Kash Patel privately agreed to hire an experienced deputy FBI director. Then Trump picked a loyalist
FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly privately agreed with an FBI agent advocacy group to install an active Special Agent to serve as deputy director – only to have President Donald Trump choose an inexperienced and controversial loyalist.
Members of the FBI Agents Association, a nonprofit that supports and advocates for more than 14,000 active and retired agents, received a memo, obtained by NBC News, that claimed Patel had agreed with the group that, 'the FBI Deputy Director should continue to be an on-board, active Special Agent— as has been the case for 117 years for many compelling reasons, including operational expertise and experience, as well as the trust of our Special Agent population.'
Patel, who was sworn in as head of the federal law enforcement agency last week, is a known Trump loyalist who has no prior experience in the FBI.
His agreement with the FBI Agents Association was seemingly a way to balance his lack of experience with a current Special Agent.
But instead, Trump appointed Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent and right-wing podcaster who has previously critcized FBI leadership and often uses derogatory language to describe liberals.
Bongino, who has no experience in the FBI, left the Secret Service in 2011 and has since become a loud advocate for Trump. He echoed Trump's false claims of election fraud after the 2020 presidential election.
Like Patel, Bongino has claimed the FBI has become weaponized and needs to be fixed from the inside out. Bongino has argued the bureau focuses too much on domestic intelligence gathering, despite its purpose being domestic matters.
Now, Patel and Bongino will lead the FBI at a crucial time for the bureau undergoing massive changes. So far, at least six senior FBI officials have been ousted as well as dozens of heads of FBI field offices.
Previous deputy directors have all been active special agents upon designation to deputy director.
That includes Andrew McCabe who served under Trump's first administration, David Bowdich and Paul Abbate who served under former president Joe Biden and the current acting deputy Robert Kissane.
FBIAA did not immediately release a statement about Bongino's appointment but previously congratulated Patel on his confirmation as director.
'As the new leadership team considers and implements reform measures, the FBIAA stands ready to serve as a valuable resource, ensuring that Special Agents can continue safeguarding the American people from emerging threats while upholding the Constitution,' FBIAA said in a statement about Patel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Seven partners depart law firm Willkie Farr to join Cooley after Trump deal
June 13 (Reuters) - A group of seven partners is leaving Willkie Farr & Gallagher, which struck a deal with U.S. President Donald Trump in April to avert an executive order targeting its business, to join Cooley, which is representing one of the law firms fighting Trump's orders. Cooley on Friday said Simona Agnolucci, Benedict Hur, Joshua Anderson, Tiffany Lin, Jonathan Patchen, Michael Rome and Eduardo Santacana are joining the firm as litigation partners in San Francisco. The lawyers leaving New York-founded Willkie, which has more than 1,200 lawyers, are among the latest to depart from major U.S. firms that have made deals with Trump. Agnolucci and Hur, who were both leaders of Willkie's San Francisco office, and the other departing partners did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday. Agnolucci was also a member of the firm's executive committee. The New York Times, which first reported the departures earlier on Friday, cited an unnamed source who said Agnolucci and Hur had told others they were disappointed that Willkie had capitulated to Trump. Reuters could not independently confirm the report. A Willkie spokesperson said "we wish them well" and had no further comment. Some of the former Willkie lawyers have represented major tech clients on court matters. Agnolucci, Hur and Patchen were on Google's defense team in litigation led by the state of Texas that led to a $1.8 billion settlement. Palo Alto-founded Cooley is representing Jenner & Block in its legal challenge to a Trump executive order that restricted Jenner's access to government officials and threatened its federal contracting work. A federal judge in May overturned Trump's order, calling it an unconstitutional act of retaliation for Jenner's past cases and its employment of a prosecutor who investigated ties between Trump's 2016 campaign and Russia. Cooley CEO Rachel Proffitt in a statement said the firm is "thrilled to welcome this esteemed group of Bay Area leaders and litigators." Willkie Farr in its deal with Trump had agreed to provide free legal services worth $100 million to mutually agreed-upon projects with the administration and had pledged not to engage in illegal diversity-related employment practices. Eight other large firms have reached similar agreements with the White House. Willkie's leadership had said in an internal email seen by Reuters in April that the deal prevented Trump from signing an executive order that could have imperiled the firm and its clients, though it had acknowledged dissent about the decision. The first firm to settle with Trump, Paul Weiss, has seen at least eight partners leave since its agreement in March. Since the end of May, seven partners have left the firm to join a new firm, Dunn Isaacson Rhee, co-founded by former Paul Weiss partner Karen Dunn. The new firm has taken over from Paul Weiss in at least one case – an antitrust lawsuit in Nevada in which some of the former Paul Weiss lawyers are representing the Ultimate Fighting Championship, according to court documents filed this week. A Paul Weiss spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Dunn Isaacson firm is now also representing Google and Qualcomm in antitrust litigation, though Paul Weiss remains involved in those cases.
