Sewage discharges to halve by 2030, minister pledges
Steve Reed's vow marks the first time ministers have set a clear target on the issue, following public outcry over the pollution incidents.
It comes after data published by the Environment Agency on Friday showed serious pollution incidents by water companies in England rose by 60% in 2024 to the highest number on record.
Reed said families had "watched their local rivers, coastlines and lakes suffer from record levels of pollution" - but the Conservatives said Labour had "done nothing to stop water bill rises" despite "big promises" to reform the system.
The pledge forms part of wider government plans to improve the water sector, ahead of a landmark Water Commission review of the industry due to be published on Monday.
The plans announced on Sunday will also include a commitment to work with devolved governments across the UK to ban wet wipes containing plastic, among other measures.
Reed is also expected to confirm aims to cut phosphorus pollution from treated wastewater - which causes algae blooms that are harmful to wildlife - in half by 2028, compared to 2024 levels.
There has been widespread scrutiny of water companies over the increasing number of sewage discharges into UK waterways amid rising bills - all while the firms have paid out millions to executives and shareholders.
The Environment Agency said water companies recorded 2,801 pollution incidents in 2024, up from 2,174 in 2023.
Of those, 75 were considered to pose "serious or persistent" harm to fisheries, drinking water and human health - up from 47 last year.
At the same time, water bosses in England were paid £7.6m in bonuses, according to the government. In June, it barred them from being paid out at six firms that had fallen foul of environmental and consumer standards.
How much sewage is spilled near you?
Bosses' bonuses banned at six water companies
Serious water pollution incidents up 60% in England, Environment Agency says
The Water Commission's chair will lay out his recommendations on how to improve the environmental and financial performance of the sector. The government will respond in Parliament.
Several UK media outlets reported on Friday that the report would suggest scrapping the regulator, Ofwat, altogether. A government spokesperson said it would not comment on speculation.
England has a combined sewage system, which means both rainfall and sewage are processed through the same system. Last year, rainfall levels were up, which could have overwhelmed some water company infrastructure.
However, despite variations in rainfall, discharges that result in serious pollution are a breach of their permits and legal obligations.
Many incidents are reported to the Environment Agency by the companies themselves, but of 4,000 inspections carried out last year by the regulator, nearly a quarter of sites were in breach of their permits.
A record £104bn is due to be invested into the water sector over the next five years to improve its infrastructure.
As a result, consumer bills are expected to rise on average by £123 annually - though for Southern Water customers this could be as much as £224.
The Environment Agency has also received £189m to support hundreds of enforcement offices to inspect and prosecute water companies, with the fines retroactively paying for this.
Conservative shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins said the government "must be transparent about where the £104bn investment is coming from as some will come through customer bill rises".
She said plans "must also include credible proposals to improve the water system's resilience to droughts, without placing an additional burden on bill payers and taxpayers".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man United fans make their thoughts known on Ineos' tenure
Manchester United fans have spoken on how they view new owners Ineos' time at the club to date. Ineos takeover There is no question that United's majority owners, the Glazer family, are deeply unpopular but the jury is out on Ineos. The company owned by Sir Jim Ratcliffe bought a minority stake in the club in 2023 and have been at the centre of some huge changes at the football club. There has been a complete revamp of the football structure, the manager and coaching team and numerous new signings at senior and youth team level. Mixed reviews According to a poll undertaken by The Peoples Person, 32% of respondents felt that 'the good outweighs the bad' in what Ineos have done at Old Trafford. Despite a terrible season last year, head coach Ruben Amorim is a popular figure amongst fans and many new signings such as Leny Yoro and Matheus Cunha have been welcomed by supporters. United have also seen the revamp of their Carrington training ground and plans put in place for a new 100,000 seater stadium. Storm clouds have gathered Nonetheless 24% of fans claimed that they have been average while 18% believe that Ineos' tenure has been 'mostly disappointing.' The garden has not always been rosy for Sir Jim Ratcliffe as The 1958 have been very active in protests against some of the club's decisions and they are planning a demonstration against the British billionaire before the opening game of the Premier League season. What's more, the club have also taken some deeply unpopular decisions such as large-scale job cuts, the increase of