Melinda Gates has curt response to Bill Gates calling their divorce the ‘mistake I most regret'
Melinda Gates has responded to her ex-husband Bill Gates's comments about their divorce.
Earlier this year, the Microsoft founder named his divorce from Melinda after 27 years as 'the mistake he most regrets.'
In an interview with Elle for its 2025 Women of Impact issue published on Monday, Melinda was asked about his remarks.
'You've clearly Googled more than I have,' she told the publication, which noted that she rolled her eyes at the question. 'Look, divorces are painful, and it's not something I would wish on any family.'
During his interview with The Times earlier this year, Bill said that the 'top of the list' in terms of his biggest mistakes was his divorce. 'There are others, but none that matter,' he said. 'The divorce thing was miserable for me and Melinda for at least two years.'
Still, Bill said that he and his ex have stayed on good terms, and 'see each other' often.
'We have three kids and two grandchildren so there are family events. The kids are doing well. They have good values,' he explained. The couple tied the knot in 1994. Their three children are now adults: Jennifer, 28, Rory, 25, and Phoebe, 22.
He didn't go into any details about what triggered the divorce in the interview, though he admitted in 2021 that he had an affair with an employee during the marriage.
Announcing their separation on May 3, 2021, Bill and Melinda said in a joint statement: 'Over the last 27 years, we have raised three incredible children and built a foundation that works all over the world to enable all people to lead healthy, productive lives.
'We continue to share a belief in that mission and will continue our work together at the foundation, but we no longer believe we can grow together as a couple in this next phase of our lives.'
Melinda previously spoke about her relationship with Bill in June 2024, one month after she exited the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
'It gave us the privacy to do what needed to be done in private,' she said during an interview with Time magazine about going through the split during the pandemic. 'You know, I separated first before I made the full decision about a divorce. And to be able to do that in private while I'm still trying to take care of the kids, while still making certain decisions about how you're going to disentangle your life — thank God.'
She acknowledged that when her split happened, both her work with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and her family were on her mind.
'I thought a lot about my three children,' she said. 'But I certainly thought about the effect on the foundation. Those are the three biggest buckets: me, the kids, and the foundation. And I wanted to make sure that when we came through it to the other side — when I came through it on my side — all of those pieces were intact.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
GitHub's CEO says startups can only get so far with vibe coding
Founders can use AI to launch a startup, but GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke says they still need developers. At VivaTech in Paris, Dohmke said a startup built with coding assistants "doesn't have much value." Startups would struggle to attract investors without developers building complex systems, he said. AI tools can lower the barrier to launching a startup, but scaling them still requires technical expertise, GitHub's CEO has said. Speaking on the sidelines of VivaTech in Paris, Thomas Dohmke said over the last two years, he's observed companies go from needing convincing to use AI to "a lot of FOMO" in the market. AI coding assistants can now help non-technical founders create a startup with a small team and no external funding, he said during a Q&A at Station F, a startup campus. But as more startups use vibe coding tools to build products using natural language prompts, it's harder to stand out among investors. "The investors would ask, 'Why would I invest in you instead of the 10 other people?'" Dohmke said, adding that bootstrapping startups predominantly built with coding assistants wouldn't necessarily have "as much value." He added that a "non-technical founder will find it difficult to build a startup at scale without developers," because they "can't build a complex system to justify the next round." "The value of your startup isn't defined by what you can develop using cheap measures," Dohmke said. Startups would still need a deeper understanding of how their systems operate, he added. GitHub, which was acquired by Microsoft for $7.5 billion in 2018, has over 150 million users worldwide who create and share code on its platform. The company's Copilot tool provides coding suggestions and explanations for human developers. Vibe coding has raised questions about the demand for software developers and the skills that are most valuable in the AI era. In an April "EO" podcast, Dohmke said he had "never seen anything more exciting" than today's AI-driven engineering boom. However, he stressed that "every kid, every child, should learn coding" because knowing when to rely on one's own code still matters. Speaking at VivaTech, Dohmke said software engineers still need a "willingness to learn" about how to use AI prompts when coding and when to use an AI agent. "If I figure out how to write a prompt for something I can do myself, it's a waste of time," he said. "It's about the prompting skills, but also knowing when not to use the prompt." Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
SoundHound's Amelia 7.0 Launch: A Turning Point for Voice AI?