Daily Mail
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Jon Stewart's foul-mouthed rant at ABC News for firing veteran reporter who trashed Trump
Jon Stewart has slammed ABC News for firing a veteran anchor who trashed President Trump. The Daily Show host framed the move as just the latest example of the network bending the knee to Trump, following Terry Moran's comments about the conservative and his aide Stephen Miller. 'Of course not. So stupid. No, for God's sake,' Stewart said on The Weekly Show podcast Thursday when asked whether he agreed with the network's decision to do away with Moran. 'The entire thing is because ABC clings to this façade that they somehow exist in a bubble,' Stewart continued, calling the correspondent's ouster 'a joke.' 'They're a f**king joke,' he added of ABC. 'They shouldn't have paid the $15million [either].' The latter came in reference to the network's costly settlement with Trump in December, after George Stephanopoulos mistakenly claimed the conservative was found found 'liable for rape' in a case brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. 'We are pleased that the parties have reached an agreement to dismiss the lawsuit on the terms in the court filing,' an ABC spokesperson said at the time, avoiding going to court for defamation. A still-seething Stewart went on to slam White House Deputy Chief of Staff Miller as a 'sick f*ck', after Moran days before said he was full of 'bile' and fueled by 'hate.' 'The problem with it all is there's no level of fealty that is enough,' the Daily Show host went on. The tirade ended with Stewart openly accusing execs who fired Moran Tuesday - two days after his since-deleted social media post - of engaging in hypocrisy. 'Literally, every day on Fox News, they're taking stuff out of context or their people are saying utterly vicious things about Democratic politicians,' he said. A spokesperson for the network specifically cited Moran's post - penned just after midnight - as a 'clear violation' of ABC's policy. The 65-year-old correspondent - who worked at ABC for nearly 28 years - wrote how Miller was the 'bile' behind the Trumpist movement he said was being fueled by 'hate. He also dubbed Trump a 'world class hater' hell-bent on 'his own glorification.' Despite Moran's years of service, ABC took a hardline approach - suspending him and then showing him the door. By Tuesday, the punitive action took a more pronounced turn. The network issued a statement saying they were cutting ties with the former Nightline host. 'We are at the end of our agreement with Terry Moran and based on his recent post – which was a clear violation of ABC News policies – we have made the decision to not renew,' the 5pm statement read. 'At ABC News, we hold all of our reporters to the highest standards of objectivity, fairness and professionalism, and we remain committed to delivering straightforward, trusted journalism,' it went on. It quickly cut ties with a man who had been a senior national correspondent at the Disney-owned network for years, as well as ABC's Chief Foreign Correspondent from 2013 to 2018. Prior to that, Moran co-anchored the network's newsmagazine Nightline and was ABC News' Chief White Correspondent from 1999 to 2005. The journalist even sat down with the president this past April, for an exclusive interview in the Oval Office. The sitdown became contentious when Moran attempted to fact-check the president when it came to the case surrounding deported El Salvador native Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Moran pointed out there was a lack of evidence to support the government's claim that he was part of the notorious migrant gang MS-13. 'You're not being very nice,' Trump said in response. He also claimed he had handpicked Moran to oversee the interview because he had 'never heard of [him].' This time around, Moran's remarks brought the attention of both ABC News and the Trump administration, The Wall Street Journal reported. Within hours, Rick Klein, ABC News's vice president and Washington bureau chief, was contacting Moran to tell him to take the post down, to which he obliged. After White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt saved the tweet and re-shared it to her official X account, Klein consulted with ABC News's legal and standards teams, as well as senior execs such as ABC boss Debra O'Connell, the Journal reported. Almin Karamehmedovic, ABC News' president, was not mentioned in the report, but his boss, Disney CEO Bob Iger was. He reportedly signed off on the decision to boot Moran, who the next day was touting his new Substack. 'For almost 28 years I was a reporter and anchor for ABC News. As you may have heard, I'm not there anymore,' he said, 'I'm here, with you, on Substack, this amazing space and I can't wait to get at it,' he said.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Israel is making the world a more dangerous place
