Sen. Lindsey Graham says there's no way to for Israel to negotiate an end to the war with Hamas
Graham said he believed Israel has concluded 'that they can't achieve a goal of ending the war with Hamas that would be satisfactory to the safety of Israel.'
'I think President Trump has come to believe, and I certainly have come to believe, there's no way you're going to negotiate an end of this war with Hamas,' Graham said.
'They're going to do in Gaza what we did in Tokyo and Berlin, take the place by force and start over again, presenting a better future for the Palestinians, hopefully having the Arabs take over the West Bank and Gaza,' he later added.
His comments come as Israel is facing mounting international pressure over a growing hunger crisis in Gaza, where at least 133 people have died by starvation, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. On Sunday, Israel announced a pause in fighting in parts of Gaza to facilitate aid delivery.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has previously said that Israel was 'moving toward full control' of Gaza. Ceasefire discussions have stalled in recent days, and the White House's special envoy Steve Witkoff last week brought home the U.S. negotiating team, which had been participating in talks in Qatar.
Asked whether a takeover of Gaza would mean hostages would not come home alive, Graham said, 'I hope not.'
'I think there are people maybe in the Hamas organization that would accept safe passage if they release the hostages,' Graham said. 'If I were Israel, I'd make that offer to Hamas fighters: 'You can leave safely. We want our hostages back.''
Graham continues advocating for special counsel to investigate Obama claims
Graham on Sunday advocated for a special counsel to investigate Republicans' claims that President Barack Obama tried to influence an intelligence assessment about Russian interference in the 2016 election.
These claims came to the fore last week when Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard alleged during a press briefing that the former president participated in a 'treasonous conspiracy' to harm Trump's campaign.
Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush has said that the 'bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' NBC News has also reported that former CIA officer Susan Miller, who helped lead the team that produced a report on Russia's actions during the 2016 election, defended the report and said the White House was 'lying' about it.
Graham said Sunday that 'the best way to handle this is if there is evidence of a crime being committed, or suspected evidence of a crime being committed, create a special counsel to look at it.'
A special counsel had previously been appointed during the first Trump administration to examine the origins of the Russia probe, and in 2023, then- special counsel John Durham argued that certain FBI personnel 'displayed a serious lack of analytical rigor toward the information they received.'
A 2020 Senate report backed up the assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election, with the then-chair of the Senate intelligence committee, a Republican, saying: 'The Committee found no reason to dispute the Intelligence Community's conclusions.'
In recent days, critics have accused Republicans of trying to turn the spotlight on Obama to distract from mounting criticism of the White House's handling of files related to Jeffrey Epstein.
Asked whether he was trying to rewrite history to distract from the Epstein news, Graham said: 'At the end of the day, I'm not calling for prosecution against President Obama for treason, but I am calling for an investigation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Trump order will allow alternative assets like cryptocurrencies, private equity in 401(k)s
President Donald Trump will sign an executive order on Thursday to allow alternative assets such as private equity, cryptocurrencies and real estate into 401(k)s, according to a senior White House official. The executive order will direct the U.S. Secretary of Labor to review fiduciary guidance on private market investments in 401(k) and other defined-contribution plans that are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The federal law sets minimum standards for most retirement plans. Trump has an executive order signing scheduled at noon. The development was first reported by Bloomberg News. An executive order would mark a major victory for alternative asset industry, which has pushed for greater adoption of private assets in defined contribution plans under Trump's second term in office. Bitcoin jumped on Thursday in response to the news. Private equity stocks such as Apollo Group were slightly higher on Thursday in early trading. Private market exposure in 401(k) plans was considered permissible in 2020, when the Department of Labor under the first Trump administration issued an information letter saying it could be appropriate for defined contribution plans under certain conditions. The guidance was later affirmed by the Biden-directed agency. But its presence is starting to expand. Asset managers and plan sponsors have created products for retirement vehicles in which Americans collectively hold roughly $8.7 trillion in assets, according to data on 401(k)s at the end of the first quarter of 2025 from the Investment Company Institute. In June, BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, said it's launching a 401(k) target date fund in the first half of 2026 that will include a 5% to 20% allocation to private investments. In May, Empower, the country's second-largest retirement plan provider, said it's joining asset managers such as Apollo to start allowing private assets in some accounts later this year.