matchday ticket prices and the removal of Sir Alex Ferguson's ambassadorial role. Finally, some people have taken more extreme views with 16% agreeing with the statement that Ineos have been responsible for an 'absolute sh**show' while 10% feel they have been 'excellent' and a 'breath of fresh air.' Mixed bag All in all, the majority fans view Ineos as a mixed bag. 42% of readers view the new owners as generally positive, while 34% see them in a generally negative light. That leaves 24% of people who haven't really made up their mind as of yet. With the signing of Benjamin Sesko looking likely and the links to Brighton and Hove Albion's Carlos Baleba heating up, Ineos will be hoping to convince a few more fans with an incredibly successful summer window. Featured image Michael Regan via Getty Images online polls Follow us on Bluesky: @
Forbes
19 minutes ago
- Forbes
John Cena-Priyanka Chopra's ‘Heads Of State' Among Prime Video's Top Films
Indian star Priyanka Chopra Jonas is elated that Amazon Prime Video's new original movie, Heads of State, is now the fourth most-watched film ever on the platform. A press release from Prime Video announced that the film garnered 75 million views worldwide. Directed by Ilya Naishuller (Hardcore Henry, Nobody), the film features Chopra along with John Cena and Idribs Elba in lead roles. The film released on July 2 and remained among the top most-viewed films worldwide on Prime Video for four weeks. Priyanka Chopra Jonas-John Cena-Idris Elba's Heads of State garners 75 million+ views In its debut week, Heads of State secured the fifth spot on Nielsen's Movie chart, clocking 1.098 billion minutes streamed in the USA. Lead actors John Cena and Priyanka Chopra Jonas expressed their gratitude towards the audience soon after the viewership announcement on social media. According to Flixpatrol, Heads of State was among the top ten most-viewed films worldwide for a month on Amazon Prime Video. Cena plays the US president, and Elba is the prime minister of the UK while Chopra is an MI6 agent in the film. The film is produced by Amazon MGM Studios. Heads of State also features Stephen Root, Paddy Considine, Carla Gugino, Jack Quaid and Sarah Niles. The action comedy is streaming on Prime Video in English, Hindi, Tamil, Telugu, Malayalam, and Kannada languages. In India, Heads of State was the fifth most-watched film online in its debut week, Ormax Media recorded 1.7 million views in India for the film in the week ending July 6. The next week, it doubled the Indian viewership and climbed to fourth spot on the list. In its third week, Heads of State slid back to fifth position on the list. Heads of State is an action fictional comedy that shows a US President and the UK Prime Minister who need to thwart a global conspiracy to save the world, and they must set aside their rivalry to do so. Their close ally in the mission is the brilliant MI6 agent Noel Bisset (Chopra). The president and the prime minister have a lot going on - the latter doesn't appreciate the fact that the former was elected as the head of his country because he was a huge Hollywood star. As heads of two countries majorly deciding the course of most global actions, they must be seen as allies. Despite their differences, they must appear to agree on important ideologies and steps. Both the actors offer a charming camaraderie in the process. They are playful and cheerful, yet authoritative. Chopra adds an interesting twist to the equation. She brings the agility and expertise of a secret agent while keeping it curtly passionate with her ex. The film is a fun-filled action ride which offers adrenaline-rush in the action sequences and lighthearted comedy in others. It also pushes political commentary with subtlety, making it possible for the audience to thoroughly enjoy the movie even if they are not aware of the politics. Earlier in July, Heads of State director Naishuller hinted at the possibility of having a sequel. In an interview with Screenrant, Naishuller said creating more of 'Jack and Marty' would be fun, if people enjoy the movie, and Amazon "feels like it makes sense to do a second one". The 2024 Christmas action comedy Red One ranks on top of the list of most-watched films worldwide on Prime Video ever. The film features Dwayne Johnson and Chris Evans in lead roles and is directed by Jake Kasdan. Ben Affleck-starrer The Accountant 2 is the second most-watched Amazon MGM movie on the platform, with 80 million global views. It was directed by Gavin O'Connor. The Tomorrow War ranks third on the list, right above Heads of State, Deadline reports.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How you can still make money from flipping property
