Maghi Ganesh mandals await HC order on PoP idols to determine visarjan date
Maghi Ganeshotsav
ended Feb 11, two tall Ganpati idols carved from plaster of paris (PoP) continue to remain in their pandals in Kandivli, face covered, awaiting immersion. The mandals now plan to perform visarjan "within a few days" if a PIL in
Bombay High court
is decided in their favour June 9.
The Kandivli Cha Shree mandal had led a visarjan yatra Feb 11 but brought its idol back to the pandal. The other organiser Charkop Cha Raja too retained its idol. In the wake of PIL filed by activist Rohit Joshi from Thane, the Bombay high court had "prohibited manufacture, sale and immersion of
PoP idols
."
The mandals declined to do so in artificial tanks built by BMC for this purpose
Sagar Bamnolikar, treasurer of Kandivli Cha Shree said Monday, "We are keen to immerse our idol within a few days.
Firstly the monsoon is scheduled to arrive earlier than usual this year. Secondly the Bombay high court will pronounce judgement in the PIL on June 9. If it is decided in our favour, we may conduct visarjan on June 10."
The Shree's mandal is still keen to head to Marve seafront for immersion as they do each year despite the HC ban and BMC strictures. On Monday, thousands of devotees were being amassed via social media for the visarjan yatra in a show of strength.
Nikhil Gudhekar, president of Charkop Cha Raja said, "Both mandals are working together to determine the
visarjan date
. However, if the HC verdict does not permit us to immerse in the sea, we will keep the idol and reuse it the following year. That is the custom observed by Ganesh mandals in Pune which we will emulate."
Mandals are reluctant to utilise the BMC's artificial tanks which they say are "small and inadequate for large idols spanning 10-15 ft as theirs".
"We have noticed civic workers using JCBs to extract fragments afterwards, which hurts our sentiments," one organiser said.
Interestingly, Ganesh mandals claim that PoP idols of Goddess Durga were allowed to be immersed during Chaitra Navratra. "Neither police nor civic authorities stopped them. These include the idols of mandals led by politicians Eknath Shinde, Pratap Sarnaik and Rajan Vichare in Thane," they said.
The 10-day Ganeshotsav of Bhadrapad which comes up Aug 27 will be a litmus test. Leading PoP moortikar Siddhesh Dighole will open his workshop in Parel Tuesday. "I must start work in order to cater to outstation orders. I will begin crafting local orders once the high court gives its verdict on the PoP matter June 9. I am purchasing material and hoping that the investment does not go to waste."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
Convince Mumbai civic body: High Court on Jain community's slaughterhouse ban plea
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday instructed a section of the Jain community, who sought a week-long ban on slaughterhouses in Mumbai during Paryushan Parva, to convince the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, Live Law reported. The BMC on August 14 ordered a two-day ban on slaughterhouses during the festival as demanded by the community.A division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne also questioned if the community had any statutory right to seek such a ban during the entire Paryushan Parva, which will be celebrated from August festival promotes inner purification, fasting, austerity, and the cultivation of virtues, among others. "If it is left to us and people will listen to us we will ask everyone to be vegetarian. But the order needs to be within the four corners of law. We respect your sentiments but you need to convince the BMC," the bench to this, Senior Advocate Prasad Dhakephalkar, appearing for the Jain community, argued that it was easier to convince Emperor Akbar to close down the slaughterhouses than the BMC or the Maharashtra government."The community could easily persuade Emperor Akbar, who ordered the closure of slaughterhouses in Gujarat then. But it is really difficult to convince the Maharashtra Government and the BMC," Dhakephalkar argued."The civic body wrongly considered the total population of Mumbai. They must have considered the population of Jains in comparison only to non-vegetarians. They even counted vegetarians against the Jains. In fact, there is also Shravan going on in Maharashtra, so half the non-vegetarians aren't eating non-veg," he added to solidify the validity of the community's demand, while quoting the BMC commissioner's observations that the population of Jains in Mumbai was "too low".Advocate Abhinav Chandrachud, also appearing for the Jain community, cited Ahmedabad, saying the city has banned slaughterhouses for the entire duration of the the court seemed not convinced by the counsel of the community, stressing that they should rather convince the BMC. The also asked the Jains if there was a law in place which legitimised such a demand."The Ahmedabad case, there was a challenge which went up to the Supreme Court. But there has not been any legal right as such. No legally enforceable right has been created that they must close. There are no statutory provisions or even laws on this aspect. There is fundamental duty regarding compassion for animals etc. We understand that. But you tell us which law says that they must close it for all the 10 days. You must have a right which can be enforced through a court of law," the court court, nevertheless, issued a notice to the civic agency and the state government seeking their response to the plea, while assuring the petitioners that it would decide the issue for the next matter has been adjourned for two weeks.- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
