logo
Durham Court demolition branded 'appalling mistake'

Durham Court demolition branded 'appalling mistake'

BBC News5 days ago

Concerns have been raised over plans to demolish a tower block and rehouse its elderly residents.South Tyneside Council's Labour cabinet recently unanimously agreed plans to rehouse the residents of Durham Court in Hebburn and to demolish the building.The 18-storey block dates back to 1974 and currently has 96 people living there, the majority aged over 65.Opposition councillors from the South Tyneside Alliance Group have criticised the move, describing it as "a staggering waste of public money".
Councillor Andrew Guy, a representative for the opposition group, called the move an "appalling mistake", and also raised concerns about the tower being a "substantial customer" for the Hebburn Energy Centre.The heating facility cost the council £11.9m, of which £4.8m came from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.Guy added: "This 18-storey tower block will be flattened, in the process wiping out the main reason the £11.9m Hebburn Energy Centre was built."
The opposition group and independent councillors said they requested the decision to be "called in" and referred to a scrutiny committee.However council chiefs said they had not "received a valid request for call-in" – a ruling which Guy said the group would be "formally challenging".The local authority added a valid call-in request must come no later than 12:00 on the fifth working day after publication of the minutes – which in this case falls on 2 June.Jane Carter, deputy council leader, previously said it was "by no means a conclusion we have reached lightly" to demolish Durham Court.She highlighted how the building would require £12m of investment to modernise and keep at a decent standard – which would have meant "significant disruption to the tenants without any guarantees about the long-term sustainability of the block".In response to concerns around the Hebburn Energy Centre, a council spokesperson said a new children's home would be connected to the renewable energy network, which would "mitigate a proportion of the lost carbon savings".The local authority added rehousing residents and the demolition process was likely to take about three to four years to complete.
Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colin Campbell appeal 'straightforward', Court of Appeal told
Colin Campbell appeal 'straightforward', Court of Appeal told

BBC News

time20 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Colin Campbell appeal 'straightforward', Court of Appeal told

The appeal of a former nurse who was convicted of murdering four elderly patients is a "straightforward" case, the Court of Appeal has Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women by injecting them with insulin and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which referred the case to the Court of Appeal four years ago, said prosecutors had relied on a "wholly circumstantial" case. Campbell, originally from Glasgow, was also found guilty of attempting to murder another inpatient, with his sentence carrying a minimum term of 30 the 13th day of the appeal hearing in London, judges heard closing submissions from Campbell's written submissions, Michael Mansfield KC said: "The appellant submits that this is a straightforward case in which this court must conclude that these convictions are unsafe."Campbell, who denied any wrongdoing and said he did nothing to cause hypoglycaemia, unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the CCRC in Curtis KC, representing the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court there were "certain matters to which we take exception" from the defence's closing submissions."There are a number of matters that I would seek to issue corrections on, things we firmly disagree with my learned friend on," he said. The appeal before Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken is due to conclude on Friday. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Fresh plans for £40m Hull park-and-ride to be submitted
Fresh plans for £40m Hull park-and-ride to be submitted

BBC News

time26 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Fresh plans for £40m Hull park-and-ride to be submitted

Revised plans for a £40m park-and-ride site north of Hull will be submitted "in the coming weeks", a developer has initial proposal for the scheme, at the Dunswell roundabout of the A1079 near Kingswood, was submitted to East Riding of Yorkshire Council (ERYC) by Ashcourt Group last it was withdrawn in March after concerns were raised about noise and light pollution, retail outlets and a bus Stathers, the head of external affairs at Ashcourt Group, said: "The team has taken on board concerns raised by residents and this scheme will lead to much reduced traffic congestion and pollution along Beverley Road into Hull." "We hope to have the revised plans ready for submission by mid-summer," he site, which is just outside the city boundary, is designated for a park-and-ride in ERYC's local plan. The initial proposal included space for 500 vehicles, a petrol station, car wash and drive-through residents lodged objections, saying they feared the development would "cause chaos" and be "unworkable". 'Ghastly' development In February, Hull City Council (HCC) wrote to ERYC to object to the inclusion of a bus depot, three drive-through restaurants and a petrol said that while it shared an "aspiration" for a park-and-ride, there were already restaurant facilities a separate letter of objection, three Hull city councillors, including the authority's leader Mike Ross, described the proposal as a "ghastly, oversized development".Ashcourt Group, a Hull-based construction company, said the fresh proposal would represent "one of the largest traffic management and infrastructure improvements to be undertaken in the region for decades" and would be "entirely funded" by private developer claimed it would provide "faster" transport links between Hull and Beverley and the two local hospitals, Hull Royal Infirmary and Castle Hill in Cottingham. 'Reduced congestion' The new proposal would still include food and retail spaces as Ashcourt said it believed there was "clear demand for such outlets in this area".Mr Stathers added: "Our proposal is very much about getting people out of cars and into energy efficient buses, reducing congestion and pollution."At the same time it will protect and enhance public transport services across many key areas of Hull and East Yorkshire."The BBC understands the updated proposal will be submitted to the council by the end of July. Listen to highlights from Hull and East Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.

