
Majority of Finns prefer to shift away from U.S. products, investment: survey
The shift is largely attributed to U.S. President Donald Trump's unpredictable trade policies.
According to the survey results released Tuesday, 66 percent of respondents said Trump's policies have made them more inclined to favor European goods and services. Only 16 percent disagreed, while 18 percent remained undecided.
The findings also show that 56 percent of Finns believe that avoiding investments in U.S. companies is a responsible value-based choice. Among those who currently hold investments, that figure rises slightly to 59 percent.
The accompanying press release cites growing concern over the negative impact of Trump's policies on Europe, particularly regarding economic stability and security, as the main driver behind this shift away from U.S. goods and investments.
Beyond economic and political concerns, many Finns expressed frustration with Trump's communication style. The survey indicated that his rhetoric and behavior have fostered an emotional resistance toward American products.
This sentiment appears to extend beyond Finland. The press release mentioned Tesla as a notable example, pointing out that its sales have been hit hard. According to the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association, registrations of new Tesla vehicles in EU countries dropped by more than 45 percent between January and May 2025, compared to the same period in 2024.
Heikki Urpelainen, portfolio manager at LahiTapiola Asset Management, noted that escalating trade restrictions are making the United States a less attractive export market. In response, European companies are increasingly lowering prices and focusing on domestic sales.
While this trend may provide short-term advantages for some European firms, Urpelainen warned that the broader impact of Trump's tariffs is detrimental to European exporters overall.
The survey, conducted in April 2025, collected responses from 1,100 Finnish residents aged 18 and older.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
27 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
‘He does not understand the reality': Hiroshima mayor slams Trump for likening Iran strike to atomic bombings
TOKYO, July 2 — Donald Trump should visit Hiroshima to see the effects of nuclear weapons, the Japanese city's mayor said today after the US president likened the 1945 atomic bombings to recent air strikes on Iran. 'It seems to me that he does not fully understand the reality of the atomic bombings, which, if used, take the lives of many innocent citizens, regardless of whether they were friend or foe, and threaten the survival of the human race,' Mayor Kazumi Matsui told reporters. 'I wish that President Trump would visit the bombed area to see the reality of the atomic bombing and feel the spirit of Hiroshima, and then make statements,' Kazumi said. The United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945 and then another on Nagasaki three days later. Shortly afterwards, Japan surrendered, ending World War II. Around 140,000 people died in Hiroshima and about 74,000 others in Nagasaki, including many from the effects of radiation exposure. It was the only time that atomic weapons were used in warfare. On June 22, following days of Israeli strikes on the Islamic republic, the United States bombed Iranian nuclear facilities. Soon afterwards, Iran and Israel agreed a ceasefire, ending their 12-day war. 'I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing,' Trump said last Wednesday. 'That ended that war and this ended (this war),' Trump said at a Nato summit in The Hague. His comments prompted anger from survivors and a small demonstration in Hiroshima. Last week, the city's assembly passed a motion condemning remarks that justify the use of atomic bombs. Japan's atomic bomb survivors' group Nihon Hidankyo won the Nobel Peace Prize last year, and while accepting the prize, called on countries to abolish the weapons. — AFP


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Paramount settles Trump ‘60 Minutes' lawsuit for $16 million
WASHINGTON: CBS parent Paramount has agreed to pay $16 million to settle US President Donald Trump's lawsuit over the contents of an interview with then vice president Kamala Harris, media reports said. The settlement resolves Trump's $20 billion lawsuit against the network over its '60 Minutes' interview with Harris during the 2024 presidential campaign. The $16 million will go toward Trump's future presidential library rather than to him personally, according to a Paramount statement published by the Los Angeles Times Tuesday. Paramount did not offer an apology or express regret as part of the settlement, but agreed to release transcripts of '60 Minutes' interviews with future presidential candidates. Trump sued CBS late October claiming the '60 Minutes' interview with Harris last year was edited to remove an embarrassing response. CBS maintained the editing was standard practice. Legal experts have argued the lawsuit is baseless, and would have been an easy legal victory for CBS if it ever went to court, per constitutional protections for freedom of the press. Paramount nevertheless entered into mediation in a bid to placate Trump as it seeks to close an $8 billion merger with the entertainment company Skydance, which needs federal government approval. Trump initially sought $10 billion in damages before amending the lawsuit to $20 billion. The case prompted resignations at CBS News, with '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens leaving in April and CBS News chief executive Wendy McMahon departing in May.