SoundHound AI's SOUN rollout of Amelia 7.0, unveiled on May 8, marks a significant milestone, shifting its voice AI suite from reactive assistants to fully agentic, voice-enabled AI agents that understand, reason and act autonomously. Built on the proprietary Agentic+ framework, these agents offer a hybrid of deterministic flows and generative AI. This enables them to complete multi-step tasks, like reordering prescriptions or resetting passwords, without human Amelia 7.0 integrates Polaris ASR, delivering low latency and 99% intent recognition accuracy, alongside seamless LLM interoperability and enterprise-grade guardrails. This positions SoundHound not just as a voice AI player, but as a leader in agentic AI, a rapidly emergent category poised for exponential adoption across timing is strategic. During the first quarter of 2025, SoundHound's revenue jumped 151% year over year to $29.1 million, supported by expanded voice commerce in restaurants and automotive integrations. Though slightly below expectations, the company maintained strong guidance ($157–177 million for 2025), backed by a record pipeline and $246 million in cash with no 7.0 could be a catalyst, offering defenses against commoditization in speech-to-text markets and unlocking new revenue streams via autonomous agents in healthcare, finance, customer service, and more. Still, SoundHound must convert technological leadership into clear monetization, maintain competitive gross margins, and scale enterprise adoption amid macroeconomic 7.0 is a transformative leap. If SoundHound can translate this tech into scale, the stock could enjoy a strong re-rating. However, execution is key, especially in proving ROI and driving profitable growth across diverse verticals. As SoundHound pushes forward with Amelia 7.0, it faces mounting competition from both established tech giants and specialized AI players, who are also sculpting the voice AI Corporation MSFT, through its Azure OpenAI integrations and Nuance Communications unit, remains a formidable force. Nuance's deep roots in healthcare voice automation and conversational AI give Microsoft a strong enterprise footprint. By embedding large language models into voice-enabled workflows, Microsoft is targeting the same high-value verticals, like finance and call centers, that SoundHound seeks to Inc.'s GOOGL Google, with its Assistant and Vertex AI platforms, is another heavyweight rival. Google Assistant is already embedded in millions of devices, and Vertex AI provides developers with customizable voice agents powered by Google's advanced speech-to-text and LLM models. Its scalability and ecosystem—spanning Android, Smart Home, and Workspace—present a serious challenge to SoundHound's adoption in consumer and enterprise environments. SoundHound plunged 52.1% year to date, underperforming the Zacks Computers - IT Services industry's 6.7% decline. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research In terms of its forward 12-month price-to-sales (P/S) ratio, SOUN is trading at 20.65, higher than the industry's 19.32. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Over the past 60 days, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for SOUN's 2025 loss per share has remained unchanged at 16 cents per share. Nonetheless, the estimated figure reflects an improvement from the year-ago loss of $1.04 per share. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research SOUN stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #3 (Hold).You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) : Free Stock Analysis Report Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) : Free Stock Analysis Report SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prediction: Buying This AI Stock Will Not Look Smart in 5 Years
is growing its revenue at a decent rate, but it's not scaling its business with any efficiency. It is growing slower than its AI peers and is posting huge operating losses. The stock trades at an expensive valuation. 10 stocks we like better than › Just about every stock with some connection to artificial intelligence (AI) has seen its price soar in the past couple of years. Ever stock, that is, except (NYSE: AI), that is. The AI-focused company with the ticker "AI" is trading down around 22% over the past year and around 86% from all-time highs as the company struggles to grow and get anywhere close to generating a profit. This AI company has a lot of hype around it, and even brags about huge wins with partnerships with other AI players. A lot of this is all bark and no bite. Here's why investors will be disappointed with the results of stock compared to other AI-associated investments over the next five years. has been a trendy name in the AI space for years. The company brands itself as the AI enterprise software company, deploying software solutions including its new agentic AI platform and generative AI tools. It has large customers, including energy giants and the U.S. Air Force, implementing its software in operations. This all sounds fine and dandy, but it oversells as a company with actual software products. Similar to a consultant, has a large sales team that wins contracts to build custom software solutions for companies, which is different than a software provider that builds once and ships as many times as it can, such as Microsoft. It is a much more difficult business model, and one that is harder to scale with large profit margins. generated only $389 million in revenue over the last 12 months, even though the AI sector is in the middle of one of the largest spending booms ever. Compare that to its quasi-competitor, Palantir Technologies. The company generated $3.11 billion in revenue over the last 12 months and is growing revenue much faster than Last quarter, revenue grew 26% year over year compared to 39% for Palantir. One could argue, looking at the metrics referenced above, that is in fine shape as a business. It is growing revenue at over 20% year over year and has long-term software consultant contracts with big enterprises. But those strong top-line metrics aren't making it down to the company's bottom-line profit and loss metrics, which keep moving in the wrong direction. This is an indicator that the company has a bloated expense structure and will struggle to scale due to the custom-built software it deploys. Last fiscal year, had an operating loss of $324 million on $389 million in revenue. It spent $231 million on stock-based compensation -- a noncash dilutive expense -- which is around 60% of its overall revenue. This is an unsustainable figure and needs to be dramatically reduced in order for to generate a profit. Spending 10% of revenue on stock-based compensation can be a concern for investors when analyzing a stock, but 60% is unheard of. It is no surprise then why stock is down. It has to spend a boatload every year to retain its research, sales, and operational staff that deploy these consultant contracts with large enterprises, and these costs are simply outweighing any revenue earned by these contracts, making persistently unprofitable. Two main reasons stand out to me as to why stock will struggle to generate a positive return for shareholders over the next five years. First, the services it provides do not look scalable due to the custom-build process and heavy losses it is sustaining. In fact, it looks like the company has the opposite of operating leverage, as its operating loss has gotten worse and worse since going public around five years ago, even though revenue is growing. Second, stock trades at a high valuation. It has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 8.5, which is much higher than the S&P 500 average. This is for a company with deeply negative operating margins and no history of profitability. Yes, revenue is growing at a decent clip, but the company is showing zero signs of operating leverage. In fact, one might argue that growing revenue is a bad thing for as historically, all growing revenue has done is lead to larger operating losses. A high valuation, huge losses, and slower revenue growth than its AI peers make a bad stock to own right now. Avoid buying it for your portfolio despite the AI hype in the markets today. Before you buy stock in consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Brett Schafer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Microsoft and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends and recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Prediction: Buying This AI Stock Will Not Look Smart in 5 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool
