Labour mayor accused of bullying and harassment by staff
Dan Norris, the Labour MP, has been accused of bullying and harassment by staff at a local authority, The Telegraph can reveal.
The accusations were made against Mr Norris in his role as the Mayor of the West of England.
In recent years the authority has handed over hundreds of thousands of pounds in taxpayers' money to pay off former employees.
The details have emerged after Mr Norris, a former minister and the serving MP for North East Somerset, was arrested on suspicion of sexual offences against a girl, rape, child abduction and misconduct in a public office following a police raid on his constituency home.
The 65-year-old, who has previously worked as a teacher and an NSPCC-trained child protection officer, was immediately suspended by the Labour Party.
Sir Keir Starmer's party selected him as a candidate for the July 2024 election when he was already embroiled in a row over allegations of the unlawful use of public money to pay for an advert on a bus.
Since ousting Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg at the general election, Mr Norris has caused controversy by keeping his job as mayor, leading to him claiming two salaries from the public purse, totalling almost £180,000.
The Telegraph has now seen documents which detail allegations about his behaviour at the West of England Combined Authority (Weca), which he leads as mayor.
This includes a 'proposal regarding a culture review', which came after a grievance was raised against Mr Norris for harassment, bullying and constructive dismissal.
It noted that a staff survey in October 2023 had raised concerns that there was 'a need to 'protect officers from the mayor'.'
There had been an 'unprecedented level of turnover' within some teams because of Mr Norris's 'actions and decisions', one union boss alleged.
An independent report by auditors Grant Thornton noted that there were concerns over the severance pay to a former chief executive and the use of £10,000 for the bus advert.
It states that the circumstances leading to the £219,000 severance payoff to Dr Patricia Greer 'included instances of sub-optimal interaction' between Weca officers and the mayor.
A 'dissatisfaction with the quality of interaction' with Mr Norris and his office had been cited by a number of senior employees who had quit Weca since he was elected to the role in 2021.
The report by Grant Thornton said: 'Whilst the mayor is entitled to fulfil their role in a style that they choose, they need to ensure that this does not fall short of applicable standards of conduct and does not expose the combined authority to a disproportionate level of financial, legal or reputational risk.'
They concluded that the payoff to Dr Greer was dealt with properly.
Labour was aware of issues at Weca as a warning over governance and value for money was sent in March 2024 in part because of the 'poor state of professional relationships' between Mr Norris and other members of the authority.
However, two months after the Best Value Notice was published, the party announced that Mr Norris would be standing against Sir Jacob.
The Grant Thornton report also noted that the £10,000 payment for a bus advertisement featuring the mayor, which was intended to promote a bus subsidy scheme, had been found to be unlawful by Weca officers.
The wrap featuring Mr Norris and his dog had been found in 2023 to be in breach of guidance on the 'use of public funding for personal political benefit' as it promoted him as an individual as opposed to the scheme.
There was evidence that he had given a 'verbal direction' to proceed with the purchase, though this was denied by Mr Norris, the report notes.
The documents have been lodged with an employment tribunal and will be presented to the High Court, where Mr Norris is separately being sued for harassment and bullying related to his role as the chairman of the League Against Cruel Sports. It is understood that they are being used as evidence of a course of conduct by Mr Norris.
Mr Norris stepped down from his role at the League after his arrest.
Andy Knott, the former chief executive of the charity, alleges that he was forced out after he refused to accept a 'U-turn' on Labour's promise to close 'all loopholes' in hunting laws if they won the election.
Mr Norris has not responded to a request for comment. He is currently on conditional bail pending further enquiries into the allegations of sexual offences.
In a statement, Avon and Somerset Police said: 'In December 2024, we received a referral from another police force relating to alleged non-recent child sex offences having been committed against a girl.
'Most of the offences are alleged to have occurred in the 2000s but we're also investigating an alleged offence of rape from the 2020s.'
A spokesman for Weca said: 'We are aware of Avon & Somerset Police's statement but are unable to comment on an ongoing police investigation.'
Mr Norris is due to stand down from his role as mayor at the local elections in May.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Four ways the spending review could impact you
Rachel Reeves has said her spending review tomorrow will be about 'making working people better off', admitting that not enough Britons are feeling their lives improving under the Labour government. Sharing out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules, the chancellor is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with several infrastructure projects. However, other areas could face cuts as the Treasury tries to fulfil its self-imposed fiscal rule to match day-to-day spending with revenues. Some have suggested that the government will be unable to achieve this balance without imposing higher taxes, with tomorrow's spending review likely to set the tone for this year's autumn budget. Here, Yahoo News takes a look at what the spending review entails, and how it is likely to affect your lives. A spending review is the process the government uses to set all departments' budgets for future years, according to the website, including for public services. The current 2025 spending review takes place in two phases – the first of which concluded at the 2024 autumn budget when spending plans for 2024/25 and 2025/26 were confirmed. Phase two, will prioritise delivering the government's missions, and has seen departments holding negotiations with the Treasury over their spending plans for the coming years. Reeve's announcement tomorrow will set planned day-to-day spending totals for all government departments from 2026/27 to 2028/29, and investment spending plans for a further year (from 2026/27 to 2029/30). The government has said that its review will be 'zero-based', meaning it will set budgets from zero and assess all spending for value for money, rather than adjusting up or down from existing budgets, according to Parliamentary documents. Here are some ways this process could affect the lives of ordinary Britons. The NHS is expected to receive an additional £30bn in funding in tomorrow's spending review – most likely at the expense of other public services. A 2.8% increase to the Department of Health and Social Care's day-to-day budget is reportedly to be set over the three year spending review period, which according to The Times, amounts to a £17bn real-terms increase, although capital spending is only expected to rise in line with inflation. What does this mean for patients? Well, it could help the government achieve its target of 92% of patients in England waiting for planned treatment being seen within 18 weeks of referral by the next election, rather than the current 60%. The spending review will likely benefit the government's 10-year plan to modernise the NHS, including with more community-based care, better preventative treatment and digital technologies, with details on a revamp and additional funding of the NHS app expected to be announced in tomorrow's review. This, in theory at least, means you could have more freedom and flexibility in accessing scan and test results, booking appointments, and receiving information on treatments and trials, as well as the ability to choose which hospital to go to. Ahead of her review, Reeves announced that £15.6bn will go towards improving public transport projects in the North and Midlands – hopefully improving travel times and available routes. The spending settlement includes £2.5bn for Greater Manchester for projects including new tram stops in Bury, Manchester and Oldham and £2.4bn for an extension of the metro from Birmingham city centre to the new sports quarter. It also includes £2.1bn to start building West Yorkshire Mass Transit by 2028, £2bn for the East Midlands to design a new mass transit system between Derby and Nottingham and £1.8bn for a metro extension linking Newcastle and Sunderland via Washington. An additional £1.6bn is being given to Liverpool City Region for new bus routes, including to the airport and football stadiums, while £1.5bn will go to South Yorkshire, including £530m to renew the region's trams. The deal also includes £1bn for Tees Valley, including £60m for the Platform 3 extension at Middlesbrough station and £800m for the West of England, including £200m for mass transit links between Bristol, Bath, South Gloucestershire and north Somerset. The spending review looks to provide a big boost to public transport outside the capital, but Londoners will not fare as well, with Mayor Sadiq Khan decrying a lack of cash being allocated to London. Campaigners feared that the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero's Warm Homes Plan was in line for cuts, although a government source has told The Guardian that Reeves has decided against this. If this does prove true, then up to 300,000 households will likely have the same level of support in saving money on their bills and making their homes more energy efficient. The plan includes a boiler upgrade scheme supporting households switching to a heat pumps, while lower-income households and renters are entitled to energy efficiency upgrades such as insulation and low-carbon heating. Access to affordable housing may still prove challenging after tomorrow's review, however, with Inside Housing writing that the government's target of delivering 1.5 million new homes by the end of this Parliament is regarded by most as "unfulfillable". Council services such as tenant support and homelessness services could also take a hit, with councils currently making an unprecedented £1.2bn of savings and cuts to balance their books, with the County Councils Network warning tomorrow's review will be a "make or break" moment. It is rumoured that the government is considering introducing taxes on rental income for landlords in its Autumn budget to pay for the Department of Housing's spending. Schools are expected to receive an unexpected extra £4.5bn a year in the upcoming spending review in a move that will be welcomed by teachers and parents alike. This means day-to-day funding for schools will increase by more than £4.5bn a year by 2028-9 compared to this year, The Observer reports. This will help cover the expansion of free school meals for families who receive Universal Credit, and partly fund a pay rise for teachers agreed upon last month. However, school finances are still likely to feel squeezed, as the government puts £615m towards pay rises, with schools having to find £400m from their own budgets. More money is also expected for reforms to Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) provision, which will help more pupils stay in mainstream schools. Additional money is also set to be made available from the Treasury's £113bn capital investment fund to repair leaking roofs and crumbling classrooms. What is the spending review? Everything Rachel Reeves could announce to fix UK economy (The Independent) London bracing for cuts in Chancellor's Spending Review (The London Standard) Voices: Wes Streeting has won the spending review – but will he blow his winnings? (The Independent)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Scottish Government refuses to rule out changes to pensioners' winter payment
