logo
Lee County family planning medical director steps down due to employer OSF HealthCare reproductive care policy

Lee County family planning medical director steps down due to employer OSF HealthCare reproductive care policy

Yahoo04-02-2025

Feb. 4—DIXON — The Lee County Health Department has selected a new family planning medical director after its former director was told by their new employer, OSF HealthCare, to step down due to the Catholic health system's restrictive policies for reproductive care, LCHD's administrator says.
The health department's new family planning medical director, Dr. Christine Doyle, an OB/GYN at UW Health Swedish American Hospital in Rockford and a former KSB OB/GYN, has replaced Dr. John Plescia, former KSB — now OSF — family medicine physician in Oregon.
OSF took over operations at KSB, an independent hospital based in Dixon, on Jan. 1 and all KSB employees that decided to stay, including Plescia, became OSF employees.
Shortly after the takeover, OSF "informed Dr. Plescia that because of their policy on women's health care, he would no longer be able to serve in the position of our family planning medical director," LCHD Administrator Cathy Ferguson said in an interview with Shaw Local.
Like other Catholic health systems, OSF follows the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services, which guides provider practices based on the teachings of the Catholic church. The directives outline several limitations to reproductive care specifically for medical birth control and contraceptive practices, terminating a pregnancy, infertility treatments and alternatives.
[ Dixon's KSB Hospital merger with Catholic organization sparks reproductive healthcare concerns ]
"I'm trying to play nice. I'm trying to be collaborative, but I was a little upset about the whole thing," Ferguson said.
Plescia served as the department's family planning medical director for about nine years while employed by KSB, Ferguson said.
The director is a volunteer position acting as an oversight role and does not directly treat patients. The director signs standing orders from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control that allow the department to operate on a day-to-day basis and is the collaborating physician to LCHD physician assistant Courtney Teller, Doyle said in an interview with Shaw Local.
By law, in Illinois, physician assistants are required to have a written agreement with a collaborating physician.
To assume the role, Doyle notified her employer — UW Health — which had "no problem" partly because it's a volunteer position and "I'm kind of behind the scenes, but they didn't really question it," she said.
"In our profession, family planning is sometimes equated to abortion, and part of the policies of the department is with counseling patients, not providing abortion care or anything like that, but rather telling people their options," Doyle said. "It may just be that it's easier just to say no because there's certainly things that the health department provides information on, evidence-based practice, that they (OSF) disagree with."
OSF HealthCare and Plescia declined Shaw Local's request for interview.
"We worked really well with Dr. Plescia and were sorry to see him go, but we're very fortunate to have found somebody else to take his place," Ferguson said.
Doyle said that Plescia leaving "happened a little suddenly" and Ferguson "was frantically looking for someone to fill the role."
Ferguson asked Doyle, who joined the Lee County Board of Health in fall 2024, to fill the role and she was excited to step up for the position, but, Doyle said, "I had to backtrack a little bit" thinking "I better talk with my lawyer."
Although it's a volunteer position, certain no-compete clauses prohibited her from assuming the role and the department had to wait to "get the OK from OSF that I (Doyle) could proceed without getting sued," Doyle said.
During that waiting period, the health department had to pause any operations that fell under the family planning medical director for about a day and a half. That pause included canceling some patients' appointments.
"I was grateful they (OSF) were willing to work with me," Doyle said.
Without a family planning medical director, the health department would not be able to offer family planning services which "has been the answer" to OSF Saint Katharine Medical Center's — formerly KSB's — new restrictive policies.
[ Administrator: Lee County Health Department offers reproductive services not provided by new Catholic hospital ]
Doyle, a former KSB employee, said "in my last months at KSB, we were referring a lot of patients here (the health department) knowing that we wouldn't be able to continue prescriptions or whatever it was through OSF."
The health department has also been planning for a change in health care services in the county.
When Doyle filled the open spot on the Lee County Board of Health, Ferguson "was specifically looking for someone with a commitment to women's health to be a voice on the board as we knew that the landscape in the community was changing in terms of access or contraception," Doyle said.
Doyle had been an OB/GYN at KSB for about four years when the hospital announced in May 2024 that it would be merging with OSF.
"My initial reaction was like, 'OK, well, I need to leave,'" Doyle said.
She spent some time debating the decision and tried to find out what OSF's policies would be for women's and reproductive care, specifically for contraception.
OSF does "not promote or condone contraceptive practices," according to ERD directive No. 52.
That includes birth control methods such as taking prescribed medication or getting an implantation, and procedures including a tubal ligation or a vasectomy, according to directives 52 and 53.
OSF physicians can purchase what's called a "limited private practice," which allows them to act independently of OSF, but even with that license physicians still have some restrictions. One example is they can't implant copper intrauterine devices, Doyle said.
In the end, Doyle — one of only two OB/GYNs at KSB — turned in her resignation on Nov. 1, she said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A judge tells federal agencies they can't enforce anti-trans bias policies against Catholic groups

time2 days ago

A judge tells federal agencies they can't enforce anti-trans bias policies against Catholic groups

