Super junior ministers ‘acting as a collective authority in Cabinet meetings'
The High Court is hearing a challenge by Sinn Fein TD Pa Daly about the attendance of super junior ministers at Cabinet meetings.
Also attending court on Monday was Sinn Fein leader Mary Lou McDonald and Donegal TD Pearse Doherty.
Mr Daly argues that Article 28 of the Constitution of Ireland limits the number of government members to 15.
Sinn Féin are here today to challenge Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael blatant stroke politics. We believe they are playing fast and loose with the Constitution to grease the wheels of their grubby deal with Michael Lowry and load the Cabinet with so-called 'Super Junior' Ministers. Pa… pic.twitter.com/JYTGyWUzGJ
— Mary Lou McDonald (@MaryLouMcDonald) July 7, 2025
The super junior ministers appointed include Fine Gael's Hildegarde Naughton, as well as Independents Sean Canney and Noel Grealish.
Fianna Fail's Mary Butler is also a minister of state attending Cabinet.
Senior government ministers are appointed by the President of Ireland on the advice of the taoiseach of the day, and with the approval of the Dail.
Super junior ministers are appointed by the government on the nomination of the taoiseach.
Feichin McDonagh SC told the three judges that the legal basis of their appointment was exactly the same as the other ministers of state who do not attend Cabinet.
He said he has queried with the respondents about what exactly is a minister of state who regularly attends government meetings.
'One would have thought following exchange of meetings there might be some consensus, but there does not appear to be a consensus,' Mr McDonagh said.
He told the court it was not possible to address the issues unless the court knows what is a super minister.
'The designation of super junior by taoiseach was in some way an exercise of executive power of the state,' he added.
He said it is suggested in the respondent's affidavit that there is an office called minister of state who regularly attends government, which Mr McDonagh said does not exist.
He added that a decision to pay an allowance to super juniors does not change that position.
'Four super juniors now get an allowance and we challenge the provisions in that legislation to allow that,' he added.
'There is minister of state who is told by Taoiseach they can regularly attend government (meetings) and if they come into that category they get 16,000 euro a year.
'But it is not an office, not enacted under the constitution and there is no underpinning to suggest that the office is being created.'
He also queried the meaning behind the words under Article 4.1, in which it states that the Government shall meet and act as a collective authority.
'What does collective authority do? They meet and with the others (ministers) they collectively act. Who is acting collectively? It is the government along with the super junior ministers,' Mr McDonagh added.
'There will be government decisions taken and government acting collectively.
'In that scenario there are extra individuals who are there present in the counsel of chamber. They are taking a full role in the formulation and formation of government policy, thereby acting as a collective authority and there is no dispute between the parties as to that being what is happening.
'The government is formulating policy and taking countless decisions and undoubtedly purporting to act as a collective authority.
'You cannot unscramble that egg. If you have government meeting with super juniors speaking to perspective government decisions and a consensus is arrived at, that decision is no less than a government decision than one that has been voted on.
'That decision is arrived at following a process of mixing yolks to getting into scramble egg and that cannot be unscrambled.'
Earlier, Ms McDonald said the Government has broken the rules.
Speaking outside court, Ms McDonald said: 'This is a challenge to a government who we believe have played fast and loose with the Constitution in a bid to secure a grubby deal with Michael Lowry and to retain office, Fianna Fail and Fine Gael, we believe are acting in defiance of the Constitution.
'There are four so called super junior ministers who attend cabinet. The Constitution, in our view, is very clear. The Cabinet amounts to 15 members, and we believe that the government is breaking the rules.
'They've broken the rules because at all costs, Micheal Martin and Simon Harris wish to remain in government, so they cut this deal, as you know, with Michael Lowry, and we are here now to challenge that action and to seek clarity.'
Mr Daly brought the constitutional challenge against the Government in the High Court regarding the appointment of super junior ministers.
The case challenges what Mr Daly says is a 'deeply problematic and unconstitutional practice that has taken root in recent decades'.
He said: 'The attendance and participation of so-called 'super junior' ministers at meetings of the Government.