Keir Starmer attacks ‘staggering' SNP move to block £11m investment
Keir Starmer attacks ‘staggering' SNP move to block £11m investment

Times

time26 minutes ago

  • Times

Keir Starmer attacks ‘staggering' SNP move to block £11m investment

Sir Keir Starmer has accused the SNP of choking off opportunities for young Scots by banning taxpayer support for munitions projects. The prime minister claimed it was 'staggering' that the nationalist government was 'blocking' an £11 million private investment from Rolls-Royce in the creation of a specialist welding centre on the basis that it could be used to support the building of Royal Navy submarines. John Swinney, the first minister, rejected accusations on Wednesday that he was indulging in 'student union' politics and insisted that the 'longstanding' position of the SNP — which is not to use public money to support the creation of weapons — would not change. It emerged at the weekend that a plan to create a state-of-the-art welding skills centre, part of a wider project aimed at reviving Scottish shipbuilding, faced being cancelled after Scottish Enterprise refused to provide a £2.5 million grant, branding the centre a 'munitions' project. The UK government said it would provide the funding instead, with Labour claiming the SNP's 'ill-informed dogma' was costing young people and the Scottish economy. At prime minister's questions, Starmer accused the SNP of 'blocking opportunities' for young people while also attacking cuts to college budgets in Scotland. An independent report last year found that real-terms funding for the sector had been cut by 17 per cent since 2021. 'At a time of global conflict, it is staggering that the SNP policy is to block an £11 million investment for a new national welding centre on the Clyde,' Starmer said. 'I was there earlier this week. I saw the huge potential for apprenticeships, for job opportunities and for young people. I support it, they block it. 'Despite the highest funding settlement in the history of devolution, they're cutting college budgets, they're blocking opportunities, they have no plan for Scotland's future.' SNP ministers have said their agencies have a longstanding policy that public money should not support 'the manufacture of munitions'. They have argued that the welding skills centre is ineligible for funding due to links with an attack submarine programme. However, the Scottish government-owned shipyard, Ferguson Marine, has taken on work supporting the construction of Royal Navy frigates. Meanwhile, Swinney has also faced criticism for turning down a briefing with the UK government about the defence review and instead going campaigning for the SNP in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse by-election. 'We have a longstanding policy that we don't use public expenditure to support the manufacture of munitions, and that's been a policy position that has been well set out and well understood within parliament for many years,' Swinney said. 'As would be expected, it's been applied in this case in the proper fashion. We do not support the use of public expenditure to support the manufacture of munitions. It's a very clear and a distinctive position.' However, Stephen Kerr, a Scottish Tory MSP, claimed that the position could not be reconciled with the SNP 's claim to support the defence industry and causes such as providing more backing to Ukraine. 'This is not a serious policy,' Kerr said. 'It is posturing, bound up in the pacifistic ideology that requires ignoring the hard realities of an increasingly dangerous world.' Meanwhile, Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, said Swinney's position on the issue was 'stupid and dangerous'. He told journalists: 'I think you should ask John Swinney, quite clearly, whether he wants to live in the real world or if he thinks he's a university student in the debating chamber. 'If he says there's no public money going towards munitions, are we going to Uber the missiles in? Are we going to Deliveroo the equipment if someone tries to attack us? 'It is completely and utterly incoherent, frankly stupid and dangerous, and it demonstrates why he's not fit to lead our country.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store