Louisiana's tourism leaders concerned about anxious Canadian travelers
Why it matters: President Trump's tariffs and insistence that Canada should become the 51st American state are fueling a remarkable rally-round-the-flag effect up north.
Canadian patriotism is skyrocketing alongside disdain for all things American throughout the Great White North.
The big picture: Canada is New Orleans' top market of origin for international visitors by a large margin, according to New Orleans & Co., the city's tourism arm.
Walt Leger, the group's president and CEO, tells Axios he's hearing from visitors and travel partners about their "distaste" for the political climate.
The city has had some cancellations, but he says those have been isolated so far.
It's a "concern," he says, but it's not a trend showing up in the data yet.
What he's saying: "We also recognize that sometimes it's hard to know if your phone is not ringing, and I think it's fair to say that based on the sentiment we're hearing, we think that there's probably some slowdown in lead volume and other things," Leger says.
Between the lines: New Orleans & Co. hosted a group of Canadian journalists last week in an effort to showcase what the city has to offer.
The trip was planned before the tariffs were announced, leaders say.
Zoom out: Canada is also Louisiana's top international market, according to the state's tourism office.
"I'm hoping these trade wars can be put to bed quickly because it will affect our numbers from Canada," Lt. Gov. Billy Nungesser said at a conference last month, according to The Acadiana Advocate.
Case in point: Four busloads of Canadian tourists canceled their plans to attend this fall's Grand Réveil Acadien in Lafayette, writes The Acadiana Advocate's Claire Taylor.
The Canadians cited political uncertainty as one of the reasons.
Threat level: A mere 10% drop in Canadian visitors could cost U.S. businesses as much as $2.1 billion in revenue, according to the U.S. Travel Association.
State of play: Advance bookings for Canada-U.S. flights in April-September are down more than 70% compared with this time last year, per aviation data firm OAG.
"This sharp drop suggests that travelers are holding off on making reservations, likely due to ongoing uncertainty surrounding the broader trade dispute," writes OAG chief analyst John Grant.
Airlines are also reducing transborder capacity — a strong signal that they, too, are seeing (or at least predicting) less demand.
Yes, but: At least one airline is calling OAG's data into question.
The numbers are "not reflective of Air Canada's booking patterns, nor the state of the market, based on all information sources available to us," an Air Canada spokesperson told travel news site The Points Guy.
Yet the spokesperson confirmed there's been a "softening" in demand, and the airline has trimmed capacity accordingly.
What we're watching: Reluctance to visit the U.S. this summer may not be a strictly Canadian phenomenon.
Go deeper
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
a few seconds ago
- USA Today
Brand advertising on news sites isn't risky, it's absolutely necessary
News junkies are more likely to show interest in your brands and buy your products. They hold more favorable views of brands, trusting them more and recommending them to others. People who check the news five or more times a day make up a quarter of the American population. They're information hungry, consume media often and tend to have more money and more education. In a political and economic climate where everything is constantly changing, more and more people are checking news websites on their phones. Any sensible marketer would see a no-brainer opportunity there. Yet many brands are completely withdrawn from digital news. Why? An irrational fear of 'brand safety.' But what are brands really missing out on when they don't advertise on news platforms? For one, they're writing off a high-impact audience that makes up a large cross section of the population. Roughly 80.4 million U.S. adults follow the news very closely. News junkies are more likely to show interest in your brands and buy your products. They hold more favorable views of brands, trusting them more and recommending them to others. The average "purchase intent" among news junkies is 66% −16 percentage points higher than the general population − according to Stagwell's Advertising Impact Study, which tested a mix of 20 ads in various formats from 20 brands and major sectors across tech, travel/hospitality, consumer packaged goods, financial