
Travers 'The Candyman' Beynon 'sued' by his Free Choice tobacco founder stepfather in $55 million legal battle - as notorious playboy drops off the radar
Notorious Gold Coast playboy Travers 'Candyman' Beynon is being sued by his stepfather Trevor in an explosive multimillion-dollar legal stoush.
Trevor Beynon, 79, is the founder of the Free Choice tobacco store empire, and was married to Travers' mother, Sandra, when the couple founded the cigarette chain.
Now, according to court documents, Trevor is alleging that Travers, 53, used 'sham' documents in an effort to gain more control over the group's assets - which is at odds with what Trevor intended in his will.
The Gold Coast Bulletin recently reported that Trevor ceased his role as director of two 'key' Free Choice companies in March.
Court documents indicate he is now alleging that he was removed from the position against his will.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
The publication reported that documents lodged before the Supreme Court of Brisbane allege that Trevor met with Travers in 2007 to discuss the future of Free Choice Tobacco.
As alleged in those documents, they agreed that Travers would take control of the business on the condition that siblings received a percentage of profits from some of the businesses.
It was also claimed that two years after Sandra Beynon died in 2015, Travers enlisted lawyer Matthew Burgess to draw up documents preventing siblings from challenging Travers to a larger cut of the estate.
They allege in the documents that they, along with accountant Richard Hoult, created estate planning documents which stated Trevor would gift $55 million to one of Travers' companies - Free Choice Master Holdings - and then loan it back.
A separate deed also purported to secure the loan against Trevor's assets, according to the court documents.
According to court filings, it allegedly came to a head in January this year, after Trevor and Travers had a disagreement over the management of Free Choice, which resulted in Travers enforcing the interest repayments on the alleged $55 million loan.
Trevor claimed in the court documents that he had never paid or received the $55 million, alleging the figure was 'made up'.
Trevor also argues the documents had shifted control of his assets to Travers and would prevent his estate from servicing debts after he died.
He alleges that he had never signed documents to allow his shares in free Choice companies to be transferred from his ownership, and that he was removed from company directorships without due process.
Trevor is asking the court to declare the $55 million a gift and the loan declared fake as well as seeking reinstatement as director of Free Choice companies and that his shares be placed back in his hands.
Daily Mail Australia has reached out to Travers' lawyer for comment.
Questions started to swirl this week following Travers' apparent internet exit.
The flamboyant businessman was certainly not shy about sharing glimpses of his lavish lifestyle to social media.
His Instagram account, which enticed a million followers to fawn over posts of luxe parties and high-end living, has been apparently deleted.
It's the same story for Travers' Candyshop Mansion website which as been offline since May this year.
His Facebook and TikTok pages are still active, however they have not seen some action in quite some time.
Travers' last post on Facebook was back in April 2023, while his last TikTok post occurred in August 2019.
It's apparently a similar story for the Beynon family tobacco empire with the main Free Choice Tobacco site also currently offline.
While its string of franchise stores are still operating, the Gold Coast Bulletin reported that Free Choice vacated its Gold Coast head office in February, with the space, owned by one of Beynon's companies, now leased to a new business.
It comes amid what appears to be a period of upheaval for Travers with the playboy recently having another crack at offloading his Candyland mansion.
Travers first listed the property back in 2023 and, at one stage, it had an eye-watering $25 million price tag attached
The Gold Coast Bulletin reported in May that Travers had enlisted another agent to give the property the push it needs to get it over the line.
He had engaged the services agents Ivy Wu and Isaac Kim from Ivy Realty to run an expression of interest campaign for the lavish property.
Travers originally purchased the property, located in the northern Gold Coast suburb of Helensvale, in 2010.
He later purchased neighbouring land, effectively tripling the footprint of the compound.
The property sits on a substantial 1.4 acres with 175 metres of private water frontage.
The house itself is set across an expansive 2,230 square-metre floorplan and boasts mosaic murals and hand-painted frescos throughout.
The opulent home, which has hosted many wild parties over the years, sits behind large two-ton crested gates and features a gorgeous sandstone driveway and marble-clad majestic courtyard.
Its highly desirable location is close to a variety of amenities including world renowned Surfers Paradise shopping centres, restaurants and beach.
The listing came after Travers welcomed his fifth child, Santiago, back in June last year.
