Trump's dangerous resettlement scheme
While on his tour of the Gulf, Trump repeatedly said the US should 'take' Gaza and make it into a 'freedom zone." What does this mean? Freedom for whom? Not for Gaza's 2.3 million Palestinians for sure. Freedom from Palestinians and, perhaps, for Israelis and wealthy international real-estate investors to transform Gaza into a Disneyland resort. Earlier this year Trump said the US would take over Gaza after the Palestinians were expelled into Jordan and Egypt, rebuild the strip with money not from the US, and turn it into a Middle Eastern riviera. Amman, Cairo and the Arabs rejected this proposition.
Trump's delusional schemes are in line with Israel's earlier establishment of a vehicle for "voluntary" ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza and sending them to war-torn Sudan and Somalia and impoverished Somaliland in Africa. Israel has backed up this scheme by preventing all food, water, fuel and medicines from entering Gaza since March 2, ending the ceasefire on March 18th, and stepping up its military campaign with the objective of occupying most or all of Gaza and confining Gazans to unsafe "safe zones." Trump has not joined the chorus of Western friends of Israel who have exerted pressure on Israel to compelled it to lift minimally its blockade and allow the entry into Gaza of some supplies to prevent starvation and famine.
Instead, on the humanitarian level the Trump administration and Israel have proposed a system of distributing supplies in southern Gaza, forcing those living in the north to leave in order to survive. This programme would be controlled by US contractors and the Israeli military and provide lifegiving aid only to Palestinians vetted by Israel. UN and international humanitarian agencies have rejected this plan as it would "weaponise" aid. Nevertheless, Israel could continue the blockade to blackmail the UN and aid agencies to accept the unacceptable plan.
The acceptable plan for Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, is the two-state solution, endorsed by the UN and the international community. Last July, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an advisory opinion on a request made by the UN General Assembly following rulings made by the Human Rights Council.
Then ICJ President Nawaf Salam said the court had found that "Israel's... continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is illegal." He stated. "The State of Israel is under the obligation to bring an end to its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible." This included ending illegal settlement activity and evacuating all its settlers from the affected areas and pay reparations to Palestinians for damages inflicted by the occupation. This would mean abandoning 145 official Israeli settlements and 200 settlement outposts and rehousing more than 700,000 Israeli settlers who would exit the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Trump has asked the wrong people to be resettled.
The ICJ said Israel's "policies and practices amount to annexation of large parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory", which is illegal under international law. The ICJ added by saying Israel was "not entitled to sovereignty" over any areas of the occupied territories.
While this amounts to a comprehensive ruling on the status of the occupied Palestinian territories, no action has been taken because the West, dominated by the US, has no intention of resolving the Palestinian/Arab-Israeli crisis by insisting that Israel abide by the two-state solution. Palestinian self-determination, independence and statehood rather than ethnic cleansing, occupation and apartheid could resolve the conflict. This conflict has gripped the Arab world since Britain and France carved up and took over Arab lands ruled by the Ottoman Empire after World War One instead of granting the Arabs independence promised for joining the war against Germany and its Ottoman allies.
Nothing positive nor sensible can be expected from Trump even though he is in his second term, cannot run again, and is not a committed Zionist like his predecessor Joe Biden. During his first term when Trump was yearning for a second, he recognised Jerusalem as Israel's capital, shifted the US embassy to Jerusalem, declared Israeli settlements were not illegal, and defunded the UN Palestinian refugee agency, UNRWA. His actions negated the terms of the 1993 Oslo peace process which said the fates of Jerusalem, Israeli settlers and Palestinian refugees were to be determined through negotiations between virtual Palestine and omnipresent Israel. Trump also closed the East Jerusalem US consulate serving Palestinians and the Palestinian mission in Washington.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Roya News
3 hours ago
- Roya News
'Israeli' data admits 83% of Gaza casualties are civilians, contradicting previous claims
A joint investigation by +972 Magazine, its Hebrew-language partner Local Call, and the Guardian has found that Israeli Occupation Forces' (IOF) intelligence data indicates most Palestinians killed by 'Israel' are civilians. According to the report, five out of every six Palestinians killed in the genocide are not resistance fighters. The investigation drew on a classified IOF intelligence database that, as of May 2025, listed 8,900 Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) fighters as dead or 'probably dead.' At that time, the Gaza Health Ministry reported that around 53,000 Palestinians had been killed by IOF. This suggests that only 17 percent of the total fatalities were fighters, while the remaining 83 percent were civilians. When approached by +972 Magazine and Local Call, the IOF did not dispute the database's existence or the number of Hamas and PIJ deaths. However, when questioned later by the Guardian, a spokesperson stated that 'figures presented in the article are incorrect' and 'do not reflect the data available' in the military's systems, without clarifying which details were disputed. The military did not explain why its responses differed between publications. The dataset named 47,653 Palestinians considered by 'Israeli' intelligence to be active members of Hamas or PIJ. This included 34,973 Hamas operatives and 12,702 PIJ operatives, based on internal documents allegedly seized from the groups in Gaza. Of the 8,900 killed, 7,330 were considered certain, while 1,570 were 'probably dead.' Most were junior figures, with only 100–300 senior operatives reported killed out of 750 listed in the database. The investigation notes that the civilian death toll may be even higher than reported. The Gaza Health Ministry's numbers likely underestimate deaths, as they do not account for thousands buried under rubble. In addition, 'Israeli' intelligence may have counted civilians with alleged ties to Hamas as fighters, including police officers or administrative staff, who are considered non-combatants under international law. 'People are promoted to the rank of terrorist after their death,' said one intelligence source who accompanied the IOF on the ground. 'If I had listened to the brigade, I would have come to the conclusion that we had killed 200 percent of Hamas operatives in the area.' The ratio of civilian deaths is also likely to have increased since May, as nearly 2,000 Palestinians have reportedly been killed while waiting for aid from the 'Israel'- and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The 83 percent civilian casualty rate is extraordinarily high for modern warfare. According to the Guardian, only a few conflicts in recent decades, such as the Srebrenica genocide, the Rwandan genocide, and the Russian siege of Mariupol, have seen higher proportions of civilian deaths.
