Nevada Among 10 U.S. States Imposing the Longest Prison Sentences for Sexual Abuse Felons, Study Finds
The research by personal injury law firm Simmrin Law analyzed federal sentencing data for sexual abuse cases across all 50 states via the U.S. Sentencing Commission's 2024 Federal Sentencing Statistics. The average length of sentence per sexual abuse incident was calculated for each state to identify which jurisdictions hand down the most severe punishments.
Nevada takes the ninth position with an average sentence length of 23.25 months per sexual abuse incident — 44% increase over the national average of 16.09 months. Across 4 recorded cases, the state issued a total of 93 months of sentencing in 2024.
Looking at the study, a spokesperson at Simmrin Law commented:
'The study highlights that Nevada imposes the ninth harshest penalties for sexual abuse convictions compared to the rest of the nation.
'These substantial sentencing disparities raise important questions about consistency in our criminal justice system. While serious sexual offenses certainly warrant appropriate consequences, such wide variations in sentencing from state to state may indicate systemic inequities.
'State legislators and judicial authorities might consider reviewing these sentencing patterns to ensure that punishment aligns with the severity of crimes and promotes both justice and rehabilitation.'
Table for Expanded Results : Top 10 U.S. States With Longest Sentence for Sexual Abuse State Length of Sentence for Sexual Abuse Convictions(Mean Months 2024 Number of Sexual Abuse Cases 2024 Length of Sentence for Sexual Abuse Convictions per incident Rank New Hampshire 260 3 86.67 1 Connecticut 240 3 80.00 2 Rhode Island 176 3 58.67 3 Colorado 192 4 48.00 4 Hawaii 168 4 42.00 5 Vermont 124 4 31.00 6 New Jersey 215 8 26.88 7 Alaska 240 9 26.67 8 Nevada 93 4 23.25 9 North Dakota 290 13 22.31 10
The study was conducted by Simmrin Law, an experienced criminal defense firm dedicated to protecting clients' rights and ensuring fair treatment within the justice system.
ENDS
P.S. If using this story, please credit and link to www.simmrinlawgroup.com
Methodology
The research analyzed federal sentencing data for sexual abuse cases across all 50 states via the U.S. Sentencing Commission's 2024 Federal Sentencing Statistics. The average length of sentence for sexual abuse was calculated for each state to identify which jurisdictions hand down the most severe punishments.
Data Sources
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
17-07-2025
- Time Business News
Press Freedom Violated: Police Brutality Against Journalist Sparks Global Condemnation
In an era where press freedom and civil rights are more crucial than ever, an alarming incident has emerged that demands our attention—and our action. A viral video circulating online has sparked widespread condemnation after capturing a shocking act of police misconduct. The clip, available here on YouTube, shows a police officer spitting on a journalist, an act that has stunned viewers and raised urgent questions about accountability and abuse of power. The video clearly shows a uniformed officer confronting a journalist who appears to be documenting a public situation. Tensions rise quickly, and without provocation, the officer spits directly at the journalist—an act both dehumanizing and completely unacceptable. This isn't just a matter of disrespect; it's a blatant assault and an attack on the First Amendment rights that protect free speech and a free press. This incident is not isolated. Across the country and around the world, journalists are increasingly becoming targets when all they are trying to do is their job—inform the public. This particular case is a chilling reminder of how #PressFreedom is under threat, even in societies that pride themselves on democratic values. When the protectors of the law begin to act with impunity, the line between law enforcement and lawbreaking starts to blur. The hashtags tell the story: #PoliceBrutality, #PoliceMisconduct, #PoliceAbuse. These are not just trending topics—they are real issues affecting real people. Acts like this erode public trust in law enforcement and highlight a deeply rooted problem within the system. We must not look away. When police officers betray their oath to protect and serve, they must be held accountable. This isn't just about one officer or one journalist. It's about our collective responsibility to demand justice and uphold civil rights. Every act of abuse that goes unchecked sets a dangerous precedent. We must amplify the voices of those who are being silenced and speak out against such violations. Share it with your network using these hashtags: #CopSpitsOnJournalist #JusticeForJournalists #CaughtOnCamera #FirstAmendment #CivilRights #PoliceBrutality #PoliceMisconduct #PoliceAbuse #PressFreedom with your network using these hashtags: Tag local and national news outlets . Raise awareness. . Raise awareness. Demand a full investigation and appropriate consequences for the officer involved. Silence in the face of injustice is complicity. This video is more than just content—it's a call to action. As citizens, as viewers, and as human beings, we must raise our voices. Let's show the world that we stand for truth, justice, and the fundamental rights of journalists and all people. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Time Business News