He took to his Instagram Stories to confirm that he and wife of 14 years Taesha had welcomed a baby boy as he shared sweet snaps of the little one.
Welcome to the world son,' Travers wrote alongside a video of him holding his newborn son's hand.
Travers also shares two daughters Velicia, 12, and Serafina, 11, with his wife Taesha and has two other children - Valentino, 24, and Luciana, 22 - from his previous marriage to Ninibeth Leal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Five Networking Groups Every Small Business Owner Should Consider in 2025
When a Sydney tech founder's payment infrastructure imploded faster than a social media trend due to a high dispute rate, she didn't panic-search 'crisis management consultants' or spiral into a doom-scroll. She tapped her Entrepreneurs' Organisation Forum, and was introduced to the right person with the right authority at her faceless payment provider company faster than you could say 'online meeting.' Forty-eight hours later, her crisis was ancient history; a testament to EO's on-demand lifeline for founders. Welcome to the age of strategic solitude-busting, where 45% of entrepreneurs report stress levels that make Wall Street traders look zen, and isolation has become as common as AI-generated headshots. With business failures hitting record highs (November 2024 saw 1,442 Australian companies flatline, the worst month in recorded history), the question isn't whether entrepreneurs need peer support, but whether they can afford to network with anything less than the A-list. The Loneliness Epidemic Recent sentiment analyses of thousands of online forums reveal founders oscillating between existential dread and Navy SEAL–level coping strategies. Yet 70% of new business opportunities still emerge from networking, making isolation not just emotionally devastating but financially suicidal. The stats paint a picture grimmer than a Succession season finale. Half of CEOs feel lonelier than a crypto evangelist at a climate summit, while 82% of entrepreneurs deem mentorship as essential as wifi. The remedy? Five networking powerhouses that have turned peer support from transactional glad-handing into transformational strategy. 1. Entrepreneurs' Organisation: The Led Zeppelin of Business Networks With nearly 20,000 members across 220 chapters, including 17 across Asia Pacific, EO has achieved global relevance without sacrificing intimate authenticity. This year's Global Leadership Conference in Hawaii drew 1,600 entrepreneurs from 60 countries, featuring globally-recognised luminaries from Deepak Chopra to Marcus Lemonis, making Davos look quaint. EO's signature Forums unite 8–12 founders monthly under stricter confidentiality than a Supreme Court leak investigation. 'In EO, you learn to ask the tough questions and listen for your own answers,' explains EO's Asia Pacific Chair, sounding more like she's describing enlightenment than networking. Beyond peer counsel, EO's partnerships with Harvard, MIT, and Bond University offer executive education that costs less than YPO's dues while delivering Ivy League credentials. Its upcoming 'EO Fun Japan 2025' in Osaka will coincide with the World Expo, proving that even global learning can be Instagram-worthy. 2. Young Presidents' Organisation: An Exclusive Club with an Expiration Date YPO operates like a velvet-rope nightclub, where the bouncer checks your P&L instead of your ID. With CEOs and Executives who must be under 45 prior to joining and represent companies generating $15 million or more annually, it's the ultimate achievement badge for overachievers. YPO's EDGE conference in Barcelona attracted 2,200 leaders to dissect fractured geopolitics, essential for CEOs managing complex supply chains. But YPO's age gate sparks expiration-date anxiety that makes midlife crises look cheerful. Members face an awkward transition to 'Gold' status at 46, trimming benefits and sparking membership whiplash. Its annual dues surpass EO, and with the age limit firmly in place, membership is tantamount to leasing a mega-bucks super car with a 10,000-kilometre cap. 3. Club of United Business: Australia's Soho House for Startups When Daniel Hakim launched CUB at 23, he blended festival cool with Gold Coast glamour, complete with marble baristas and luxury locker rooms. Nine years later, his empire boasts 23,000 members across Sydney, Melbourne, and Brisbane, with clubhouse openings timed to major international events. 'It's not your father's golf club,' Hakim has said previously, offering concierge-level networking for $9,900 AUD a year. But without EO's global lattice or YPO's legacy planning, CUB can feel like a luxury boutique, irresistible within Australia but limited for founders eyeing international scale. 