North Dakota governor vetoes the housing budget -- by mistake
When North Dakota Gov. Kelly Armstrong took up an agency budget bill approved by the legislature, he vetoed a couple line items. At least, that was his intention Monday. Instead, he accidentally vetoed $35 million for the state's housing budget.
Now the state is figuring out how to deal with the unusual problem of a mistaken veto.
'I have no recollection of anything like this happening in the 37 years I've been here,' John Bjornson, legislative council director, said Thursday. 'So, yeah, I'd say it's a little extraordinary.'
The governor's staff called his veto of the housing budget in Senate Bill 2014 a markup error. Armstrong's staff met with the legislative council Thursday morning to discuss options.
'This was an honest mistake, and we will fix it,' a statement from the governor's office read.
Armstrong, a Republican who served three terms in Congress, was elected governor in 2024. The legislative session that adjourned earlier in the month was his first as governor.
In a message accompanying the veto, Armstrong wrote he had intended to veto a $150,000 grant to fund a Native American homelessness liaison position. The budget veto would take effect July 1.
What happens next is largely up to the governor, Bjornson said, but it is likely that the legislature will need to reconvene in Bismarck for a special session. The governor's office said it will call a special session if needed but hopes to 'avoid the expense.'
If the legislature overrides the veto, that would include funding for the grant Armstrong had wanted to strike. If the legislature wants to only fund the $35 million housing budget, lawmakers may need to pass a new bill, which could take as long as three days, Bjornson said.
The Legislature has six days available to use of its 80-day session limit, and a special session could open the opportunity to override other vetoes by the governor. The governor vetoed all or parts of four bills this session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Five big issues looming over the final days of Maine's legislative session
Jun. 1—Some of the thorniest and most divisive policy issues of the session stand between Maine lawmakers and their plan to adjourn on June 18. While the biggest outstanding item on the agenda is finalizing a two-year state budget, other major issues remain unresolved, as well. Here's a look at what lies ahead. TRANSGENDER ATHLETES When Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, he issued two executive orders targeting people who are transgender, including an order prohibiting transgender girls from participating in girls sports. Those orders put Maine in the administration's crosshairs because the state allows transgender athletes to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity — a stand state officials say is consistent with Title IX, which grants equal opportunity to females in education and sports, and with the Maine Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on gender identity. That dynamic led to a high profile confrontation between Gov. Janet Mills and Trump at the White House, efforts by the Trump administration to cut Maine's funding, the censure of Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, for a social media post identifying a transgender high school athlete, a U.S. Supreme Court intervention, and a hotly contested and emotional debate in the State House, where Republicans have offered a slate of bills that would restrict participation by transgender athletes and students. None of those have yet been taken up by the full Legislature. Lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee deadlocked 6-6 on two bills that would eliminate funding from school districts that allow transgender girls to participate in girls sports. Democratic Rep. Dani O'Halloran of Brewer joined Republicans in backing LD 233, sponsored by Richard Campbell, R-Orrington, and LD 1134, sponsored by Sen. Sue Bernard, R-Caribou. Two other bills were voted "ought not to pass" by the committee, but still face floor votes. LD 868, sponsored by Rep. Liz Caruso, R-Caratunk, which would have required sports to be male, female or coed and required students to use restrooms and changing rooms consistent with their gender assigned at birth, was narrowly defeated in committee, 7-5. And LD 1432, sponsored by Rep. Mike Soboleski, R-Phillips, which would have removed gender identity from the Maine Human Rights Act, was opposed, 11-2. CHILD CARE The budget presented by Gov. Janet Mills proposes rolling back some recent investments in child care, including stipends to attract workers, but pending legislation would boost support for the struggling industry. Child care advocates presented a show of force early in the session, calling on lawmakers to protect the investments targeted by Mills. And while lawmakers are still negotiating the budget, additional standalone bills have been working through the Legislature. One of those bills, LD 1955, is sponsored by Senate President Mattie Daughtry, D-Brunswick. It calls for $1 million a year in child care provider stipends, plus a onetime appropriation of $3.8 million and an annual appropriation of $2 million to help qualifying families pay for child care. HOUSING The affordable housing shortage in Maine has been front and center again this session. LD 1829, sponsored by House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, aims to make it easier to build housing in communities by reducing minimum lot requirements, loosening regulations on in-law apartments or accessory dwelling units, streamlining municipal review for smaller housing developments, and allowing a single-story high bonus for qualified affordable housing. Lawmakers have also taken up bills that would provide funding to allow residents of mobile home parks to purchase those parks when offered for sale. Mobile home residents own their homes, but not the land underneath them. In recent years, parks have changed hands, leading to an increase in lot fees, and increasing the housing instability of of tenants. IMMIGRATION Immigration enforcement has been another focus of the