
Education boss shuts down questions about Hazlehead knife incident amid 'huge concerns about behaviour' at Aberdeen schools
Education bosses sparked a backlash as they barred councillors from asking questions about the knife incident at Hazlehead Academy during a debate on violence in Aberdeen schools.
Today's education committee meeting descended into a heated spat – as elected members argued over what the next steps should be in the wake of an alleged slashing at the west end secondary.
A 12-year-old girl was taken to hospital last Thursday, requiring stitches, after police were called to the school during the morning break.
It is understood she suffered wounds to the head and face, and a 14-year-old girl has now been charged in connection with the incident.
The city's education leaders have now pledged to bring forward a report on what is being done to police behaviour in schools.
However, there were concerns that more urgent action is needed.
The meeting got off to a fiery start, as Lower Deeside councillor M. Tauqeer Malik lamented not being able to ask education officials questions.
He blasted Lib Dem education boss Martin Greig, who arranged the meeting in such a way as to prohibit this.
Mr Greig, however, insisted he was right to limit any discussion on what is an ongoing police investigation.
Mr Malik said: 'We did not get the opportunity to ask questions… When I raise these things you (Mr Greig) just start shouting at me.
'There is a process where you get to ask questions and get answers, but you did not give us the opportunity to ask questions in relation to a very important issue.'
Other opposition councillors later raised the same concerns.
Conservative councillor Richard Brooks was later shut down as he referred to the alleged slashing at Hazlehead Academy.
After only making a fleeting mention of the incident, he was quickly muzzled by the local authority's legal team.
Lord Provost David Cameron was quick to interject following Mr Brooks' remark, saying: 'This is a live police investigation, and Councillor Brooks is making statements.'
After consulting with the legal team, the Tory Kincorth, Nigg and Cove councillor was told no mention to the alleged Hazlehead Academy knife attack would be permitted.
This was despite, as Mr Brooks brought up, the issue being discussed in public in the Scottish Parliament last week.
Mr Malik previously called for the anti-weapons lessons rolled out in the wake of the tragic Bailey Gwynne killing in 2015 to be reinstated across Aberdeen.
He wanted the possibility discussed at an urgent council meeting on Monday.
However, this too was turned down as it concerned a live police investigation.
John Murray, the council's representative for Roman Catholic schools, also attended the talks on Tuesday.
He appeared to grow impatient as councillors debated what subsequent meeting to discuss the behaviour report in.
He said: 'I would like people to consider how that looks to the general public in Aberdeen that over this very, very important issue, what we're debating is what committee a particular report should go to.
'There are huge concerns about the behaviour of some children in schools.
'This is something that the education committee should be focusing a lot of time and attention on.'
His sentiments were echoed by council co-leader Christian Allard, who likened the situation to 'walking a tightrope'.
The SNP group leader added: 'We will have a report. Will it be enough to deal with particular incidents? I don't think so, it may be too early.
'But it will feed into the plan, and we need to address what needs to be addressed.'
In the end, councillors voted for a report to come back to the next education committee in June.
You can view the full meeting here.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
27 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
ScotRail is 'fixing' AI train announcer after voice controversy
But after prompting from Fiona Hyslop, he said: 'The Transport Secretary tells me they're fixing it, so they will be fixing it.' Ms Potter has welcomed this commitment as a 'meaningful step forward'. The issue was raised at First Minister's Questions at Holyrood, with Scottish Conservative MSP Dr Sandesh Gulhane asking if it is how the Scottish Government – which took ScotRail into public ownership in 2022 – 'supports actors'. The Tory pressed the case with Mr Swinney after Ms Potter, in a widely shared Facebook post, accused ScotRail of dismissing her concerns. She said Iona came from voice data held by Swedish-based company ReadSpeaker, who she did recordings for in 2021 – adding that by using her voice in an AI model the company had acted outside of the terms of her agreement with them. Ms Potter spoke of her 'distress' at discovering Scotland had 'installed the ReadSpeaker model 'Iona' that contains my biometric voice data as their new announcer on all their trains'. She insisted: 'I did not know. I was not asked. I did not consent.' Mr Swinney said he is 'sure' the rail operator will be 'engaging constructively with all concerned'. He added: 'I think sometimes these things do indeed need careful handling and I am sure ScotRail will be doing exactly that.' Following the First Minister's comments, a spokeswoman for Ms Potter told the PA news agency: 'We welcome the fact that the First Minister acknowledged the issue at hand and confirmed that ScotRail 'will be fixing it'. 'While the language may not be definitive at this stage, this public commitment is a meaningful step forward for Gayanne, and other artists in her position. 'That said, this case isn't just about hiring Scottish actors. It's about the use of a real actor's voice without her informed consent, and the broader need for ethical standards in the deployment of AI voice technology. 'We now hope that 'fixing it' will include direct engagement with Gayanne, proper accountability from those responsible, and a clear commitment to ensuring that consent, transparency, and fair treatment become non-negotiable in the use of AI by public bodies. 'The public sector needs to be rigorous in their procurement of AI solutions and the commercial partnerships they strike with AI companies.' Ms Potter's representative said the voice actress had been told by ScotRail earlier this week that the matter was between her and ReadSpeaker. She said they would request that ScotRail cease using 'Iona', adding: 'Any use of Gayanne's or anyone else's voice through AI must be based on her full, informed consent and agreed upon under fair conditions.' ReadSpeaker has said it has a contract to use her voice and its legal team has 'comprehensively' addressed Ms Potter's concerns.


