Hundreds support pausing Oregon's investment in private fossil fuel holdings but Treasury opposed
A fracking site in Greeley, Colorado, is pictured on June 24, 2020. About 10% of Oregon's Public Employees Retirement System fund is invested in so-called real assets, such as investments in infrastructure, commodities and natural resources including fracked gas and oil. The single largest portion of emission-related investments in the state's pension portfolio are held in real assets. (Andy Bosselman/Colorado Newsline)
A bill to get the Oregon State Treasury to pause new pension investments in private assets and equity funds that are invested in fossil fuel companies received hundreds of letters of support this week, and one powerful letter of opposition.
Senate Bill 681, the Pause Act, would put a five-year moratorium on new private equity investments made with Public Employees Retirement System, or PERS, funds, if more than 10% of the private equity fund is invested in fossil fuel companies or heavy users.
The bill had its first public hearing Wednesday in the Senate Committee on Finance and Revenue. Nearly 300 letters of support were submitted in advance of the hearing and more than 30 — including one from the Oregon State Treasury —were submitted in opposition.
The idea, according to the bill's chief sponsor Sen. Jeff Golden, D-Ashland, is to ensure the Treasury actualizes its own plan to get the PERS portfolio to 'net-zero' greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.
Former state Treasurer and current Secretary of State Tobias Read published the plan in February 2024, with the goal of getting PERS out of some fossil fuel investments, stop investing in some fossil fuel funds and companies and increasing investments in industries that are cutting or absorbing greenhouse gas emissions or are committing to doing so.
'We have an opportunity to answer an important question about an important document,' Golden told lawmakers during Wednesday's hearing. 'The question is this: Are we looking at yet one more comprehensive document that will only gather dust on bookshelves around the Capitol? Passing Senate Bill 681, Mr. Chair, is a clear way to say 'No. We are actually beginning to put this plan into action in careful alignment with the pathway to net zero.''
But new state Treasurer Elizabeth Steiner and the Oregon State Treasury are opposed to the bill, according to written testimony submitted in advance of the hearing.
'It reduces our ability to diversify our portfolio and maximize returns for the retirees who are beneficiaries of the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Fund,' wrote Jessica Howell, the Treasury's lobbyist.
Her letter included data showing Treasury's private investments have had 10-year returns on investment about 2% higher than those from investments in public markets.
Steiner is instead sponsoring House Bill 2200, which would codify the goals of the Net Zero Plan in law, but does not mandate specific ways of achieving them. Senate Bill 681 would mandate the Treasury pause new private investments in specific funds.
Susan Palmiter — co-founder of the coalition of nonprofit advocacy groups Divest Oregon and a chief petitioner of the Pause Act — told lawmakers at the hearing that the Treasury is already backing away from its commitment to end investment in private funds enmeshed in fossil fuels.
'This is in the plan that they hope to implement, but we have no indication that anything has been done in this area. The plan's been out for over a year,' she said. 'This is why we need Senate Bill 681.'
About 28% of the funds in PERS, which serves more than 166,000 current retirees, are invested in private equity funds, which are pooled investments in non-publicly traded companies. That is more than double the average of other state pension systems, according to Public Plans Data, a nonprofit research consortium housed at the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. This exposes the PERS system to major risks, according to Divest and pension watchdog groups like the Chicago-based Private Equity Stakeholder Project.
Rep. Mark Gamba, D-Milwaukie, testified in support of the bill Wednesday and took aim at Treasury's heavy investment in private funds and assets.
Gamba explained to lawmakers that the Oregon Treasury typically commits hundreds of millions of dollars at a time to private fund managers, with investment contracts lasting 10 to 15 years.
'Treasury becomes a limited partner and has no say in what the fund manager invests in. These private investments are secret. Long ago, private investment folks got laws passed in every state that keep the beneficiaries — in this case, Oregon PERS members — from knowing what their retirement money is invested in,' he explained.
Another 10% of PERS funds are wrapped up in real assets, such as investments in infrastructure, commodities and natural resources including fracked gas and oil. This is where the single largest portion of emission-related investments in the state's pension portfolio are held.
