
Syria's Wheat War: Drought Fuels Food Crisis for 16 Million
Rival Syrian and Kurdish producers are scrambling for shrinking wheat harvests as the worst drought in decades follows a devastating war, pushing more than 16 million people toward food insecurity.
"The country has not seen such bad climate conditions in 60 years," said Haya Abu Assaf, assistant to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) representative in Syria.
Syria's water levels have seen "a very significant drop compared to previous years, which is very worrying", Abu Assaf told AFP, as a relatively short winter rainy season and decreased rainfall take their toll.
"A gap of between 2.5 to 2.7 million tons in the wheat crop is expected, meaning that the wheat quantity will not be sufficient to meet local needs," Abu Assaf said, putting "around 16.3 million people at risk of food insecurity in Syria this year".
Before the civil war erupted in 2011, Syria was self-sufficient in wheat, producing an average of 4.1 million tons annually.
Nearly 14 years of conflict have since crippled production and devastated the economy.
The FAO estimates that harsh weather has impacted nearly 2.5 million hectares of wheat-growing land.
"Around 75 percent of the cultivated areas" have been affected, as well as "natural pastures for livestock production", said Abu Assaf.
Imports, competition
To bridge the wheat gap, imports would be essential in a country where around 90 percent of the population lives in poverty.
Before his ouster in an Islamist-led offensive in December, Syria's longtime ruler Bashar al-Assad used to rely on ally Russia for wheat.
In April, new authorities reported the first wheat shipment since his removal arrived in Latakia port, with more Russian shipments following.
Iraq also donated more than 220,000 tons of wheat to Syria.
During the war, Damascus competed with the semi-autonomous Kurdish administration in the northeast to buy wheat from farmers across fertile lands.
Last year, Assad's government priced wheat at $350 per ton, and the Kurds at $310.
After Assad's ouster, Damascus and the Kurds agreed in March to integrate Kurdish-led institutions into the new Syrian state, with negotiations ongoing on implementation.
Damascus set wheat prices this month at between $290 and $320 per ton, depending on the quality, plus a $130 bonus.
The Kurdish-led administration offered $420 per ton including a $70 bonus.
'Poverty and hunger'
Damascus' agriculture ministry expects a harvest of 300,000 to 350,000 tons in government-controlled areas this year.
Hassan Othman, director of the Syrian Grain Establishment, acknowledged Syria was not self-sufficient, in comments on state television.
But he said authorities were working "to ensure food security by importing wheat from abroad and milling it in our mills".
In northeast Syria's Amuda, farmer Jamshid Hassu, 65, inspected the tiny wheat grains from his fields, which cover around 200 hectares (around 500 acres).
Despite heavy irrigation efforts to offset scarce rainfall, he said, production has halved.
The FAO's Abu Assaf said indicators showed that "about 95 percent of rain-fed wheat has been damaged and affected", while irrigated wheat yields were down 30 to 40 percent.
Hassu, who has been farming for four decades, said he had to pump water from depths of more than 160 meters (525 feet) to sustain his crops as groundwater levels plunge.
Agriculture remains a vital income source in rural Syria, but without urgent support, farmers face ruin.
"Without support, we will not be able to continue," Hassu warned.
"People will suffer from poverty and hunger."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Argaam
25 minutes ago
- Argaam
Q2 performance outlook for Saudi firms: What to expect?
The Saudi-listed companies will disclose their Q2 2025 financial results on July 1 and will continue until August 11. Investors and market participants are eagerly awaiting the start of earnings releases, expected to begin next week.


Al Arabiya
25 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Where is Iran headed after the ceasefire
On Monday, US President Donald Trump announced an Israel-Iran ceasefire, after 12 days of intense escalation between the warring sides. The peak of that escalation came when US forces struck three sensitive Iranian nuclear sites – Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan – with precision strikes. These three sites are considered the backbone of Iran's nuclear program. For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app. Amid the flurry of analyses, this announcement appeared as a pivotal moment that warrants pause and reflection – not just as a step to de-escalate tensions, but also to understand Iran's place within the complex regional and global landscape. Since Khomeini's revolution in 1979, Iran has presented itself as the center of resistance forces in the Middle East. It built a political narrative based on standing firm against external pressures and supported anti-Western movements. It began with the hostage-taking of 52 American embassy staff in Tehran for 444 days and went on to directly target American interests in the region, all while chanting anti-US slogans and labeling it the 'Great Satan.' This approach undeniably granted Tehran influence within certain radical circles in the region, but on the flip side, it placed Iran in ongoing confrontation with its regional and global surroundings, leading to growing isolation – an isolation whose greatest cost was borne by the Iranian people. American writer Thomas Friedman wrote in The New York Times two days ago that Iran chose from the beginning to align itself with the 'resistance axis' that thrives on conflict, in contrast to other regional powers that bet on development, integration, and prosperity. While Tehran may have made some military progress, Friedman argues that the losses it has sustained – economically, socially, and diplomatically – far outweigh any gains. While internal burdens piled up inside Iran, neighboring moderate states were achieving growth indicators and strengthening their diplomatic presence as influential players on the global stage. Iran's insistence on its nuclear program stands as one of the clearest manifestations of the path it has chosen. The program is no longer just a subject of international suspicion – it has become a real threat to Iran itself before even threatening its neighbors. Today, the world no longer views nuclear capabilities as symbols of deterrence or admiration, but rather with suspicion – especially when such capabilities are tied to a vague political ideology and tense regional relations. How can a country demand the trust of the international community while simultaneously raising the level of threat to such heights? And how can anyone feel assured about a nation that operates under the logic that the only guarantee for survival is the pursuit of destructive tools? The truth is, the core issue does not lie in the nuclear program itself as much as it lies in the mentality behind it – a mentality focused on amassing power rather than pursuing development, seeking deterrence more than integration, and fearing its own people more than its adversaries. Unless there is a genuine transformation in this mindset, there will be little difference between the end of one war and the beginning of another, because the core of its political thinking will remain unchanged. Today, development is no longer a secondary option – it has become the most important benchmark for political legitimacy and the compass by which nations measure their ability to progress and maintain stability. Iran possesses the necessary resources to become a powerful regional economic force – if it chooses that path. But this will not happen without deep internal introspection and a redefinition of what 'power' means within its political discourse. The ceasefire, as announced by Trump, is not a victory for any side so much as it is a moment of reckoning. Tehran can either seize it as a beginning for a calm inward shift, or remain trapped in cycles of escalation and retreat, of withdrawal and suspicion – of both external and internal matters alike. At this crossroads, the true weight of nations is not measured by the number of ballistic missiles they possess, but by the clarity of their vision and their capacity to foster hope. Yes, the Iranian revolution has endured for 46 years, but the seismic blows its expansionist projects have suffered in the past two years reveal that this endurance is turning into a burden. What remains of the revolution should, ideally, be translated into a nation-building project – not into further siege and paranoia. Today, countries are measured by what they deliver to their people… not by what fear they instill in others.


