Wall Street futures, stocks, dollar rally as Trump tariffs hit court roadblock
European stocks and Wall Street futures rose on Thursday after a U.S. federal court blocked President Donald Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs from going into effect, sending the dollar up on safe-haven currencies.
The little-known Manhattan-based Court of International Trade ruled that Trump overstepped his authority by imposing his April 2 across-the-board duties on imports from U.S. trading partners.
The White House quickly appealed the decision, and could take it all the way to the Supreme Court if needed. But in the meantime, it offered some hope that Trump might back away from the highest tariff levels he had threatened.
Advertisement
5 A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) at the opening bell in New York City, on May 27, 2025.
AFP via Getty Images
'The ruling has brought a temporary sense of relief to the markets, even as uncertainty lingers over whether the administration will fully comply,' said James Leong, chief executive officer at Grasshopper Asia.
'While volatility has eased for now, the lack of clarity around the government's response could reignite market turbulence. Until the Supreme Court provides a definitive ruling, we're unlikely to see a lasting resolution,' he added.
Advertisement
The ruling could also encourage U.S. trading partners to stall any trade negotiations they are having with the White House while they wait to see how the case is resolved.
5 Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange during morning trading on May 27, 2025.
Getty Images
However, analysts at Goldman Sachs noted the order does not block sectoral levies, and there were other legal avenues for Trump to impose across-the-board and country-specific tariffs.
'This ruling represents a setback for the administration's tariff plans and increases uncertainty but might not change the final outcome for most major U.S. trading partners,' analyst Alec Phillips wrote in a note.
Advertisement
Europe's STOXX 600 index .STOXX was up 0.3% in early London trade.
U.S. markets looked primed for a stronger reaction with S&P 500 futures ESc1 last up 1.6%. Nasdaq futures were up 2%, also benefiting from relief over earnings from Nvidia.NVDA.O, which beat sales estimates.
But Britain's FTSE 100 index .FTSE shrugged off the news and was last down 0.1%.
5 People stand in front of an electronic stock board showing Japan's Nikkei index at a securities firm Thursday, May 29, 2025, in Tokyo.
AP
Advertisement
'Is this a sign that stock markets in countries who did manage to score trade deals with the US in recent weeks, could be at a disadvantage if tariffs are reversed? This could be a short-term theme to watch,' said Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB.
Britain was the first country to secure a trade deal with the U.S. and will hold talks with Washington next week to speed up the implementation of that deal, the Financial Times reported.
Earlier in Asia, Japan's Nikkei .N225 rose 1.9%, while South Korean shares .KS11 climbed 1.9% to a nine-month high. Chinese blue chips .CSI300 firmed 0.6%.
SAFE HAVENS TAKE A BACKSEAT
The news of the court decision hit traditional safe-haven currencies, which have benefitted from tariff fears punishing the U.S. dollar.
5 Trump holds a chart during Liberation Day.
AFP via Getty Images
The dollar gained nearly 1% against the Japanese yen JPY=EBS. It later eased and but remained up 0.3%. The dollar was, meanwhile, up 0.4% against the Swiss franc CHF=EBS.
Another beneficiary of dollar woes, the euro EUR=EBS dropped as much as 0.7% and was last down 0.2% against the greenback.
Advertisement
U.S. Treasury yields rose, adding to the pressure on the market unnerved by Trump's hefty tax and spend bill, which passed the House of Representatives last week.
Yields on 10-year Treasuries US10YT=RR, which move inversely with prices,were up 4 basis points to 4.52% and markets further shaved the chance of a Federal Reserve rate cut anytime soon.
5 A customer holds a bottle as a sign that reads 'Buy Canadian Instead' is displayed after the top five U.S. liquor brands were removed from sale at B.C. Liquor Stores, as part of a response to U.S. President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on Canadian goods.
REUTERS
Longer-dated, 30-year yields US30YT=RR held above the closely-watched 5% level.
Advertisement
Minutes of the last Fed meeting showed 'almost all participants commented on the risk that inflation could prove to be more persistent than expected' due to Trump's tariffs.