A study commissioned by the Oregon Treasury in 2021 from the international financial consultant Ortec Finance showed the Treasury's asset values could decline nearly 40% by 2060 due to the effects of climate change.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Dollar steadies after rally, focus shifts to US-China trade talks
The dollar held steady against all major currencies on Monday, as exuberance over an upbeat U.S. employment report gave way to caution ahead of pivotal U.S.-China trade talks set to take place in London later in the day. The talks come at a crucial time for both economies, with China grappling with deflation and trade uncertainty dampening sentiment among U.S. businesses and consumers, prompting investors to reassess the dollar's safe-haven status. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer are expected to represent the U.S. at the trade talks, while vice premier He Lifeng would likely be present with the Chinese delegation. "A deal to keep talking might be better than nothing, but unless we see a concrete breakthrough, the impact on sentiment is likely to remain muted," said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo Markets. Friday's upbeat U.S. jobs report yielded some relief for investors following other bleak economic data last week. The dollar advanced against major peers after the employment report, which cut weekly declines in the dollar index by more than half. However, it is still down by more than 8.6% for the year. On Monday, the yen firmed 0.10% at 144.750 per dollar, as data showed Japan's economy contracted at a slower-than-expected pace in the January-March period. The Swiss franc was steady at 0.8221 per dollar by 0041 GMT. The euro was last flat at $1.1399, while the sterling fetched $1.3535. The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six others, was steady at 99.169. The yield on 10-year Treasury notes was flat in early Asia trading, after a more than 10 basis points jump on Friday. New Zealand's dollar last bought $0.6020, while the Australian dollar inched up 0.1% at $0.65 in light volumes as markets were closed for a public holiday. An inflation report out of the U.S. for the month of May will be in the spotlight later in the week as investors and Federal Reserve policymakers look for evidence on the damage trade restrictive policies have had on the economy. Fed officials are in a blackout period ahead of their policy meeting next week, but they have signalled that they are in no rush to cut interest rates and signs of better-than-feared economic resilience are likely to further cement their stance. Interest rate futures indicate that investors are anticipating the central bank may cut borrowing costs by 25 basis points, with the earliest move expected in October this year, according to data compiled by LSEG. "May is the first month where the impact of Trump's 10% universal tariff on imports ex-USMCA is expected to show. The Fed will want a few months of inflation data in order to judge the tariff impact and most importantly, its persistence," analysts at ANZ Bank said. Elsewhere, China's offshore yuan was last at 7.187 per dollar ahead of inflation and trade data.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
China exports growth misses expectations despite tariff truce; imports plunge amid weak consumption
China's exports growth missed expectations in May, despite a temporary trade truce with the U.S. that prompted businesses to frontload shipments and capitalize on the 90-day pause on steep duties. Exports rose 4.8% last month in U.S. dollar terms from a year earlier, customs data showed Monday, shy of Reuters' poll estimates of a 5% jump. Imports plunged 3.4% in May from a year earlier, a drastic drop compared to economists' expectations of a 0.9% fall. Imports had been declining this year, largely owed to sluggish domestic demand. Exports had surged 8.1% in April as a jump in shipment to Southeast Asian countries offset a sharp drop in outbound goods to the U.S. Chinese shipment to the U.S. plunged over 21% in April, as prohibitive tariffs kicked in. U.S. President Donald Trump's prohibitive 145% tariffs on Chinese goods took effect in April, with Beijing retaliating with triple-digit duties and other restrictive measures, such as export controls on critical minerals. U.S. and China struck a preliminary deal in Geneva, Switzerland, last month that led both sides to drop a majority of tariffs. Washington's levies on Chinese goods now stand at 51.1% while Beijing's duties on American imports are at 32.6%, according to think tank Peterson Institute for International Economics. The temporary tariff ceasefire is expected to have triggered a renewed surge in trade as exporters and importers alike in China and the U.S. seek to frontload shipments, sending shipping costs soaring. Chinese Vice Premier and lead trade representative He Lifeng is expected to meet with the U.S. trade negotiation team led by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in London later in the day for renewed trade talks. The second-round of meetings come after tensions flared up again between the two sides, as they accused each other of violating the Geneva trade agreement. Washington had blamed Beijing for slow-walking its pledge to approve the export of additional critical minerals to the U.S., while China criticized the U.S. decision to impose new restrictions on Chinese student visas and additional export restrictions on chips. China's Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it would continue to review and approve applications for export of rare earths, citing growing demand for the minerals in robotics and new energy vehicle sectors.