Trump administration that spilled into the Legislature this year. Lawmakers are still considering bills that would define the relationship between federal authorities and state, county and local police. One bill, LD 1656, sponsored by Soboleski, would prohibit any restrictions from being placed on assisting with federal immigration enforcement. But two Democratic bills — LD 1259, sponsored by Rep. Ambreen Rana, D-Bangor, and LD 1971, sponsored by Rep. Deqa Dhalac, D-South Portland — take the opposite approach. Rana's bill would prohibit state and local law enforcement from entering into contracts for federal immigration enforcement, while Dhalac's bill would go further by adding additional restrictions on state and local law enforcement's ability to enforce immigration laws, while emphasizing the rights of detained immigrants. TAX BILLS With state revenues flattening, lawmakers are considering a range of proposals to support state programs and provide tax relief to families. One bill likely to come to the floor is LD 1089, sponsored by Rep. Cheryl Golek, D-Harpswell. It would create a so-called millionaire's tax to support K-12 education. Adding a 4% surcharge to incomes above $1 million could generate over $100 million a year, according to advocates who celebrated the positive committee recommendation. Copy the Story Link
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maine lawmakers are still wrangling over state budget with weeks left in session
Jun. 1—Maine's legislative session is scheduled to end in just over two weeks, and many of the biggest issues remain unresolved. Lawmakers still must close out a two-year state budget that could include tax increases and spending cuts to settle thorny policy issues ranging from transgender athletes to immigration enforcement to child care funding. Finalizing the budget is going to be the biggest hurdle and likely will come down to the wire after some marathon days of negotiation and debate. Democratic lawmakers passed a portion of the state budget earlier this session with enough funding to continue basic services into the new fiscal year that starts July 1. But they left unresolved proposed tax increases and program cuts the Mills administration says are needed to meet the state Constitution's mandate for a balanced budget. They took a similar approach two years ago. Republicans, who have criticized Democrats for using their majorities to adopt baseline budgets without their input, are not keen on helping Democrats dig themselves out of a projected budget hole, especially if it includes tax increases. Democrats will need some Republican support for the remaining pieces of the budget to take effect in July. Lawmakers from both parties say they're aiming to conclude the session by June 18. They will need to approve a budget before they adjourn for the year, but they have the option of carrying over until next year any remaining bills, including about 100 spending bills that have passed both chambers and are awaiting funding before being sent to the governor. 'TOUGH CHOICES' Gov. Janet Mills is expected to meet with a bipartisan group of lawmakers next week to urge Republicans and Democrats to agree to a bipartisan budget — one that makes "tough choices" that protect core services at a time when state revenues have begun to level off and decline and as federal funding becomes increasingly uncertain under the Trump administration and the Republican-controlled Congress. "The Governor believes that with state revenues leveling off — and cuts likely coming from the President and Republicans in Congress — the time for hard budget decisions is here and now," spokesperson Ben Goodman said. "She continues to strongly urge Republicans and Democrats in the Legislature to work together to make the tough choices that are needed to ensure programs that keep Maine people healthy, our school children fed, our communities safe, and provide access to education and good-paying jobs are maintained in the years to come." Rep. Jack Ducharme, the lead Republican on the Appropriations and Financial Affairs Committee, which is reviewing the budget, said his party is largely in the dark as Democrats debate among themselves about any changes to Mills' budget proposal. Committee Republicans have refused to support of many budget items until Democrats present a plan for new spending and revenue sources, he said. "We're really kind of the mercy of what they're going to bring to the table and what they're not," Ducharme of Madison said. "To date, they have not come up with an idea about where they're getting the money." In a written statement, Sen. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston and co-chair of the budget committee, accused Republicans of not engaging in negotiations. Rotundo said lawmakers have routinely passed bipartisan budgets in her 19 years in elected office, though her statement did not acknowledge that Democrats, who have controlled both chambers since 2019, have passed mostly partyline budgets in recent years. "What has always made Maine's government work, regardless of who holds the majority, is the understanding that governing is a shared responsibility." Rotundo said. "It requires both parties to come to the table, roll up their sleeves, and work through challenges together." Earlier this session, Democrats used their majority to pass an $11.3 billion continuing services budget that continues to fund 55% of public education and provides $122 million to help stabilize the MaineCare program. But that budget doesn't include at least $122 million in additional funding needed to fund MaineCare — Maine's Medicaid program — in the second year of the budget. The governor's budget office said that the continuing services budget does not include $285 million in additional spending originally proposed by Mills. WHAT'S LEFT TO SPEND It's unclear exactly how much money is or isn't left for lawmakers to spend. Ducharme says the continuing services budget already spends $100 million more than state revenue projections over the next two years, which, when coupled with the additional MaineCare spending, has created a hole of more than $200 