services and automotive. (People with purchase intent are defined in the study as those who said they were likely to make a purchase or use services from the brand within the next six months.) Included in this cross section are the vast majority of the world's leaders: 90% of CEOs and board members are news junkies, too. That's not to mention "exclusive news" junkies − the 37 million people (14% of U.S. adults) who follow the news very closely, but do not engage in sports and entertainment in the same way. Best 2025 Super Bowl commercials: Check out all 57 ranked according to USA TODAY Ad Meter By not advertising in news, brands completely forgo 14% of the adult population. This is a group that shows greater post-ad exposure lift than the average American − that is, bigger gains in brand reputation measurement scores like favorability and trust after viewing an ad. These are individuals who are eager for more information and respond better to ads. Also, the number of exclusive news junkies is growing. Just a year ago, they made up 11% of the population. Now, more than 7 million U.S. adults have converted – a nearly 3 point jump in the number of news junkies. Brands safety concerns are overblown Brands that don't invest in news now are missing out on the opportunity to drive real business results. We know why brands aren't investing in news. It's the overblown 'brand safety' movement that turned genuine concern into brand censorship. It's the organized coalitions colluding to demonetize unfavorable content. The Global Alliance for Responsible Media, a now-disbanded advertising coalition that created subjective guidelines dictating what content was suitable for advertising support, is a prime example. It's the outdated blocklists that prevent ads from being placed in articles with chicken 'breasts' and 'shots' and 'Ariana Grande.' That means if 'breasts' is on a blocklist − a list of keywords brands do not want their ads to appear next to − a harmless, otherwise widely read article about the price of poultry goes unadvertised. Now if it's a beverage company around Super Bowl time, that's a huge, missed opportunity to advertise to all the boneless fried chicken fans. However, evidence is growing that these fears really are overblown. Stagwell's News Advertising Study, conducted among 50,000 Americans, found that there is no difference in key brand reputational metrics between ads next to shootings and war versus ads next to business, sports or entertainment stories. The risk, and there's proven to be virtually none, is trivial compared with the reward. 'Fake news' does exist. But Trump is dangerously wrong about where it comes from. | Opinion The time to advertise in news is now. Nearly 60% of news junkies and exclusive news junkies follow the news more closely than they did a year ago. Roughly half of news junkies consume more political, economic and international news today. News junkies have never been a more attractive audience for marketers. Advertising linked to news drives results for businesses Incorporating news into advertising strategies already drives results. Stagwell has seen 2024 campaigns deliver three times the average return on ad spending (ROAS) since beginning news-focused testing in the second half of 2023. News delivers three times higher ROAS than other paid media channels for Stagwell's agency, Assembly. These results mirror what I saw at Microsoft as executive vice president of advertising: News sites were some of the best-performing sites for technology. Refusing to advertise in news over brand safety concerns is like a grocery store that refuses to carry The New York Times or The Wall Street Journal. News is a critical platform for marketers and advertisers. It's a powerful business medium that reaches highly desirable audiences. If you're a chief marketing officer, tell your team you've made the decision to treat news on an equal playing field as sports and entertainment. Run the computer models and try out a minimum media buy. Test and distribute the same ads and see whether they'll work equally well. Your performance metrics will thank you for it. Mark Penn is chairman and CEO of Stagwell Inc. His career spans 40 years in market research, advertising, public relations and politics. A globally recognized strategist, Penn has advised world leaders, including Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, founded companies and written two bestselling books. USA TODAY's parent company, Gannett, is a partner in Stagwell's Future of News initiative.