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Trade, inflation fears will grab limelight
There are several economic reports worth looking at this week, but pay closer attention to two economic events. One will come from London. The other comes Friday from Michigan. Get $100 off TheStreet Pro - our best deal of the summer won't last long! Your portfolio will thank you Both events can cause investors to buy or sell stocks, bonds or even houses. Futures trading Sunday evening suggests stocks will open modestly lower on Monday. In between are two inflation reports probably that will probably paint a benign inflation picture - for now. Related: Markets start to gear up for summer drama The London event is the meeting between U.S. and Chinese trade officials trying to hammer out a workable tariff deal. It's not clear if anything major will come from the meeting, but one can hope. The last time there were talks, the two sides agreed on May 21 to come to an agreement on the issues in 90 days. That would mean by Aug. 11. But little has happened since, and the Trump Administration is getting impatient. The U.S, team will include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. China's team will be led by Vice Premier He Lifeng. At the time of their first meeting in Switzerland in May, the Chinese were charging 125% tariffs on U.S. goods. The U.S. had imposed 145% in tariffs on Chinese goods. Related: Scott Galloway sends blunt message to Elon Musk After the May meeting, the tariffs on Chinese goods were dropped to an average 51%. The Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods were dropped to an average 32.6%. (Sounds reasonable, but they could wipe out a retailer's annual profit.) Complicating matters is China produces 90 % of rare earth metals, important materials for use in electric vehicles and other products work. And the country is now holding back on export licenses so non-Chinese companies can buy the materials. Without the rare earths, assembly lines could shut down. It sounds dull but isn't. China is a major source of everything from semiconductors and auto parts to Apple (AAPL) iPhones. Oh, and let's not forget: Most toys made for the holiday season are produced in China. If the London meeting goes badly, financial markets could swoon again. After President Trump announced the U.S. tariff proposals on April 3, the Standard & Poor's 500 Index fell 10.5% in two days. Stocks soared on the decision to negotiate. On April 8, the S&P 500 was down as much as 15.3% for 2025. It's now up 2% on the year. Related: Veteran investor makes surprising Fed rate call after jobs report Friday's event is the first cut of the University of Michigan's Consumer Sentiment Survey for June. (The second comes out at month's end.) The Michigan survey has been avidly followed this year because it suggests extreme worries about the economy, inflation and tariffs. And its findings, optimistic or rotten, have moved markets. The criticism of the survey is that it generates soft data - basically irrational one-off reactions compared with data based on statistics that have shelf life. Fair enough. But the survey and the Conference Board's Confidence Index grab National Federation of Business will release its own confidence index on Tuesday. Its members have complained for most of the year that the Trump Tariff proposals are making business planning impossible. So, while many businesses are holding on to workers, they're being very cautious on spending for, say, new plant and equipment. Thursday's Initial Jobless Claims report may be concerning. It's been rising in the last few weeks. This past week, the claims estimate climbed to 247,000, up from 239,000 the week before. No one wants to see jobless rates climb, least of all the Trump Administration. In truth, the gains over the last year have been on a slow drift higher. Nothing, in fact, like the first week of April 2020, during the Covid-19 pandemic, when 6.1 million people were laid off in a week. More Personal Finance: Denmark raises retirement age to 70 – Could Social Security be next?Dave Ramsey sends strong message on Social Security, 401(k)sBuffett's Berkshire predicts major housing market shift soon The two inflation reports are widely watched and discussed and will be again this week. The odds the reports won't change the inflation picture the inflation changing much. The Consumer Price Index comes out at 8:30 on Wednesday. The report from the Labor Department is likely to show a 0.2% change in prices from April to May and a 2.3% change year over year. That's unchanged from April. Stripping out energy and food prices, the one-month change is likely to be 0.2% and the year-over-year change holding steady at 2.8%, the same as in April. Related: Surprising Trump, Musk rift worsens a huge Tesla problem The index is built to estimate what's happening to prices for stuff and services consumers buy. During the winter, it showed that egg prices rose during the winter as bird flu invaded many poultry farms. But in April, egg prices fell. Look for indications tariffs are affecting consumer prices. You may see signs in costs for apparel, new and used cars, and meat. At 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, the BLS's Producer Price Index comes out. This measures the selling prices producers get for goods and services. It may show a 0.5% decline month to month but a 2.4% increase year over year. The core estimates are down 0.1% month-to-month and 2.9% year-over-year. Are these bad numbers? The Federal Reserve thinks so because the central bank wants U.S. inflation at no more than 2%. President Trump thinks the numbers are fine because he wants the Fed to cut interest rates. He has sort of a point: It would take prices rising at 2.9% a year about 24 years to double. Remember when the CPI year-over-year change briefly hit 9% in the summer of 2022? Sustained Inflation that high a rate would double prices in 7.5 years. But that would create its own problems, wouldn't it? Related: Veteran fund manager who predicted April rally updates S&P 500 forecast The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
