Hamas condemns 'blatant US aggression' against Iran
[Editor's Note: Follow our live blog for real-time updates on the latest developments in the Israel-Iran conflict.]
Palestinian group Hamas condemned "blatant US aggression" against Iran after President Donald Trump said American warplanes bombed Tehran's main nuclear enrichment facilities.
"The Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) condemns in the strongest terms the blatant US aggression against the territory and sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran," the group said in a statement issued after Trump announced the US had joined Israel's bombing campaign against Iran.
"This brutal aggression is a dangerous escalation," the Hamas statement added, calling the attack "a flagrant violation of international law, and a direct threat to international peace and security".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Even the climate agenda has been affected by US strikes on Iran
The topic of the moment at the ongoing Climate Action Week in London is to get ready for the next global climate summit at Belem in Brazil. But it is happening at a time when the climate change agenda has slipped markedly under the radar. One speaker said it was like living in a 'good news, bad news' world. The radical optimists are still to be found, but the naysayers who foresee a future of a lemming-like collapse from the cliff are in stronger voice. The US strikes on Iran over the weekend represent a radical moment not just for the global political balance, but also the environmental movement, which has an uneasy relationship with nuclear power. Its emotional heart is not in favour of atomic energy, but administrators who need to deliver on net-zero goals by the mid-century see no alternative. The B2 bombers that carried out the raids on Iran's Fordow were clearly running the risk of contamination from the nuclear facility. So far, the reporting from the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN's nuclear body, is that there have been no leaks that would pose a danger to the region. The area may be mountainous and arid, but it is close to multiple countries and thus the ultimate threats exist far wider afield than just in the host nation. It is clear how badly Iran fell short in its nuclear adventure Iran has invested much of its resources in mastering atomic technology. Decades of underground research and the building of refining facilities have come about despite the international community expressing doubts over the programme. The IAEA has been the principal forum in which this contested activity was carried out, with reference regularly to the UN Security Council, and now finally culminating in a bombing intervention by the US. I say 'finally', but there is no certainty that the raid will cap Iran's nuclear programme. This is even as Israeli officials claimed over the weekend that the war they have waged, combined with Washington's intervention, has set Tehran several years back from weaponisation of this programme. What is the link between climate change and Iran's nuclear programme, you may ask. The short answer is that the climate change agenda could have taken Iran down a different path. Because around the world, there is more and more investment in nuclear capability. As mentioned above, it is crucial to net-zero goals. There is no denying that Iran meets several metrics for how a nation can benefit from nuclear energy. It is a vast country with a rapidly expanding population that has great manufacturing potential. As it asserts, it has the right under international law to develop an indigenous nuclear programme. And yet, in failing to recognise the wider political context of its claims, it has lost sight of its own national needs for clean and sustainable energy output. Tim Gould, the chief economist of the International Energy Agency (which is not affiliated with the IAEA), told the City of London's Net Zero Delivery Summit on Monday that nuclear energy was at the heart of a new age of electricity. Power generation is needed to meet an increasing share of the world's rising demand. One of the components of this push for more electricity directly stems from climate change and rising global temperatures. Mr Gould says there is more demand for electricity for cooling systems so that humans can live normally in the changed climate. Iran is one of the countries bearing the brunt of this trend. For a country like Iran, electricity offers the 'most readily available' set of advantages, ranging from falling costs to more efficient clean technologies. Worldwide, despite the headlines around countries like India returning to coal generation, more than 80 per cent of new electricity capacity is coming from low-emission sources. Mr Gould makes the point that countries also like to have homegrown energy security, which can be derived from renewables. Energy transition is vital to the future of the Earth. It is essential for us to survive and make our habitats more liveable. And contamination in any part of the planet from a nuclear facility that is in the middle of a confrontation amounts to the greatest failure to meet the challenge of climate change. But even at this moment, with the brink of disaster in front of us, there is progress being reported. According to Mr Gould, the Cop28 goal that was announced by the UAE presidency of tripling renewable energy is being met. With innovation like carbon capture and storage, there is an opportunity to increase energy efficiency and to line up enough capital to back big-ticket sustainable energy systems, including nuclear. That is where the global agenda is really at, with just months to go before Brazil hosts the next UN climate summit. It is, therefore, important that progress not be blown off course by cataclysm in the Middle East. Seen through the lens of climate change, it is clear how badly Iran fell short in its nuclear adventure. It is just as hard to know when it will start back on the international path.
