logo
Pro-Israel countries to block Irish efforts to sanction Israel at EU summit

Pro-Israel countries to block Irish efforts to sanction Israel at EU summit

Irish Times9 hours ago

Pro-
Israel
countries, including Germany and
Italy
, are set to block efforts by Ireland and other member states to take action against Israel over its war in
Gaza
at today's summit of
EU
leaders in Brussels.
Several member states, also including
Austria
, the
Czech Republic
and
Hungary
, will not agree for the EU to take action despite a recent review of an EU-Israel trade agreement that found Israel was committing human rights violations in conflict with it.
The EU-Israel 'association agreement' governs relations between the bloc and Israel and includes a free trade deal.
Ireland and other countries favour taking action, up to and including suspending the agreement, but officials accept that any move to sanction Israel at the summit would likely be blocked.
READ MORE
Several capitals traditionally supportive of Israel opposed the review even being mentioned in a joint statement – or 'conclusions' – that would be signed by all 27 national leaders.
Haggling over the language in the joint communique was set to continue into Thursday. It would be 'bizarre' if a statement from EU leaders at the end of the summit failed to mention the critical review, one diplomat involved in the talks said.
It is expected, however, that the conclusion will point to the 'dire' humanitarian situation in
Gaza
, and diplomats said the focus was likely to be on pressuring Israel to allow aid into the enclave rather than for any sanctions.
The dispute over the wording in the statement illustrates the tense divisions that remain within the EU about how to push Israel to change course and let humanitarian aid flow into Gaza. 'There is no consensus on the issue around the European table,' the diplomat said.
Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
said the EU's inability to reach a unified position on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza
is a 'huge stain' on the union
.
Speaking in Brussels on Wednesday, Mr Martin said there must be 'consequences' for Israel's human rights violations. 'Europe needs to speak with a very strong voice, to end this blockade and get vital humanitarian aid into the population of Gaza – otherwise Europe will not have credibility,' he said.
The Taoiseach is expected to have discussions with like-minded countries, including on the legislation to ban imports from the occupied Palestinian territories. Irish officials were cautious about the prospects for countries to co-ordinate such actions, but expressed frustration with the EU's lack of action.
Yesterday, the Government published a summary of its proposed legislation to prohibit the sale of Israeli goods produced in the occupied Palestinian territories.
As expected, it makes no reference to services being subject to a similar ban. This drew criticism from pro-Palestinian campaigners and Opposition parties.
[
Where do Europe and Ireland stand as Donald Trump changes the world?
Opens in new window
]
The summary, or 'heads' of the Bill, will now be sent for pre-legislative scrutiny by the Oireachtas Foreign Affairs Committee.
Meanwhile,
Nato
leaders on Wednesday backed a big increase in defence spending and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack after a brief summit tailor-made for US president
Donald Trump
.
In a short statement, Nato endorsed a higher defence spending goal of 5 per cent of GDP by 2035 – a response to a demand by Mr Trump and to European fears that Russia poses a growing threat to Europe's security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The planned increases will see hundreds of billions of euro more being spent on defence and military capabilities over the next decade.
'We reaffirm our iron-clad commitment to collective defence as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all,' said the statement, which came after Mr Trump sparked concern on Tuesday by saying there were 'numerous definitions' of the clause.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ireland at odds with Hungary over Ukraine's EU membership, as Orbán flaunts state poll results
Ireland at odds with Hungary over Ukraine's EU membership, as Orbán flaunts state poll results

The Journal

time32 minutes ago

  • The Journal

Ireland at odds with Hungary over Ukraine's EU membership, as Orbán flaunts state poll results

IRELAND IS AT odds with Hungary over Ukraine's accession into the EU, but Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has vowed total opposition to progressing talks. Speaking to reporters this morning, Obrán said: 'The problem is the war. If a member of the European Union is in a war, it means that the European Union is in the war, and we don't like it.' European leaders are meeting in Brussels today to discuss tariffs, the Middle East and the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Orbán, the Kremlin's closest ally in the EU, is expected to present the results of a government poll on Ukrainian membership. According to Orbán, 95% of the two million respondents to the state-run poll are opposed to Ukraine's membership, in a move seeking to add validity to his previous efforts to curb the progression of EU accession talks. Asked about this issue today, Taoiseach Micheál Martin said Ireland is totally opposed to Hungary's attempts to suppress accession negotiations. He is to tell European leaders that Ukrainian membership in the EU will bring much-needed stability to the country. He claimed it is 'deeply, deeply regrettable' that Hungary's Orbán intends to oppose Ukraine's membership. 'I think the approach he has taken to Ukraine in general, from a European perspective, is to be regretted, and it's very problematic,' Martin said. 'We will do what we always do, we will seek to persuade and engage across the full range of issues before the EU.' Advertisement The Taoiseach added that he believes Ukrainian membership in the EU is 'very important', adding that he has 'always been in favour of enlargement because of the beneficial impact it had on Ireland and Ireland's history'. Orbán and Martin previously clashed in May after the Taoiseach was critical of the Hungarian Prime Minister on a podcast. Orbán asked the Fianna Fáil leader not to 'ruin the love story' between Ireland and Hungary Orbán has repeatedly rejected progressive legislation and has taken action to disrupt Ukraine's path to EU membership. Orbán has rejected funding programmes for Ukraine aimed at helping it in its war against Russia's invasion. It came after funding for Hungary was withheld by the EU after his party planned to outlaw the mentioning of homosexuality . European politicians have suggested using Article 7 of the Treaty of the EU, which allows for a member state to be blocked from voting in the EU, to crack down on the vetoes by Orbán. Speaking to The Journal in Brussels yesterday, justice commissioner Michael McGrath said the EU is launching infringement proceedings against Hungary over proposed anti-LGBTQ+ legislation . The EU Commission is currently awaiting a formal judgement by the European Court of Justice on the Hungary case. McGrath said that the Court of Justice has sided with the Commission in every instance of alleged EU law infringement in Hungary to date. 'On this new law, which provides for the ban of certain gatherings or the potential to ban certain gatherings, we have written to the Hungarian authorities in relation to the use of facial recognition and data privacy issues that arise,' McGrath said. 'We await the response from them, and we will then evaluate that response and decide what action is open to the commission to take,' he said. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