A rate cut in July is now seen as around a 20% chance, while September has come in at around 60%, having been more than fully priced a month ago. 0#USDIRPR
In commodity markets, gold was down 0.2% to $3,283 an ounce XAU=. GOL/
Advertisement
Oil prices extended a rally first begun on supply concerns as OPEC+ agreed to leave its output policy unchanged and the U.S. barred Chevron CVX.N from exporting Venezuelan crude. O/R
Brent LCOc1 rose $1 to $65.9 a barrel, while U.S. crude CLc1rose similarly to $62.84 per barrel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Transgender athlete says adults going to her track competitions to heckle her ‘shows how you are as a person'
If high school track standout A.B. Hernandez competes at the state championship, California's federal funding may be in doubt. President Donald Trump has promised to cut the funds if the transgender teen is allowed to compete.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs are headed for a constitutional showdown at the Supreme Court that could reshape presidential power for decades
The Trump administration is preparing for a Supreme Court battle that could reshape presidential power by deciding the extent of the executive branch's authority over tariffs, which was originally granted to Congress by the Constitution. The administration appealed after many of its recent tariffs were invalidated by a federal trade court, which argued the president's actions were too sweeping and cut into Congress' authority. President Donald Trump's struck-down tariffs are almost guaranteed to end up before the Supreme Court, experts say, and the outcome is a toss-up that could shape presidential power for years to come. The Supreme Court rarely opines on trade issues, said Lee Smith, shareholder and leader of the international trade and national security practice at law firm Baker Donelson. The last case it heard on the topic was decided in 2009—U.S. v. Eurodif S.A., which dealt with the 'anti-dumping' duties on low enriched uranium, he said. Yet, this week, the New York-based Court of International Trade set up a future Supreme Court battle royale when it invalidated many of Trump's tariffs. The tariffs in question, including those imposed on Mexico and China, were undergirded by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which gives the President 'broad authority to regulate a variety of economic transactions following a declaration of national emergency.' Smith said the administration's decision to use the IEEPA as justification for the struck-down tariffs was likely made to move things along faster than it could have using other provisions of U.S. trade law. But the Court of International Trade argued that the tariff action was so sweeping it took authority away from Congress, which was granted the power to levy tariffs by the Constitution. The Trump administration has appealed the court's decision, and has signaled that it will elevate the issue to the Supreme Court if it loses. Now, the Supreme Court will likely need to decide how far the president's power over tariffs goes—after years of past U.S. leaders expanding their power over tariffs, with the acquiescence of Congress. 'It's a constitutional question,' Smith told Fortune. 'The Trump administration is taking it up no matter what, if they lose. The other side has already won—the Court of International Trade. So, if they lose the Court of Appeals, they're going to want the Supreme Court to reinstate the earlier decision.' Trump fought several court battles over tariffs during his first administration, especially over his tariffs on China, which were justified with a different provision of U.S. trade law. While none reached the Supreme Court, he was largely successful, said Smith, and it's possible, although not guaranteed, Trump may succeed this time around because the court's conservative majority has shown 'a lot of deference to this president,' said Smith. Still, since Trump last defended tariffs in court during his first administration, several groundbreaking cases decided by the Supreme Court overturned precedents which could affect the administration's odds. Stavros Gadinis, a law professor at U.C. Berkeley, said two cases, West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, which overturned the Chevron Doctrine, signaled that the Supreme Court has been paying attention to expanding executive power. Broadly, the decisions in both of these cases imply that any president seeking to exercise powers under vague or ambiguous statutes is subject to more scrutiny and requires more evidence and support for their actions than before. 'When, initially, those rulings were issued, a Democratic administration was in the White House, and the Republicans were very happy about it,' Gadinis told Fortune. 'But now that the situation is reversed these rulings could suggest more checks on how a Republican administration interprets certain statutes.' Thanks to the overturning of the Chevron doctrine, the courts don't need to automatically defer to the administration's definition of ambiguous terms used by Trump to back his tariffs such as 'national security' or 'retaliation.' Instead these definitions will be decided by the court, which may or may not agree with the administration's definition, said Gadinis. It's not guaranteed the Trump administration will lose at the Supreme Court. Yet, during his first administration, Trump officials gathered evidence and followed set procedures—for example by opening an investigation into China on intellectual property, technology transfer, and innovation. The administration did not follow the same procedure for the recently struck down tariffs, said Gadinis. 'These kinds of principles—the procedural background was just not in place in this particular set of times. So, this seems broader than what (the courts) upheld back then, and therefore more likely to fall,' Gadinis told Fortune. This story was originally featured on
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Sen. Elizabeth Warren sides with Trump's call to eliminate debt limit: ‘Should be scrapped'
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said on Friday she agrees with President Donald Trump's call to eliminate the debt limit, urging bipartisan action to scrap it permanently. In a post on X, Warren wrote: '@realDonaldTrump and I agree: the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe.' 'Let's pass a bipartisan bill and get rid of it forever,' she added. The senator also said 'jacking up the debt limit by $4 trillion to fund more tax breaks for billionaires is an outrage,' in an attack on a GOP-backed tax bill to enact Trump's priorities. Warren's post cited comments Trump made at a news conference earlier on Friday, when he referenced her past support for eliminating the debt limit and said he 'always agreed with her' on the issue, 'She wanted to see it terminated, gotten rid of not being voted on every five years or 10 years, and the reason was because it's so catastrophic for our country,' Trump said. Sen. Elizabeth Warren said 'the debt limit should be scrapped to prevent an economic catastrophe.' Getty Images for Families Over Billionaires The debt limit was last suspended by Congress in the summer of 2023 as part of a bipartisan bill reached between Republican leadership and former President Joe Biden, pushing off the threat of national default through January of this year, when the debt limit was reinstated at more than $36 trillion. The Treasury Department said in January that the government would need to implement 'extraordinary measures' to prevent it from defaulting on its debt. Earlier this month, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent called on Congress to raise the debt ceiling by mid-July to prevent the government from defaulting, warning that the country is on track to run out of money to pay its bills as early as August without congressional action. President Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the US Steel Mon Valley Works-Irvin plant on May 30, 2025. AP 'A failure to suspend or increase the debt limit would wreak havoc on our financial system and diminish America's security and global leadership position,' Bessent wrote to House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. 'Prior episodes have shown that waiting until the last minute to suspend or increase the debt limit can have serious adverse consequences for financial markets, businesses and the federal government.' Republicans want to raise the debt ceiling as part of a broader package, but intra-party debate remains over issues such as tax changes.
