Judge makes bombshell ruling after Trump assassination attempt suspect tries to unseal 'classified national security' documents
Ryan Routh, 59, who is representing himself in his upcoming trial for the attempted assassination at Trump's West Palm Beach golf course on September 15, 2024, was shot down in his request for documents related to his case.
In her ruling on Friday, Judge Aileen Cannon mysteriously determined that 'the United States has made a sufficient showing that the information at issue was classified' and that its disclosure 'could cause serious damage or exceptionally grave damages to the national security of the United States.'
'The Court finds that the United States properly invoked the provisions of [the] Classified Information Procedures Act and its classified information privilege as to the information referenced by the classified order,' Cannon wrote in her two-page decision.
'The United States' motion and all accompanying material are hereby sealed.'
It is unclear what classified documents Routh may have been seeking or how it relates to national security threats.
But some have speculated online about what the ruling could mean, with conservative influencer Nick Sortor asking, 'Was this guy a Ukrainian asset or something.'
Libertarian Ken Silva also wondered, 'What are they trying to hide?!'
Routh has been charged with attempting to assassinate Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course last year before the presidential election, as well as charges of assaulting a federal officer and multiple firearm violations related to the September 15, 2024 assassination attempt.
He is also charged with owning a handgun despite being a convicted felon and with possessing a firearm with a removed serial number.
Prosecutors have said Routh aimed a rifle at Trump from behind a bush on his golf course, but his plot was quickly foiled by a sharp-eyed Secret Service agent.
The would-be assassin then allegedly aimed his rifle at the agent, who opened fire while Trump was raced away to safety.
The action took place just a few hundred yards away from where Trump was golfing on September 15, 2024, just weeks before the November elections.
Routh has denied the charges against him, pleading not guilty in the weeks after the incident.
Last month, he was granted the ability to represent himself in his upcoming trial, with his court-appointed attorneys serving as standby counsel as Cannon warned him that the lawyers 'will defend you better than you can defend yourself' and urged him not to make the decision, Fox News reports.
He has filed a number of motions ever since, and at his first opportunity to speak in court, Routh went of topic - bringing up what he thought were the ambitions of Cannon and the federal prosecutors, according to WPBF.
Libertarian Ken Silva also asked what the federal government is trying to hide
He also reportedly wrote Cannon - who previously oversaw Trump's classified documents case - an unusual letter asking why the death penalty was not on the table in his case.
Routh even went as far as proposing he be included in a prisoner swap with enemies of the United States.
'Why is the death penalty not allowed? At nearly 60, a life of nothingness without love - what is the point? Why is it all or nothing?' he wrote, according to Fox.
'I had wished for a prisoner swap with Hamas, Iran ... or China for [businessman] Jimmy Lai or one of the 40 others, or to freeze to death in Siberia in exchange for a Ukrainian soldier... so I could die being of some use and save all this court mess.'
He then suggested that Cannon send him away - joking that it would give Trump a symbolic win.
'Perhaps you [Judge Cannon] have the power to trade me away... An easy diplomatic victory for Trump to give an American he hates to China, Iran or North Korea... everyone wins.'
Meanwhile, Routh tried to flex his legal muscles when he filed a motion asking Cannon to exclude 'irrelevant and prejudicial evidence' including messages from his former employer, Tina Cooper, who pleaded guilty to conspiring with Routh to help get weapons illegally.
The Department of Justice blasted Routh in its response, claiming he was 'mistaken' on a number of things he alleged, including an 'odd claim' that the government has not identified specific pieces of evidence against him.
'Other arguments are more persuasive in light of the defendant's decision to represent himself,' federal prosecutors argued, Law & Crime reports.
'This court has a responsibility to ensure that trial does not become a circus and that the jury is not burdened and distracted by plainly inadmissible evidence,' they added.
Routh did not seem to help his case in his response, when he rambled about the 'new DOJ, Trump [and United States Attorney General Pam] Bondi,' and argued that one can't 'besmirch the president's morals when he has none.
'The defendant respectfully moves this court to recognize that the prosecution is making every attempt in this motion to silence the defense in every fashion.'
Federal prosecutors now say they expect Routh to present statements from self-published 'books' and other writings of his as well as hearsay statements in his defense.
'It is the defendant's evidence that is most likely to upend this trial by injecting irrelevant and prejudicial facts unrelated to the actual charges,' the federal prosecutors argued.
'None of the substantive legal arguments raised... has merit.'