The Scottish Government has not ruled out making changes to its equivalent on the winter fuel payment scheme, amid concerns some pensioners could be left worse off than their counterparts south of the border. A spokesperson for First Minister John Swinney said ministers at Holyrood were 'trying to understand the fiscal implications' of Monday's policy change by the UK Government. After cutting the winter fuel payment for all but the poorest pensioners last year, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has now confirmed some nine million pensioners in England and Wales will receive the benefit this winter. The payment, worth up to £300, will be restored to the vast majority of pensioners who previously received it, with those with an income of under £35,000 a year qualifying for the UK Government's payment. Today we are expanding Winter Fuel Payments to benefit nine million pensioners this winter. It is right that we continue to means-test this payment so that it is targeted and fair. That's why we have acted to expand eligibility so no pensioner on a lower income will miss out. — Rachel Reeves (@RachelReevesMP) June 9, 2025 In Scotland, ministers had already announced plans to ensure all pensioner households receive a payment. The Pension Age Winter Heating Payment will see all pensioner households get at least £100, with poorer pensioners getting either £200 or £300 depending on their age. Labour, however, challenged SNP ministers to ensure that 'no struggling Scottish pensioners will be left out of pocket under their plans'. Mr Swinney's spokesperson confirmed that, as it stands, the policy in Scotland has not been changed. But adding that ministers are 'trying to understand the fiscal implications' of what has been announced', the spokesperson refused to rule out future changes to the payments. 'We will always seek to support pensioners in Scotland the best we can, we are absolutely committed to that,' the spokesperson said. The change in policy from the UK Government will bring additional money for the Scottish Government – with the spokesperson stressing SNP ministers are 'still trying to understand' how much extra cash could be due. Here, the spokesperson stressed the Scottish Government's budget is 'set largely by Westminster', adding: 'We have to, frankly, read the tea leaves sometimes about what is going to happen to our block grant throughout the year.' The comments from the First Minister's spokesperson came as Scottish Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville described the UK Government's handling of of the benefit as 'shambolic'. Ms Somerville welcomed Labour's U-turn on the benefit cut, but said the decision should never have happened in the first place. She told BBC Radio Scotland it was 'very difficult to try and run a devolved social security system when you're actually finding out some of the details on social media before you can actually find out the details from the Government'. The Social Justice Secretary insisted that was 'no way for the Governments to work together,', adding she was 'deeply disappointed in the way that the UK Government have handled this once again with the Scottish Government'. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray stressed the benefit was devolved to Scotland, saying: 'This is a devolved payment. There's lots of social security that is devolved in Scotland. It is up to the Scottish Government to develop that and come up with their own policy.' The Labour MP also told BBC Radio Scotland the Scottish Government's winter fuel payments system meant that 'limited public money' will go towards helping millionaire pensioners with their heating bills. He insisted the initial decision by the UK Government to scrap the universal payments had been the 'right thing to do at the time', but added that changes could be made to this now the economy has been 'stabilised'.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The winners and losers in Labour's first spending review
When Rachel Reeves publishes the government's spending review on Wednesday, the stories the Treasury will want to tell are the energy, transport and other infrastructure projects that will get a share of the big boost in capital funding – £113bn. They will argue that cash, freed up by the change to the fiscal rules in the budget, could only have happened under Labour and was opposed by the Tories and Reform. But the capital spending cannot stop expected cuts in day-to-day spending, meaning extremely tight settlements for departments, with savings expected from policing budgets, local government, civil service cuts, foreign aid, education and culture. Treasury sources said they would still spend £190bn more over the five-year parliament than the Conservatives' spending plans – meaning more than £300bn will be distributed among departments. Real-terms spending will grow at an average of 1.2% a year over the three years that the spending review period covers, a significant drop from the first two years when it will be 2.5%. Even that figure does not tell the full story because of the disproportionate boost being given to defence and the NHS – and has led the Institute for Fiscal Studies to warn that the spending commitments will require 'chunky tax rises' in the autumn, when coupled with other expected priorities such as restoring the winter fuel allowance to more