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why Lords are striking a blow for creative industries over new AI bill
Strange to say but a government with a Commons majority of 156 is somehow in danger of losing one of its more important pieces of legislation. The Data (Use and Access) Bill is commonly called the 'data bill' or ' AI bill' because it is central to the regulation of the new world of artificial intelligence; indeed, it is the first act of parliament specifically designed to deal with it. After breezing its way through the Commons, it has encountered unexpectedly stiff resistance in the House of Lords. Peers have five times rejected parts of the bill, and unless the government is prepared to compromise, the AI bill will have to be abandoned. Why is the AI bill in trouble? There are a lot of complicated parliamentary shenanigans involved, but at issue is the right of artists, creatives, authors – and, indeed, journalists – to own and make a living out of their work. Elton John, Kate Bush, Damon Albarn, Dua Lipa and Paul McCartney are just a few members of a formidable coalition of interests who want to stop AI giants 'scraping' their work, undermining their livelihoods, and potentially killing the whole sector. It's the biggest change to the law in copyright and intellectual property in generations, effectively abolishing royalties, and hasn't really been subjected to the kind of national debate that it merits. The artists, writers and musicians have found a doughty defender in Beeban Kidron, a film director (Bridget Jones) who's been leading the guerrilla warfare in the upper chamber. As a lead character, she's been compelling. What do the Lords rebels want? A relatively modest amendment to the bill that would subject AI companies to copyright rules and make them declare when and what material they are using for their own commercial purposes: a duty of transparency. Thus, copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by whom. How determined are the rebels? Very. In the words of Baroness Kidron: 'It is not fair, not reasonable, not just, balanced or any other such word to stand in the way of the creative industries identifying those who are taking their work or their property. It is not neutral – it is aiding and abetting what we have called in the House widespread theft. We have asked privately and repeatedly on the floor of both Houses what is the government going to do to stop the work of creatives from being stolen right now? The answer is nothing.' Why won't the government give way? It has offered concessions, but ministers maintain the new law does not weaken copyright law; creatives, who have the most to lose, beg to differ. Obviously, the government is anxious not to lose a whole piece of legislation that also covers, for example: a data preservation process supporting bereaved parents; new offences for intimate image deepfake abuse; smart data schemes such as open banking; and a framework for research into online safety. AI is also an important driver of economic growth. More than that, the government has been trying to tread a middle path between the more restrictive European approach and the American policy of laissez-faire. If Britain annoys the Americans, who lead in the sector, it might spoil the trade deal and relations more widely. Can't the government just force it through? Not easily. The deadlock between the Commons and Lords is such that either the bill gets amended to the satisfaction of both sides, or it cannot go forward for final readings and ultimately royal assent. This resistance by the Lords is exceptional and called 'double insistence', arising from the fact that the bill originated in the Lords rather than the Commons. (It must have been assumed to be less controversial.) But in the end, the government could get its way by invoking the Parliament Act, which trumps anything. The new law would be delayed, but the rebels might lose their cause by refusing to compromise. What is likely to happen? A compromise – but with further Lords reform in the way, the rebel peers may feel they have nothing to lose. By delaying the bill, they would force ministers to think again and allow the campaign by Elton John and his formidable creative forces to regroup and build more momentum – the issue still lacks much salience with the public. Either way, it has been tough on the personable Peter Kyle, secretary of state for science, innovation and technology.


The Courier
41 minutes ago
- The Courier
Angus killer Tasmin Glass parole deferral slammed as 'appalling'
The deferral of Angus killer Tasmin Glass' parole bid has been slammed as 'appalling'. Liam Kerr, justice spokesperson for the Conservatives, criticised the treatment of her victim's family, the Donaldsons, during the process. Glass' latest parole bid was deferred on Wednesday after the board failed to reach a decision following her recall to prison. It will now be around six to eight weeks before the case is considered again by the board at an oral hearing. Mr Kerr told The Courier: 'It is appalling that this family have once again been left in limbo. 'After first having to suffer through Tasmin Glass being released only halfway through her sentence, this decision will only add to their trauma. 'It looks as though the needs of a cold-blooded killer are being put above those of the victims' family which is all too often the case in the SNP's soft-touch justice system. 'Steven Donaldson's family deserve to be treated much better than this and for parole decisions to stop being kicked into the long grass.' The North East MSP's words reflect the feelings of Steven's dad Bill when he learned the case had been pushed on. He called the situation 'a nonsense'. 'This means this is, yet again, going to drag on for us,' Bill told The Courier. 'We now have to go through the entire procedure yet again. 'We can take comfort from the fact she currently remains in prison but how much longer do we have to deal with this. 'Yet again Glass seems to be dictating terms.' Glass was convicted of culpable homicide in 2019 for her 'pivotal role' in the murder of Steven and sentenced to 10-years in prison. Last July, halfway through her term, the killer was granted her freedom. The Donaldson family were left in limbo twice during that time thanks to deferrals by the board. Nine months after being paroled, Glass was back in jail after breaking the conditions of her release. Through our A Voice for Victims campaign, The Courier has been working with families like the Donaldsons to bring reforms to the Scottish parole system. We want more transparency, better communication for victims and a rethink on automatic parole consideration for violent offenders halfway through their sentence. The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.