Thai teen says he threw himself out of a window to escape Cambodia's brutal scam farms
BANGKOK (Reuters) -Lured to Cambodia, tortured and forced to defraud strangers online, a Thai teenager said he barely survived after he threw himself from an eighth-floor window last year in a desperate bid to escape one of the Southeast Asian nation's prison-like scam compounds.
The 18-year-old, who asked to be identified only by the nickname Louis, told Reuters he endured brutal conditions for about a year, alongside children as young as 13, in an operation run by Chinese criminals.
Trafficked workers lived like "slaves", he said, forced to work from early in the morning until midnight in buildings surrounded by high walls and barbed wire where they were subjected to brutal punishments and guarded by men with electric batons.
The transnational scam industry emerged in Southeast Asia during the pandemic and is believed to generate billions of dollars a year for organised crime as people across the globe are defrauded of their life savings.
Louis spoke to Reuters in the Thai capital of Bangkok, a day before London-based rights group Amnesty International published a report on Thursday accusing the Cambodian government of 'deliberately ignoring' human rights abuses by cybercrime gangs, allegations the Cambodian government rejected, saying the report was 'exaggerated'.
Reuters was unable to independently verify Louis' account but details matched other accounts by trafficking survivors published by numerous groups including United Nations agencies.
While Louis declined to share his full name, he was willing to be interviewed by Reuters TV.
A HIGHLY PAID JOB
A softly-spoken teenager, Louis said he was 17 when a woman contacted him on Facebook offering him a well-paid role, meals and accommodation after he posted that he was looking for work.
She persuaded him to travel to Bangkok - the first time he had left his rural home province - but he was then told to go to the border where he was taken to one of at least 53 scam compounds in Cambodia identified by Amnesty.
Louis was put to work using deepfake video software to dupe Thai women into sending money.
He said he "felt pressured" and after a week he was sold to another compound near the Vietnamese border that looked 'like a prison".
ESCAPE
In a room with eight Thai men and women, Louis said they were ordered to scam at least one million baht a month (about $30,000) and shocked with electric batons if they were late, rested too much, or failed to meet the quotas.
Louis said he decided to escape after he was confined to a dark room. Breaking through a window, he crashed down several storeys and smashed his chin.
"My mouth filled with blood, it was everywhere, and my teeth were broken. Then I passed out," he said.
The bosses stripped him naked, but took him to hospital. From there he managed to get home.
Louis said he wanted to tell Thai people looking for work not to go to Cambodia.
'It's for your own safety … You might never come back.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Defamation case against Fox News highlights role of its hosts in promoting 2020 election falsehoods
In short: Fox let Trump aides spread conspiracy theories despite knowing they were false because it was what their viewers wanted to hear. Fox was trying to hold on to viewers who were angry at the network for saying Biden had won the election. Fox said it was covering a newsworthy story. It accuses the London-based company, which had only Los Angeles County as a client for the 2020 election, of exaggerating its claims of damages in the hope of receiving a financial windfall. Pirro now working in the second Trump administration The focus on Pirro is noteworthy because the former Fox personality Smartmatic, relying on emails and text messages revealed as part of the case, said Pirro was using her position as a Fox host in 2020 to help Trump and persuade him to pardon her ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who was convicted of conspiracy and tax evasion. Trump pardoned him before leaving office in 2021. Advertisement In a text to then-Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel in September 2020, Pirro said, 'I'm the No. 1 watched show on news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and the party,' Smartmatic said in court papers. One of her own producers, Jerry Andrews, called Pirro a 'reckless maniac,' Smartmatic said. He texted after one of her shows in November that it was 'rife (with) conspiracy theories and bs and is yet another example of why this woman should never be on live television.' FOX Business Network anchor Maria Bartiromo, right, arrived at the White House, on March 6. Alex Brandon/Associated Press The court papers said Pirro also suggested 'evidence' of supposed fraud to Trump lawyer Sidney Powell that she could use on a television appearance — material that also was spread by Bartiromo. Bartiromo still works at Fox, and in 2020 had shows on both the news channel and Fox Business Network. The court papers uncovered messages showing her desire to help Trump: 'I am very worried. Please please please overturn this. Bring the evidence, I know you can,' she texted to Powell. Dobbs, whose business show was canceled by Fox in February 2021, texted to Powell four days after the election, saying 'I'm going to do what I can to help stop what is now a coup d'etat in (its) final days — perhaps moments,' a reference to Biden's victory. Dobbs A central figure in Fox's 'pivot' Smartmatic portrayed Pirro as a central figure in Fox's 'pivot' to deemphasize Biden's victory because it angered Trump fans. Instead, the network found that ratings jumped whenever claims of election fraud were discussed, it said. Advertisement As in the Dominion case, the discovery process helped Smartmatic find messages and statements that seem embarrassing in retrospect. For example, in early December, Fox's Jesse Watters texted colleague Greg Gutfeld that 'Think of how incredible our ratings would be if Fox went ALL in on STOP THE STEAL.' Fox, in a response to the newly-revealed court papers, pointed to an ongoing corruption case involving Smartmatic and its executives, including a claim by federal prosecutors that it used money from the sale of voting machines to set up a 'slush fund' for bribing foreign officials. