logo
UK must prepare for ‘wartime scenario' at home, security reports warn

UK must prepare for ‘wartime scenario' at home, security reports warn

Roya News11 hours ago

The UK must prepare for the possibility of a 'wartime scenario' on its own soil for the first time in decades, according to a new National Security Strategy published on Tuesday.
The government review highlights rising international instability driven by Russia's war in Ukraine and escalating tensions in the Middle East, increasing the risk of direct conflict affecting the British homeland.
The strategy comes just two days after Iran threatened to target UK military bases in response to a US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities. Although a ceasefire was later announced, the document warns that adversaries such as Iran and Russia continue to pose significant risks to national security, including through cyberattacks and sabotage.
'For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario,' the report states. It calls the coming years a critical test for the UK, urging 'agility and courage' while expressing confidence in the resilience and determination of the British public.
As part of a new 'Home Defence' approach, the strategy outlines plans to:
Conduct annual national resilience exercises involving civilians, businesses, and government institutions.
Enhance protection of critical infrastructure, including energy grids and water systems.
Strengthen coordination across sectors to combat cyberwarfare, sabotage, and disinformation.
Increase public awareness and preparedness for emergencies, including potential military or hybrid attacks.
The government also plans cross-departmental crisis simulations modeled on pandemic and wartime scenarios to bolster institutional readiness.
The publication coincides with the start of a NATO summit in the Netherlands, where leaders from 32 nations are expected to commit to raising security spending to 5 percent of national income by 2035 — with 3.5 percent allocated to core military expenditure and 1.5 percent to broader security efforts.
The strategy further calls for tougher measures against malign foreign actors, promising more 'robust and consistent' responses, especially in dealings with China. It also emphasizes the importance of keeping human security central in artificial intelligence development.
Similar efforts are underway across Europe. Sweden recently distributed public guides on war preparedness, while Finland updated its national crisis plans. The UK joins these nations in recognizing that modern threats transcend borders, making domestic preparedness essential.
The document warns the UK faces confrontation from adversaries threatening national security, citing Russia's war in Ukraine as the most pressing example. It also highlights 'Iranian hostile activity on British soil' and adversaries' plans to disrupt energy and supply chains.
The report calls for an 'all-of-society effort' to enhance security and urges national unity.
Speaking in the House of Commons, Cabinet Office Minister Pat McFadden described the strategy as a 'clear-eyed and hard-edged' response to current challenges. He emphasized plans to strengthen border security, improve coordination with allies, and boost capabilities in shipbuilding, nuclear power, and artificial intelligence.
McFadden announced a £1 billion investment in a new network of national biosecurity centers aimed at defending against biological attacks.
The strategy stresses reducing dependence on external actors and countering coercion or manipulation by hostile powers.
It outlines increasing threats including assassination, intimidation, espionage, sabotage, cyberattacks, and interference in democratic processes. Disinformation and social media manipulation designed to sow division are also identified as serious concerns.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Current Israeli-American attack on Iran is a clear violation of International Law
Current Israeli-American attack on Iran is a clear violation of International Law

Ammon

time32 minutes ago

  • Ammon

Current Israeli-American attack on Iran is a clear violation of International Law

Even though I strongly disagree with the Iranian government—because of its oppressive actions at home and its harmful role in the region—that does not make it acceptable for Israel or the United States to carry out military attacks against Iran. These actions clearly violate international law and put global peace and security at risk. According to the United Nations Charter, Article 2, Paragraph 4, no country is allowed to use force against the land or political independence of another country. When Israel or the U.S. strike targets inside Iran, either by air or through secret operations, they are breaking this rule and disrespecting Iran's sovereignty. These attacks were not approved by the United Nations Security Council, which is the only international body with the legal power to allow such actions—unless there is an immediate, proven threat that requires self-defense. In this case, there was no such threat from Iran to justify military action. When the world accepts these attacks without speaking out, it sets a dangerous example. It tells other countries that they too can attack their neighbors just by claiming they feel "threatened." This weakens the international laws that were created after World War II to prevent wars and protect peace. We must separate our disapproval of Iran's government from our support for the rights of the Iranian people—including their right to safety, sovereignty, and protection from foreign attacks. War does not only hurt governments. It brings suffering to ordinary people and often helps dictators stay in power by blaming outside enemies. If there are real concerns about Iran's nuclear program or regional activities, the best way to deal with them is through diplomacy—by talking, applying international pressure, using fair sanctions, and working together. Military attacks usually make things worse and lead to more violence and instability. Rejecting the Iranian government's actions does not mean supporting attacks on Iran. If we want a fair and peaceful world, we must defend international law for all countries, not just the ones we agree with. True justice and peace come from respecting the law equally—without double standards, and without using violence as the first option.

Oil prices rise as investors assess Iran-Israel ceasefire
Oil prices rise as investors assess Iran-Israel ceasefire

Ammon

time2 hours ago

  • Ammon

Oil prices rise as investors assess Iran-Israel ceasefire

Ammon News - Oil prices climbed on Wednesday as investors assessed the stability of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, but held near multi-week lows on the prospect that crude oil flows would not be disrupted. Brent crude futures rose 85 cents, or 1.3%, to $67.99 a barrel at 0341 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude gained 87 cents, or 1.4%, to $65.24. Brent settled on Tuesday at its lowest since June 10 and WTI since June 5, both before Israel launched a surprise attack on key Iranian military and nuclear facilities on June 13. Prices had rallied to five-month highs after the U.S. attacked Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. Reuters

France warns Iran sanctions still possible if no nuclear deal
France warns Iran sanctions still possible if no nuclear deal

Roya News

time4 hours ago

  • Roya News

France warns Iran sanctions still possible if no nuclear deal

France and its European partners are still prepared to reactivate sanctions on Iran if an agreement is not reached soon on its nuclear program, the French ambassador to the UN warned Tuesday. "Time is running out," said Jerome Bonnnafont at a UN Security Council meeting, in reference to the October expiration of the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. "We expect Iran to return to talks without delay in order to achieve a robust, verifiable and lasting diplomatic solution," he added. Bonnafont said negotiations were the only way to "guarantee the impossibility of an Iranian military nuclear program," days after the United States conducted strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities. "France and its E3 partners (Germany and the United Kingdom) remain ready to use the leverage established by Resolution 2231, that of a 'snapback' (of sanctions), if a satisfactory agreement is not reached by summer," he warned. UK ambassador Barbara Wood concurred, saying: "We will use all diplomatic levers at our disposal to support a negotiated outcome, and ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon." UN Security Council Resolution 2231 endorsed the 2015 agreement Iran reached with the E3 countries, as well as China, Russia and the United States, to regulate its nuclear program in return for eased sanctions.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store