Vox
a few seconds ago
- Vox
What makes Israel's starvation of Gaza stand apart
is a correspondent at Vox, where he covers the impacts of social and economic policies. He is the author of 'Within Our Means,' a biweekly newsletter on ending poverty in America. Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war has been well-documented by human rights organizations since 2023. Abdelhakim Abu Riash/Anadolu via Getty Images 'We are imposing a complete siege on [Gaza]. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel — everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we must act accordingly.' That was Yoav Gallant, then the Israeli defense minister, two days after Hamas's attack on October 7, 2023, killed some 1,200 Israelis and took 250 more hostage. The following week, Israel's national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir echoed a similar sentiment: 'So long as Hamas does not release the hostages,' he posted on X, 'the only thing that should enter Gaza is hundreds of tons of air force explosives — not an ounce of humanitarian aid.' So why is it that it took this long for the world to turn its attention to this humanitarian disaster? Part of the answer is that in recent weeks, the situation really has gotten much more dire, after Israel ended its 42-day ceasefire with Hamas in March and stopped allowing any aid into Gaza for two months, as my colleague Joshua Keating recently wrote. But there's another factor: The images coming out of Gaza have been absolutely heart-wrenching. Photos and videos have gone viral — on news sites and on social media — clearly showing malnourished babies starving to death, as well as those showing children and adults with their skin clinging to their bones with barely anything in between. 'It is tragic that it takes those types of really graphic, really horrible images to break through,' said Alex de Waal, an expert on famine who serves as the executive director of the World Peace Foundation at Tufts University. 'And that is such a terrible commentary on just a gargantuan failure.' This, of course, is nowhere near the first time horrific images from Gaza have surfaced and sparked outrage around the world. But there's something about the visibility of a human-made famine that, for many people — including some of Israel's most ardent supporters — crosses a moral threshold. Starving an entire population cannot be spun as collateral damage or merely the cost of war — a messaging tactic that Israel has turned to to justify its killing of innocent people despite plenty of evidence that it has routinely targeted civilians. 'You can't starve anyone by accident. It has to be deliberate and sustained,' de Waal said. 'It is beyond dispute that you have to starve people systematically because it takes so long.' Indeed, Israel's use of starvation as a weapon of war has been well-documented by human rights organizations since 2023, and both Gallant and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have been indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, including the use of starvation as a method of warfare. Israel's mass starvation of Gaza is, by definition, a form of collective punishment — imposing potentially fatal consequences on every Palestinian living in the enclave, whether they are a combatant or an innocent civilian. That's why using starvation as a weapon of war is illegal under international law. But that wasn't always the case. What Israel is doing is part of a long history of weaponizing food and basic resources. Still, while there are many examples of countries intentionally creating or exacerbating famine conditions on populations, there are also aspects of Israel's current policies in Gaza that are unique. How countries have used starvation as a weapon of war Using starvation as a weapon of war wasn't always explicitly illegal under international law. The siege of Leningrad by the Nazis and their allies, which lasted from 1941 to 1944, was one of the deadliest sieges in history, killing more than one million people. Many of these deaths were attributed to starvation. An American-run tribunal, however, determined that the forced starvation was compatible with international law. After all, it was a tactic that the Allies themselves had used as well, notably in their blockades of German-occupied territories and in Japan. There are many examples throughout history of famines that were either entirely engineered or deliberately made worse through reckless colonial and war policies. In 1943, as the British empire's colonial rule of the Indian subcontinent was nearing its end, the Bengal famine killed up to 3 million people. Since then, studies have uncovered scientific evidence that the famine was not a result of climate conditions like serious drought. Instead, British policies, under Prime Minister Winston Churchill — which included confiscating rice and boats from the coastal parts of Bengal and exporting rice from India to other parts of the empire — seriously exacerbated famine conditions. Churchill denied this, saying that the reason there was a famine was because Indians were 'breeding like rabbits' and suggesting that if the situation was indeed as dire as people claimed, then Mahatma Gandhi would be dead. Another example is the Holodomor, the famine that killed millions of Ukrainians under the Soviet Union in the early 1930s. Joseph Stalin pursued a range of policies that engineered famine conditions — including restricting the movement of people, seizing grain even when there wasn't enough to feed the local population, and exporting grain even as Ukrainians starved — in part, historians argue, to tamp down Ukrainian nationalist movements. Several countries and scholars have since recognized the famine as an act of genocide. The US also used blockades as a means to advance its war interests. One of its military campaigns against Japan during World War II was named 'Operation Starvation' — which aimed to destroy Japan's economy by limiting the distribution of food and other imports. The military assault deprived Japan of essential raw materials and led to food shortages. That, along with naval blockades and America's destruction of agricultural infrastructure contributed to widespread malnutrition and starvation. It was only after World War II that the Geneva Conventions of 1949 established some rules about the responsibility to allow food and other essentials into enemy territory for vulnerable populations. But even then, by and large, starvation tactics were still permissible. 