Al Etihad
31 minutes ago
- Al Etihad
Israel rescuers say 7 dead in multi-wave Iran missile attacks
24 June 2025 10:24 Beersheba, Israel (AFP/AP) At least seven people were killed in Israel in a multi-wave Iranian missile attack Tuesday shortly before a staggered ceasefire announced by US President Donald Trump was meant to enter force, emergency services and the army on X, the Magen David Adom rescue service said three people were pronounced dead at the scene of a strike in southern Beersheba while a fourth was added in an update to its three people were "moderately injured" while 20 were treated for minor injuries and anxiety, it footage from the scene showed rescue teams combing through the rubble and mangled slabs of concrete looking for metal jutted out of the top of the multi-storey block, which was partially collapsed down one rang out across Israel for around two hours from dawn as Iran fired six waves of missiles according to statements released by Israel's around 8:00 am (0500 GMT), the military said the public could leave areas near full extent of damage after 12 days of war is not known due to military censorship rules, but at least 50 impacts have been acknowledged nationwide and the official death toll stood at 24 before Tuesday's ceasefire agreement, as outlined by Trump on social media in a surprise late-night post, would see the arch-enemies stop firing in staggered phases. According to Trump, Iran would unilaterally halt all operations beginning 0400 GMT Tuesday, with Israel following suit 12 hours later. Israel-Iran Conflict Continue full coverage
The National
39 minutes ago
- The National
Stocks rally and oil slumps as Israel agrees to ceasefire with Iran
Stocks gained while oil prices slipped after US President Donald Trump announced that Israel and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire. Brent, the benchmark for about a third of global crude, fell 2.87 per cent to $69.53 a barrel at 9.05am UAE time. The slide comes after it closed 7 per cent lower on Monday following Iran's attack on a US airbase in Qatar, a more restrained response than previously feared in retaliation against US strikes on its nuclear sites. West Texas Intermediate, the gauge for US crude, fell about 3 per cent to $66.62 a barrel after losing more than 8 per cent in Monday's trading. 'Crude futures were continuing to weaken early Tuesday … after US President Donald Trump said in a social media post late-Monday that Israel and Iran had agreed to a complete and total ceasefire,' Singapore-based consultancy Vanda Insights said on Tuesday. Although Mr Trump said an official end to the 12-day war would soon follow, 'crude's decline was cautious', it added. The Israeli government agreed to the ceasefire on Tuesday after 'achieving the objectives' of its attacks on Iran. A statement from the office of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel has now 'removed a dual immediate existential threat – both in the nuclear and ballistic missile fields'. Iran had said earlier that it would agree to stop attacking Israel only if it did the same. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X: 'As Iran has repeatedly made clear: Israel launched war on Iran, not the other way around.' The war has threatened to disrupt energy supplies from the region and stoked fears of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz, a vital water way for global crude flows. The conflict has rattled global equities markets as well, adding to the already heightened volatility due to tariff concerns. Stocks rally Shares in Asia advanced on Tuesday, with Japan's Nikkei index gaining 1.16 per cent and China's Hang Seng rising 2.03 per cent. Stocks in Mumbai also gained 0.8 per cent, on hopes the conflict will soon come to an end. Futures of S&P and Nasdaq also advanced 0.6 per cent and 0.83 per cent respectively, while those of the FTSE 100 gained 0.39 per cent, indicating a positive start for the US and European equities. S&P 500 on Monday closed 0.96 per cent higher, the Nasdaq Composite Index rose 0.94 per cent and the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index ended 0.89 per cent higher. While the conflict in the Middle East is dominating headlines, sell-offs caused by geopolitical events tend to be brief, Bloomberg cited Morgan Stanley's strategists led by Michael Wilson as saying in a note. According to the Morgan Stanley team, prior geopolitical risk events have led to some volatility for equities in the short term, but one, three and 12 months after the events, the S&P 500 has been up 2 per cent, 3 per cent, and 9 per cent, on average, respectively.