Roya News
3 hours ago
- Roya News
US urges 'Israel' to ease military actions in Lebanon to support Hezbollah disarmament
The Trump administration has reportedly requested that 'Israel' scale back 'non-urgent' military operations in Lebanon to support the Lebanese government's decision to begin disarming Hezbollah, Axios reported. The unprecedented Lebanese cabinet decision, made two weeks ago under US pressure, tasks the military with preparing a plan to disarm all non-state armed groups, granting the state a monopoly over weapons. The Trump administration aims to see Hezbollah fully disarmed by the end of 2025, though many regional observers doubt Beirut will be able to enforce the plan. Since the 'Israel'-Hezbollah ceasefire in November, 'Israel' has carried out nearly daily air strikes in Lebanon, claiming these actions respond to Hezbollah violations or threats not addressed by the Lebanese government. Lebanese officials, however, have rejected these claims, condemning 'Israel' for violating the ceasefire and Lebanese sovereignty. 'Israel' also maintains a presence in five military outposts in southern Lebanon, saying it will remain as long as Hezbollah poses a threat. Under the new US proposal, 'Israel' would consider reducing air strikes and potentially withdrawing from one outpost temporarily, signaling cooperation with the Lebanese government's effort. US envoy Tom Barrack has been in discussions with 'Israeli' officials on steps that could run parallel to Hezbollah's disarmament. The plan envisions a step-by-step withdrawal from the outposts contingent on practical actions by the Lebanese military to prevent Hezbollah from reestablishing itself in southern Lebanon. Additionally, the US proposal includes creating a 'Trump economic zone' in parts of southern Lebanon along the border with 'Israel', with reconstruction investments from Saudi Arabia and Qatar. The economic zone is intended to strengthen local infrastructure while making it difficult for Hezbollah to regain a military foothold near the border. The most recent talks took place Wednesday in Paris, where 'Israeli' Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer met with Barrack and US diplomat Morgan Ortagus for several hours. A source familiar with the meeting said progress was made but no final decisions were reached. 'The Israelis didn't say no and they are willing to give it a chance. They understand that what the Lebanese cabinet did was historic and that they need to give something back,' the source said.
Jordan Times
4 hours ago
- Jordan Times
PM stresses importance of field work, urges officials to interact with citizens, identify their needs
AMMAN — Prime Minister Jaafar Hassan chaired a meeting with ministers and secretaries-general to discuss preparations for the government's executive programme for the coming years. The sessions are scheduled to begin at the Prime Ministry next week. Hassan highlighted that the programme will be anchored in the Economic Modernisation Vision and aligned with the Administrative Modernisation process, stressing the importance of unified action in drafting and implementing the plan. He also affirmed that secretaries-general 'are the cornerstones of administrative modernisation' and must shoulder their responsibilities at this stage by leading planning and implementation efforts, ensuring that their initiatives and departmental budgets should align with the priorities of economic modernisation to achieve real, tangible impact on the ground. Hassan further noted that the success of any ministry hinges on the secretary-general's ability to deliver their duties with efficiency and effectiveness. Hassan stressed the need to prioritise projects and manage them efficiently to achieve their intended outcomes, noting that the that financial resources should not hinder progress, pointing out that several projects in certain service sectors, which had been delayed for years, were successfully completed within months. 'His Majesty King Abdullah has instructed the Royal Hashemite Court to oversee the implementation of this vision in coordination with the government to ensure its successful delivery. The Economic Modernisation Vision forms Jordan's national plan for the coming years, and we are all responsible and accountable for implementing this programme,' he said. Hassan underscored the importance of cooperation and coordination between ministries and institutions, facilitating their interconnection, and called for a clear implementation framework for the programme and its projects, with set timelines and regular follow-up. He added, 'We need field leaders who interact with citizens, identify their requirements, take prompt action to address issues, and work to enhance public services.' During the meeting, an extensive discussion took place in which several secretaries-general presented their ministries' strategies for modernisation and development, improving performance, simplifying procedures, and enhancing services for citizens. These measures aim to bolster the capacity of ministries and institutions to achieve the objectives and priorities set out in the modernisation vision. Noting that the government is considering delegating some authorities to the secretaries-general to enhance their ability to make decisions, as well as delegating some authorities to the executive departments, according to a comprehensive evaluation system at various levels that will be applied transparently.