4. Business Network International: An Impressive Network BNI has engineered networking into a super clever algorithm. Its 330,000+ members across 11,200 chapters generated $25.2 billion in member-to-member referrals in 2024, under a 'one profession per chapter' rule stricter than Olympic doping tests. Weekly meetings run like accountability boot camps, best for service-based entrepreneurs craving instant ROI rather than transformational growth. At about $2,500 USD annually, BNI delivers transactional networking with measurable dividends, but its transactional zeal can leave growth-hungry founders wanting deeper counsel. 5. The Executive Centre: Workspace with Serendipity on Tap TEC offers premium coworking from $400 USD per month, spanning 150+ global locations from Singapore to London. Its harbour-view lounges and barista-grade coffee foster chance encounters that can spark partnerships, but without curated peer forums or confidentiality protocols, TEC remains a workspace theatre, not a true advisory network. Robert How, TEC's Australia Country Director, touts double-digit revenue growth and expansion across financial districts. The Verdict: EO Reigns Supreme in 2025 In a world awash with AI-powered match-making apps and virtual business conferences, EO's decidedly human approach feels both revolutionary and timeless. While competitors focus on demographics, amenities, or referral volume, EO tackles the root cause of entrepreneurial failure (isolation) through confidential Forums that forge psychological safety nets stronger than any algorithm. It's not-for-profit structure channels every dollar back into member value instead of shareholder dividends, fostering peer environments where founders share vulnerabilities without commercial agendas. From Serengeti sunrise treks to Harvard case studies, EO blends professional rigour with personal renewal with a holistic model that others struggle to replicate. As entrepreneurs navigate AI disruption, supply-chain shocks, and global volatility, choosing the right network isn't about prestige or perks; it's about survival. EO's blend of global reach, founder-for-founder empathy, and transformational learning creates the lifeline that turns isolation into connection, one Forum at a time. In 2025, settling for anything less than EO isn't just short-sighted. It's entrepreneurial malpractice.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trio face jury verdict in tense retrial ten years after the gruesome 'Toolbox murder' of an Aussie man and woman
For hours, three men played video games and drank whiskey as Cory Breton and Iuliana Triscaru lay bound in a toolbox nearby. The pair had been beaten, stabbed and choked before they were stuffed into the two metre-long container. They were likely 'screaming for their lives' when the toolbox was later dumped in a lagoon south of Brisbane in January 2016. Almost 10 years later, Stou Daniels, Davy Malu Junior Taiao and Trent Michael Thrupp were found guilty of the pair's murder for a second time. They faced a retrial in Brisbane after the Court of Appeal set aside murder convictions in July 2024. Mr Breton, 28, and Ms Triscaru, 31, had been lured to a residential unit at Kingston, south of Brisbane, before being attacked by a group of men. 'It was torturous. They were assaulted when they arrived and throughout the day... while bound with cable ties and duct tape,' Crown prosecutor Nathan Crane told the weeks-long trial that concluded with Friday's verdicts. They were attacked, interrogated and threatened over a drug dealing dispute. When Ngatokoona Mareiti arrived at the unit to buy drugs, Mr Breton and Ms Triscaru were sitting bound on the couch. Sent away to buy whiskey, by the time Mareiti returned she could not see the pair and assumed they were in the toolbox at the unit. They drank and played video games as the bound pair were held captive in the container nearby. 'We drank the alcohol... they had a PlayStation there,' Mareiti told the jury. Cloths and bleach used to clean bloodstains in the unit were thrown into the toolbox before it was taken away with Mr Breton and Ms Triscaru still inside. The terrified pair made so much noise as the container was being moved, music from an awaiting ute was turned up in a bid to conceal it. 'The transition of the toolbox to a HiLux utility vehicle attracted attention from those present at the unit complex - there was noise emanating from the toolbox,' Mr Crane said. 'There was music used from the HiLux to cover up the sound.' Thrupp either threw the toolbox weighed down by concrete into nearby Scrubby Creek or was present when it happened, Mr Crane said. Daniels and Taiao were also liable for murder by forcing the victims into the toolbox hours before their deaths, he said. Police divers found the bodies locked in the toolbox submerged in the creek two weeks later. 'Most likely the two... were alive and screaming for their lives when they were placed in the creek,' Justice Peter Davis said in 2020 when sentencing Tuhirangi-Thomas Tahiata, who drove the ute to the creek. 'It is haunting to imagine the moment that the toolbox slipped under the water, plunging the night into silence.' Daniels, Taiao and Thrupp each pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder at their retrial. The jury on Friday returned its verdict after deliberating since 10.45am Wednesday. The trio will be sentenced on Thursday. Overall seven men and a woman were charged over what became known as the 'toolbox murders'. Tahiata received a life sentence for murder, unsuccessfully appealing the conviction in April 2024. Mareiti, Webbstar Latu, Tepuna Tupuna Mariri and Waylon Ngaketo Cowan Walker were found guilty of manslaughter. However, Walker had his convictions overturned in July 2024.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
