
‘Designed in California, assembled in the Gulf': Region gains traction as a friendshoring destination
Multinational businesses are recalibrating their global supply chains, with one eye focused firmly on Washington. As the Donald Trump administration reignites the use of tariffs as a blunt instrument of economic leverage, so-called 'friendshoring' is gaining traction as multinationals re-evaluate the geography of their supply chains. Friendshoring, the practice of moving production or final assembly to countries with favourable trade relations, is not new. But with US-China trade tensions and unpredictable tariff regimes, it is becoming more of a core consideration in companies' global manufacturing strategies. Among the options for final-stage manufacturing, the Middle East – particularly the UAE and Saudi Arabia – stands out for its combination of low trade friction with the US and a broader ecosystem that facilitates the fast establishment of manufacturing operations. Mexico remains the most common US nearshoring destination, while Vietnam, Thailand and Malaysia are among the top choices for so-called 'China+1' strategies, where companies shift some production out of China to reduce geopolitical and tariff risk. However, the US's strong and consistent trade surplus with the UAE – reaching approximately $19.5 billion in 2024 – and a recently improved trade balance with Saudi Arabia, which recorded a modest surplus last year after a deficit in 2023, make both countries relatively low-risk from a tariff standpoint. While trade surpluses do not guarantee immunity, they reduce the likelihood of politically motivated levies compared to countries with persistent deficits. While still far behind more established friendshoring destinations like Mexico and South-East Asia, the Middle East is beginning to attract interest. Continuing economic reforms and significant investments in manufacturing infrastructure are among the factors prompting a selective set of companies to take a closer look, especially for final-stage assembly and packaging. Although activity remains limited, the strategic posture of both the UAE and Saudi Arabia suggests that interest is likely to grow. For instance, Saudi Arabia recently signed nine investment agreements worth more than $9.3 billion with foreign companies – including India's Vedanta and China's Zijin Group – as part of a broader push to anchor supply chain infrastructure and industrial capacity within the kingdom. Additionally, Gulf states are pouring investment into critical mineral extraction, to embed themselves earlier in the global industrial supply chain, where mineral access is fast becoming a chokepoint. However, for companies facing steep and lingering tariffs on Chinese-origin goods, countries such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia offer a relatively low-risk location for final-stage manufacturing. While not covered by a formal free trade agreement, their exports have largely avoided punitive US tariffs, making them a potential workaround for companies seeking to reclassify the country of origin through assembly or packaging. But this strategy is legally viable only if the process results in what US customs defines as a 'substantial transformation'. For instance, assembling a laptop from imported components – integrating the motherboard, installing software and calibrating the system – may qualify. By contrast, simply packaging a Chinese-made circuit board in a new case or attaching accessories to a nearly finished vehicle would not suffice. Still, the UAE and Saudi Arabia are actively courting this type of investment as part of broader economic diversification plans – Vision 2030 in Riyadh and Operation 300bn in the Emirates. Both initiatives aim to reduce reliance on hydrocarbons. While labour costs in the UAE and Saudi Arabia remain significantly higher than in traditional manufacturing hubs such as Vietnam or Bangladesh, both countries are investing heavily in workforce development to attract advanced manufacturing. Saudi Arabia, in particular, is leveraging its young and growing population through national training initiatives such as the Human Capability Development Programme, aimed at aligning skills with industrial needs. However, reconfiguring supply chains is a multi-year endeavour. Factories, even final assembly sites, take time and capital. A company betting on friendshoring now must do so under the assumption that Mr Trump's tariff policies – or similar measures by a future administration – are more than a passing phase. The Trump administration has shown a proclivity for sweeping actions, including targeting shipping lanes, re-evaluating trade classifications and tying tariffs to broader diplomatic concerns. Then there is the ecosystem factor. Manufacturing thrives not in isolation but in networks – of parts suppliers, logistics companies and quality control specialists. Rebuilding even a slice of this in a new geography requires co-ordination not just between private firms, but often between companies and host governments. For now, companies face a stark choice: absorb rising tariffs or re-architect the back end of their supply chains. While such shifts are complex and capital-intensive, a growing number of companies are weighing long-term bets on geopolitical stability and tariff insulation. And for many, the Middle East is starting to look less like an outpost and more like a pivot point. So, a new kind of label may soon become more familiar to American consumers: 'Designed in California, assembled in the Gulf'. Carlos Cordon is IMD professor of strategy and supply chain
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
43 minutes ago
- The National
Iran warns European nations over move to censure it for nuclear 'non-compliance'
Iran 's Foreign Minister warned the UK, France and Germany on Friday against backing a resolution censuring Tehran at a meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency next week, saying such a move would be a "strategic mistake". "Instead of engaging in good faith, the E3 is opting for malign action against Iran at the IAEA Board of Governors," Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X. "Mark my words as Europe ponders another major strategic mistake: Iran will react strongly against any violation of its rights." Mr Araghchi's warning comes as the three European nations prepare to join the United States in backing a draft resolution to censure Iran at next week's board meeting, a diplomatic source told AFP. The resolution would accuse Iran of failing to meet its obligations as a signatory of the Nuclear No-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and carries the threat of referral to the UN Security Council if Tehran "does not show goodwill", the source added. The move follows a quarterly report from the IAEA last week which cited a "general lack of co-operation" from