Arab News
41 minutes ago
- Arab News
The GCC's unified tourist visa could reshape travel for Pakistanis
After years of speculation and deliberation, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) has finally green-lit a unified tourist visa, a long-awaited move that promises to reshape travel and mobility across the region. While this step is undoubtedly a major win for regional tourism, its impact on the Pakistani diaspora, one of the largest expatriate communities across the Gulf, is particularly noteworthy. For decades, Pakistani workers, students and families have navigated complex, often frustrating visa procedures for each individual Gulf state. From applying for separate visas for travel between Dubai and Doha to struggling with student documentation or missing out on major events like concerts or expos due to last-minute rejections, the process has been anything but seamless. The unified tourist visa offers a glimmer of relief. Though designed primarily for tourists, the ripple effect is far more expansive, opening doors for short-term mobility, job exploration, educational opportunities, and cross-border family reunions. Consider this: In the first three months of 2025 alone, over 151,000 Pakistani workers relocated to GCC countries. These include both skilled professionals and unskilled laborers seeking better livelihoods and the chance to support families back home. For them, even temporary mobility between GCC countries can mean access to new job markets, interviews, trade expos, and skill training opportunities that would otherwise be financially and bureaucratically out of reach. The emotional weight of these restrictions is not to be underestimated either. Countless Pakistanis living in the Gulf find themselves separated from family members in neighboring countries, unable to attend weddings, funerals, or even share a meal during Eid simply because of visa delays or denials. The recent Coldplay concert in Dubai, which saw several Pakistani fans turned away due to visa rejections despite holding confirmed tickets, was just one high-profile example of how cultural experiences, too, become inaccessible behind red tape. The new visa could allow families to plan trips, attend events, and spend quality time across borders without enduring the anxiety of visa roulette. For the Pakistani diaspora, often the invisible workforce behind Gulf megacities, it is a small but symbolic shift toward acknowledgment and inclusion. Sara Danial Moreover, for students and young professionals, this visa could open up cross-GCC educational fairs, internships, workshops, and academic conferences, giving them the kind of exposure and access their peers in more mobile regions have long enjoyed. In a time when digital economies, innovation hubs, and collaborative education are reshaping the Gulf's landscape, this ease of movement is not just a convenience, it's an enabler of progress. For Pakistan, the benefits go beyond personal mobility. The remittances sent back by Pakistani workers in the Gulf form the backbone of the country's fragile economy. According to the State Bank of Pakistan, remittances from GCC states alone make up a substantial portion of the country's foreign exchange reserves. Any move that facilitates smoother onboarding, better job access, and regional mobility for workers can directly impact the volume and sustainability of this economic lifeline. But there's more. This unified visa also has the potential to boost tourism from Pakistan to lesser-visited Gulf destinations. While Dubai and Doha have long attracted visitors, countries like Oman, Bahrain, and Kuwait may now see an uptick in Pakistani tourists and short-term business travelers who previously didn't find it worth the hassle or cost of applying for multiple visas. This not only enhances people-to-people ties but also presents an opportunity for regional cultural exchange. That said, it's essential to acknowledge that the unified visa is, for now, a tourist visa, not a work or study permit. Skeptics may argue that its benefits for Pakistani workers or students are limited. But in practice, this visa provides the first layer of accessibility. It simplifies initial visits, lets prospective workers explore job markets, attend interviews, and build networks before securing long-term permits. Similarly, students can scout campuses, attend short courses or conferences, and explore their options with far less friction. It's the bridge before the commitment. This step toward integration also signals something larger: a region increasingly recognizing the need for cooperation, not just in policy or economy, but in the lived experiences of the millions who call the Gulf home, even temporarily. For the Pakistani diaspora, often the invisible workforce behind Gulf megacities, it is a small but symbolic shift toward acknowledgment and inclusion. Ultimately, for this policy shift to achieve its full potential, it must be coupled with clarity, accessibility, and perhaps, in time, expansion into work and study categories. But as a first step, it's an important one. It shows that the Gulf is ready to open up in ways that matter not just to tourists in luxury resorts but to workers, students, and families in shared apartments. The GCC unified visa may be stamped as a tourist pass, but for millions of Pakistanis, it carries the promise of connection, convenience, and economic opportunity. At a time when the world feels increasingly divided, that's a border worth crossing. —Sara Danial is an independent writer from Karachi.