to cut 14,000 managerial positions globally by early 2025 as part of a broader effort to reduce costs and improve operational the last two years, large technology players have been acquiring AI startups for their technology teams. Microsoft paid $650 million in a licensing deal to Inflection AI, whose cofounder Mustafa Suleyman is now heading Microsoft AI. In a similar licensing deal, Amazon hired AI startup Adept cofounder David Luan and others who joined Amazon's AGI May, ET reported that Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski and Zoom's Eric Yuan are among the first to experiment with AI versions of themselves for public-facing Klarna, an AI-powered avatar of Siemiatkowski handled most of the fintech firm's recent earnings call — with only subtle giveaways, such as a slightly out-of-sync voice, hinting that it wasn't the real CEO.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Consumer panel asks Apple, Croma to refund customer's iPhone cost over microphone defect
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (Suburban) held that the 'manufacturer (Apple) merely mentioning certain unauthorized modification or damage in hardware cannot be the correct resolution' for the customer's grievance. Both the manufacturer and the seller are 'jointly and severally liable for the defective product', the commission said in the order passed earlier this month, as the two companies failed to resolve the defect in the device purchased by the customer (now deceased). Mumbai, Jul 20 (PTI) A consumer commission here has directed Apple India and Croma to refund an i-Phone cost of Rs 65,264 to the legal heirs of a customer for failing to resolve a microphone defect in the device, holding the two companies deficient in service. It further ruled that the seller (Croma) too cannot escape liability merely by stating the 'defect is attributable to the manufacturer'. 'Once the product was sold through their outlet, they assumed responsibility for ensuring that the product was free from defects and serviceable,' the commission noted. It said the 'principle of vicarious liability squarely applies', as the seller stands in a position of trust and derives commercial benefit from the sale. The complainant purchased an iPhone 11 for Rs 65,264 from a Croma store in Mumbai on June 4, 2021. Shortly after the purchase, the device developed an issue as the speakerphone function was not working during calls, with specifically 'no speech from mic'. The complainant approached Apple's authorised service centre, but repairs were denied on the grounds of 'unauthorized modifications in the device,' rendering it ineligible for warranty service. Despite repeated complaints and emails, the opposite parties failed to address the grievance, following which the complainant approached the commission. During the course of proceeding, the customer passed away, but the complaint was continued by his legal heirs. The Apple India Private Limited, in its response, admitted the purchase and the issue with the microphone. But it reiterated that the device had unauthorised modifications, voiding the warranty. Infiniti Retail Limited (Croma) failed to appear and was proceeded against ex-parte. The commission, after perusal of documents on record, held that Apple failed to specify exactly which term or condition of the warranty was breached by the complainant. 'Merely referring clauses of warranty terms and condition cannot be sufficient to attribute the particular defect as certain unauthorized modification or damage to software,' it noted. The commission concluded that documents and evidence brought on record are sufficient to ascertain the defect in goods coupled with deficiency in service provided by the opposite parties. It ruled that both the manufacturer and the seller are 'jointly and severally liable for the defective product'. The commission directed both the opposite parties to refund the iPhone cost of Rs 65,264, along with a 6 per cent interest per annum from the date of the complaint (August 6, 2021) until the date of actual payment. The two companies were also directed to pay Rs 15,000 as compensation for mental agony and Rs 2,000 for legal expenses to customer's family. PTI AVI GK This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