In the Nineties and Noughties, a significant number of property investors — and ordinary owner-occupiers — were making large amounts of money from buying properties in need of refurbishment, doing them up quickly and selling them on at a profit, aka flipping. But, 20 years on, this practice is much less common. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership According to recent figures from Hamptons Research, in the first quarter of 2025, the proportion of homes bought and then re-sold within a year (ie flipped) fell to 2.3% across England and Wales, down from 3.6% in Q1 2024. This equated to 7,301 flipped homes in Q1 2025, 27% below the 10-year Q1 average. The average profit of these Q1 2025 flips was £22,000 and Hamptons found that while 80% of flipped homes were sold for a higher price in Q1 2025, only 66% made a profit. So, how can you still make money from flipping? We spoke to several experts to find out. Why has flipping property become less profitable? While there are several factors eating into flippers' profits, the main one is stamp duty. Not only have rates increased over the last 20 years, but property price inflation means that more properties are liable for this tax, while investors with multiple properties have to pay stamp duty at an additional rate. Read more: What are branded residences and who's buying them? 'Bigger stamp duty bills are wiping out a lot of profit from flipping. The 5% surcharge for investors, coupled with a reduction in the point at which buyers start paying stamp duty, means it's harder than ever to make the sums stack up,' says Aneisha Beveridge, head of research at Hamptons. The average stamp duty bill which was once around 10% of a flipper's gross profit, now swallows up around 30%. 'As recently as 20 years ago the highest rate of stamp duty was 2%. Now it is 12%, plus an extra 2% if you are an overseas buyer and an additional 3% if you own a property anywhere else in the world. So, you could be paying as much as 15% of the value in tax,' flags Marc Schneiderman, director, Arlington Residential. Renovating a property has also become more expensive, meaning investors need to pay out increasing amounts initially. 'Renovation costs have also risen, while inflation in both labour and materials, along with new compliance requirements such as energy efficiency standards, has increased upfront investment and overall project risk,' says Caroline Marshall-Roberts, CEO and founder of BuyAssociation. Read more: The pros and cons of buying property off-plan Sarah Walker, owner of Walker Hall Estate Agent, gives the example of a kitchen refurb. 'A kitchen that might have been £8,000 just a few years ago can easily come in at £15,000 or more once you factor in appliances, fitting and VAT.' What's more, the reduction of the capital gains allowance and stricter rules on what can be claimed on this make tax-efficient renovations difficult. 'Combine this with uncertain market timing and tighter lending conditions, and today's property investors looking to flip properties are dealing with thinner margins and greater exposure to downturns,' adds Marshall-Roberts. Which areas of the UK are still profitable when it comes to flipping? There are still areas of the country where you can flip and make a profit. According to Hamptons Research, the North East is the only region where flipping has become more common over the last decade. This is predominantly due to the prevalence of homes costing less than £40,000, well below the stamp duty threshold of £125,000. 'We still see some success in parts of the North West, in particular in certain areas of the Wirral, where property prices are lower and demand is steady,' says Liam Gretton, Bespoke Estate Agent. 'Buyers are also looking in areas with planned regeneration, where prices are starting to rise.' While there are general regional patterns of flip profitability, Walker believes it's more likely that a good hyper-local knowledge will help you find a suitable property. 'You need to understand which streets, which styles of homes, and which improvements genuinely add value in your patch. Forget national 'hotspots.' Success comes from knowing your area inside out and running the numbers with zero room for guesswork.' What types of houses are good for flipping? In terms of what makes a successful flip property, many of the age-old rules still hold true. 'Probate sales, long-held family homes or rentals that haven't been touched in decades are the sweet spot. Dated kitchens, pink bathrooms, swirly carpets, all perfect,' suggests Walker. Read more: What is pre-application planning and can you do it yourself? With the cost of renovations high, you're looking for properties that have good bones, are structurally sound and just need cosmetic modifications. With the age of first-time buyers increasing, larger, family homes are increasingly in demand and, therefore, have more flip potential. 'Investors looking to flip property should focus on three- or four-bedroom semi-detached houses. These homes tend to appeal to families and young professionals, increasing the likelihood of a quicker sale and a stronger return,' says Marshall-Roberts. 'Terraced houses and standard flats in residential blocks can also make good flip candidates.' In contrast, luxury homes with large stamp duty bills come with higher stakes attached. 'High-end homes or unusual properties are harder to flip quickly and carry more risk,' says Gretton. While flipping can be seen as a way of making a fast buck, Gretton flags that there are hidden benefits and that it has its place in the property market. 'It brings older or neglected homes back to life, creating more modern, liveable spaces that are ready for today's buyers or renters. It also helps maintain and support local property values especially in areas where tired housing stock might otherwise drag the market down.' Read more: How school fees can affect your mortgage borrowing The pros and cons of getting a mortgage into your 70s Pros and cons of lifetime ISAs