'The reason it was permitted was because the Americans and the British rather liked using it,' de Waal said. 'It really wasn't until the British and the Americans had abandoned their colonial wars — the American one being Vietnam in the '70s — that they thought, 'Okay, now we're not going to fight these kinds of wars, and we can get around to banning it.'' The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions, which were agreed to in 1977, finally prohibited the 'starvation of civilians as a method of warfare [or combat].' And just over 20 years later, in 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court officially codified weaponizing starvation as a war crime. How Israel's starvation of Gaza is different 'Here, what we see is all the ingredients coming together in a deliberate way. We see the [Israeli leaders'] statements; we see the total bombing of all the food production,' said Neve Gordon, a professor of human rights law at Queen Mary University of London. 'I don't think there's [another] case in history, because other cases had to do with other stuff going on that were not human-made. Here, the whole starvation — from beginning to end — is human-made.' Israel has also significantly limited traditional aid groups' operations and, for months, entirely blocked aid from entering Gaza. Generally, UN-coordinated aid providers, which include UN agencies and established NGOs, have been able to enter and operate in war zones. But since the ceasefire ended in March, Israel has placed unprecedented constraints on those organizations. Instead, since May, Israel has been coordinating with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a newly formed US- and Israel-backed private entity that operates militarized distribution sites in central and southern Gaza. Israeli troops have also shot at aid-seekers at GHF's distribution sites, and, according to the UN, some 1,000 Palestinians have been killed trying to get aid from GHF. Gordon calls GHF 'a famine profiteering company,' adding that it 'does not actually provide the necessary food, while producing these hunger games that everyone was watching, [showing] starving people are going to get food and getting shot at.' While Egypt has been complicit in enforcing the blockade through its border with Gaza, the reality is that even aid going into Gaza through the Egyptian border has to go through Israeli inspection. The result is that Israel has effectively vacuum-sealed Gaza, with full control of what aid gets in. Israel could have chosen to prevent a famine at any point. Instead, it has repeatedly hampered or entirely rejected efforts to deliver life-saving aid to Palestinians — all in contravention of international law. 'Israel is not unique at all in using hunger as a weapon of war,' de Waal said. 'What is unique about the Israeli one is just how rigorous and how sustained it is, and how it is in defiance of an international humanitarian capacity that can respond just like that. So if Netanyahu wanted every [child in Gaza] to have breakfast tomorrow, it can be organized.' One example of Israel's (and the world's) capacity to stop the worst from happening is the polio vaccination campaign that happened last year. When polio — which had been eradicated from Gaza for 25 years — resurfaced as a result of the humanitarian and sanitation crisis imposed by Israel's war, governments around the world pressured Israel to agree to a humanitarian pause in combat, in order to vaccinate children across the Gaza Strip. In the middle of the war, the vaccination campaigns were successful, reaching 95 percent of the target population. An effort to stop malnutrition can be similarly efficient.
NBC News
a few seconds ago
- NBC News
Tariffs on dozens on countries take effect and Kremlin confirms Trump-Putin meeting: Morning Rundown
Sweeping tariffs on dozens of countries have taken effect. A doctor fears that a rift with UnitedHealthcare could bankrupt her clinic. And a conservative community fights to keep a beloved teacher from being deported. Here's what to know today. Trump's tariffs take effect, affecting everything from food to cars from around the world After months of threats, delays and extensions, President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs took effect overnight, raising the overall average tariff rate to more than 17%, its highest since the Great Depression. Everything from European Union appliances and Japanese cars to food, furniture and toys from China TVs from South Korea will be hit. However, selected oil and gas imports, along with some smartphones and goods covered by a pre-existing trade agreement with Canada and Mexico, are not affected. Trump has indicated his trade offensive won't stop. The president said he still plans to impose import taxes on pharmaceutical products and semiconductors. Amid that pressure, Apple said it plans to invest $600 billion in the U.S. over the next four years amid pressure from Trump to shift its supply chain to American soil. Meanwhile, Trump hiked the tariff rate for India to 50% because of the nation's purchases of Russian oil, and he said he could raise the European Union's tariff level to 35% from 15% if it reneges on an investment commitment. The Trump administration has already insisted tariffs are working, pointing to billions raised in new monthly revenues for the federal government. While the White House says nations have pledged hundreds of billions of dollars in investments, it hasn't released details of how that money will be spent. While the full effect of the tariffs is yet to be felt, the U.S. economy appears to be on much shakier ground than at the start of the year. Price growth has continued to pick up, employment growth in manufacturing has flatlined and other non-manufacturing sectors are feeling the pinch. The Kremlin said Thursday that a meeting between presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin has been agreed in principle and will happen in the 'coming days,' teeing up their first in-person encounter of Trump's second term. At the same time, Moscow all but dismissed Trump's proposal for a three-way summit involving Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, continuing the Kremlin's longstanding resistance to such a sit-down. Trump's efforts are part of his campaign promise to resolve Russia's war in Ukraine, and his wider 'America First' pledge to end involvement in foreign conflicts altogether. 