Legacy body to investigate Narrow Water and M62 bombing atrocities
They are among the latest cases that have been accepted by the commission and are in the information recovery stage.
The Narrow Water atrocity occurred on August 27 1979, as a convoy of vehicles transported Parachute Regiment soldiers from Ballykinler barracks to Newry.
As they passed the old Narrow Water castle ruins, IRA terrorists remotely detonated the two bombs from a firing point across the Newry River in the Republic of Ireland.
Eighteen soldiers were killed, the highest death toll suffered by the Army in a single day during the Troubles.
There was also a 19th victim – Michael Hudson, who had been visiting the Republic of Ireland from London, who was killed by army gunfire across the river following the blasts.
Nobody was ever convicted over the attacks.
The incident came just hours after Lord Mountbatten, two members of his family and a Co Fermanagh teenager had been killed by the IRA in a boat bomb in Co Sligo.
The M62 coach bombing in West Yorkshire occurred on February 4 1974.
The coach was carrying soldiers and their families back to their Catterick base when an IRA bomb hidden in the luggage compartment of exploded.
Twelve people were killed, including two children aged five and two.
The ICRIR was created by the previous government's controversial Legacy Act and is headed by former Northern Ireland Lord Chief Justice Sir Declan Morgan.
Bereaved families, victims and certain public authorities can request the commission carry out an investigation into Troubles incidents.
While the Labour Government has said it will repeal and replace parts of the Act and reinstate inquests and civil cases, it is retaining the ICRIR.
Many bereaved families are unhappy with the retention of the commission and have vowed not to engage with it.
Victims have questioned the body's independence and its ability to uncover answers about Troubles crimes.
The commission has previously revealed that it is carrying out an investigation into the Guildford pub bombings of 1974 and has also been asked to investigate the Kingsmill massacre in Co Armagh in 1976.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Supreme Court declines to block age verification law for social media
The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on July 17 lifted a hold put on the law by a federal district judge who had ruled that it likely violates the First Amendment. U.S. District Judge Sul Ozerden had said the law is too broad, and parents have others way of monitoring their children's use of social media. The Supreme Court didn't explain its decision in the case. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that while Mississippi's law is likely unconsitutional, NetChoice didn't show that letting it be enforced during the legal challenge is sufficiently harmful. NetChoice attorney Paul Taske called the court's decision "an unfortunate procedural delay." "Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment - not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits," Taske said in a statement. A spokesperson for Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch said the state is "grateful for the Court's decision to leave Mississippi's law in effect while the case proceeds in a way that permits thoughtful consideration of these important issues." Mississippi's attorneys say the law is a targeted effort to regulate social media platforms that let predators interact with children. "The Act requires what any responsible covered platform would already do: make 'commercially reasonable' efforts to protect minors," they told the Supreme Court. They said the law was prompted by a 16-year-old boy taking his own life after someone he met on Instagram threatened to expose their sexual encounter unless he paid $1,000. And they said Ozerden's order blocking enforcement conflicts with the Supreme Court's June decision upholding Texas' age verification law for pornographic websites. More: Supreme Court upholds Texas' age verification law for porn sites NetChoice said the law forces every Mississippian - adults and minors alike - to surrender personal information to access online speech that's protected by the First Amendment. "Social media is the modern printing press - it allows all Americans to share their thoughts and perspectives," said Paul Taske, co-director of the Net Choice Litigation Center. "Just as the government can't force you to provide identification to read a newspaper, the same holds true when that news is available online."
