Jenrick demands Law Society withdraw ‘race and ethnicity' guidance
The shadow justice secretary has written to the body, which represents solicitors across England and Wales, complaining about new advice aimed at promoting the use of inclusive language by legal professionals.
The guidance says that racial categorisation is based in white supremacy, and 'was developed as an attempt to prove biological superiority and maintain dominance over others'.
Mr Jenrick said these were 'dangerous ideas' and that the society should be 'colour-blind and merit-based'.
He claimed the guidance runs contrary to 'the principle of equal treatment' and 'seeks to divide people on the basis of race and ethnicity'.
'It is unacceptable for the Law Society to promote this kind of ideology, particularly as other legal bodies back away from these ideas,' Mr Jenrick said in a letter to Law Society president Richard Atkinson.
'I urge you to withdraw this guidance immediately.'
The Law Society has been contacted for comment.
It comes after a row over new guidance directing judges to consider the lives of offenders from ethnic minority and other backgrounds before sentencing.
Opponents claimed the changes could lead to a 'two-tier justice system' in which people from minority groups are treated more leniently.
The guidance, which the Sentencing Council argued would ensure courts had comprehensive information to decide on an appropriate punishment, was later abandoned after ministers tabled legislation to override it.
The Law Society's guide is separate, and its stated intention is to help solicitors 'be more inclusive with the language we use'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
40 minutes ago
- CNN
CNN10 Special Edition The Role of the Monarchy, The Role of the Crown
Today on CNN10-- A full ten minutes on one fascinating topic: The difference between the British government and the Royal Family. The U.K. runs their country quite differently from the way we do things here in the U.S. And what roles do the King, the Queen and the Prince even play? It can get confusing, but we're here to break it all down.
Associated Press
40 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge rules officials in Georgia's Fulton County must appoint rejected Republicans to election board
ATLANTA (AP) — A judge has ordered elected leaders in Georgia's Fulton County to appoint two Republican nominees they had rejected to the county's election board. The county Republican Party sued in June seeking to force the Board of Commissioners to appoint the party's nominees to the county Board of Registration and Elections, arguing that the commissioners were required to do so by law. In a ruling entered Monday, Senior Judge David Emerson agreed that the law doesn't give Board of Commissioners the discretion to veto qualified nominees proposed by political parties. The election board in the heavily Democratic county, which includes most of the city of Atlanta, is made up of five people. The Board of Commissioners chooses the chair, and the county Republican and Democratic parties each nominate two people to be appointed by the commissioners. Nominees must live in Fulton County, be registered to vote and cannot be public office holders. Don Samuel, a lawyer representing the Board of Commissioners, said they are 'disappointed in the court's decision and are evaluating whether to appeal.' Although the board is required to appoint two people nominated by each party, he said in an email, it is not required to appoint whoever is nominated 'regardless of how qualified or unqualified the nominee may be.' He added, 'The BOC does not simply rubber-stamp any nominee.' Commissioner Marvin Arrington Jr., part of the Democratic majority on the board, said the judge's ruling strips commissioners of their discretion, 'treating us more like record-keepers than decision-makers.' But being a county commissioner is 'inherently discretionary,' he said in an emailed statement, adding that commissioners 'are elected to exercise judgment on behalf of our constituents.' Commissioner Bridget Thorne, a Republican, celebrated the ruling as a victory in an Instagram post. The Board of Commissioners had voted in May to reject Republican Party nominees Julie Adams and Jason Frazier. Democratic members of the Board of Commissioners raised concerns about their qualifications given their past actions. Adams, a sitting election board member, had abstained from certifying primary election results last year and unsuccessfully sued the board seeking a ruling saying county officials can refuse to certify elections. Frazier has formally challenged the eligibility of thousands of Fulton County voters and was previously denied a spot on the county election board. In his ruling, Emerson said, 'The Board shall appoint the two members as nominated by the county executive committee chairperson. Those nominees are Jason Frazier and Julie Adams.' He wrote that the law outlines the process by which members of the election board 'shall' be appointed and that he did not find anything in the law 'to support a conclusion that 'shall' in the appointment clause is directory only.' Elections in Fulton County had a yearslong history of problems, including long lines to vote and delays in reporting results. A particularly troubled primary in 2020 resulted in the appointment of an independent monitor to observe the general election that year as part of a consent agreement between the county and the State Election Board. The monitor said the county's elections were badly managed but he found no evidence of fraud. Another monitoring team appointed to observe last year's general election said it was 'organized and orderly.' President Donald Trump and his supporters zeroed in on Fulton County in the wake of the 2020 general election, claiming without proof that election fraud had cost him victory in Georgia. Local, state and federal officials have repeatedly said there's no evidence that fraud affected the outcome of that election, but conspiracy theories continued to circulate.
Bloomberg
40 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
A Defiant Israel Eyes a Full Gaza Takeover Despite Global Isolation
As pictures of malnourished Gazans flood world media, pressure on Israel is intensifying not only to dramatically increase the supply of food and end the fighting but to accept a Palestinian state. More than 61,000 Gazans have been killed in nearly two years; Hamas isn't destroyed; hostages are still held: the Jewish state is turning into a global pariah. But as international condemnation intensifies — arms embargoes, arrest warrants, cultural boycotts — Israel is not merely defying the pressure, it is redefining itself. Once a besieged secular outpost with an agrarian economy, it has evolved into a Middle East superpower: an aggressive military and intelligence juggernaut with a GDP per capita higher than the UK, an increasingly populist ethno-religious government with an unflinching security ethos.