12-07-2025
- Time Business News
Wife Not Entitled to Maintenance if Living Separately Without Sufficient Cause: Allahabad High Court
In a recent judgment, the Allahabad High Court ruled that a wife who resides separately from her husband without sufficient cause is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The decision came while setting aside a February 17, 2025, order passed by the additional principal judge of the family court in Meerut, which had directed the husband to pay ₹5,000 per month as maintenance to his estranged wife. The matter came before Justice Subhas Chandra Sharma through a criminal revision petition filed by the husband, Vipul Agrawal, who challenged the family court's order on the grounds that the trial court itself had found that his wife had failed to establish any valid reason for living separately and yet had awarded maintenance in her favour. The High Court took note of the family court's findings, which had observed that the wife could not prove that she was residing apart from her husband due to his neglect or refusal to maintain her. Despite this, the family court had granted her maintenance, which the High Court found to be inconsistent with the legal framework laid down under Section 125(4) of the CrPC. This provision explicitly disqualifies a wife from claiming maintenance if she is living separately without just cause. Justice Sharma pointed out that the lower court's reasoning was contradictory, as it accepted the absence of sufficient grounds for separation yet proceeded to award maintenance, thereby violating the statutory bar under the said provision. During the proceedings, counsel for the husband argued that the trial court had overlooked the petitioner's financial capacity and erroneously fixed ₹8,000 as monthly maintenance—₹5,000 for the wife and ₹3,000 for the minor child. In response, counsel for the wife and the state maintained that the woman had separated due to the husband's neglect, which warranted the maintenance order. However, the High Court did not find merit in this contention in light of the trial court's own factual findings. The High Court, in its order dated July 8, remanded the matter to the family court for fresh adjudication, directing that both parties be granted a fair opportunity to present their case. In the interim, the husband has been ordered to pay ₹3,000 per month to the wife and ₹2,000 per month to the child until the matter is finally decided. This ruling reiterates the principle that a wife cannot claim maintenance as a matter of right unless she satisfies the statutory conditions under Section 125 of the CrPC, particularly when she chooses to live apart from her husband without sufficient justification. News source TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Time Business News
12-07-2025
- Time Business News
Saharanpur Court Sentences Three Family Members to Life Imprisonment in 2019 Journalist Murder Case
A court in Uttar Pradesh's Saharanpur has sentenced three members of a family to life imprisonment for the 2019 double murder of a journalist and his brother. The verdict was delivered on Friday by Additional District and Sessions Judge Alok Sharma, who found Mahipal Saini, his wife Vimlesh, and their son Suraj guilty of the killings. Alongside the sentence, the court imposed a collective fine of ₹1.95 lakh on the convicts. The incident occurred on August 18, 2019, in the Kotwali Nagar area of Saharanpur. According to police records and trial proceedings, the case stemmed from a written complaint submitted by Urmila, the mother of the deceased and wife of Parveen Kumar, a resident of Madho Nagar. In her complaint, Urmila stated that a dispute over the disposal of cow dung and garbage into a local drain escalated into a violent altercation. She alleged that Mahipal Saini, his wife, son, father Jagdish, and three juveniles from the same family forcefully entered their home, armed with illegal weapons. The attackers allegedly abused and assaulted her sons, Ashish and Ashutosh Dhiman, before fatally shooting them. Based on the complaint, the police registered a First Information Report (FIR) under sections of the Indian Penal Code dealing with murder and other related offences. After conducting a detailed investigation, law enforcement authorities submitted a charge sheet against the adult accused. The trial court examined the evidence and concluded that Mahipal, Vimlesh, and Suraj were criminally liable for the deaths of the two brothers. Additional District Government Counsel Amit Tyagi confirmed that the trio was convicted following a full trial. The case against the three juveniles allegedly involved in the incident is currently under adjudication before the Juvenile Justice Board, as per the applicable provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The judgment brings a significant development in a case that had attracted public and media attention due to the victims' background and the violent nature of the offence. News Source TIME BUSINESS NEWS