The Daily Mail has reached out to the Department of Justice for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer vows ‘unwavering support' for Ukraine after defiant Zelensky rules out giving up land to Russia
Sir Keir Starmer has pledged the UK's 'unwavering support' for Ukraine after a defiant President Zelensky rejected Donald Trump 's suggestion that a peace plan may involve giving up land to Russia. President Trump is set to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin next Friday in Alaska as he seeks to bring an end to the war in Ukraine, and said the talks could include 'some swapping of territories'. But President Zelensky hit back, insisting Ukraine "will not give Russia any awards for what it has done" and that "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'. In a phone call with the Ukrainian leader on Saturday morning, Sir Keir reiterated 'his unwavering support for Ukraine and its people'. After the call, President Zelensky said the two men 'shared the same view' on the danger of discussing what he described as 'the impossible'. A Downing Street spokesperson said: "Both leaders welcomed President Trump's desire to bring this barbaric war to an end and agreed that we must keep up the pressure on Putin to end his illegal war. "The prime minister ended the call by reiterating his unwavering support for Ukraine and its people." It comes as the UK is set to host a hastily arranged meeting of national security advisers from the US, Ukraine and European countries on Saturday. The meeting at David Lammy's official country retreat, Chevening, will "discuss progress towards securing a just and lasting peace". It is understood the meeting was arranged at the request of the US and will be co-hosted by American vice-president JD Vance, who is staying in Kent at Chevening at the start of his UK holiday. Confirming the summit with President Trump in Alaska next week, the Kremlin said the two leaders would focus on discussing options for achieving a 'long-term peaceful resolution'. President Putin is expected to use the meeting to set out his demands, including that Ukraine give up two eastern regions as well as Crimea. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday, Mr Trump said any deal may include the 'some swapping of territories', adding: 'We're going to get some back. We're going to get some switched. There will be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' But in an angry response on Saturday, President Zelensky said his country would not violate its constitution by ceding territory. 'Ukrainians will not give their land to occupiers,' he said. He also warned that any peace deal which excluded Kyiv would lead to "dead solutions." President Trump's decision to meet Mr Putin has fuelled fears that Ukraine could be sidelined in the efforts to end the war. But Mr Zelensky issued a staunch warning to the international community that any agreement reached without Ukraine would ultimately fail. He said: "Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work."
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump Burger owner in Texas faces deportation after Ice arrest
The owner of a Donald Trump-themed hamburger restaurant chain in Texas is facing deportation after immigration authorities under the command of the president detained him. Roland Mehrez Beainy, 28, entered the US as 'a non-immigrant visitor' from Lebanon in 2019 and was supposed to have left the country by 12 February 2024, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) spokesperson told the Guardian. Citing the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Texas's Fayette County Record newspaper reported that Beainy applied for legal status after purportedly wedding a woman – but the agency maintained there is no proof he ever lived with her during the alleged marriage. Ice said its officers arrested Beainy on 16 May – five years after he launched the first of multiple Trump Burger locations – and placed him into immigration proceedings, an agency statement said. 'Under the current administration, Ice is committed to restore integrity to our nation's immigration system by holding all individuals accountable who illegally enter the country or overstay the terms of their admission,' the agency's statement also said. 'This is true regardless of what restaurant you own or political beliefs you might have.' In remarks to the Houston Chronicle, Beainy denied Ice's charges against him, saying: 'Ninety percent of the shit they're saying is not true.' He is tentatively scheduled for a hearing in immigration court on 18 November. Trump Burger gained national attention after Beainy opened the original location in Bellville, Texas, in 2020, the same year Trump lost his bid for a second presidential term to Joe Biden. Replete with memorabilia paying reverence to Trump as well as politically satirical menu items targeting his enemies, Beainy's chain expanded to other locations, including Houston. Trump won a second presidency in January, and his administration summarily began delivering on promises to pursue mass deportations of immigrants. Political supporters of Trump in the US without papers, at least in many cases, have not been spared. One case which generated considerable news headlines was that of a Canadian national who supported Trump's plans for mass deportation of immigrants – only for federal authorities to detain her in California while she interviewed for permanent US residency and publicly describe her in a statement as 'an illegal alien from Canada'. In another instance, Ice reportedly detained a Christian Armenian Iranian woman who lost her legal permanent US residency, or green card, after a 2008 burglary conviction and incarcerated her at a federal detention facility in California despite her vocal support of Trump. Her husband, with whom she is raising four US citizen children, subsequently blamed the couple's plight on Biden's 'doing for open borders', as Newsweek noted. Beainy's detention by Ice is not his only legal plight, according to the Houston Chronicle. He sued the landlord of a Trump Burger location in Kemah, Texas, whom Beainy claimed forcibly removed staff and took over the restaurant. The landlord responded with his own lawsuit accusing Beainy of unpaid debts and renamed the Kemah restaurant Maga Burger. In 2022, Beainy told the Houston Chronicle he endured threats to have Trump Burger burned down when the first one opened its doors. But the brand had since gained a loyal following and a portion of its profits were set aside to aid Trump's fundraising, Beainy said to the outlet. 'I would love to have [Trump's] blessing and have him come by,' Beainy said at the time. 'We're hoping that he … sees the place.'