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' Fox said. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' Smartmatic has already settled similar defamation claims
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Crown will not appeal decision to acquit players in Hockey Canada sexual assault trial: Source
The Crown will not appeal Ontario Superior Court Justice Maria Carroccia's decision to acquit the five players involved in the Hockey Canada sexual assault case, according to a source with knowledge of the decision. Last month, Carroccia found all five players — Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote — not guilty of sexual assault charges stemming from a 2018 incident in which a woman said she was assaulted in a London, Ont., hotel room while the players were in town for a gala celebrating their World Junior Championship. Advertisement In the judge's ruling, which she detailed and read aloud over the span of several hours on July 24, Carroccia said she did not find the complainant — known as E.M. to protect her identity — in the case to be 'credible or reliable.' The decision came following a trial that garnered widespread attention, spanned two months and featured a number of bizarre twists, including the discharge of two juries. The Crown had 30 days to appeal the decision but decided against proceeding with a challenge in the Ontario Court of Appeal. TSN was first to report the news. The case focused on what happened in the early hours of June 19, 2018, at the Delta Armouries hotel. After a night of drinking and dancing at Jack's, a popular bar in London, E.M. and McLeod had consensual sex in his hotel room. Later, E.M. said McLeod invited his teammates to the room to engage in sexual activity, without her knowledge or consent. Defense attorneys for the five accused players argued that E.M. was the instigator and aggressor in the sexual activity that occurred in the hotel room. The Crown argued that E.M. was put in a 'highly stressful' and 'unpredictable' situation and that she did not voluntarily consent to any of the specific acts that occurred. In her testimony, E.M. described disassociating at one point in the hotel room, which the Crown later explained as a response to fear. Carroccia rejected that theory, saying in her decision that she found 'actual consent not vitiated by fear.' Megan Savard, Hart's attorney, criticized the Crown for pursuing the case, describing the initial outcome as 'not just predictable — it was predicted.' 'The Crown attorney did not have to take this case to trial,' Savard said in July. Immediately following Carroccia's decision last month, Karen Bellehumeur, who represents E.M., expressed her disappointment and stressed the need for institutional reform in how the justice system deals with sexual assault cases. Advertisement 'The justice system continues to fall short on identifying and eradicating stereotypes,' Bellehumeur said. 'It struggles to understand complicated social interactions, such as victim responses to unpredictable, threatening situations such as that described by E.M.' Carroccia's decision came nearly a month and a half after the highly publicized trial concluded and seven years after the alleged assault was first reported to London police. Players gathered with their families and expressed relief that the yearslong saga had seemingly come to an end. Almost immediately, speculation began about what the acquittal meant for the players' potential hockey careers, though the National Hockey League issued a strong response about their eligibility via a written statement: 'The allegations made in this case, even if not determined to have been criminal, were very disturbing and the behavior at issue was unacceptable,' the NHL said. 'We will be reviewing and considering the judge's findings. While we conduct that analysis and determine next steps, the players charged in this case are ineligible to play in the League.' The NHL Players' Association pushed back on that, saying the league's stance was not consistent with the collective bargaining agreement. 'Dillon Dubé, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, Carter Hart, and Michael McLeod were acquitted of all charges by Justice Carroccia of the Ontario Superior Court,' the NHLPA's statement read. 'After missing more than a full season of their respective NHL careers, they should now have the opportunity to return to work. The NHL's declaration that the Players are 'ineligible' to play pending its further analysis of the Court's findings is inconsistent with the discipline procedures set forth in the CBA.' The Players' Association said in its statement that it was 'addressing this dispute with the League.' Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'
