
Items seized from aesthetic clinic over intent to supply concerns
This was done under the concern that they were not going to be used for the person that they were prescribed to.
'No comment'
Following the search, in February 2023, Ms Hawes took part in an interview with the Medicines Regulatory Group - accompanied by her solicitor - and this interview was relayed to the court.The court heard Ms Hawes was asked during the meeting if it was the case that she was creating a stock of prescription only medicines - so that people can walk in off the street and be treated there and then in her clinic - to which Nichola Hawes replied: 'No comment.'During the meeting Ms Hawes said the majority of her clients came to her for Botox and that she had a well-established business. She said if her clients did not go through with orders such as Botox the order was destroyed. She also added that a new patient requesting Botox would always have to wait at least one day before receiving their treatment.Ms Hawes was asked if she could explain why a prescription had been written for a woman called Lauren Caproni, if Ms Caproni did not receive any treatment after filling in an online questionnaire for the self-administering weight-loss drug, Ozempic.
'Administrative error'
She was also asked why would she prescribe something for somebody if they had not asked for it or received it – and questioned as to why she had a back log of Ozempic in her clinic.To each of these questions and several others, it was relayed to the court that Ms Hawes had answered no comment.The jury heard that Ms Hawes said she had made one mistake in relation to client Jordan Cairns - when she accidently put another client's prescription under her name, but she added that this was an administrative error. Ms Hawes said she had full records and notes, was widely known and respected and at no point had any patient been at risk.The jury also heard from a second Medicines Enforcement Officer, Jacqueline Pyper.She told the court she had visited the home of a former client of Ms Hawes, Louise Abott, who had previously ordered two weight loss pens from Ms Hawes.Ms Abott showed Ms Pyper her previous orders, which came in a box with someone else's name on it. She also confirmed to Ms Pyper that she did not ask Ms Hawes to order a third pen for her.The trial continues.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scottish Sun
11 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Watch as cops raid illegal penis enlargement clinics where ‘dodgy docs performed unsafe willy ops in filthy conditions'
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) TWO clinics allegedly offering penis enlargement and circumcisions from unlicensed doctors has been raided by cops. The police action comes after complaints of procedures being carried out by unqualified staff. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 6 Police raided two cosmetic surgery clinics allegedly offering penis enlargement and circumcisions by unlicensed doctors Credit: AsiaPacificPress via ViralPress 6 Officers from the Consumer Protection Police Division stormed the clinics in Pathum Thani province Credit: AsiaPacificPress via ViralPress 6 Allowing non-medical personnel to provide treatment is against Thai law Credit: AsiaPacificPress via ViralPress Officers from the Consumer Protection Police Division stormed the clinics in Pathum Thani province, just north of Bangkok, Thailand. Managers had also been advertising the service online featuring pictures of men holding AI-generated bananas next to their crotch. When cops raided the first clinic, they found a 28-year-old in the middle of a cosmetic procedure on a patient. They quickly found that the premises had no licence to operate. It had offered services including brow lifts, eye bag removal, penis enlargement and circumcision. The 28-year-old admitted to only being a nursing assistant who had worked at clinic for around four months. He allegedly said: "The clinic sometimes has doctors performing procedures, and I would act as a medical assistant. "If no doctors were available, I would perform the procedures myself." He was detained pending prosecution, and more than 625 items including medical equipment and medicines were taken by cops. The clinic reportedly has multiple branches across Thailand, so police are expanding their investigation. At least three dead in horror mass shooting after gunman opens fire at Bangkok market A separate venue in the area was also raided, this one offering Botox, filler injections, thread lifts and laser treatments. Here, a 37-year-old was caught giving vitamin IV drips to patients even though she only had a vocational certificate. She was arrested, and 175 bottles of prescription and unregistered drugs was seized. Police Major General Pattanasak Bupphasuwan, commander of the CPPD, said: "The Consumer Protection Police Division has repeatedly received reports of non-medical personnel carrying out cosmetic injections and medical procedures on the public. "Penile filler injections are a personal preference and offer no medical benefit. "Surgery to insert foreign objects into the penis carries serious risks, including inflammation, infection, and even long-term dysfunction. "I want to warn those involved, including people posing as fake doctors running illegal clinics, to stop this dangerous behaviour immediately." Allowing non-medical personnel to provide treatment is against Thai law. It can lead to up to two years in prison, a fine of up to 40,000 baht (£910), or both. What are the risks of getting surgery abroad? IT'S important to do your research if you're thinking about having cosmetic surgery abroad. It can cost less than in the UK, but you need to weigh up potential savings against the potential risks. Safety standards in different countries may not be as high. No surgery is risk-free. Complications can happen after surgery in the UK or abroad. If you have complications after an operation in the UK, the surgeon is responsible for providing follow-up treatment. Overseas clinics may not provide follow-up treatment, or they may not provide it to the same standard as in the UK. Also, they may not have a healthcare professional in the UK you can visit if you have any problems. Source: NHS 6 Cops are now expanding their investigations Credit: AsiaPacificPress via ViralPress 6 Penalties for breaching this law include up to two years in prison and a fine of up to 40,000 baht Credit: AsiaPacificPress via ViralPress


Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Millions fall foul of scam websites selling mislabelled toxic substances
Gen's cyber safety brand Avast has warned of more than 5,000 fake pharmacy websites operating in the UK, selling counterfeit drugs More than 5,000 bogus pharmacy websites are currently operating across the UK - flogging mislabelled toxic substances ranging from pesticides to animal tranquillisers. Avast, a cyber safety brand of Gen, revealed that in 2025 so far, it has thwarted more than a million attacks from these sites targeting its customers. Web addresses including and 77pharmacy have been exposed as fraudulent, with the sites masquerading as legitimate operations complete with professional layouts, fabricated customer service details, and comprehensive product listings. It comes after UK households issued warning if they have Nescafé coffee in kitchen. . The investigation discovered many Britons are at risk of losing their cash, personal information or worse, exposing a network of cybercriminals utilising AI to create fake websites. These dodgy sites can dispatch authentic-looking items bearing counterfeit labels and false expiry dates for medications like Ozempic or Viagra, with the actual contents being potentially lethal. Branded 'PharmaFraud', the criminal enterprises employ various methods including embedding malicious software into medical websites, manipulating search engine results, creating AI-generated health blogs and fabricating customer reviews. Siggi Stefnisson, cyber safety chief technology officer for Avast, said: "Cyber threats are now smarter, faster, and more personal. PharmaFraud is a perfect example of how cybercriminals think – they want to prey on people who are vulnerable, feeling desperate, or generally in need. In many cases, people looking for medications online can fall into that bracket. That's why awareness and vigilance are critical." According to a recent report, these bogus pharmacies primarily prey on individuals seeking to maintain their privacy when purchasing products related to sexual health, hormone therapy or erectile dysfunction. They also target those in search of quick results through weight loss medication, or simply those looking for more affordable alternatives. At best, customers may receive counterfeit drugs that contain no active ingredients, but at worst, they could contain heavy metals, animal tranquilisers or contaminated stock. Laura Wilson, director at the Royal Pharmaceutical Society, warned: "These medicines may be out of date, substandard or contain dangerous substances." She added: "Websites that offer prescription only medicines without a prescription are acting illegally." She advised: "Only use online pharmacies that are registered with the pharmacy regulator, The General Pharmaceutical Council." She further cautioned: "Always check an online pharmacy has a verified UK address, contact number and the official registered pharmacy logo which links to the regulator's website." The report also exposed tactics frequently used by fraudsters such as hijacking legitimate sites, manipulating search engines to push their sites to the top and using AI to generate 'health blogs', five-star reviews and even provide customer support. Accepting payments via cryptocurrency and unsecured checkout forms were other methods employed. To avoid falling victim, it's recommended to only use UK registered pharmacies, look for the official pharmacy logo on the website and seek out genuine customer service information. Furthermore, any legitimate site will require you to have a prescription.


BBC News
24-07-2025
- BBC News
Doctor suspended for theft cleared to return to work
A Liverpool-based doctor who stole lip fillers and botox from a former employer has been cleared to return to Nimrit Dhillon was suspended in 2023, after being found guilty of taking items from a former employer worth £1, self-referring to the General Medical Council (GMC), she was suspended for eight months following a three-day hearing by the Medical Practitioner Tribunal Service (MPTS).In a reflective statement, made public by the MPTS, Dr Dhillon has since acknowledged her actions were "wholly unacceptable". She said she had used the suspension period "to reflect extensively, to rebuild my ethical understanding and to ensure that I never repeat these mistakes". Documents made public by the MPTS set out how, in May 2023, Dr Dhillon, who runs an aesthetic procedures business in Liverpool, stole Belotero Intense lip fillers and boxes of Bocouture botox worth £450.A week later, she stole a further three 100-unit boxes of botox and one box of 50-unit Belotero Volume dermal fillers, as well as an additional box of botox and fillers, totalling £700 in 8 June 2023, Dr Dhillon took four more boxes of 100-unit botox belonging to Facethetics Training in Aigburth, worth £ was convicted in August the same year. At a hearing last September at Liverpool Magistrates Court. she was sentenced to a 12-month community order, an unpaid work requirement of 200 hours and ordered to pay £1,450 in a reflective statement, made public by the MPTS, Dr Dhillon said she accepted "full responsibility" for her actions."I was dishonest and I stole property," she said."These actions were wholly unacceptable and fell far below the standards expected of any medical added she "deeply regretted" harm caused to colleagues and to "the reputation of the profession, to public trust, and to those who relied on me to act with honesty and integrity".After serving her suspension, it has been confirmed the GMC has revoked any barriers to the University of Leeds graduate returning to GMC and Dr Dhillon agreed in writing, signed by both parties last month, that her fitness to practise is no longer impaired by reason of her conviction, and the suspension imposed should be revoked for the outstanding GMC found "the risk of repetition of the behaviour that led to her conviction is so low as to be negligible". Listen to the best of BBC Radio Merseyside on Sounds and follow BBC Merseyside on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.