BISMARCK, N.D. -- Two federal agencies cannot punish Catholic employers and health care providers if they refuse for religious reasons to provide gender-affirming care to transgender patients or won't provide health insurance coverage for such care to their workers, a federal judge ruled Thursday. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Peter Welte, the chief federal judge in North Dakota, bars the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from enforcing a health care rule it imposed in 2024 under Democratic President Joe Biden. The rule said that existing policies against sex discrimination covered discrimination based on gender identity, so that health care providers risked losing federal funds if they refused to provide gender-affirming care. Welte also barred the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from telling employers that a failure to have health plans cover gender-affirming care for their workers would represent discrimination based on sex that could lead to a lawsuit against them and penalties. The judge rejected a request from an order of nuns, two Catholic homes and the Catholic Benefits Association, which represents employers, to impose similar bans on each agency covering abortion and fertility treatments Catholic organizations consider immoral. He said those claims were 'underdeveloped' and not ready for court review. But he concluded that allowing the two agencies to enforce policies on gender-affirming care or health coverage for it would restrict employers' and health care providers' ability to live out their religious beliefs, violating a 1992 federal law meant to provide broad protections for religious freedoms. The HHS rule had a provision allowing the agency to make case-by-case exceptions based on religious beliefs, but Welte said that would be insufficient. 'The case-by-case exemption procedure leaves religious organizations unable to predict their legal exposure without furthering any compelling antidiscrimination interests,' wrote Welte, who is based in Fargo. The two agencies did not immediately respond to email messages seeking comment Thursday. The Catholic Benefits Association serves more than 9,000 employers and about 164,000 employees enrolled in member health plans, according to its website. The group, founded in 2013, says it 'advocates for and litigates in defense of our members' First Amendment rights to provide employee benefits and a work environment that is consistent with the Catholic faith.' The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects religious freedoms. Association General Counsel Martin Nussbaum welcomed the ruling, saying the organization's members 'want to do the right thing in their health plan and in their medical services that they provide for those medical providers, and this gives them protection to doing that.' And he said the judge's ruling suggests there are no mandates from the federal government on abortion or fertility treatments, so there is 'no need to provide protection.' The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the Civil Rights Act's protections against discrimination based on sex also cover anti-LGBTQ+ bias in employment. The landmark 1964 act doesn't have specific provisions dealing with bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity. But courts also have intervened to limit how far the federal government can go in combating anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination when religious organizations or employers with religious beliefs against LGBTQ+ rights are involved. Both the HHS rule and the EEOC's policy on sex discrimination have their roots in efforts by President Barack Obama to protect LGBTQ+ rights in 2016, in his last year in office. When President Donald Trump began his second term in January, he issued an order saying the federal government would not recognize transgender people's gender identities. In April, two employees said the EEOC was classifying all new gender identity-related discrimination cases as its lowest priority, essentially putting them on indefinite hold. The 2024 HHS rule also covered bias based on 'pregnancy or related conditions," and the Catholic health care providers argued that they might face losing federal funds if they refused to perform abortions, in line with Catholic opposition to abortion. But HHS said the rule wouldn't have forced them to perform abortions or provide health coverage for abortions — only that it couldn't refuse to care for someone because they'd had one, according to Welte.

NYS lawmakers set vote to make assisted suicide legal despite controversy
NYS lawmakers set vote to make assisted suicide legal despite controversy

New York Post

time3 days ago

  • New York Post

NYS lawmakers set vote to make assisted suicide legal despite controversy

ALBANY – State lawmakers are 'likely' to pass a bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide next week –despite controversy over the legislation, the Senate Democratic leader said Thursday. The measure — which would allow people with six months or less to live to be prescribed a cocktail of drugs to end their lives — would be sent to Gov. Kathy Hochul's desk after approval by the state legislature in a vote that could come as soon as Monday. 'I do believe there are the votes and it is likely it will come to the floor,' Senate Democratic Majority Leader Stewart-Cousins told reporters. Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins (D-Westchester) said the Medical Aid in Dying Act will likely be brought up for a vote before the end of session next week. Hans Pennink 'Ultimately, the majority of the conference felt comfortable with providing options for people during difficult end of life times,' the Westchester County legislator said. A source familiar said the vote is likely to be scheduled for Monday and Stewart-Cousins' acknowledgement it is set for a vote indicates wide support in the Democratic caucus, which controls both houses of the legislature. Critics of the legislation – which include the Catholic church and disability rights groups, amongst others – argue the bill doesn't have adequate safeguards against abuse. 'We appreciate the Senator's desire to have a conversation about end of life care, but handing sick people a suicide cocktail is not compassion nor is it healthcare,' Bob Bellafiore, spokesperson for the New York State Catholic Conference told The Post. 'We know many Democratic senators have very deep reservations about this bill and they should be allowed to vote their conscience instead of toeing a party line,' he added. State Sen. Jessica Scarcella-Spanton, one of the Senators driving the effort to pass the bill, said the legislation is about 'honoring choice.' A source said Stewart-Cousins' acknowledgement the measure is set for a vote indicates wide support for it in the Democratic caucus. Hans Pennink 'Passing the Medical Aid in Dying Act affirms New Yorkers' right to make deeply personal end-of-life decisions. This legislation offers terminally ill individuals the autonomy to choose a peaceful and dignified passing, surrounded by loved ones,' Scarcella-Spanton said. 'It's about honoring choice, alleviating suffering, and treating people with the compassion they deserve. I'm proud to see that we have the support to get this landmark piece of legislation done,' Scarcella-Spanton added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store