'At the suggestion of the American side, an agreement in principle was made to hold a bilateral meeting at the highest level in the coming days,' Putin's longtime foreign policy aide, Yury Ushakov, said in an audio idea of a Trump-Putin-Zelenskyy meeting 'for some reason was mentioned by Washington yesterday' but 'not specifically discussed,' Ushakov said. The Russian side had 'left this option completely, completely without comment.' The Trump administration is currently still set to impose secondary sanctions on Russia this week, despite a meeting yesterday between U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin. An administration official said secondary sanctions 'are still expected to be implemented on Friday.' Zelenskyy said he spoke to Trump after Witkoff's meeting and reiterated the country's insistence on defending its independence. Putin's longtime foreign policy aide, Yury Ushakov, said the talks were 'very useful and constructive,' adding that Russia has 'forwarded some signals ... on the Ukrainian issue.' Read the full story here. More politics news: As the fight in Texas over redistricting plays out, take a look at who draws congressional maps and how they do it. Also, review how nearly a decade of Supreme Court rulings have given states more redistricting power. National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard declassified a document on Russia's 2016 election interference with relatively minimal redactions despite objections from CIA officials. Trump said he's considering a federal takeover of Washington, D.C.'s local police force. The Trump administration is scaling back the State Department's annual Human Rights Report, which is widely read around the world. A Republican running to succeed Mitch McConnell is leaning into the same anti-establishment sentiment that sent JD Vance from the private sector to the vice presidency. Texas surgeon fears insurance dispute may force her into bankruptcy Dr. Elisabeth Potter said she was midway through performing a breast reconstruction surgery when she got a call from a UnitedHealthcare representative who wanted to talk about the patient on the table. During the call, Potter said the representative wanted more information on why the patient needed an overnight hospital stay, even though the surgery had been approved. 'If they can ring me in the operating room, not for something urgent, just for that, and to ask me to justify her staying overnight ... we have lost our way,' Potter said in a TikTok video that has racked up nearly 6 million views. Potter said UnitedHealthcare denied coverage for the hospital stay. An insurance spokesperson said the stay was approved but there was an error with a separate request. Now, Potter believes UnitedHealthcare is retaliating against her because of her social media posts but not allowing her clinic in Austin, Texas, to join their in-network list of providers. Without being able to accept UnitedHealthcare patients in network — the second biggest player in the market, according to the Texas Department of Insurance — Potter said she likely won't be able to stay in business. Experts say the dispute is one example of ongoing tension between insurers and health care providers. Potter's dispute, in particular, comes as UnitedHealth Group comes under intense scrutiny. A new CDC report is the first to provide estimates about how much ultra-processed foods make up Americans' diets. It's more than half. A federal prison camp in Texas where Ghislaine Maxwell was transferred has increased security measures in response to her arrival. And while there, Maxwell will be barred from participating in a puppy training program. The Trump administration has suspended $584 million in federal grants for UCLA, the first public university whose funding has been targeted over allegations of civil rights violations. Scientists want to stop AI from turning evil. Their solution? Teaching the models some bad behavior. I am endlessly fascinated by the stories of people dealing with the effects of major political decisions, such as the overhaul to America's immigration policy. I was especially interested in this incredible story from Daniela Pierre-Bravo about a Haitian immigrant who has become a beloved fixture in his Ohio community, where 83% of voters backed Trump last year. Science teacher Marc Rocher saw serious violence in Haiti. After a close friend was kidnapped and killed was the final straw, he left for the U.S., finding his way to Putnam County under temporary protective status. While it may be a reliably Republican corner of the state, Putnam County's church-goers, students and community members realized that losing Rocher to the country's immigration policies, which they helped put in motion as Trump voters, would mean losing a pillar of the community. Now, the pastor of a conservative church is standing up for Rocher. High school students are sending letters pleading with DHS Secretary Kristi Noem to let him stay. And a family with adopted Haitian children say Rocher has helped their sons heal from the trauma inflicted in their home country. To them, Rocher puts a human face on a polarizing political issue. — Michelle Garcia, NBC BLK editorial director NBC Select: Online Shopping, Simplified NBC Select has been testing fitness trackers for years now, and these are their favorites from Apple, Oura, Garmin and Fitbit. Plus, the brand On has a wide range of sneakers, but which are the right ones for you? We created a handy guide compiled our favorite On sneakers and apparel. here.