million. But Rep. Drew Gattine, D-Westbrook, who is co-chair of the budget committee, said there is more than $120 million in unallocated revenue available for the next biennium. That does not include any of the additional taxes or spending cuts proposed by Mills, he said. Gattine said that lawmakers will likely alter the governor's proposal, though he didn't provide any specifics. "The budget will be different than what the governor proposed — it always is," Gattine said. "Whether or not it's significantly different is in the eye of the beholder." Mills proposed a series of tax increases that could generate $156 million in revenue to meet existing commitments, including proposing the first increase in cigarette taxes in 20 years. Increasing cigarette taxes from $2 a pack to $3 would increase state revenue by $78 million, according to her administration. But Republicans and others have criticized that approach as hurting low-income families. Mills also proposed taxing online streaming services, such as Netflix and Spotify ($14 million); phasing in a new pension income tax for wealthier retirees ($44.7 million); increasing cannabis taxes ($6.3 million); and taxing pharmacies and private ambulance services, which it says will unlock additional federal funding to reinvest into the MaineCare program. Ducharme said Republicans remain steadfastly opposed to new taxes. "Maine people are the third or fourth highest taxed people in the nation with one of the smallest populations," Ducharme said. "It's ridiculous for us to think that we need to add more taxes because government can't get its spending under control." Mills has also proposed cutbacks, including eliminating state-funded Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funds for noncitizens, cutting two crisis receiving centers planned for Aroostook and Kennebec counties, stopping a planned increase in child care worker stipends and planned cost-of-living increases for direct care workers, among others. Mills also proposed reforms to the state's General Assistance program aimed at reducing costs and returning the program to its original mission as a last resort safety net, rather than an ongoing housing assistance program. House Democrats initially agreed to a version of those reforms earlier this year, winning Republican support for a supplemental budget bill that would have allowed the state to immediately pay hospitals for services already provided to MaineCare patients. But that deal fell apart when Senate Republicans blocked its passage. House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham said at a news conference last week that Republicans are still fighting for some of the reforms they had previously sought in the budget, including reforms to the General Assistance and MaineCare programs. "We're still hoping they appear in the budget," Faulkingham said. Gattine said Democrats have focused on scrutinizing the governor's proposals, while also considering changes sought by lawmakers. But he said it's too soon to say where the final budget will land. "When we look at this stuff, we understand that these were tough choices, so we have to be much more careful and diligent in our work reviewing that (proposal), because at the end of the day we have to come up with something that is balanced, but also something that meets the moment and the needs of Maine people, which are significant," he said. Staff Writer Rachel Ohm contributed to this story. Copy the Story Link
CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Transcript: Sen. Rand Paul on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 1, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Sen. Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on June 1, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we go now to Republican Senator Rand Paul, who joins us from Lexington, Kentucky this morning. Good morning to you. SEN. RAND PAUL: Good morning, Margaret. MARGARET BRENNAN: You just heard the Treasury Secretary say a number of things, dismiss the potential price increases that could come from the tariffs when it comes to retailers. He also played down the cost of this tax and border bill that just passed through the House. Do you agree with his math? SEN. PAUL: Well, the math doesn't really add up. One of the things this big and beautiful bill is is it's a vehicle for increasing spending for the military and for the border. It's about $320 billion in new spending. To put that in perspective, that's more than all the DOGE cuts that we found so far. So, the increase in spending put into this bill exceeds the DOGE cuts. When you look just at the border wall, they have 46.5 billion for the border wall. Well, the current estimate from the CBP is 6.5 million per mile. So, if you did 1,000 miles, that's 6.5 billion, but they have 46 billion. So they've inflated the cost of the wall eight fold. So, there's a lot of new spending that has to be counteracted. But essentially, this is a bill by the military industrial complex advocates who are padding the military budget. There's going to be a lot of extra money. Look, the President has essentially stopped the border flow without- without new money and without any new legislation. So, I think they're asking for too much money. And in the end, the way you add it up to see if it actually is going to save money or add money, is how much debt are they going to borrow? 