Iran and raised concerns over undeclared nuclear material. The UN's nuclear watchdog also expressed 'serious concern' that Iran had stepped up its enrichment of uranium to near weapons-grade level in recent months. The report said Iran had an estimated 408.6 kilograms of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent as of May 17, up by 133.8kg since the last report in February. According to the IAEA, Iran is the only non-nuclear weapon state to enrich uranium to 60 per cent, which is close to the roughly 90 per cent level needed for atomic weapons. Iran has repeatedly denied that it is seeking to develop nuclear weapons. Tehran rejected the report as politically motivated and based on "forged documents" that it said had been provided by its arch foe Israel. In his post on X, Mr Araghchi said that despite "years of good co-operation with the IAEA – resulting in a resolution which shut down malign claims of a 'possible military dimension' (PMD) to Iran's peaceful nuclear programme – my country is once again accused of 'non-compliance'." "Falsely accusing Iran of violating safeguards – based on shoddy and politicised reporting – is clearly designed to produce a crisis," he said. The pressure on Iran comes as it holds indirect talks with the US, mediated by Oman, to reach an agreement that would see Tehran accept curbs on its nuclear activity in return for the lifting of economic sanctions imposed by Washington. The two sides have held five rounds of talks since April 12 but are at odds over the issue of uranium enrichment, which produces fuel for nuclear reactors or, at higher levels of purity, material for nuclear warheads. Iran's leaders say that it has the right to enrich uranium under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and that the issue is "non-negotiable", while President Donald Trump insists that US will not allow enrichment to continue on Iranian soil. Tehran and Washington are seeking a new agreement to replace a 2015 deal with major powers which Mr Trump unilaterally abandoned during his first term in 2018. The agreement quickly unravelled as Mr Trump reimposed sweeping sanctions on Iran, leading Tehran to begin breaching commitments it made under the pact including a 3.67 per cent cap on the level of its uranium enrichment. Britain, France and Germany, which were all party to the 2015 deal, are now considering whether to trigger a "snapback" of UN sanctions under its dispute resolution mechanism – an option that expires on the deal's 10th anniversary in October.


The National
an hour ago
- The National
Trump presses Fed's Powell to cut interest rates by a full point
US President Donald Trump called on Jerome Powell to cut interest rates by a full percentage point on Thursday, ramping up his pressure on the Federal Reserve chair. Mr Trump's latest attacks on the Fed chair came shortly after a Labour Department report showed employers added 139,000 jobs last month, slower than its March gain but still above economists' projections. The unemployment rate remained steady at 4.2 per cent. ''Too Late' at the Fed is a disaster!,' Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social, referring to Mr Powell. 'Europe has had 10 rate cuts, we have had none. Despite him, our Country is doing great. Go for a full point, Rocket Fuel!' In a series of follow-up posts, Mr Trump claimed rate cuts would allow the US to lower short and long-term rates 'on debt that is coming due'. Mr Trump has regularly attacked Mr Powell in recent months over the Fed chair's caution in cutting interest rates. Mr Powell so far has resisted the pressure from the White House and maintains that policy decisions will be data dependent. He and other members on the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee are currently debating how Mr Trump's tariffs will affect the economy. Speaking in New York on Thursday, Fed Governor Adriana Kugler laid out her support for keeping rates at their current level due to rising inflation risks. Also speaking on Thursday, Kansas City Fed president Jeff Schmid said he expects tariffs will 'likely push up prices', with their effects not being 'fully apparent for some time'. The Fed, which has left rates unchanged for the past three meetings at roughly 4.3 per cent, will hold its next two-day meeting from June 17-18. The Fed's next blackout period begins at midnight on Saturday, meaning there will be no public communications from the central bank before it announces its next rate decision. Traders anticipate the Fed will keep rates unchanged through the summer, according to CME Group data.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Elon Musk has 'lost his mind', Donald Trump says
Elon Musk has 'lost his mind', President Donald Trump said on Friday after a bitter falling-out between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful man. Mr Trump told ABC News in a phone call that he was 'not particularly interested' in talking to Mr Musk following Thursday's dramatic break-up. 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' ABC quoted Mr Trump as saying. An extraordinary and public meltdown in the Trump-Musk relationship played out on social media over several hours, with a dispute over the US President's tax bill quickly escalating into a remarkably personal exchange during which Mr Musk appeared to call for Mr Trump's impeachment. It was a stunning collapse for a close relationship that deepened last year when Mr Musk pumped hundreds of billions of dollars into the Republican's campaign. The tech tycoon was invited into the inner White House to gut parts of the federal workforce through his 'Department of Government Efficiency'. Reports had suggested the two would speak by phone on Friday in a bid to patch up the damaging public row, but the White House scotched that speculation. 'The President does not intend to speak to Musk today,' a senior White House official told AFP when asked if the pair planned to speak. ABC said Mr Trump seemed 'bummed' about the collapse of the relationship, and in a telling symbol, an official told the network that the President is considering selling or giving away a Tesla he had bought to show support for Mr Musk amid protests against the company. A break-up in the billionaire bromance had appeared to be on the cards since Tuesday, after Mr Musk said the Republican President's signature 'big, beautiful' tax bill was a ' disgusting abomination ' that would blow up the national debt. The row exploded on Thursday when Mr Trump said he was 'very disappointed' in Mr Musk and threatened to end his government contracts. Mr Musk even posted, without providing proof, that Mr Trump was referenced in government documents on the disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. He also approvingly retweeted a post that said Mr Trump should be impeached and Vice President JD Vance sworn in as US leader.