Daily Record
20 hours ago
- Daily Record
OAP arrested at anti-abortion protest in Glasgow has case dropped by prosecutors
A pensioner who was arrested at an anti-abortion protest has had the case against her dropped by prosecutors. Rose Docherty, 75, was arrested as she stood near the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow. She was holding a sign which read: "Coercion is a crime, here to talk, only if you want". The grandmother became the first person to be arrested and charged under a new law which created buffer zones outside Scottish abortion clinics in February. She was accused of 'influencing the decision of another person to access, provide or facilitate the provision of abortion services at the protected premises'. But it has now emerged prosecutors have decided no further action should be taken against her at this time. The Crown Office said they 'reserve the right' to take proceedings in the future. Speaking about the decision, Ms Docherty told LBC: "This is a victory not just for me, but for everyone in Scotland who believes we should be free to hold a peaceful conversation. I stood with love and compassion, ready to listen to anyone who wanted to talk. "Criminalising kindness has no place in a free society." She has also been told her sign will be returned to her. Ms Docherty was supported by the group ADF International. Lorcan Price, Irish barrister and legal counsel for ADF said: "No one should fear arrest for offering a consensual conversation. Rose's case is a stark example of how 'buffer zone' laws can be weaponised to silence peaceful expression. We are relieved that common sense has prevailed, but the fact that Rose was arrested and threatened with prosecution shows the urgent need to protect fundamental freedoms in Scotland." The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Act came into effect in September last year, a month before the introduction of similar legislation in England and Wales. Under the law, protestors who come within 200m of clinics face fines of up to £10,000. In a speech at the Munich Security Conference in February, US Vice President JD Vance claimed that the Scottish Government had sent letters warning people against praying inside their own homes if they were within buffer zone areas. Ministers responded denying that claim and stating that the new legislation had been 'carefully drafted to capture only intentional or reckless behaviour close to a small number of premises providing abortion services'. A spokesperson for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) said: "The procurator fiscal received a report relating to a 75-year-old female and an incident said to have occurred on February 19, 2025. "Professional prosecutors from COPFS considered the report. All Scotland's prosecutors operate independently of political influence. "After careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, including the available admissible evidence, it was decided that there should be no further action taken at this time. "The Crown reserves the right to take proceedings in relation to this incident in the future."
Spectator
a day ago
- Spectator
Kate Forbes's treatment at the Edinburgh Fringe was a farce
Summerhall is one of Edinburgh's largest Fringe venues, also running year-round exhibitions and artistic performances. This past week, it has also played host to the city's latest site-specific beclowning show, with artists so reportedly 'terrified' by Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes being in the building, they had to set up a 'safe room' on the day she was booked to be there. Forbes is apparently so dangerous to your average avant-garde theatre-maker or performance poet, using Summerhall's many spaces for their Fringe run, that management at the venue issued a grovelling apology to these notional adults: A fragility and intolerance of others, an anti-arts politics even, has been permitted to spread Summerhall Arts' primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of the artists and performers we work with, and going forward we will be developing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that would prevent this oversight in our bookings process happening again. With such overblown rhetoric and handwringing, your average person still living in reality may suspect something appalling happened. Did Forbes goosestep across the atrium? Call for an immediate ban on stage make-up? Did she bring some kind of weapon to the venue, which was awarded £608,302 of public cash from Creative Scotland in January? It's worse. She came to the building, was asked questions by the Herald's Andrew Learmonth, in front of a paying audience who wanted to hear her, then left again. Frightening. Forbes was booked to take part in the Herald's Unspun Live talk-show series on 6 August. Leaving aside the irksome rise in political interview shows at what is supposed to be an arts festival, it's entirely ordinary she would do so. A diminutive 5ft 2, Scotland's not-remotely-dangerous deputy First Minister has an earned reputation of being a capable, diligent and principled legislator who, until the recent announcement she'll be leaving parliament at the 2026 elections, was tipped to be a future First Minister. She also holds gender-critical views. Despite these being entirely lawful, they bring instant pariah status in the arts world. In addition to the heresy of believing in the law of the literal land, which states that women and men are not each other, and that the former require single-sex spaces sometimes, Forbes is also a devout Christian. Her religious views wouldn't have permitted her to vote for same-sex marriage had she been in parliament at the time that Act was passed. She has also said she'd personally never have an abortion. Both viewpoints arguably scuppered her leadership bid against former First Minister Humza Yousaf in 2023, despite his devout Muslim beliefs likely being similar. If you want to impose a double standard on a woman, of course, it suddenly becomes very easy to know what one is. It says something ugly about both the state of the arts and freedom of expression that a venue in a city once celebrated as the 'home of the Enlightenment' wishes to apologise for a mild-mannered political leader saying things some people disagree with. In my recent experience, however, as someone formerly embedded in Scotland's artistic community, I know that using one's art form to explore difficult, controversial issues is in itself a downward trend. The performing arts have been inculcating such a navel-gazing, relentless focus on the self – whether one's sexuality or the ever-nebulous 'gender identity' – that it has made a great deal of its practitioners about as edgy as a floral-patterned fabric circle. A fragility and intolerance of others, an anti-arts politics even, has been permitted to spread. It's not normal for artists to act this way – something younger performers perhaps may not be aware of. It's also not remotely acceptable – or lawful – for a venue in receipt of taxpayers' funds to say they may in future ban people with Forbes's views from their programming. The dramas created by these types are often worthy of a Fringe First award. A stunning display of both comedy and farce, good fodder for column inches and baffled conversations with like-minded peers. But, for those of us who value the arts, freedom of speech, and democracy, this is yet another example of a growing tragedy.