'This case is a constitutional challenge aimed at protecting the integrity of our system of government under Bunreacht na hEireann with which Fianna Fail, Fine Gael and the Lowry-led Independents are playing fast and loose.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Croydon Council is not failing despite finances, says mayor
Croydon's mayor has insisted that the council is "not failing" as the prospect of a possible government takeover Perry, the south London borough's executive mayor, has vowed to oppose commissioners imposing tax hikes or service cuts, a stance critics say is undermined by his own row follows a government announcement last month that it was "minded to" send in commissioners to take control of the financially troubled government minister Jim McMahon warned that without a shift in direction, Croydon risked sliding into a deeper crisis with "no clear way out". In a video released shortly after the announcement, Perry pushed back against the proposal, stating: "The government should be helping us, not hindering us by heaping more pain on our borough."Tensions came to a head at an "extraordinary council meeting" on Wednesday, brought forward by Labour councillors in response to the looming the mayor's defiant stance won some support, many councillors expressed concern that his tone risked damaging the south London council's chances of negotiating a favourable outcome. Labour opposition leader Stuart King said he understood Perry's frustration, but criticised the combative response."Launching a full-throttle political attack on the government doesn't make it more likely we'll secure the deal we need," he said."Your reaction was ill-considered and has harmed, rather than helped, Croydon's prospects."New figures released this week show the council overspent its budget by £30m last year, requiring £136m in exceptional financial support to stay council is also burdened with £1.6bn in legacy debt, costing £70m annually to service. This debt appears to have risen by £0.2bn in the past has been under the government's Improvement and Assurance Panel (IAP) review since it issued a Section 114 bankruptcy notice in IAP was intended to provide oversight and challenge, but McMahon's recent report described a "lack of urgency" during the intervention and warned that the council was approaching a fresh financial report also called Croydon's ongoing reliance on emergency funding, now totalling £553m since 2021, as McMahon promised a "short, sharp reset", no specific details have been shared on what powers commissioners might hold or how direct their involvement would be. Despite his earlier video, the mayor later struck a more conciliatory tone during the sweltering hot council to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) after the meeting, he said he would be willing to work with commissioners, but added: "If we get to a position where they say council tax needs to go above the cap or that services need to be salami sliced, I will oppose those decisions."While there was broad agreement on the decision to work with future commissioners, opposition councillors were quick to remind the mayor that he had raised council tax to its highest ever level and brought forward cuts to services like libraries and youth engagement under his Conservative-led council says it has generated over £230m in capital receipts, including £130m from asset sales, with another £68m in sales planned this despite what Perry has called "difficult decisions", the council's budgetary shortfall continues to grow. 'Blinkered denial' Many councillors now believe only a full government bailout can break Croydon's debt cycle, though such a move would be said he holds regular meetings with government ministers, during which the need for a bailout is often Rowenna Davis, Labour's candidate for mayor, said: "To deny the need for commissioners is a blinkered denial of the financial danger we face three years into your leadership."She adding that Perry's attacks on the intervention were "insulting" to those trying to Council has officially opposed the commissioner proposal in the ongoing consultation, with several local charities also submitting consultation closes on 20 July, and further details on the government's next steps are expected later this year.
South Wales Guardian
3 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Harsher punishments planned for those who intimidate election candidates
The new proposals are aimed at making sure no one is put off standing for office, after a rise in threats against candidates at the 2024 general election. They will be set out next week in a strategy paper aimed at safeguarding the UK's election system. Ministers are keen to stress that they want to ensure freedom of expression is protected, while also cracking down on threatening behaviour against those competing for votes. Communities minister Rushanara Ali said: 'We want to ensure our democracy is resilient and thriving, that people are able to engage and participate in our democracy, free from the fear of harassment and intimidation. 'Harassment and intimidation is completely unacceptable and having a chilling effect on our democracy.' Courts will be given powers to impose tougher punishments on people who target candidates, campaigners, elected politicians, and electoral staff with threatening or hostile behaviour. The punishments could apply to both real life incidents as well as those online, the Government suggested. Some 55% of candidates at the 2024 general election experienced some form of abuse, according to research by the Electoral Commission. Activities included slashing candidates' vehicle tyres and targeting their families. Ministers have sought to step up work to protect elections from interference, and those involved in them from threats, via the Defending Democracy Taskforce. In the Commons, Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is meanwhile hosting the Speakers' Conference, examining the growing threats faced by MPs. The conference has warned this is having a stifling impact on democratic debate, and is dissuading people from standing in parliamentary elections.
Glasgow Times
3 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Harsher punishments planned for those who intimidate election candidates
The new proposals are aimed at making sure no one is put off standing for office, after a rise in threats against candidates at the 2024 general election. They will be set out next week in a strategy paper aimed at safeguarding the UK's election system. Ministers are keen to stress that they want to ensure freedom of expression is protected, while also cracking down on threatening behaviour against those competing for votes. Communities minister Rushanara Ali said: 'We want to ensure our democracy is resilient and thriving, that people are able to engage and participate in our democracy, free from the fear of harassment and intimidation. 'Harassment and intimidation is completely unacceptable and having a chilling effect on our democracy.' Speaker of the House of Commons, Sir Lindsay Hoyle (Ben Whitley/PA) Courts will be given powers to impose tougher punishments on people who target candidates, campaigners, elected politicians, and electoral staff with threatening or hostile behaviour. The punishments could apply to both real life incidents as well as those online, the Government suggested. Some 55% of candidates at the 2024 general election experienced some form of abuse, according to research by the Electoral Commission. Activities included slashing candidates' vehicle tyres and targeting their families. Ministers have sought to step up work to protect elections from interference, and those involved in them from threats, via the Defending Democracy Taskforce. In the Commons, Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle is meanwhile hosting the Speakers' Conference, examining the growing threats faced by MPs. The conference has warned this is having a stifling impact on democratic debate, and is dissuading people from standing in parliamentary elections.
