Auckland Businesses Get Immigration Edge
With Auckland's 227,000+ businesses employing over 1 million workers, many reliant on skilled migrants - this alliance addresses critical workforce challenges by streamlining visa processes, reducing compliance risks, and ensuring Chamber members retain a competitive edge in global talent acquisition. This partnership reinforces the region's position as New Zealand's economic engine.
Simon Bridges, Chief Executive of the Auckland Business Chamber, says, 'Auckland's businesses are the backbone of New Zealand's economy, and the ability to access and retain skilled people is more important than ever. Our members consistently tell us that visa compliance and workforce planning are major challenges. By partnering with Working In, we're giving our members the tools and support they need to succeed.'
He adds, 'This isn't just about compliance - it's about helping Auckland remain a hub for global talent and ensuring our region stays competitive.'
The strategic partnership to provide members a discount to Working In'sMyVisaTeam, a comprehensive immigration management platform combining expert advisory services,and the company's VisaTrackonline platform for real-time visa management and compliance alerts.
Scott Mathieson, who co-founded Working In in 1998, says, 'We're proud to support the Auckland Business Chamber and its members at a time when immigration is so central to business success. Our VisaTrack services are already helping some of New Zealand's largest employers save time, reduce risk, and secure the talent they need. Partnering with the Chamber means we can extend this expertise to thousands more businesses.'
He continues, 'We know the challenges - policy changes, compliance headaches, and the need for certainty. Our goal is to make immigration and hiring easier and more transparent for every Auckland employer.'
Bridges adds, 'This partnership is a real win for our members. It's about practical support, not just advice, and it shows the Chamber's commitment to delivering real value.' Mathieson agrees, 'Auckland is New Zealand's business engine room, and we're excited to play our part in helping it grow.'
About Working In
With one of the most experienced teams of Licensed Immigration Advisers and Recruitment Specialists in New Zealand and 4,000+ successful placements, Working In (workingin.nz) is New Zealand's only end to end employer-focused immigration & recruitment service provider. Services span Immigration Strategy, Visa Processing and Workforce Planning to International & Local Recruitment, and INZ-compliant settlement support
About Auckland Business Chamber
The Auckland Business Chamber is one of New Zealand's leading business networks, dedicated to supporting, advocating for, and connecting businesses across the region. With over 165 years of experience, the Chamber exists to make it easier to do business in Auckland—offering practical support, trusted advice, and opportunities for growth and connection.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Call for government to help Auckland as unemployment rises
File photo. Simon Bridges it was tough in Auckland and called for fiscal stimulus. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Auckland's Business Chamber boss is calling on the government do more to stimulate the economy in the supercity, and the country, as jobless figures rise . The latest Stats NZ data shows Auckland's 6.1 percent unemployment rate for the June 2025 quarter is the worst of all regions. It is also above the national unemployment rate which rose to a near-five year high of 5.2 percent as businesses either sacked staff or stop hiring. "It's pretty grim ... it's very very tough in Auckland," Chamber chief executive Simon Bridges told Morning Report. There was a real case for serious policy or fiscal stimulus around New Zealand, and particularly in the big cities, in order to "get things going". "I think we need to raise the animal spirits, if you like, of the business community." Bridges said a boost in confidence in Auckland was needed at both business and consumer levels. Things were tough in the city which hadn't caught a break since before the Covid-19 pandemic started, he said. "There is more stimulus, there is more policy work that government could be doing to provide a better business environment in Auckland in the here and now," he said. "I think [the government has] done some worthy long term things, but in the end if all we worry about is the long term, I'm not sure there'll be that many Kiwis left in Auckland," he said. "It's now that they need to be focused on." Employers and Manufacturers Association (EMA) head of advocacy Alan McDonald said while the agriculture industry was bolstering employment elsewhere, Auckland had different economic drivers. "Numbers from the Auckland Council Economic Unit indicated unemployment would be quite high [in the June quarter] and it has been for some time. "There are some signs of recovery but they're being led by the regional economy and primary sector and Auckland is more about manufacturing and services. "Hospitality, tourism, education sectors have all been down as well." McDonald said EMA had received a spike in calls to its advice line about redundancies and restructures since March. "We had hoped 5.1 [in December 2024] might be the bottom of Auckland's unemployment numbers, but we've been hearing from March until now that things are still very tight and very tough." But things were starting to turn he said. The Stats NZ quarterly labour market figures released on Wednesday also showed unemployment was [ more than double the national rate at 12.1 percent. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Commerce commission calls on business to report electricity companies