O'Donovan has ‘no notion' of abolishing TV licence fee or replacing it with tax on tech companies
O'Donovan has ‘no notion' of abolishing TV licence fee or replacing it with tax on tech companies

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

O'Donovan has ‘no notion' of abolishing TV licence fee or replacing it with tax on tech companies

Minister for Communications Patrick O'Donovan has insisted he has 'no notion' of abolishing the TV licence fee or replacing it with a tax on big tech companies. Mr O'Donovan was responding in the Dáil to People Before Profit (PBP) TD Paul Murphy , who described the licence fee as a 'regressive, unjust tax' where the richest and poorest households pay the same €160 fee. Mr Murphy said increasing numbers are 'boycotting' the licence as he asked the Minister to instead tax the social media and technology giants to fund public service broadcasting. 'No, I won't, so that's the end of that,' said Mr O'Donovan. 'I have no notion of doing it. This is a fund that's in place to support RTÉ and public service broadcasters.' READ MORE It also supports the 'sound and vision' sectors, he said. 'I have no intention of replacing it and I have no intention of going down a cul-de-sac that Deputy Murphy would like us to do, which is a road to nowhere for RTÉ and everybody associated with broadcasting,' the Minister said. 'So the short answer is no.' Mr Murphy said the 'tax is deeply unpopular and licence sales have plummeted '. He said 950,000 paid in 2022. That figure dropped to 825,000 in 2023 and to 790,000 in 2024. Mr Murphy said that was a fall of more than 155,000 households 'who are refusing to pay either in protest or because they cannot afford to pay this regressive flat tax, which takes no account of ability to pay'. [ Why I stopped paying my TV licence fee: 'The whole model is broken' Opens in new window ] The Minister replied that 'the licence fee is not a tax. I don't see references to that anywhere in the legislation'. Describing it as an 'important funding mechanism for RTÉ,' Mr O'Donovan said Mr Murphy seems 'to think that there's a phantom entity out there that can pay for everything'. Mr Murphy said the licence accounted for just more than a third of funding for public service broadcasting. He said his party's proposals included a 'radical plan' to increase funding for public service broadcasting by taxing big tech corporations. Mr Murphy said they had a 'parasitical role' in journalism, not creating content but getting most of the advertising from it and it 'clearly makes sense to allow them to pay'. 'I'll continue to support those who refuse to pay the TV licence, and I warn you that that number is increasing,' he said, adding that the number of prosecutions was also dropping. 'You're entitled to start whatever campaign it is you want to start to undermine another public service,' Mr O'Donovan replied. 'I don't support it… and I don't think most people do either.' He said if Mr Murphy gets an opportunity to be in government, he will 'actually see that there's more to running a public service than a megaphone'.

Furious farmers back EU-wide ban on plant-based products 'hijacking' meat terminology
Furious farmers back EU-wide ban on plant-based products 'hijacking' meat terminology

Extra.ie​

timean hour ago

  • Extra.ie​

Furious farmers back EU-wide ban on plant-based products 'hijacking' meat terminology

Furious farmers have shared their support for an EU-wide ban on vegetarian and vegan food producers using meat-related words to sell their products New rules are currently under draft by the European Commission which would result in the food producers being banned from using words such as sausage and burger to 'camouflage' their products. The Irish Creamery Milk Suppliers Association (ICMSA), who represent farmers locally and internationally, have said they welcome the new restrictions under review. Furious farmers have shared their support for an EU-wide ban which on vegetarian and vegan food producers using meat-related words to sell their products. Pic: Getty Images President Denis Drennan said the use of meat terminology to market veggie foods was 'deliberate and cynical and must constitute a breach of any trade descriptions act as commonly understood.' Mr Drennan said the terms were being 'hijacked' in an attempt to 'camouflage' non-meat products. He said while 'people are free to eat whatever they want,' farmers are 'irritated' by the fact that those trying to 'replace naturally produced meat and dairy' are using words 'generally understood to refer to' those products. He said while 'people are free to eat whatever they want,' farmers are 'irritated' of the fact that those trying to 'replace naturally produced meat and dairy' are using words 'generally understood to refer to' those products. Pic: Getty Images 'Rather than come up with their own terms and descriptions, they simply appropriate the names of the very good they're trying to replace and supplant,' Mr Drennan said, 'It's unbelievably cynical.' Mr Drennan added that it was confirmation from corporations that 'they know they're unable to convince consumers by their own efforts or merits.' The ICMSA President added: 'The fact that they're being allowed to 'camouflage' and take advantage of people's understanding is wrong and will have to be addressed.' It comes as French MEP Céline Imart proposed an amendment which banned plant-based products from being labelled with a long list of terms typically linked to animal products. The European Court of Justice has already ruled that non-dairy products cannot be described as milk and cheese.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store