The Guardian
25 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Erasure of years of work': outcry as White House moves to open Arctic reserve to oil and gas drilling
The Trump administration's plan to expand oil and gas drilling in a 23m acre reserve on the Arctic Ocean is sparking an impassioned response, amid fears it threatens Arctic wildlife, undermines the subsistence rights of Alaska Natives and imperils one of the fastest-warming ecosystems on Earth. More than a quarter of a million people have responded to the 2 June proposal from the US Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to roll back protections on the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A), the largest tract of public land in the US. A man from Georgia described hearing from an oil company that an employee shot a mother polar bear after encountering her with two cubs in northern Alaska. 'I beg you to reconsider … I'm just 18 years old and haven't had a chance to see the real world yet,' said a teenager from Denmark. 'This will make that impossible – if not in the whole world, then at least in the icy areas of our planet.' The staggering number of comments submitted during the two-month comment period showed the public was watching, said Andy Moderow, senior director of policy at the Alaska Wilderness League. 'That's a pretty large turnout of Americans saying this is not the direction we need in the Arctic.' The BLM rollback is part of a broad, rapid-fire regulatory push to industrialize the Alaskan Arctic, particularly the NPR-A. Weeks after proposing to strip protections from the reserve, the Department of Interior signaled it would adopt a management plan that would open 82% of the NPR-A to oil drilling. Two weeks ago, before the public comment period had ended, the BLM rescinded three other Biden-era documents protecting the reserve. The Alaska Wilderness League, an Alaska-focused conservation non-profit, said the administration's decision to start dismantling protections for the NPR-A before the comment period concluded showed 'a lack of interest in meaningfully reviewing any input before taking action to allow unfettered industrialization across this landscape'. Alaska Native groups, some of which have worked for years to secure protections for areas of the NPR-A, also expressed frustration. The rollback is 'a coordinated erasure of years of work by Alaska Native communities', said Sovereign Iñupiat for a Living Arctic in a press statement. 'To have all the work we've done for the last two decades, trying to create important special areas with their unique biological features demonstrated by science, disregarded to allow full-force development is crazy to consider,' said Rosemary Ahtuangaruak, an activist and former mayor of Nuiqsut, Alaska, a village in the NPR-A. The BLM said in a statement it was working through all comments received on the 2024 NPR-A rule rescission, and that it would respond to substantive comments in the final rule. The White House referred the Guardian to the BLM when asked for comment. Under Trump, the Department of Interior has embarked on a push to promote resource extraction in the Arctic, vowing to expand oil and gas in the NPR-A, open oil leasing on the coastal plain of the Arctic national wildlife refuge, and advance a controversial mining road in the southern Brooks range. The total land in play from these proposals is nearly 25m acres (10m hectares) of Arctic ecosystem, an area larger than the state of Indiana. The NPR-A comprises the vast majority of this. The reserve supports home grounds for polar bears, calving areas for caribou, and habitat for millions of migratory birds from Africa and Europe, as well as the Americas. In 2023, the Biden administration began consultations with Alaska Native groups and other stakeholders to update existing rules on how the NPR-A should be managed. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion These consultations led to the 2024 rule which the BLM now aims to rescind. That rule protects key areas in the NPR-A for subsistence use and habitat, including Teshekpuk Lake, the Utukok Uplands and the Colville River. Ahtuangaruak, who participated in the 2023 consultations, said removing these protections could be 'very devastating rapidly'. She described a worsening ecological situation across the reserve, partly driven by existing oil development. Caribou herds were declining, she said, and some had shifted their migration patterns away from her village because of oil and gas development to the west of her village. Permafrost was thawing, causing freshwater Arctic lakes to drain. Ice roads separated caribou calves from caribou cows; polar bears struggled to den in the melting snowpack. Tim Fullman, a senior ecologist at the Wilderness Society, a US conservation non-profit, said that already-existing roads in the Alaskan Arctic had been shown to hinder caribou movement, at times delaying migrating animals for up to a month. Then there's the perennial health impacts on communities from gas flaring in the NPR-A, which Ahtuangaruak said she began to notice in the early 2000s when she was a healthcare worker. 'The flares, when there'd be 20 or more, there would be nights where people would have trouble breathing,' she said. 'Babies would start to have events. There was one point where we had 20 babies develop respiratory distress and 10 of them were put on ventilators.' Thirty miles east of Nuiqsut, Ahtuangaruak's village, is the ConocoPhillips Willow project, a drilling operation approved in March 2023 under the Biden administration. Still under construction, it is projected to come online in 2029. Once it begins to produce, Willow will be operational for at least 30 years, according to its environmental impact statement. The project is an example of the timeframe involved in the Arctic oil and gas projects the Trump administration is currently encouraging, says Moderow – spanning decades. 'We're not talking about oil next year. We're talking about oil in 2050 and 2060 and beyond, when we need to move past it,' he said. The projects 'could easily be pumping oil when babies born today are retiring in a climate that's not livable if that oil is not blocked'. 'It's investing in production that's going to be going on for decades, well past when we need to be at essentially net zero greenhouse gas emissions if we're going to have a livable climate,' said Jeremy Lieb, a senior attorney at Earthjustice.