Commerce Commission chair John Small said if electricity suppliers were found to be misusing their market power to deter competition, it would take action. Photo: RNZ / Alexander Robertson The Commerce Commission is calling for business customers to anonymously report unfair or anti-competitive electricity industry practices. The commission has an anonymous reporting tool that it uses to collect information about other industries, such as the grocery sector. It is now making it available for reports about electricity as well, with encryption to avoid information being disclosed about the person making the report. Commerce Commission chair John Small said if electricity suppliers were found to be misusing their market power to deter competition, it would take action. The initiative was prompted by comments by Auckland Business Chamber chief executive Simon Bridges reported in the media, which said his members were uneasy or scared about raising complaints about their energy bills with their providers because they worried about retaliation, Small said. "I contacted Simon because that's really concerning. He got a group of his members together, the Major Electricity Users Group, people like that. I got the Electricity Authority and we had a couple of hours talking about it in a group," he said. "I really wanted to find out first of all what were the complaints and secondly was there evidence of breaches of the law the commission could prosecute. It was a really good discussion but it was all anecdotal." Further investigation had not settled on anything concrete, he said, so it was decided a way to "flush out" the problem could be to expand the anonymous reporting tool. "That works for us in other areas like cartels and groceries where there's the same kind of problem ... People can tell you stuff absolutely securely, knowing their name is never going to be published or found out. It might be that it doesn't get used, it might be all this goes away, sometimes a shot across the bows is all it takes to sharpen up behaviour." He said he had concerns about the power sector more generally. "We are working very closely with the Electricity Authority at the moment on a range of things. We will start to articulate a medium and longer-term regulatory strategy within a few weeks. It is under active consideration. I'm not at all happy with it." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
3 days ago
- NZ Herald
Energy crisis threatens NZ economy, time for gentailer reform
Meanwhile, Transpower's annual Security of Supply Assessment, which evaluates the ability of the electricity system to meet national demand in the years ahead, shows that there has been a marked decrease (i.e. 70%-80%) in anticipated new supply, in comparison to prior expectations. This is despite the high future wholesale prices, which should (at least in a well-functioning market) result in more supply and enhanced competition. A sharp fall in the availability of gas over recent years (much sharper than anyone had foreseen) certainly hasn't helped matters, but it is far from the only factor suppressing demand, as some are suggesting. Delayed or cancelled solar and wind projects make up half of the projected fall Transpower speaks of. The reality is that neither the big four gentailers nor the smaller independent players have brought renewable energy projects to market as quickly as had been indicated. To understand what's driving this, I believe we need to look squarely at the current structure of the energy market, where the four gentailers operate on both the generation and retail sides, and completely dominate both (combined market share is close to 90% in each case, and climbing). This model incentivises gentailers to hold back supply and foreclose competition, and provides them with the power to do so. When a single business controls both sides of the market, basic incentives to increase supply are dulled. After all, more supply will only mean lower prices, and poorer returns for the gentailers' retail arms. Energy today is a severe handbrake on business and the economy, and on our collective goal of making New Zealand a more productive, prosperous nation. Simon Bridges Likewise, there is minimal incentive to facilitate the entry of new players into the market by offering adequately long-term, competitively priced contracts – not just for energy supplied to gentailers by independent generators, but also for energy sold by gentailers to independent retailers. This is not to say that no investment in new generation is taking place, or that no contracts are being signed with independents, but rather that these things are not happening on the scale or at the speed they need to. Nothing the gentailers are doing is crooked or underhand – they're simply acting rationally and commercially in their shareholders' interests. The problem is the rules of the game that the gentailers are responding to. As the energy sector lurches from crisis to crisis, it's very difficult not to reach the conclusion that these rules need to change. My view – which has strong support across the energy sector, bar the gentailers – is that the Government needs to separate gentailers' generation and retail functions. This would be a case of corporate separation rather than structural separation – common ownership would be maintained across the generation and retail sides, but there would be operational independence between them. Changing the structure of the market on its own won't fix all the sector's problems. We also need immediate steps to boost supply, such as a government tender for additional generation to fill the unmet need in the next five years (with the cost potentially recouped via an industry levy). Over the longer term, we need a stable, settled energy strategy, underpinned by bipartisan consensus. But it is arguably the most important single step we can take. What I'm proposing isn't wacky or radical. The same approach has been used to good effect overseas to address competition and affordability issues in the energy market, and in our own telecommunications sector a decade or so ago. The OECD has recently called for gentailer separation to be brought back to the table in New Zealand. Still, some argue that it's all too bold, and that government intervention will have a chilling effect on the market. I'd argue the opposite – that failure to intervene, and allowing the slide into de-industrialisation and productivity loss to continue, will do far more to undermine investor confidence. The time for incrementalism is over. Let's see real structural reform. Simon Bridges is CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber, and a former Minister of Energy and Resources.