No HC relief for Jain community seeking closure of slaughter houses during 10-day festival
Bombay high court (File Photo) MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Wednesday refused to grant any relief to Jain community members seeking closure of slaughter houses in the city for 10 days during their Paryushan Parv festival. A bench of chief justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne said it respects the community's sentiments but questioned from where it derives the right to ask for slaughter houses to be kept shut for 10 days. The petitions had challenged an August 14 order passed by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) Commissioner allowing closure of slaughter houses only for two days. The civic body chief had reasoned that the population of the Jain community in the city was low. Paryushan Parv will be observed from August 20 to 27 by the Digambar community, and from August 21 to 28 by the Shwetambar community. The high court, while refusing to grant any relief, said no case was made out by the petitioners. "We respect your sentiments. But tell us from where do you derive the right to ask for slaughter houses to be closed for 10 days," the court asked. The court was informed by the BMC that at present the government has notified 16 days in the year during which slaughter houses would remain shut. The court said the petitions would have to be heard and issued notice to the BMC and state government and posted the matter for hearing after two weeks. The pleas had claimed that the Paryushan Parv festival highlights the significance of Ahimsa (non-violence) and hence slaughter during this sacred time would be detrimental to the cause of Jainism. The court was informed by the civic body that slaughter houses would be closed for two days - August 24 and 27. The same cannot be extended as the city's Deonar slaughter house does not cater only to Mumbai, but also to the entire Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Senior counsel Prasad Dhakephalkar, appearing for one of the petitioners, said in a lighter vein that it was easier for the Jain community to convince emperor Akbar to keep the slaughter houses closed during Paryushan. "Emperor Akbar had banned slaughter in Ahmedabad for six months. It was easy to convince emperor Akbar, but not the state government and the corporation," Dhakephalkar said.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
'Where's The Law?': Bombay HC On Plea To Shut Slaughterhouses During Jain Festival
Last Updated: The Bombay HC ruled there's no law requiring slaughterhouses to close for nine days during Paryushan festival, suggesting petitioners challenge the BMC's decision directly. The Bombay High Court on Wednesday ruled that there is no law requiring slaughterhouses to be closed for nine days during the Jain festival of Paryushan Parv, according to a report by Bar and Bench. A bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Sandeep Marne stated that the Court cannot issue a writ of mandamus to state authorities in the absence of any law or rule enforcing such a closure. According to Bar and Bench report, the court made the observation while hearing a writ petition filed by Jain petitioners seeking closure of slaughter houses for nine days for Paryushan Parv, a Jain observance. 'You are seeking Manadamus. For that, there have to be mandate in law. Where is the law? Where does it say that that slaughter houses must be closed for 10 days?" the Bench asked. The court distinguished the case from the Hinsa Virodhak Sangh case, where the Supreme Court upheld Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation's voluntary decision to close slaughterhouses during Paryushan. 'You will appreciate the difficulty. In Ahmedabad the corporation had taken a decision. But (in this case), there is no legislative mandate, no rule, no law, policy, no legally enforceable right that they must close. Where is that obligation? You understand the distinction," the court noted. Earlier, BMC had agreed to a one-day closure but extended it to two days—August 24 and August 27 (Ganesh Chaturthi)—after the Court directed them to consider the Jain community's representation. Petitioners, represented by advocates Abhinav Chandrachud and Prasad Dhakephalkar, argued Mumbai's large Jain population justified a longer closure and cited historical and cultural precedents, including Emperor Akbar's directive. The HC, however, suggested that if the BMC's decision lacked due consideration, the petitioners should challenge the order itself rather than filing a writ petition. The matter has been adjourned for two weeks, allowing petitioners time to amend their plea. The court also issued notice to BMC. view comments First Published: August 20, 2025, 17:34 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
