logo
Unnecessary Blood Culture Testing Persists in Pediatrics

Unnecessary Blood Culture Testing Persists in Pediatrics

Medscape5 days ago
Rates of routine blood culture (BC) testing for uncomplicated infections in children had no significant effect on length of stay, costs, return emergency department visits, or hospital readmissions, according to data from nearly 95,000 hospitalizations presented at the Pediatric Hospital Medicine (PHM) 2025.
Routine BC testing has shown minimal value in the clinical management of uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), and urinary tract infections (UTI), according to Smit K. Shah, MD, a clinical assistant professor of pediatrics at the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, who presented the findings at the meeting.
While such BC testing in an otherwise healthy pediatric population has low clinical benefit, said Shah in an interview, 'downstream harms of such testing may be leading to not just healthcare waste but patient harm.'
To review the effect of BC testing patterns on outcomes, Shah and colleagues identified hospitalizations for patients aged 3 months to 18 years admitted with CAP, SSTI, or UTI from 2016 to 2023. The data on 94,524 hospitalizations across 31 hospitals came from the Pediatric Health Information System database. The researchers excluded patients with complicated infections, ICU admission, or hospital stays longer than 1 week.
Hospitals were characterized as low-, moderate-, or high-BC testers (13, 10, and 8 hospitals, respectively). The primary outcomes were rates of blood culture testing by infection and hospital, annual rates of testing over 8 years, and clinical outcomes including length of hospital stay, costs, emergency department return visits, and hospital readmissions.
The researchers reviewed data for 41% of CAP, 45% of SSTI, and 55% of UTI cases. BC testing rates varied widely; the widest range was from 16% to 77% for low-testing and high-testing hospitals for CAP, respectively. BC testing ranged from approximately 38% to 77% for SSTI and from approximately 22% to 77% for UTI for the low-testing and high-testing hospitals.
Over the study period, seven hospitals showed significant increases, 17 showed no changes, and seven showed decreases in annual BC testing.
Overall, no significant differences appeared between the high- and low-testing groups in outcome measures of adjusted length of stay, costs, emergency department return visits, hospital readmissions at 7 days, or bacteremia.
The findings were limited by several factors including the use of administrative data and potential lack of generalizability to nonacademic hospitals, Shah noted.
Many hospitals showed no reduction in BC testing over time, despite growing evidence of no change in outcomes, Shah said in his presentation. The results of the current study suggest that the reassessment of BC use and reduction of unnecessary testing is needed to optimize resources and improve healthcare value, Shah concluded.
What Drives Disregard for Guidelines
Despite guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics on the futility of BC testing in uncomplicated SSTIs, the proportion of hospitalized children with this infection undergoing testing is alarming and continues to remain high over time, Shah told Medscape Medical News .
'We need to understand drivers of unnecessary testing,' said Shah. Identifying whether unnecessary testing stems from institutional factors or lack of education about futility and downstream effects of unnecessary testing would help direct national stewardship efforts to reduce testing overuse, he said. 'The recent blood culture vial shortage could act as a natural experiment in reducing testing,' Shah noted
'Diagnostic stewardship in regard to blood cultures is important as overuse of blood cultures when not clinically indicated has the potential to lead to false-positive results, antibiotic overuse, antibiotic resistance, and can potentially increase healthcare costs,' said Shirin Mazumder, MD, an infectious diseases specialist in Memphis, Tennessee, in an interview. 'Evaluating scenarios where blood cultures may not be clinically indicated can help to address these issues,' said Mazumder, who was not involved in the study.
The fear of missing an invasive infection and changing long-standing practice habits are some barriers to reducing unnecessary BC culture testing, but they can be overcome in part by sharing available study data, said Mazumder. In addition, the development of guidelines to determine which candidates would or would not benefit from BCs would help guide clinicians in best practices, she said.
This study was supported in part by grants from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to two of the coauthors. Shah reported no financial conflicts of interest.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New COVID variant 'Stratus' is spreading in the U.S. and worldwide: What are the symptoms?
New COVID variant 'Stratus' is spreading in the U.S. and worldwide: What are the symptoms?

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

New COVID variant 'Stratus' is spreading in the U.S. and worldwide: What are the symptoms?

A new COVID variant is climbing the ranks in the U.S., becoming the third-most common strain of the summer. Variant XFG, colloquially known as "Stratus," was first detected in Southeast Asia in January but accounted for less than about 0% of cases in the United States until May. By late June, it was estimated to account for up to 14%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The World Health Organization (WHO) added XFG to its watchlist but evaluated the additional public health risk posed by the variant as "low" at the global level in a late June report, in which it also advised that currently approved COVID-19 vaccines are "expected to remain effective to this variant against symptomatic and severe disease." Here's what we know about XFG. What is COVID variant XFG? XFG is a combination of COVID-19 variants F.7 and LP.8.1.2, the latter of which is currently the second most prominent strain in the U.S. The variant's mutations may enhance XFG's ability to evade immune responses, but its binding behavior shows that it is less likely to be highly contagious than other dominant variants, Subhash Verma, microbiology and immunology professor at the University of Nevada, Reno, told USA TODAY. "There is currently no clear evidence that XFG causes more severe disease or significantly different symptoms than earlier Omicron variants," said Verma. "Importantly, there are no immediate public health concerns associated with this variant." How common is XFG? While XFG has been growing and spreading worldwide, it has yet to become the predominant source of infection in the United States. The CDC has moved to using longer timeframes for COVID tracking due to low reporting from states. According to the latest data for the two-week period ending June 21, XFG accounted for 14% of U.S. cases, making it the third most-prevalent strain after NB.1.8.1 (43%) and LP.8.1 (31%). The prominence of XFG in the United States significantly increased in the weeks leading up to the last report, accounting for 0% of cases through March before reaching 2% in April, 6% in late May, 11% in early June and 14% in late June. WHO tracked an uptick in XFG worldwide in June as well, with the June report including data from 38 countries showing that XFG accounted for only 7.4% of positive tests in the first week of May but 22.7% by the last. USA TODAY has reached out to the CDC for more information about the spread of COVID variants in July and August. What are the symptoms of XFG? There is no evidence that XFG causes any distinct symptoms from other variants, said Verma. However, hoarseness has been anecdotally associated with the strain, according to social media posts and news reports. The CDC outlines the following as common COVID-19 symptoms: Fever or chills Cough Shortness of breath or difficulty breathing Sore throat Congestion or a runny nose New loss of taste or smell Fatigue Muscle or body aches Headache Nausea or vomiting The CDC advises seeking medical care if you experience any of the following symptoms: Trouble breathing Persistent pain or pressure in the chest New confusion Inability to wake or stay awake Depending on skin tone, lips, nail beds and skin may appear pale, gray, or blue This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: New COVID variant 'Stratus' spreading in US: symptoms, what to know Solve the daily Crossword

How much sugar is in orange juice? Here's what to know.
How much sugar is in orange juice? Here's what to know.

Washington Post

time11 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

How much sugar is in orange juice? Here's what to know.

The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday proposed a tweak to reduce the amount of sugar required in pasteurized orange juice. But the news from the Trump administration isn't a proposal to lower the amount of sugar in the American diet; it's intended to help Florida's citrus industry because the sugar content of Florida oranges has been steadily dropping due to a bacterial disease afflicting the crop.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store