pensioners and action on child poverty such as ending the two-child benefit limit. Here are some of the key offers from the spending review – and the rows over cuts. The biggest row of the spending review has been between Reeves and the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, over policing, which one source describes as being a 'huge headache'. Cooper has brought out the big guns to make her case, first with a letter from six police chiefs who warned that without more funding the government would not meet its manifesto promises on crime. Sir Mark Rowley, the head of the Metropolitan police, and other senior police officers have also written to the prime minister to warn him that investment was need to prevent some crimes being routinely ignored. It is understood the policing budget will not face real terms cuts but the level of spending is still under discussion. The Home Office is under strain as a major spending department that is key to some of the most ambitious manifesto pledges – including halving knife crime, police recruitment, reducing violence against women and girls as well as dealing with monitoring offenders who will be released earlier due to sentencing changes. The other major spending review row is over deep dissatisfaction from Angela Rayner – the deputy prime minister and housing secretary – with the level of funding for social homes in the spending review, making her one of the last remaining holdouts in negotiations with the Treasury over departmental spending settlements. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has been battling for more funding for the affordable homes programme as well as trying to preserve cash for local councils, homelessness and regional growth initiatives. The Treasury had previously put £2bn into affordable housing, described as a 'down payment' on further funding to be announced at the spending review, which Reeves said would mark a generational shift in the building of council homes. However, the next phase of funding has caused a major rift with Rayner – and more so because capital spending on infrastructure such as housing is meant to be a priority. The environment secretary, Steve Reed, is said to have been holding out for a big capital injection to fund flood defences. The autumn budget said the government was facing significant funding pressures on flood defences and farm schemes of almost £600m in 2024-25, and that those schemes would have to be reviewed for their affordability. Sources at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) confirmed a post-Brexit farming fund would be cut in the review. Labour promised a fund of £5bn over two years – from 2024 to 2026 – at the budget, which is being honoured, but in the years after that it will be slashed for all but a few farms. The energy secretary, Ed Miliband, had a long fight to keep cash for a major programme of insulation, which was a key part of the government's net zero strategy. However, there are reports suggesting other schemes could be scaled back to protect the insulation programme. At the October budget, Reeves announced £3.4bn over three years for household energy efficiency schemes, heat decarbonisation and fuel poverty schemes. The government responded to concerns expressed at the time calling the sum the 'bare minimum' and promising a spending uplift at the review. Miliband's department is expected to get significant capital investment in energy infrastructure including nuclear – with the government poised to give the go ahead to the Sizewell C nuclear plant. The chancellor has already announced £15bn in transport spending across the north of England, funds which she said fulfil promises made by the Conservatives to the country but which the party had no way to pay for them in its own plan. Wes Streeting's department is set to be one of the big winners of the spending review and it will lay the groundwork for the NHS 10-year plan, which will be published imminently after the spending review. The department will get one of the biggest boosts to funding as others face real-terms cuts. The funding for the plan prioritises three key areas, moving care from hospitals to communities, increasing the use of technology, and prioritising prevention. No 10 and Streeting hope that the 10-year plan will contain major commitments and a positive story that the government will finally be able to tell properly on improvements to the health service – though any good news could be scuppered by the ballot for strike action by resident doctors. Still, Streeting's department was one of the last to settle formally with the Treasury due to negotiations over drug prices, though departmental sources downplayed any specific row. Any child in England whose parents receive universal credit will be able to claim free school meals from September 2026, the government has said. Parents on the credit will be eligible regardless of their income. The government says the change will make 500,000 more pupils eligible. A Department for Education (DfE) source said it was the best measure outside welfare changes to address child poverty and that the education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, had consistently fought to protect school food programmes through each round of spending negotiations. But schools budgets will be squeezed. Teachers will get a 4% pay rise next year, with additional funding of £615m. But schools will still have to fund about a quarter of the rise themselves – a total of £400m from their current budgets. Phillipson has tasked the DfE with finding savings in schools budgets, such as energy bills. Savings will also come as the government is removing public funding for level 7 apprenticeships, which has drawn criticism from skills experts. The justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, was one of the first to reach her settlement to allow her to announce a £4.7bn plan to build three new prisons starting this year, part of a 'record expansion' as the government attempts to get to grips with the prison crisis. The early announcement was essential because it came alongside an announcement that the government would put a limit on how long hundreds of repeat offenders can be recalled to prison amid Whitehall predictions that jails will be full again in November.