R Kelly denied release from prison just days after overdose
Disgraced singer R Kelly has been denied release from prison just days after his lawyers claimed he overdosed as a result of a botched murder plot. The former R&B star's legal team filed a motion on June 17 to have him sent to home confinement rather than being behind bars due to the 'imminent' threat to his life. But Judge Martha Pacold ruled that there was 'no legal basis for this court's jurisdiction' and threw the request out. The artist's lawyers claimed last week that Kelly had suffered an overdose after prison guards deliberately gave him too much anxiety medication. They also claimed that the 58-year-old, whose real name is Robert Sylvester Kelly, was forcibly removed from hospital despite doctors finding blood clots in his legs that required surgery. Federal prosecutors rejected these allegations at the time as 'deeply unserious' and said the latest motion made 'a mockery' of the abuse suffered by Kelly's victims. They added that 'every convicted murderer, rapist, and terrorist will have a newfound shot at freedom' if Kelly was to be released from prison. Despite this and the recent rejection to have Kelly sent to home confinement, his lawyer Beau Brindley said he and his legal team would file a new motion based on what he called 'newly discovered evidence.' Mr Brindley said the request would also call for immediate bail 'pending its litigation'. 'We are not surprised by this ruling as we knew that technical jurisdiction would be a challenge under these circumstances,' Mr Brindley told USA TODAY. 'However, we had no choice but to act immediately given explicit evidence of a threat to Robert Kelly's life.' The news organisation said as of June 19, Mr Brindley and his team had not yet filed the new motion. Kelly was allegedly put in solitary confinement 'against his will' in response to a separate filing from his attorneys which claimed three prison officials hatched a plot to have him killed by a white supremacist gang. His legal team cited a sworn declaration from terminally ill inmate named Mikeal Glenn Stine in which he alleged the prison officials asked him to carry out the singer's murder. Kelly requested he be placed on house arrest for his crimes - which included convictions for child pornography and enticing minors for sex. Prosecutors called the attempt to be freed from his sex crimes sentence 'repugnant'. Stine, a member of the Aryan Brotherhood gang, alleged that high-ranking officials in the prison system offered him the opportunity to escape from prison and live out his final months as a 'free man' before his terminal illness kills him. In the filing, it was further alleged that Stine was pressured to carry out the killing in March when he was transferred to Kelly's unit, and was told by staff: 'You need to do what you came here for.' Stine said he stalked Kelly for months as he considered the assassination plot, but changed his mind and told the singer about the plan to kill him, according to the filing cited by The Independent. The singer's attorneys say they became aware of a second plot in June to have a different member of the Aryan Brotherhood kill both Kelly and Stine. Kelly's attorneys have also requested a pardon from President Donald Trump, saying the singer, 'does not have the luxury to wait for vindication from the Courts that will follow the exposure of the corruption at the heart of his prosecutions.' The attorneys previously claimed they 'are engaged in conversations with multiple persons close to the White House and to President Trump'. Kelly was convicted in 2021 and 2022 for racketeering, sex trafficking, child pornography and enticement. A New York City federal court sentenced him to 30 years in prison in 2022 and he was sentenced to 20 years in jail in a Chicago federal court the year after. Evidence at trial in New York included testimony from more than 10 victims, as well as video and DNA evidence. In the Chicago trial it emerged that Kelly enticed multiple underage girls to engage in sexual activity which he recorded. Kelly met his victims in the late 1990s and engaged in sex acts with them when they were as young as 14, 15 and 16 years old before covering up the acts. The singer has been behind bars since July 2019, and is now at the prison that housed late Ponzi schemer Bernard Madoff. He will be 78 when eligible for release in 2045. MailOnline approached The Bureau of Prisons for comment.