5 trillion over two years, an enormous amount. MARGARET BRENNAN: Right. That- that was the number that the Secretary was quibbling over. The President has taken note of some of your skepticism, and he did tweet yesterday saying that if you, Rand Paul, vote against his massive border and tax bill the people of Kentucky will never forgive you. Do you consider that a threat, and do you know if you have three other Republicans who will join you to block it from passage? SEN. PAUL: I had a very good conversation with the President this week about tariffs. He did most of the talking, and we don't agree exactly on the outcome. But when I come home to Kentucky, I talk to the Farm Bureau, which is opposed to the tariffs. I talked to the bourbon industry which is opposed to the tariffs. I talked to the cargo companies, UPS, DHL, all their pilots are opposed to it. I talked to the hardwood floor people. I talked to the people selling houses, building houses. I have no organized business- business interests in Kentucky for the tariffs. So I think it's worth the discussion, and it's worth people remembering that the Republicans used to be for lower taxes. Tariffs are a tax. So, if you raise taxes on the private sector, that's not good for the private sector. MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, you know, we hear from other senators who also get complaints from their people in their districts, but they're falling in line. Do you have three other Republicans who will stand with you to block this bill? SEN. PAUL: I think there are four of us at this point, and I would be very surprised if the bill, at least, is not modified in a good direction. Look, I want to vote for it. I'm for the tax cuts. I voted for the tax cuts before. I want the tax cuts to be permanent, but at the same time, I don't want to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion. So, I've told him, if you take the debt ceiling off the bill, in all likelihood, I can vote for what the agreement is on the rest of the bill, and it doesn't have to be perfect to my liking. But I can't be- if I vote for the $5 trillion debt, who's left in Washington that cares about the debt. We will have lost it. The GOP will own the debt once they vote for this. MARGARET BRENNAN: But that the leader, as you know, is sort of in a tight spot here. He needs a vehicle to raise that debt ceiling. Otherwise, you have to turn to Democrats to get that done. What was the White House response when you asked that to the President? SEN. PAUL: Well, historically, the debt ceiling has always gone up and will always go up, and I'm not proposing that it doesn't, but the people who should vote for it are the people who vote for the spending. Historically, all the Democrats vote for raising the debt ceiling, and about 15 big government Republicans vote for it. This will be the first time it's voted on just by Republicans. This will be the first time that Republicans own the debt. They already own the spending. In March, we continued, not me, but most Republicans voted to continue the Biden spending levels. So you remember the campaign, everybody is talking about Bidenomics and Biden inflation and Biden spending levels. Well, the Republicans all voted to keep the Biden spending levels, and that's why the deficit this year is going to be $2.2 trillion this year. MARGARET BRENNAN: So, you think this is bad politics for Republicans. Some of your Republican colleagues, like Josh Hawley, are saying that changes to Medicaid are bad politics for America's working people and for your party. SEN. PAUL: I think it was a bad strategy. I think the tax cuts are good for the economy. When we passed the tax cuts in 2017 the economy grew like gangbusters. We had lowest unemployment historically. It was the great achievement of Trump's first administration. They should have been satisfied by just doing the tax part of this and not getting involved into the debt part of it. MARGARET BRENNAN: The last time you were with us in March, you talked about conversations you had with Elon Musk, as you know, he's just left his work with the administration. You had proposed a rescission request, a claw back about $500 billion of money Congress had already signed off on. We know now that the White House is going to ask Congress this week for some rescissions. Sounds like it's just $9.4 billion and it's- it's PBS, it's NPR and it's foreign aid. Is this really the best strategy? And do you think 51 Republican senators are on board with it? SEN. PAUL: First of all, I will vote for spending cuts. The more the better. This is very, very small to put it in perspective, if the deficit this year is 2.2 trillion, if you cut 9 billion, the deficit is going to be 2.191 trillion. It really doesn't materially change the course of the country. We should do it by all means. And it is the low hanging fruit. This is the money that was pointed out that was being spent for sex change operations in Guatemala, trans-opera in Columbia, all this crazy spending. Yes, it should be cut-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- Sesame Street.-- SEN. PAUL: -- I had an amendment about a month- Excuse me-- MARGARET BRENNAN: It's Sesame Street. It's PBS and NPR. SEN. PAUL: Yeah. And I think, yeah- you're right. We'll see if there's the votes to cut it. I don't think we necessarily need government programming anymore. We have so many choices on the internet and so many choices on television, but my preference has always been, in the past, to cut a little bit of everything, rather than cut a lot of something. So what I've done in the past is propose a penny plan budget where we cut a certain percentage of everything, but it includes entitlements, or it doesn't really work. Once you exclude the entitlements, there isn't enough money to cut so you can never achieve balance by not looking at the entitlements. MARGARET BRENNAN: The budget director on another program this morning said they may not need to use this rescission, this claw back, because the White House has other tools. Do you think they need to go through Congress? Is this overstepping? SEN. PAUL: Well, they- well, they absolutely have to use a recession- the rescission, and it is done by simple majority, by Republicans only. There is no filibuster of it. So, it's a great tool to cut spending. If they don't use, it will be a huge wasted opportunity. But I will tell you, they tried in the first Trump administration. It wasn't their fault. They sent a tiny one, 16 billion, and it failed because two Republicans went the other way. So, we'll see what happens on this. But if we can't even cut welfare that we're giving to other countries, if we can't cut foreign aid welfare, I feel bad for the country. You know, interest rates are rising. We're having trouble selling our debt. We've got a lot of problems. MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Rand Paul, we'll be right back.