Iran claims that the Israeli attack is a 'declaration of war'. It is not. It's certainly aggressive, dangerous, destabilising, and at least questionable under international law. But it is not a declaration of total war against Iran in the conventional sense. If it were, then – armed to the teeth, with the most advanced weaponry in the world, and protected by the formidable Iron Dome – Israel would by now have flattened much of Tehran and obliterated Iran's conventional military capability and economic infrastructure. Taking out all of the deeply buried nuclear bunkers in the Iranian countryside may take a little longer, but the Iranians seem more or less defenceless, and the Israeli assaults will continue. Unless America acts – and the latest remarks from Donald Trump suggest it won't – the raids will go on until Benjamin Netanyahu is satisfied that he can tell the people of Israel that this existential threat to their state has been neutralised. That's all he wants. He might well welcome it if regime change in Tehran emerges from the chaos. Not so long ago, Mr Netanyahu made a bizarre televised appeal to the 'Persian' people to depose the ayatollahs, and he has doubled down on the flattery now, offering to 'renew the alliance between our two ancient peoples'. The chances of such a happy ending have probably been reduced by his actions. Ending the nightmare of Iran being armed with a viable nuclear warhead, with a delivery system that could wipe out Israel, will be sufficient for him, for now. Donald Trump, ever the opportunist, has tried to make the best of these attacks – which he never actively wanted to happen, but was aware that they were going to happen – to try and force the Iranians, currently in talks with US officials, to agree to abandon their nuclear programme. That is not going to happen – and, when the Israelis have finished their air raids, that will not be the end of the matter. Iran will redouble its efforts to build a big bomb, and it has all the oil money, friends, allies and much of the expertise to start again. Indeed, there is no reason in theory why the Iranian leadership couldn't just buy such a system 'off the shelf' from Moscow or Pyongyang. Plainly, the Iranians wish to develop their own capabilities, and were close to doing so, so they may eventually succeed, with or without discreet external assistance. But, until now, the endpoint wasn't inevitable: the old Iran nuclear deal, co-sponsored by the Europeans, Chinese and Russians, kept Tehran under tight supervision. When Mr Trump pulled out of the agreement in 2018, that actually speeded up the Iranians' search for enriched uranium. Now, the logical lesson the Iranians will draw from the Israeli attack, and of the effectiveness of the Iron Dome, is that they need a nuclear deterrent more than ever. Had they actually had one this week, as Israel does, they might not have come under such sustained, devastating attack. History adds to the impetus to prioritise a deterrent weapon. Nations that have given up their nuclear programmes or arsenals, either voluntarily or by force – such as Ukraine, Libya and Iraq – have suffered consequently. Those that retain theirs or covertly defy the international agencies and ignore the non-proliferation treaties, such as Russia, China, Israel, India, Pakistan and North Korea, by contrast, are more immune from mortal threat and humiliating enemy bombardments. Now, President Trump's bold and laudable attempts to reach a peaceful agreement with Iran on its nuclear ambitions and its wider regional role have been devastated just as much as any secret atomic enrichment lab in Iran has been. The talks in Rome may stagger on, but the Iranians will no longer be able to see the point, especially as their American counterparts have been so responsible for turning Israel into the regional superpower. Saudi Arabia, the other Gulf states, Egypt and Turkey, all crucial partners to America in the region, will similarly ask why, if Israel (and the likes of North Korea and Pakistan) can have the reassurance of a nuclear deterrent, they are deprived of it. We cannot know how this will develop. It is another chapter in the clash between Israel, usually with America, and Iran that has been going on since the Islamic Revolution in 1979. This has taken the form of a cold war, a proxy war via terrorist entities such as Hezbollah, Hamas and the Houthi rebels, hostage-taking, economic sanctions, diplomatic games, espionage and, latterly and most ominously, direct aerial attacks between the two powers, plus targeted assassinations of Iranian and allied commanders. It has heated up and cooled down, and the tensions may subside again. There is no necessary reason why other regional players would be drawn in, let alone America or Russia. Yet it feels like the drumbeat of war in the Middle East is becoming more insistent, just as it is in Eastern Europe and around Taiwan. As has been remarked about the prospects of a third world war, such a conflagration will occur again when leaders behave as they did before the previous two world wars. It seems so today. Mr Trump has been tolerant and indulgent towards the Israeli prime minister in recent days, to put it politely, and has even gone so far as to praise Israel's 'excellent' attacks – an odd description for what the president also terms 'slaughter'. Mr Netanyahu, such an experienced and wily figure, knows exactly how to play him, and how to abuse the historic support America has always offered Israel when it was in extreme peril. However, this time, it is Israel that is making the world a more dangerous place, undermining American diplomacy and its own security. Rather than praising him and seemingly egging him on, it is time for Mr Trump, for once, to get angry, for all the right reasons, with the right man, and use the leverage Washington undoubtedly possesses to make Mr Netanyahu end his latest reckless adventure. Similarly, promising Iran's supreme leader that 'there is more to come', and warning him to do a nuclear deal, is unfortunate when the moment calls for skilful diplomacy, not Truth Social whoops, hollers and taunts. But, knowing what we do about President Trump's approach, he may yet content himself with letting Mr Netanyahu and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei simply get on with it.