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
US tariffs will have significant impact on Lao economy, economists warn
VIENTIANE: Tariffs imposed by the United States on goods imported from Laos and other trading partners are projected to have a significant impact on Laos' economy in 2025 and 2026, economists have warned. The tariffs, and the ensuing global slump that is likely to result from the high levies, will result in a decline in demand and foreign direct investment (FDI) inflow. The impact on Laos' key trading partners and foreign investors, namely China, Thailand, Vietnam and the European Union (EU), will seriously hurt Laos' growth. 'Declining economic growth in these countries will affect their demand for goods imported from the Lao PDR as well as FDI inflow and tourist arrivals into Laos,' the National Economic and Social Science Institute warned in its economic assessment released on Friday (June 27). In 2024, exports from Laos to its top three trading partners — Thailand, China, and Vietnam — accounted for 82.4 per cent of the country's total exports, amounting to US$8.176 billion. These countries are also the top three foreign investors and key sources of foreign visitors to Laos. The United States' reciprocal tariffs are forecast to remarkably impact the global economy. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has projected that the global economy will experience slower growth to 2.8 and 3 per cent in 2025 and 2026 respectively, a drop from 3.2 per cent in 2024. Tariffs as high as 48 per cent of the value of goods imported from Laos were cited when the world's largest economy announced on April 2 that it would impose reciprocal tariffs on its trading partners. However, the rollout of the tariffs has been paused for 90 days from April 9 to allow time for negotiations. Despite being a small economy, Laos has been penalised with a high levy determined by the United States based on the perceived trade deficit, according to the report by the National Economic and Social Science Institute. But the Lao government argues that there is a huge discrepancy in the trade figures. The US cites a trade deficit of over US$762 million in 2024, while statistics from the Lao Ministry of Industry and Commerce show a trade surplus of just over US$42 million. Laos exports to the US totalled US$283.8 million, while imports from the United States were valued at US$241.6 million. The main goods exported from Laos to the US included furniture, mattresses, lamps, electrical appliances and equipment, finished chemical products, clothes, headgear, inorganic chemicals and footwear. Key imports comprised wood and paper products, mechanical equipment, animal feed, vehicles and automobile spare parts. Given the huge difference in the figures, Prime Minister Sonexay Siphandone sent an official letter to President Donald Trump on April 7 - two days before the pause was announced. In the letter, the Lao government highlighted the differences and proposed that negotiations be carried out by both countries' trade agencies to establish common ground. While the United States' broader tariffs policy will have a significant impact on Laos, the increased levy imposed on Laos will have only a minor direct impact, given the relatively low value of bilateral trade, the report added. In 2024, Laos exports to the US accounted for just 2.9 per cent of total exports. In addition, Laos' exported goods fell into the labour-intensive, low value category, which are in high demand by US consumers. 'The US still needs to import these goods from the Lao PDR or other developing countries because the production cost of these goods in the US is high,' the report said, adding that the price of these imported goods plus the new tariff would still be lower than if they were made in the United States. However, the Lao economists who compiled the report acknowledged that local producers might suffer from declining orders from exporters, which would reduce their incomes and cut jobs. The economists cited disruption caused by the tariff changes as a key reason for Laos' economy being forecast to experience slower growth rates of 3.9 and four per cent in 2025 and 2026 respectively, a drop from 4.3 per cent recorded in 2024. As the pause deadline of July 9 approaches, the United States and its multiple trading partners are engaged in negotiations to reach deals to ease the situation. The report stated that if the United States goes ahead with the high levies, a notable impact on global growth, including in Laos, is inevitable. Given that the value of two-way trade is low, Director of the Macro Economic Research Institute under the National Economic and Social Science Institute, Latdavanh Songvilay, said the direct impact might be only minor. But the indirect impacts caused by the broader increased tariff policy could be enormous. 'The indirect impact is expected to be huge due to a projected decline in exports because the demand from trading partners would diminish, along with FDI and tourist arrivals,' she added. - Vientiane Times/ANN