Business Insider
a minute ago
- Business Insider
The rise of the $1 a year AI deal
While AI giants are breaking the bank to fund the future of the technology, two companies are hoping a single dollar fee can help them gain a foothold in Washington. OpenAI and Anthropic are charging the Trump administration just $1 per agency to access their leading AI models for the next year. In another sign of how competitive things remain, OpenAI announced its agreement for ChatGPT Enterprise access on August 6. Less than a week later, Anthropic announced a similar deal for access to Claude for Enterprise and Claude for Government. Government contracts could be quite lucrative for AI companies. Anthropic already has a deal with the Pentagon that could be worth as much as $200 million. "Some of these companies are going public, and if they can say their products are being used by government agencies, that boosts their long-term potential," Darrell M. West, a senior fellow in the Center for Technology Innovation, told Business Insider. West said companies that aren't striking these types of agreements risk getting "squeezed out." "There are a lot of AI companies now, but that is probably going to narrow in the future — some companies will do well and many are not going to make it — so if you are getting government employees to use your products, it increases the odds that you will be one of the survivors," he said. Google might have a similar deal in the offing. Earlier this month, US General Services Administration added the tech giant's Gemini model to a list of approved AI vendors. After that announcement, OpenAI and Anthropic, which were also added to the list, announced their $1 per agency agreements. Elon Musk 's xAi was originally going to strike a similar partnership, but those talks fizzled out after Grok began posting antisemitic content, Wired reported. Federal employees will have other avenues to use popular AI chatbots. On Thursday, the US General Services Administration unveiled USAi, a secure platform where federal employees can experiment with AI models at no cost to them. The platform will initially feature models from Google, Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, Anthropic, and OpenAI. A GSA spokesperson told BI that Anthropic and OpenAI's nominal fee agreements "are not the same as the USAi access mechanism." The partnerships follow President Donald Trump's unveiling of his AI action plan, a series of policies designed to keep the US at the forefront of the global AI race. AI companies take maintaining the US's position seriously. Last year, Anduril and Palantir announced their own effort to outfit the government with AI. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman joined Trump in January to announce Stargate, a $500 billion project that would help rebuild the AI giant's moat against Chinese competitors. Anthropic's agreement also applies to all three branches, underlining that the deal extends to congressional employees. Despite repeated efforts, Congress has been unable to pass a sweeping AI law. Most recently, lawmakers dealt some in the industry a setback after they stripped out a provision that would have imposed a decadelong moratorium on state-level AI laws from President Donald Trump's " Big Beautiful Bill." Its initial inclusion sparked bipartisan opposition. OpenAI, Meta, and Alphabet have all opposed previous state-level efforts to regulate the industry. As Business Insider previously reported, some lawmakers remain skeptical of using AI chatbots themselves.
a minute ago
Russian drone strike on Ukraine apartments kills several before Trump-Zelenskyy meet
LONDON -- At least seven people, including two children, were killed by a Russian drone strike in the northeastern Ukrainian city of Kharkiv on Sunday night, according to local officials. Serhiy Bolvinov, the head of Kharkiv National Police's investigations unit, said in a post to Facebook that five Shahed strike drones hit an apartment building at dawn. "An entire family died in an apartment on the fifth floor," Bolvinov said. Ukraine's air force said Russia launched 140 drones and four missiles in the country overnight into Monday morning, of which 88 drones were shot down or suppressed. Missile and drone impacts were reported across 25 locations in Donetsk, Kharkiv, Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa and Kyiv regions, the air force said. The latest attacks come as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy prepares to meet President Donald Trump and a host of European leaders at the White House on Monday, where Trump has said he hopes his Ukrainian counterpart will agree to a deal to end Russia's war. Andriy Yermak, Zelenskyy's influential chief of staff, wrote on Telegram of the latest round of strikes, "Russia continues to deliberately kill civilians." "That's why [Russian President Vladimir] Putin doesn't want to stop the fire -- he likes to shell peaceful cities and talk about wanting to end the war," Yermak wrote. "We don't see this desire yet." Both sides have continued their long-range strike campaigns throughout Trump's efforts to craft a ceasefire and peace deal to end the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbor in February 2022. Through July, Russia launched a record 6,443 drones and missiles into Ukraine, according to data published by the Ukrainian air force, with a daily average of 201 drones and six missiles. July's monthly total was the highest of the war to date, and around 13% more than were recorded in June. At least 286 people were killed and 1,388 injured in Ukraine in July, making last month the deadliest for Ukrainian civilians since May 2022, according to data published by the United Nations' Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine. So far in August, the scale of Russian strikes has diminished. As of Monday, Ukraine's air force had recorded 1,344 drone and 27 missile launches by Russia in August -- an average of around 74 drones and more than one missile per day so far this month. Russia's Defense Ministry, meanwhile, has claimed to have shot down 1,740 Ukrainian drones so far in August, at a daily average of around 96 per day. The Defense Ministry in Moscow said its forces downed at least 24 Ukrainian drones overnight into Monday.
